WHAT?!

WHAT?!

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Unfortunately, this was revealed to be a modern forgery.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      when?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Even if it was literally from the 1st century, that wouldn't mean anything. To me personally, it would just mean another gnostic gospel like Thomas existed that had those elements in it.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        It could be significant if it was first century, one of the main reasons nobody takes the gnostic gospels seriously is because none of them are first century.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Like I said, to me it wouldn't be significant. I am already well aware that there were strange cults that taught strange things then. It's not like this would be some mind-blowing revelation that someone thought this, nor would such a thing change my mind about what had really happened either.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          neither is John

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Bible is just a collection of stuff the church decided should be taught. There's tons of stuff (for both the old and new testament) that was left out. The Bible is basically just a selective canon from a ton of fanfiction.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      how can I found more stuff that was left out?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wikipedia has pages comparing the canon of different denominations and the apocrypha. There are books that contain the apocrypha as well.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          whats apocrypha

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          KKK website has aprocrypha which I assume is "the real stuff" the israelites at wiki wont show but haven't dug into it.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        retard

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Jesus%27_Wife#Authenticity

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Consider two points:
    a)all the wacky shit we see in non-canonical Early Christian texts
    b)Church engaged in destroying or censoring heterodox texts for literal centuries
    Imagine all the stuff we don't know about because it was destroyed.

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is Rome so powerful that we still deny that if Jesus was real he likely married and had kids?(Not to.immediately get on board with all the Merovingian bloodline stuff)

    Curious to hear what LULZ thinks of the Talpiot Tomb

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      The secret bloodline is actually the descendants of the Herodian Hasmoneans. Agrippa and Josephus were exiled to Deva fortress in Britain and were the ancestors of Constantine's mother.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ashkenazim descend from the Costabaran Herods (their Kohanim, that is).

        The bloodline of Jesus is held in the lineage of Mohammed and Hussein, and also a forgotten irrelevant lineage in Armenia. It's much more spread out and less important except maybe among obscure Shia sects.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          The secret bloodline is actually the descendants of the Herodian Hasmoneans. Agrippa and Josephus were exiled to Deva fortress in Britain and were the ancestors of Constantine's mother.

          These are the dumbest fucking things I've ever heard of.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's true.
            There was no historical Jesus. So his "bloodline" are other people. When I talk about the Muslim Jesus that was somebody else, but closer than European royalty bloodlines.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        The secret bloodline was transmitted through the patrilineal ancestors of Joseph Smith, which DNA evidence has confirmed can be traced to Niall of the Nine Hostages. This means most people in Ireland, especially Ulster, are descended from Christ.

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is a known forgery, the paper is carbon dated to be ancient but the text is modern

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Joseph Smith was on the right side of history the whole time.
    Say sorry

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *