Was Prabhupadas translation and interpretation of the Gita correct?

https://www.asitis.com/

Was the intention of the Bhagavad’s Gita’s author the same as A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada‘s

Does the original Bhagavad Gita and it’s sanskrit translation support Krishna as the Supreme Personality of the Godhead or no?

Unbiased answers pls

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It’s not only correct, it is without a doubt infallible and the only valid modern english translation of the Bhagavad Gita.

    I can say with absolute certainty that Sri Krishna is the Supreme Personality of the Godhead and the speaker of the Gita, and I pray he’ll allow me to bow under his lotus feet one day

    HARE KRISHNA HARE KRISHNA
    KRISHNA KRISHNA HARE HARE
    HARE RAMA HARE RAMA
    RAMA RAMA HARE HARE

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      NeoGaudiyafag shitposting

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Scream and cry all you want, you will NEVER transcend your karmic mode of thinking without transcendental devotion to Sri Krishna the master of all senses, every thought running through your mind right now is just laying the foundation for new hellish lives in demonic wombs

        Allow Krishna to save you

        HARE KRISHNA HARE KRISHNA
        KRISHNA KRISHNA HARE HARE
        HARE RAMA HARE RAMA
        RAMA RAMA HARE HARE

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      someone beat me to the post

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ugly ass nigga married an 11 year old and was racist homophobic and misogynistic so nothing he says is true tbh

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Ugly ass nigga
      Based
      >married an 11 year old
      Based
      >and was racist
      Based
      >homophobic
      Based
      >and misogynistic
      Based
      >nothing he says is true
      Based

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      yes gurus are just hedonist like women here

      >Ugly ass nigga
      Based
      >married an 11 year old
      Based
      >and was racist
      Based
      >homophobic
      Based
      >and misogynistic
      Based
      >nothing he says is true
      Based

      https://i.imgur.com/rBrfSvr.jpg

      https://www.asitis.com/

      Was the intention of the Bhagavad’s Gita’s author the same as A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada‘s

      Does the original Bhagavad Gita and it’s sanskrit translation support Krishna as the Supreme Personality of the Godhead or no?

      Unbiased answers pls

      huh. the Bhagavad’s Gita is the novel equivalent of the Upanishads.
      The purpose of the Bhagavad’s Gita is how the hindus cope with being ravaged by sramanas in the east. The whole story is about whether the hindu should kill his cousin, ie follow his duty, ie follow the Vedas or instead embrace non-violence, ie rejecting the Vedas, ie following the jains or buddhists or whatever the fuck results from the hindus merging their dogmatic crap in the vedas with the rebirth and karma theory of the sramanas.

      Guess what the hindus chose? They made their madeup krishna said that ''even through there is no rebirth taught in the vedas, there was always rebirth (i guess i just forgot about it lol), it's totally real, so you can kill your cousin he will be born again, just trust me lmao''

      2000 years later the poos still take this crap seriously lol

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The Vedas do mention rebirth though so everything you say kind of depends on that right? Like it’s just your opinion and your theory about the motivation

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wow, I guess he really wasn't so bad…

    • 3 months ago
      bodhi

      .... and that's a good thing

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    bump

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    HARE KRISHNA
    HARE KRISHNA
    KRISHNA KRISHNA
    HARE HARE
    HARE RAMA
    HARE RAMA
    RAMA RAMA
    HARE HARE

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's a fake and gay translation that tries to turn the Gita into some kind of an Indian bible. Gita Press translations of Hindu scriptures are the only good translations, because they aren't doing it with some vested interest or even for profit (their books are some of the cheapest you'll ever find).

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      bad faith argument, prabhupada breaks it down by the syllable

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't trust this man, he looks physiognomically horrendous. If he had aryan features I might give it a try, but he looks like some Dravidian cuck and a wicked one at that.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      the frown adds to the mystique, the fact he held such a stern face so much of the time while in the midst of permanent unblemished bliss, gets my noggin joggin

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      His face looks like it holds so much misery, frustration and hate, but then Krishna has begun to purify his heart and it is the only beautiful thing in his life.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    the smrti can be interpreted according to karmakanda and jnanakanda, so it depends on your intellectual capacity to discriminate and realize the truth
    so your question does not really make sense,
    the seemingly contradictory statements made in those kind of texts only makes sense when you learn the method used to interpret them

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Can you translate into low iq. Is his translation and interpretation accurate or inaccurate

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        his interpretation is a bhakti one, its a dualism between the soul and the supreme Lord, its all based on devotion

        but the same text can be interpreted in a higher way, following the path of knowledge (jnana), in which all duality vanishes, that was done by Shankaracharya

        the hindus are not like christians which impose a way of interpreting a text pretending there aren't differences between people (some are devotional, some privilege the intellect, etc)

        you have to have this in mind before worrying about if the translation is 'accurate' or not.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Shut up new age retard. The text is literally the most clear cut and unambiguous scripture ever, but lying atheists like you and so called “hindus” CONSTANTLY work to muddle the waters with deceitful translation and misinformation

          The text is an INSTRUCTION MANUEL about the best way to achieve liberation from samsara, and it’s extremely clear about inferior and superior methods

          Whatever interpretations the “hindus” do or do not impose on the text is fucking irrelevant because ITS NOT A HINDU TEXT, it was spoken millions of years ago by Sri Krishna to the Sun God long before humans and sects like “hindu” existed

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You have to go somewhere that reads books. LULZ is the new /b/.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *