What are your thoughts?

What are your thoughts?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t know I didn’t watch it.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i dont think

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Gatekeeping is sometimes a good thing

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >"What is a chair"
    Why can't chuds answer this simple question

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You can, in fact, give some general characteristics or criteria to fit the definition of a chair.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        we're all waiting anon 🙂

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          A chair is a type of seat, typically designed for one person and consisting of one or more legs, a flat or slightly angled seat and a back-rest. They may be made of wood, metal, or synthetic materials, and may be padded or upholstered in various colors and fabrics.

          That's all for today. Go away now.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            And yet... you're still wrong. Why can't chuds do it? It's so simple after all. We all know a chair is... and yet they simple cannot define one.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >minor spelling error

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Behold, a chair!

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That's not a chair, that's a throne.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            a throne is also a chair

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            A woman is a type of person, typically with or or more X chromosomes. They may be born male, female, or somewhere in-between, and may be producing estrogen, on some form of HRT or not on HRT at all.

            That's all for today. Go away now.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Since you're gonna just copypaste your definition, I'm gonna copypaste my previous response to it:
            >a chair with no legs isn't a chair
            >a chair with no back rest isn't a chair
            btw you should not use words like "typically" or "may" in a definition, since if it's optional it's not actually intrinsic to the definition or label

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            And yet there are multiple types of chairs with no legs.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why can't they do it bros

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      An object that I use to sit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nope, that's not quite right either. Hmm...

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yes it is.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Sorry, it's irrelevant what your own personal definition of a chair is. Facts don't care about your feelings or subjective experience of what a chair is.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's not my personal definition it's just what a chair is.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you're missing the point
      mtfs are identifying as women but can't define what a woman is without giving a circular definition
      if anything, he is deboonking the whole modern concept of gender

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you're missing the point
        chuds are claiming that mtfs are identifying as women, when they aren't women, but can't even define what a chair is themselves without giving a definition that is obviously wrong.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          okay, what is the correct definition of a chair

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            There isn't one, just like there isn't one for "woman." That's our point. Keep up chuddy.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            then how can someone identify as a woman?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            it's easy. you can sound out the words "i identify as a woman" with your vocal chords. try it yourself

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >i identify as a woman
            how can you identify as something there is no definition for?
            can you identify as a woiefjaowejif?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >coping this hard
            lmfao

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            just because there's no single, all-encompassing yet short and quippy definition for something does not mean it doesn't exist

            okay, so since words can mean whatever we want please understand when I say awoeifjlawkj oawjief oiaje fl aoweijf lakjsdoifjas dd

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            that's not even close to what i said.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You have to be at least 18 to post here btw

            >me looking for your definition of a woman

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            i will add again, the role of a woman in society is a cultural concept, what makes a dresses women's clothing? if your concept of woman is fully tied to "uterus haver" then you won't be able to know for sure most women around you are real women, good luck checking

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You have to be at least 18 to post here btw

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            [...]
            >me looking for your definition of a woman

            chud mind broken

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            repeating what you've already said doesn't make you right
            if you think you refuted my argument then quote the posts

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            What is a awoeifjlawkj?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            just because there's no single, all-encompassing yet short and quippy definition for something does not mean it doesn't exist

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    anon why would I a troony who actually enjoys living and has sex semi regularly sit down and watch a man who looks like a 90s gay candian pornstar make a movie about how much he hates my guts.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >literally cites tribe that mutilates the gentials of girls
    >talks about how much he envies them in the book version

    hmm

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i dont give a shit

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i think its kinda stupid that someone that dropped out of college can make a thinkpiece on anything with zero attempt at being charitable or neutral, while blatantly manipulating vague interviews with unprepared interviewees by cutting up the footage in skewed ways

    the movie makes no sense to me because the only dipshits that would watch and formulate any sort of thought from it are likely those that already felt this way to begin with
    and kids, which ironically proves that republican grifters are worse for kids than any homosexual at drag brunch could ever

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why are you gatekeeping knowledge or interviewing, brainlet? Haven't we collectively decided that anyone can be a woman if they think they are?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Are you moronic? Serious question. There's no way you put your fingers to your phone or keyboard and thought any of that was a good argument, even as a troll.
        I understand that an appeal to authority can be a fallacy, but if you think we as a human race should ever take a blatant uneducated idiot's opinion on a subject seriously just because you both hate trannies, I'm not sure what to say.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Okay? And should we disregard the rare academic paper published by someone with no prior qualifications or a degree? You're still appealing to authority. Classist.

          A woman is a type of person, typically with or or more X chromosomes. They may be born male, female, or somewhere in-between, and may be producing estrogen, on some form of HRT or not on HRT at all.

          That's all for today. Go away now.

          Since you're gonna just copypaste your definition, I'm gonna copypaste my previous response to it:
          >a chair with no legs isn't a chair
          >a chair with no back rest isn't a chair
          btw you should not use words like "typically" or "may" in a definition, since if it's optional it's not actually intrinsic to the definition or label

          Last I checked, women generally have a uterus and have the ability to produce human eggs. But hey, HRT makes the TiMs heccin valid!!

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >generally
            what did I just say

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >what did I just say

            And yet there are multiple types of chairs with no legs.

            >And yet there are multiple types of chairs with no legs.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I accept your concession.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I am literally taking your chud definition of a chair, and doing the exact same thing with a woman. If you don't think it's a good definition, then please try again and define what a chair is. We're waiting anon!

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I accept your concession.

            Semantic bullshit, disregarded.
            Please provide a more coherent argument.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Semantic bullshit
            THAT IS LITERALLY THE ENTIRE TOPIC OF THE THREAD
            If you don't want to discuss semantics, why the frick are you engaging in a discussion about DEFINITIONS OF WORDS?!

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >coming here to pick a fight "semantic bullshit"
            >losing it
            >seething like this
            lmfao

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I think Walsh belongs in an unmarked ditch

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Rocking chairs aren't chairs
    >Airplane chairs aren't chairs

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    some chairs are supported by only 2 legs, a handful even use an odd number of 3! therefore chairs are a social construct

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Matt walsh should be shot
    Why? He's a hero fighting Marxism, communism, and all the evils of the modern world it has created.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    defining woman is easy af, walsh is just dense and dishonest
    Woman. Adult human being pertaining to the female gender

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    i like the watermelon sour patch kids more. but for real even the idea of defining things with vocals or written text is socially constructed and this extends to the idea of man and woman. but social construct doesnt mean fake or useless

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    the sweet part of a warhead is good though wtf
    yall really are the weird booger eating kids from school with weird moms and stupid haircuts
    i cant believe after all of this we grew up and once you come out as a chaser i have to ride YOUR nasty ass wiener as a woman
    there seriously cannot be a god this is so messed up

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I love that like 98% of trans discourse just comes down to literally semantics lol

    Everybody knows what people mean they're just being deliberately obtuse.
    Did these kind of moronic internet argument tactics become the default political discourse of choice at some point, or was it always this way?

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    From Middle English chayer, chaire, chaiere, chaere, chayre, chayere, from Old French chaiere, chaere, from Latin cathedra (“seat”), from Ancient Greek καθέδρα (kathédra), from κατά (katá, “down”) + ἕδρα (hédra, “seat”)

    An item of furniture used to sit on or in, comprising a seat, legs or wheels, back, and sometimes arm rests, for use by one person.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >An item of furniture used to sit on or in, comprising a seat, legs or wheels, back, and sometimes arm rests, for use by one person.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        From Middle English chayer, chaire, chaiere, chaere, chayre, chayere, from Old French chaiere, chaere, from Latin cathedra (“seat”), from Ancient Greek καθέδρα (kathédra), from κατά (katá, “down”) + ἕδρα (hédra, “seat”)

        An item of furniture used to sit on or in, comprising a seat, legs or wheels, back, and sometimes arm rests, for use by one person.

        why can't we do it chudbros

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Furniture, furniture consists of large objects that are used in a ROOM for sitting or lying on or for putting things on or in

        a car has the main objective of being a vehicle, it's not furniture

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          What is furniture? What is a room? What about outdoor furniture, is it still "true" furniture??

          We're gonna need more definitions.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            EVERYTHING relies on definitions, intelligence and sentience relies on logic and references, no object or being can be understood without semantics and references, ontologically, it requires to be placed in a context to exist

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >no object or being can be understood without semantics and references
            huh? why not?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            tell me one, word that can be understood without references, this is not how language works, it describes things based on references, 100% of the time
            this shit is more philosophical than anything but walsh is not a philosopher specialized in metaphysics or a linguistics scholar

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >it stops being a chair when you move it outside
          uhoh...

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            no because it's main objective is to sit down, the difference is that a car is an object created to be a vehicle to move people, a chair is an object created for sitting, the dumb dictionary also forgot an important part which is that chairs are always made out of rigid materials
            furniture item made for sitting made out of rigid materials, with a back, a chair

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            But that isn't right? There are countless examples that contradict these things.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You don't make definitions based on ridiculous contrived nothingburger exceptions moron

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            In what sense are "countless examples" ridiculous, contrived, nothingburgers, or exceptions?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            exactly, that's why the definition of woman ("adult human female") has a few, rare, nothingburger exceptions

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            then why isn't question "what is a female" oh, because that also defies the common definition of what a woman is

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            female, human gender that was developed around the naturally occurring secondary sexual characteristics of humans whose chromosomes were XX

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >gender
            >weasel wording "developed around"
            So trans women are women, got it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yes, my defintion requires you to also know the definition of gender which is a cultural learned thing, based on biology but not a biological category itself

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Okay woman is a cultural learned thing.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yes, it is cultural, it has a biological background but the concept if fully made up

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            huh? i don't know why that isn't the question. i didn't ask it. and how does "female" defy the definition of what a woman is...?

            you sound kinda stupid tbh

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >moron
            >stupid
            why are you so insecure?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >can't think of an argument

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nah you can have a foam chair or a beanbag chair. Rigidity not required.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            if it's not rigid that would be a seat, if it has no back it is a stool, that's why i insist that part was needed in the dictionary

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Would you say that chair is a subcategory of seat? Because I can kinda vibe with that.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yes, i also wanted to mention that, a chair is a kind of seat, categorization also admits hyerachies and such, a trans woman and a ciswoman are both women

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >As some of the earliest forms of seat, stools are sometimes called backless chairs[...]
            oh no...

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            this has more to do with historical linguistics and how backwards and primitive germanic tribes were before being civilized by romans, middle english borrowed the word chair because it had no such object, stools were simpler seats,
            we're talking about modern english and its modern semantics

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I see the inclusion of the word "earliest" confused you into thinking that stools are not now sometimes called backless chairs

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            what about a couch, is a couch a chair?

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A woman is someone who is broadly perceived as an adult human female, and is therefore expected to fulfill the female social role of "woman". It is based on female biology but not wholly defined by it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i like yours, similar to my own

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      So if a society doesn't perceive you as a woman then you aren't one? Also what are "female social roles"?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nta but honestly, yeah kinda. You may identify as a woman, but if you are treated as a man and experience the world that way, are you really a woman? If people understand you to be a woman or if you present femininely they'll probably get that you're a woman and treat you as such nd that's honestly usually good enough. But, imo, in their daily lives, boymoders aren't really women---at least not socially. They don't have the experiences, shared culture, etc that women all have. On the internet they may be women, and I truly mean that they ARE women on the internet and I'm their persona lives, but at work or at the grocery store they are mostly just men, as possibly rude as that is.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >if you are treated as a man and experience the world that way, are you really a woman
          If you are biologically female then yes you are.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, I think that if you are not perceived to be a woman then you aren't one exactly. If gender is a social construct, outside of sex, which I believe it to be, then it must be socially defined. This is also true of men, like how in a society with a large class of eunuchs a eunuch would often be thought of as something not quite a man, but this would change in a society with no such conception. The a society's female role is primarily based on the assumption of one a) being weaker than the male, and b) giving birth, two biological facts that nevertheless still color the treatment of those perceived to be women who don't follow these. Historically this can be seen in a wife taking her husband's last name and her property becoming his without the reverse happening. A woman who does not fulfill these expectations would be punished on some level for acting outside the female social role. I know I am talking to someone with no interest in what I am saying, but I don't think that you can seriously tell me there isn't a clear female social role you see around you.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >I don't think you can seriously tell me there isn't a clear female social role you see around you
          There is but people in the west are trying to subvert it in the name of progress and it's in the same name of progress that people are expected to accept transgenderism.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If you have to ask what a woman is you're a fricking idiot. We all know what a woman is.

    If someone in good faith says they are a woman, then they are one (this is not a definition of "woman," rather a means of identifying who is one). And if they aren't in good faith, they're a dick. Easy.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This. "I know it when I see it" is the only definition you'll ever need

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There's something deeply funny about how people are responding to an obvious rhetorical question with a sincere attempt to answer
    The point is that you can't give an acceptable answer, dunces

  21. 1 year ago
    swiftie

    its a good tutorial in misuse of statistics

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is a chair, only this. If it looks exactly like this it is a chair (up to wood type, individual grain of wood, size but not scale, etc). Nothing else is a chair. I don't care if it mostly looks like this but has some extra back panels. Not a chair.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Can you describe what part of the image you're referring to?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No no anon you got it wrong.
      This isn't a chair. It's a picture of a chair.

      Or uh like.. some photons or some shit.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the worst part about this documentary isn't even that it's transphobic, but that it's so fricking boring. i barely sat through the whole thing.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >the title: what is a woman?
    >the graphic design: matt walsh is a woman

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The fact that people find this shit compelling was a real black pill. I just don’t give a shit about what anyone thinks anymore because I know most of them genuinely can’t think no good. Also have overheard guys speak positively of this “documentary” only to later hit on me. Sucks but I guess good overall cuz I’ve learned not to try to convince anyone of my beliefs, I just keep my mouth shut.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    also it's funny because walsh basicallty explores how language is shaped by, culture if a different culture had a third gender that's a conceot that needs to be translated or borrowed since modern western civ doesn't which means it's cultural relativism, which in a way would be disproving the way he wants to approach things that being is "western and christian worldview is universal therefore right"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      philosophy has always just been word games

      right wingers referring back to language itself as a justification for their ideas fail to remember that language was invented over a long history, and continues to be invented, and will always be invented, to suit our needs.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes, like every single rightoid, he is a pseud and his 15 minutes are up

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    A WOMAN IS A FEATHERLESS BIPED
    CHECKMATE CHUDS

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Diogenes would be pro-self iding but against mones

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Diogenes would run a diy lab and he would ejaculate inside of each vial.

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    idk why you're doing this with your free time

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >can't define women
    >sill sperg out if you don't accept them as a woman

    why are mtfs like this. if you're going to play cute semantic games to avoid having to define woman, why does it even matter if you're a woman or not? it's all meaningless at that point.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >thread gives many detailed explanations of what the concept of "meaning" is
      >why can't you just give me the true meaning of a single word

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not asking for a meaning. I'm asking why does being a woman matter so much to mtfs if they themselves can't define it in any meaningful way.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          many definitions were mentioned here several times before, now most actual transgenders believe there are 2 main genders, some believe in different things but most trans people want to change from one category to the other

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Matt Walsh is an autistic troony repper.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i still think it could have been a good doc if he didnt obviously scramble the interviews around and cut shit out and make everyone against him look moronic on purpose through footage manipulation

    like if youre in the right you wouldnt even need tactics like this to prove your point, much less to your target audience of people that already agree with you

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >dat cover
    literally her. there, answered.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >36 posters
    >134 replies

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My thoughts are that I can't wait till somebody else is the football.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What color is the sky

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      κυανός

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    sometimes I wonder if matt walsh is a woman

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone that thinks they're female and their dreams in their sleep is probably female. It's a state of mind and it's very difficult to change it

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    they always ask what is a woman
    but they never ask how is a woman
    curious

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *