For me the most obvious is the Nike.
It equals no morals, hypocrite.
People in Nike are hecking disgusting.
Another one is Under Armour.
Obviously primitive, ignorant but progressive and knows a lot of bullshit about health and mind.
For me the most obvious is the Nike.
It equals no morals, hypocrite.
People in Nike are hecking disgusting.
Another one is Under Armour.
Obviously primitive, ignorant but progressive and knows a lot of bullshit about health and mind.
There was a study that showed that BMW drivers were more prone to cheating and immoral behavior.
This is true. Ex drives a BMW and I broke up with her because she spent too much time with other guys. Not sure if she did ever but regardless.
>Ex drives a BMW and I broke up with her because she…
so she was the man of the relationship?
My truck mogs her little coupe.
My apple mogs your orange. You’re orange isn’t even an apple,
The only people who drive BMWs anymore are pajeets
*turks
I have two BMWs and can attest that I am a total piece of shit.
People who wear Maison Margiela are anal rapers 100% of the time
heck. I was just about to cop the Margiela GATs
>People who wear Maison Margiela
To me they are just like the Nike crowd, but more pretentious. Still liars and morons.
What experiences have given you that impression?
Margiela is fine, the people who wear it are too varied to say something asinine and silly like that.
Supreme = poor, ignorant with haplessly low self-esteem.
supreme is a skate team that posers co oped heck off
At this point skaters don’t even identify with it. Every skater I know sees it as already being co-opted and beyond saving.
owned by LVMH moron
Everyone sells out.
Anti Social Social Club- Every rich international asian student at my college who arent native english speakers and dont realize how cringe it is.
>hang out in groups
>wear mask
>"teehee so antisocial hahah!"
>"teehee so antisocial hahah!"
lol the Chinese international students don’t have enough critical thinking to be able to comprehend a situation like that. They wear it simply because it’s popular. They don’t understand the joke in the name of the brand either.
Source: I (only) dated many Chinese international girls in college and unintentionally forced myself into a WeChat feedback loop of meeting these types of people. Also I am white :^)
why would u subject yourself to that bro chinese pussy is bottom tier among all races
i still think about the one psychotic chinese girl i was hecking when i was 19
she was in her 20s and somehow had the tightest pussy ive ever experienced. completely nuts and over possessive, had absolutely 0 self awareness and quite possibly the most insensitive, indifferent person I have ever met, but still.
Damn… almost making me miss her haha (haha)
Very shit take. Whites girls are more socially acceptable to date out in the open as a white man and provide a higher “reputation” amongst people who care about other people’s business but I have enjoyed the Chinese girls I have dated much more than the white girls. They also can cook and don’t try to compete to be more masculine than you like white girls do for some strange reason despite being unable to do anything masculine OR feminine for that matter except for taking dick.
Many Chinese girls do seem soulless and have no morals though unfortunately, but there is a larger pool to sift through to find yourself a good one if you live in a big city. It is the reverse for whites who seem to get more shit if you live in a big city and be better quality in small towns.
> Many Chinese girls do seem soulless and have no morals though unfortunately
Replying to my own post to clarify that white girls do have morals, but they ignore them and I’m some instances intentionally work to combat them, but they are aware of and understand morality. I suppose having a Chinese girl with no morals may be better than a white girl who intentionally works to fight against morality. Choose your poison.
not
but chinese pussy is unironically top tier, they have tight pussies and they love getting hecked
the cure for yellow fever is suicide you should try it
>adidas
me(a cool guy)
Rick Owens = doesn’t shower
adidas=ethnic idiot
people shitty local indie bands around the world all dress like this pic.
any streetwear and "core" trend fashion is only worn by people who have low self esteem and can’t think for themselves. people wanting to look smart is why jazz became popular.
Dickies: cool person
Puma: based soccerhead
Levis: basic b***h
Lee: prententious basic b***h
Hilfinger, Ralph Lauren: dressed by mom
any prêt-à-porter luxury brand: yuppie, idiot, has no style and knows it
any haute couture luxury brand: yuppie, idiot, has no style, knows it and tries to hide that fact
anything that even remotely has ye associated with it: yes man who would buy anything for any price
>basically any piece of clothing
>Supreme
little gay boys in denial with some serious developmental issues vibes. Never excelled in anything. Gifted with absolutely zero intellectual, creative, or physical talents. Dull personality. Possibly hebrew, and possibly from NYC or the surrounding area dunno.
>Adidas
This is an interesting one. Adidas is a brand in flux. They have really done a lot of interesting things in recent years, expanding their footprint in the fashion space, including all the collabs, Yeezy etc. I think that in these times Adidas can simultaneously mean different things to different people.
Previously,
In America: teenagers
In Europe: THE soccer brand. Stay the heck away from anyone wearing Adidas unless you want to witness horrific acts of violence and levels of drunkenness that you didn’t even think were possible.
>Louis V
Catnip to dumb dumb airhead b***hes. From the dead broke ghetto welfare mammy dumb b***h who either got her a bootleg LV bag from the bodega or looted a real one during the George Floyd chimpouts, to the boring middle class suburban normie dumb b***h who can afford to spend $2k on a purse but probably shouldn’t, to the aristocratic dumb Paris Hilton b***h of refined breeding who has a spare bedroom stuffed the the gills with different LV bags. The LV monogram weaves a common thread through all social and cultural strata in its a appeal to the very dumbest of drooling stupid cunts. That being said, I actually do have respect for this brand and their whole history. That’s just who it appeals to these days.
>anti social social club
Solely for Chinese people who look like they probably can’t even speak English vibes. In my area anyway.
>Nike
Too ubiquitous and normie to pin down. Like asking what kind of vibes breathing oxygen gives you. Would have to break this down further into specific shoe models etc to do this exercise.
>Vetements
Wish I could afford it vibes
>Thrasher
Not people who skateboard
>Bape
Don’t think anyone wears this anymore?
people still wear bape just not really shark full zips ive seen more shit like their jeans & bapestas
>Supreme
goes crazy, hypes you up, always positive
>Anti Social Social Club
probably a hot girl or cute twink, has a good sense of humor, will send you funny memes
>Adidas
chill, loves to smoke & eat mad food
>Vetements
will keep you in check, tell you what’s wrong with you in private, bring you down to earth
>Nike
always down to spot you at the gym, loyal, bro, probably has a huge dick and will let you play with it
>Thrasher
always a good time, will heck shit up, has crazy stories, will peer pressure you into doing things that you will be glad you did later in life
>A Bathing Ape
based schizo, offers you shrooms, will take you to the shooting range
Very weird takes based on nothing close reality. You literally just gave each of them a completely random good personality.
Must be based on individual people who he knows personally?
I used to wear Bape from 2007 until around 2012 then I got rid of most everything. I wish I had kept some Bapestas because the new Bapesta looks like mega ultra hyper shit and some of the shoes were okay. Their denim was always trash though. It really depends what kind of pieces they are wearing for me to fork an opinion of the person.
At this point supreme is basically mainstream like everything else in the OP pic
Anyone who wears any of those brands (apart from Nike or Adidas worn subtly) is either rich and lacking in taste, poor and stupid, or under 25
Under Armor is worn mostly by conservative middle aged men
>thrasher
whore core
>nike
tiktok normie
>anti social club
same thing as FOG
>bathing ape
drug dealers
>supreme
fell off
What does /fashion/ think about the north face?
Turk tier
I like this format. Where do I find more?
That’s all I got sorry. Have only seen those 2 in vsome thread and saved Here’s an English chav brand meme for ya tho.
Who the heck actually wears Nike except for sneakers. Like who buys Nike tshirts or hoodies? Arent they all polyester? Is that an American thing to do?
>Who the heck actually wears Nike except for sneakers
Gym plebs
They have good sweatpants
American perspective: Nike is the gym wear of the most basic of all normies. Those with absolutely zero taste or personality. Its the default brand for middle-class modern peasants. The type of person that drives a Toyota Corolla. Their mindset is like "oh I don’t want to cheap out, so let me get something moderately ‘nice’ like Nike!"
Because richfags will be wearing Lululemon or Gymshark, and poorfags will be wearing the off-brand they found at Ross. Hype trend-chasing zoomers will go for YoungLA currently.
Agreed but Toyota Corolla is a patrician car. Normies will go into debt for a JEEP or some other scam SUV.
Whenever someone is wearing clothing with clearly visible brands (in his normal daywear), I automatically assume that the person has the mentality of a lower-class stupid. Imagine paying money to walk around like a billboard.
Even worse when its overpriced garbage such as LV or Gucci.
Patagonia: insufferable yuppie obsessed with status symbols like appearing to have the time to waste to go camping. Works in an office; furthest """outside""" he has ever gone is the office parking lot.
>It equals no morals, hypocrite.
like everyone who’s <40 wears nike lmao
speak for yourself gay! I hated Nike since early childhood!
1) Arc’Teryx: You’re either an actual hiker / camper / mountain climber, and pretty cool, or you’re just a yuppie who has gravitated to this brand from Patagonia. Arc’Teryx, if needed, makes some of the best gear and clothing available. It is not the absolute best, but it is among the best. This makes it expensive, which also makes it attractive to soulless yuppies who assign value to things based on being prohibitively expensive.
I have quite a few things from Arc’Teryx, because I hike and climb mountains, and it all looks exactly like the day i purchased it. No wear or change whatsoever. It is genuinely amazing just how well this brand holds up.
2) Lower tier designer brands, ranging from Calvin Klein and DKNY to Ralph Lauren and Tommy Hilfiger. During the 2000’s, these formerly decent brands took a nosedive, and are all Kmart tier. Rarely, if ever, you may find a single item that’s still good. Now, these brands are associated with trashy, poor people, or people whose idea of looking wealthy is dated to the tune of decades.
3) Higher tier designer brands, such as Gucci and Prada. Trash. Stay away from the big name designer brands. For every Gucci or Prada item you may consider (this includes black label Armani, D&G, etc.), check out Tom Ford or some designer who is a little lesser known throughout society. Gucci, Prada, D&G and other higher tier designer brands have experienced a similar degradation in quality as the lower tier designer brands listed above. After the 2000’s, many of these brands are borderline distasteful, and only valued by skanks and ghetto types.
Watch out for brands like Dior, YSL, Versace and others. Many are beginning to cater towards hip hop culture, meaning their products lack class, are shit quality with shit designs, and overall aren’t worth it. Try up-and-coming, or lesser known, designers.
4) Smartwool. Wool kicks ass, and regulates your temperature well. It keeps you warm in the winter, and good wool is not as hot as cotton.
5) All luxury brand watches. Literally nobody cares, because your $12,000 watch could be $50 for all anyone knows. Unless it is a Rolex, which everyone will recognize, you are only kidding yourself. Even with Rolexes, many people will just assume it is a fake. Similar to Gucci, Prada, and Louis Vuitton, nobody believes anything is real anymore, especially if you pair your items with a trashy overall appearance.
6) Watches. You have an irrelevant clock on your wrist. Just get a high end cuff bracelet, or keep the watch ultra simple. I own a minimalist 18k gold watch with an 18k watch band, an 18k gold watch with a black leather strap, and an 18k gold cuff bracelet. Any other watches I own are simplistic. If they look right, they look good. Literally nobody, other than fellow shallow, fragile ego-having having young males will ever even see your watch, let alone have time to see the brand name and the features. Keep watches simple. Would you spend so much on anything else you own? You want a nice watch because you think it signifies wealth. It signifies extreme waste.
7) All hip hop, street-inspired clothing. Just build yourself a sandwich board, and paint "I don’t want to be taken seriously" on both sides. It’s clown clothing for douchebags, and you will only ever associate with unbecoming degenerates, both male and female.
8) Sneakers. Good for whichever sport you are playing, but absolutely stupid otherwise. This is the same as all hip hop, street-inspired clothing. After 16, wearing silk shorts or sneakers makes you look like your balls haven’t dropped yet. Anyone with real means will judge you as a child.
9) Tattoos. Show me a tattoo that isn’t nonsensical garbage better left in a loose leaf notepad. Nearly all tattoos are cringe, and associated with low IQ. The ones that aren’t still have no place being permanently etched into your skin. Plus, culturally, they associate you with underdeveloped, emotionally stunted degenerates.
10) Fit. No matter what you wear, fit, and each item’s ability to work well with the rest of what you are wearing, are key. Bad fit, bad look. Like the idiots you see in weddings, thinking they look good because they are wearing a tux, but the tux fits like shit. A tux doesn’t make you look good just because it’s a tux. A tux with a good fit looks good. The same goes for designer brands, or expensive watches. If they don’t fit well, or look bizarre or out of place, they will look like shit.
There are countless guides on suits. Ignore any of the suit guides that push you to wear overly skinny suits, where the pants practically look like highwaters.
Typically, since so many clothes are large, get tailored fit, if you can. This isn’t the 90’s, and you don’t need to wear button-up shirts that make you look like a Microsoft employee. But know how to balance tailored clothing, because the trend of super tight, skinny everything makes you look frail, and bizarre.
11) Fitness. Anything you ever try to wear, or any look you ever try to pull off, will look like shit if you look like shit. Don’t be fat, and actually have an approach to your hair and facial hair in mind. If you are overweight, all anyone will ever see is that you are overweight, and your style will take second place. No matter what.
Research low carb diets. That’s it. You will lose weight like a mother hecker. You won’t even have to do keto, either. Just cut most sugar, breads, full sugar sodas, and other carb-packed foot. Keep your carbs to 20-50 per day, and you will casually lose weight, and everything you ever try to wear will look way better. It’s a fact, attractive people can pull off way more styles, and have a greater range of looks they can execute.
what about LULZ anons who post entire blog post paragraphs instead of just saying, "dont be fat" what do those guys look like
why post on a fashion board if you’re this clueless
>associating Ralph Lauren with that other shit
Every single person I’ve seen who wears RL’s faux vintage military line is a massive, insufferable douchenozzle. Just like their overcompensating personalities, it’s all overdesigned, kistchy bullshit that isn’t anything close to the original item, that they could easily buy for cheaper at a surplus store eBay, even at today’s antique collectible prices. It’s just milsurp lookalikes for stupids too stupid to realize surplus stores exist.
see
>t. got mogged the heck out by someone with style
Probably hecked your girl too judging by the way you’re rageposting lol. Ralph Lauren has become a heavily diluted mall brand in some respects but their best pieces remain untouchable. Obviously poor people/alt teens can still buy the original surplus version and look good. That’s not the point.
The original will always look better since it won’t have some obnoxious nonsense patch or god forbid a silkscreened RL stamp in the middle of your chest. I know enough about the originals that they’re trying to copy manufacturing errors with the stamps, but the truth is those errors are really hecking rare and were rarely issued because it was very obvious what they were.
lol Ralph Lauren duning kruger
Enjoy your overpriced bad repros then.
Post an example of what you’re talking about.
lol no response
lol your entire personality is ralph lauren
not even a good brand lmao
Shit like this.
Or $300+ for this. Granted it’s one of their better ones, but it’s a piss poor copy of a hobo standard issue woodland BDU in predecessor ERDL (RDF version, mind you) camouflage, with a soup sandwich of Army and Air Force patches, not even in the right places for the air force patch mind you. Hell, even the branch tape is on the wrong side if you’re assuming the brand is the branch.
The R Lauren tape is 50’s style so not even correct in-era for the rest of the jacket.
I thought you were talking about RRL when you said fake vintage military aesthetic. Polo is hit or miss because their scope is too varied, the two you posted are meant to appeal to basketball Americans. I stay away from anything military related. The polo ties that I have are fantastic. RRL on the other hand can do no wrong and is the best clothing brand in existence. Purple Label is nice but not for me.
That’s less egregious than having army insignia (on the wrong sleeve) and an Air Force squadron patch on the chest. All faux military clothing is cringe unless it’s a staple garment like dress uniform pants or bomber jackets.
I have no hecking clue which ones you’re talking about. My opinion on branding is if I don’t see it on the outside, then GOOD. I didn’t even know RL had other products besides than the faux military shit I rightfully associate with tryhard douchebags.
The faux military stuff is an extremely small portion of what they make. Polo started by making wide neck ties when skinny ties where the thing, they started making polo shirts and other WASP/prep staple garments later. The camo shit didn’t come into being until a couple of decades ago. RRL is their heritage ranch wear/work wear line, the western boots are made by Rios of Mercedes. Purple Label is their higher end line. Purple Label suits are at the minimum half canvassed and made in Italy (but in an American style). If you like fashion and clothing you’re really doing yourself a disservice by not looking into Ralph Lauren brands more.
lol not chance that newgay would know about RRL, he doesn’t even know about SLP, an /fashion/ staple
he admits he’s a stupid too
Why would I need to know about hipster trend of the month trash? I wear what I like and what fits for the occasion. Basically I consider context, something a lot of gays in here are too autistic to do.
kek you’re too stupid and ignorant to realize how funny and ironic what you just said was. summerfags are a plague
moron
sage
heckin kek, YSL hasn’t made clothes since 2012.
your b***h let me hit cause i have ricks
balenciaga: probably chinese with too much money
vintage: cool person
gucci: gay if wearing the "LOOK AT ME IM WEARING GUCCI" stuff, otherwise can be cool
supreme: at this point if you wear it you just like the brand, no problem with that
nike: lots of cool shoes at a reasonable price, depends on the person adn shoe model
vans: normal person
adidas: normal person
Wow this thread shows me that the modern /fashion/ poster is stuck in 2015, I mean really? People in this thread are talking about Anti Social Social Club and Supreme like it’s still mainstream.
I’m still seeing chinese students running around my local college campus and the surrounding bars wearing it, so it is as far as I can tell.
Just speaking from personal experience. Sorry not sorry to offend you. Maybe shop at your local surplus store for true vintage and I’ll respect you more?
Well those arent fashion crowds, they are normal people who decide to buy something "fashionable or trendy" but don’t keep up with fashion so they just buy those brands, it would be like me buying a diamond supply or obey shirt, it’s not a thing anymore. (although i’ve seen young zoomers buy it and rock it as an irony thing)
If they’re brandwhoring, they must have some consciousness about fashion, even if it is at a very low derivative level.
In australia there’s this popular brand called thrills and everyone who wears it is a skater or surfer with shitty ‘sticker book’ tattoos and likes drinking beer on beaches way too much and is really messy and has a fondness for late 70s aesthetics but don’t listen to the music from that time for some reason.
>>
LV is the ultimate sign of tasteless brindead npc
Anyone wearing a brand is a total sellout loser lol agreeing to child abuse and child labor not to mention banister profiteering
It kind of boggles my mind that all you really need to have a successful brand is a cool name and logo and pay/know famous people to wear it.
>all you really need to have a successful brand is a cool name and logo and pay/know famous people to wear it
Not at all.
You need very good knowledge or understanding of pleb psychology and symbolic purchasing, ie know how to use people’s low self-esteem.