what are some major flaws or non explained concepts of macro evolution Posted on May 19, 2023 by Anonymous
That's not evolution dummy. That's a fish out of water gasping for air and it was dead a couple of minutes later if it didn't get back in the water. In before some evolutionary non-verifiable claim.
its a joke you brainlet
All of this made laugh IRL
Why so transphobic? It's obviously a trans armadillo. Nature isn't binary.
The best fit for survival can't account to your mom's existence.
my mom existed after the emergence of religions and morals in general
How did consciousness evolve? By consciousness I mean qualia.
if you truly believed in darwinian evolution you would go have kids
no, if you truly believed in darwinian evolution you would procreate and create something other than your own kind, but that never happens, you only make more people
that doesn't follow and is just a cope that afecund darwinists spout
if you believe in darwinian evolution and prioritize the propagation of a genetic sequence other than yours, then you are contradicting one of the premises of DE.
as in, what in DE tells you the darwinian fitness of a gene-set other than its ability to propagate? that's a rhetorical question; the answer is: nothing. there's no way for a DE-ist to choose to propagate any genes other than his own.
speciation and mutations that produce novel organs
>I accept evolution at a small scale because I literally have no other choice because we see mutations in real time
>I reject evolution at a large scale despite it being a completely obvious consequence when you factor in life living on this planet for millions of years
Why do you need the Bible to be literally accurate? It's not a history book. Do you really think there was a dude with magic hair or a man that lived in a giant fish?
OP didn't mention the bible at all. Sad that you "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" retards are incapable of engaging in real arguments and must instead hallucinate strawmen to knock down.
Only young earth creationists use the term "Micro Evolution". They're literally the only ones.
You just used the term so by your own rules that makes you a young earth creationist.
congrats on the self-btfo retard.
Well we need to be shown that random mutations natural selection etc + time has enough creative power to be practically omnipotent.
But really what’s pretty crazy is the fact that we needed to evolve and spend thousands of tech years and millions of rupees for us to understand the genetic code just a little bit, but somehow the cell knew how to use the code before our smart ass understood it. Who taught the proteins the interpretation of the code? After all, the code generates the proteins in the first place.
It boils down to either the belief that the Universe/Nature is omnipotent/omniscient or the belief that God has those qualities, not nature.
Everyone believes in miracles, who you ascribe it to makes your religion.
How cells came to exist at all.
If you grant evolutionary theory that, it still has difficulty explaining in what domain the evolutionary process resigns in. It being embedded inside the cell begs the question.