https://www.asitis.com/
Was the intention of the Bhagavad’s Gita’s author the same as A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada‘s
Does the original Bhagavad Gita and it’s sanskrit translation support Krishna as the Supreme Personality of the Godhead or no?
Unbiased answers pls
Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |
Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |
It’s not only correct, it is without a doubt infallible and the only valid modern english translation of the Bhagavad Gita.
I can say with absolute certainty that Sri Krishna is the Supreme Personality of the Godhead and the speaker of the Gita, and I pray he’ll allow me to bow under his lotus feet one day
HARE KRISHNA HARE KRISHNA
KRISHNA KRISHNA HARE HARE
HARE RAMA HARE RAMA
RAMA RAMA HARE HARE
NeoGaudiyagay shitposting
Scream and cry all you want, you will NEVER transcend your karmic mode of thinking without transcendental devotion to Sri Krishna the master of all senses, every thought running through your mind right now is just laying the foundation for new hellish lives in demonic wombs
Allow Krishna to save you
HARE KRISHNA HARE KRISHNA
KRISHNA KRISHNA HARE HARE
HARE RAMA HARE RAMA
RAMA RAMA HARE HARE
someone beat me to the post
Ugly ass homie married an 11 year old and was racist homophobic and misogynistic so nothing he says is true tbh
>Ugly ass homie
Based
>married an 11 year old
Based
>and was racist
Based
>homophobic
Based
>and misogynistic
Based
>nothing he says is true
Based
yes gurus are just hedonist like women here
huh. the Bhagavad’s Gita is the novel equivalent of the Upanishads.
The purpose of the Bhagavad’s Gita is how the hindus cope with being ravaged by sramanas in the east. The whole story is about whether the hindu should kill his cousin, ie follow his duty, ie follow the Vedas or instead embrace non-violence, ie rejecting the Vedas, ie following the jains or buddhists or whatever the frick results from the hindus merging their dogmatic crap in the vedas with the rebirth and karma theory of the sramanas.
Guess what the hindus chose? They made their madeup krishna said that ''even through there is no rebirth taught in the vedas, there was always rebirth (i guess i just forgot about it lol), it's totally real, so you can kill your cousin he will be born again, just trust me lmao''
2000 years later the poos still take this crap seriously lol
The Vedas do mention rebirth though so everything you say kind of depends on that right? Like it’s just your opinion and your theory about the motivation
Wow, I guess he really wasn't so bad…
.... and that's a good thing
bump
HARE KRISHNA
HARE KRISHNA
KRISHNA KRISHNA
HARE HARE
HARE RAMA
HARE RAMA
RAMA RAMA
HARE HARE
yes
It's a fake and gay translation that tries to turn the Gita into some kind of an Indian bible. Gita Press translations of Hindu scriptures are the only good translations, because they aren't doing it with some vested interest or even for profit (their books are some of the cheapest you'll ever find).
bad faith argument, prabhupada breaks it down by the syllable
Yes
I don't trust this man, he looks physiognomically horrendous. If he had aryan features I might give it a try, but he looks like some Dravidian cuck and a wicked one at that.
the frown adds to the mystique, the fact he held such a stern face so much of the time while in the midst of permanent unblemished bliss, gets my noggin joggin
His face looks like it holds so much misery, frustration and hate, but then Krishna has begun to purify his heart and it is the only beautiful thing in his life.
the smrti can be interpreted according to karmakanda and jnanakanda, so it depends on your intellectual capacity to discriminate and realize the truth
so your question does not really make sense,
the seemingly contradictory statements made in those kind of texts only makes sense when you learn the method used to interpret them
Can you translate into low iq. Is his translation and interpretation accurate or inaccurate
his interpretation is a bhakti one, its a dualism between the soul and the supreme Lord, its all based on devotion
but the same text can be interpreted in a higher way, following the path of knowledge (jnana), in which all duality vanishes, that was done by Shankaracharya
the hindus are not like christians which impose a way of interpreting a text pretending there aren't differences between people (some are devotional, some privilege the intellect, etc)
you have to have this in mind before worrying about if the translation is 'accurate' or not.
Shut up new age moron. The text is literally the most clear cut and unambiguous scripture ever, but lying atheists like you and so called “hindus” CONSTANTLY work to muddle the waters with deceitful translation and misinformation
The text is an INSTRUCTION MANUEL about the best way to achieve liberation from samsara, and it’s extremely clear about inferior and superior methods
Whatever interpretations the “hindus” do or do not impose on the text is fricking irrelevant because ITS NOT A HINDU TEXT, it was spoken millions of years ago by Sri Krishna to the Sun God long before humans and sects like “hindu” existed
You have to go somewhere that reads books. IQfy is the new /b/.