Ukraine-Russia War K/D

What do you think is the real kill/death ratio between Ukrainian and Russian forces?
Can someone give me a link for objective sauce of the killings?
Oddly enough, I found a site listing daily russian loses, but nothing for ukkie loses; why is this info so hard to find?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    British Intel alleges it's 1:10 killed/wounded for Ukraine and 1:3 for Russia.
    Russia allegedly has terrible medevac protocols.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What they pull from the frontlines still counts as medevac at least

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      According to appeal videos released by Russian mobliks under DNR command, they will only evacuate lightly wounded troops with recoverable injuries (I.e they can be patched up and sent back to the front in a couple weeks). Troops with serious injuries who are out of the war for the remainder are left to die because they no longer have any use and would just waste scarce resources

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sounds not appealing

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Give them morphine and that sounds reasonable

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The government of Canada fully agrees

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I thought canada doesn't use morphine for that

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah they probably use something cheaper because the whole point is to save money

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Jesus that's grim

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What a horrible feeling to feel abandoned to die rather than anyone have your back.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          My thoughts exactly. Do you think that if they don't advance, the officers will shoot their ass?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's certainly been a time tested protocol for these kinds of mass mobilisation strategies. Typically armies with trained soldiers will always seek to extract and support troops, but if they are mobilised conscripts with little training who cares?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          There’s tons of drone videos showing Russian troops ignoring and abandoning their own wounded. No one wants to be there and it’s every man for himself.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Petty much perfect propaganda

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Russia is cracking down hard on such appeal videos for a reason yeah.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Russian mobliks under DNR command

        Kek, why would they assign their BARS reservists to a lesser fighting force? what's your source for this?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I said mobliks, which isn’t BARS reservists and you’re an idiot if you don’t understand the difference. My source is the videos released by Russian troops themselves from Irkutsk oblast, which caused scandal and prompted the oblast governor to promise to visit the front personally.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes that makes perfect sense, their country is right next door so its incredibly difficult for them to evac the wounded. Ukraine however, which is completely unstable and dilapidated to the point they have no working hospitals and have to ship their wounded to germany, have no problems treating their wounded. Its just like how Russia is firing 10 times more artillery rounds per day while Ukraine is stay in the same spots but somehow aren't dying. Its magic right you fucking nagger? You fucking morons pushing glownagger talking points are fucking subhuman trash.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    These debates are pointless and cringe. What matters is objective facts on the ground and the frontline. This hast changed since the “regrouping” from Kherson. Which followed a similar lull following the “regrouping” from Kharkov, which followed a similar lull following the “regrouping” from Kiev.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm just saying that the loses should be objectively laid out as well for the world to see; a territorial victory is a victory, but if you're going to lose 7 Russians for 1 Ukrainian in the process, isn't that some sort of a morale loss? Of course, neither side will know the cost of human lives, so i guess why should we?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And none of this will be known until some time after the war. It’s all just propaganda now and pointless cope for the front barely moving in months. Attrition I’d always cope for failure just like it was in WWI

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Explain away picrel. Russian armour tried to pass a river. Every box is Russian vehicle. After a surprise artillery counter attack, see craters.

      > Not looking great

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Those look like Ukrainian tanks tbh

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They were Russian, but not every box is a disabled vehicle.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Those look like Ukrainian tanks tbh

        They were Russian, but not every box is a disabled vehicle.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Phonefagging, what does it say?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Both russians and ukrainians losses

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          We precisely know what happened.

          Please don't claim it was Ukraine trying to invade their own territory.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            First of, you know jack shit. Second of, reddit is on the other side of internet. Kys nagger.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It’s so nice of you to inform other anons about how angry they’ve made you.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            THATS IT

            THEY DONE IT
            THE COPE TURRETS CANT POSSIBLY GET ANY HIGHER
            CLEAR OFF THE PICTURE

            WARS OVER
            PACK IT UP

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Oddly enough, I found a site listing daily russian loses, but nothing for ukkie loses; why is this info so hard to find?

    You know exactly why. They're just as high if not higher. The U.S. never concealed casualties during Desert Storm or Afghanistan because they were defeating the enemy in combat. If you're hiding your war dead, there's obviously not something to be proud of.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russia doesn't give a fuck about its front line troops. It's almost like they want them to die.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    like the post to imager ratio ITT

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Probably at least 3:1
    the russian strategy is to find weakly defended trenches and overwhelm them with numbers. This tactic favors russia but they don't get many kills this way, as sometimes there's only 5 ukies there.
    Their other strategy is lobbing inaccurate artillery at empty fields and hospitals. the hospitals aren't holding combatants so I won't count that. Still not too many. Less so now that there are ammo shortages.
    ukraine targets ammo depots and logistics centers, also not many kills.
    however russia is generally the one doing offensives most of the time, and that's when they'll lose up to 10-15 troops at a time from artillery. in drone wars ukraine is supplied with way more there and that's where many casualties come from.
    if US bradleys and abrams ever arrive it could tip the scales considerably, most russian offensives have barely a few BMPs to use. with mostly infantry supporting.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is actually a solid post. Only thing I would disagree with is this:
      > ukraine targets ammo depots and logistics centers, also not many kills.
      That’s not true at all. Troops are concentrated in these areas unlike on the front where they spread out

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is actually a solid post. Only thing I would disagree with is this:
      > ukraine targets ammo depots and logistics centers, also not many kills.
      That’s not true at all. Troops are concentrated in these areas unlike on the front where they spread out

      two glowies sucking each other off

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just civilians, the only casualties their willing to release, except when their defense minister releases that 300,000k troops have been killed. A number so high that even I'm suspicious of.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >their defense minister releases that 300,000k troops have been killed
      source your ass bro?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hey neighbor, what stories do you have to tell us? How's life?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          stupid gypsy, that ukie would put you into the meatgrinder. The fuck you think is the opinion of a self proclaimed nazi towards a literal gypsy like you?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          stupid gypsy, that ukie would put you into the meatgrinder. The fuck you think is the opinion of a self proclaimed nazi towards a literal gypsy like you?

          we love gypsies here they are probably the funniest people i've ever met, i worked at a closed (underground) coal mine once and this guy suddenly starts calling everyone a nagger because of the coal dust making our faces dirty for the rest of the shift everyone was making nagger/slave related jokes, best laugh i ever had

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Cool story proxy fag. I bet you're closer to me in Virginia or DC. homosexual nagger

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              being called an American is the greatest compliment i can ever receive, thank you anon

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    500k hohols deads, 50k Russians dead

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dude stop playing with your microdick and give me the actual sauce of your claim, all i want is the truth, but i guess...we'll never fully know, it depends on who's going to win, if it's the Russians that will win, maybe your claim will be valid then lol

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        dude, the fuckin hohols are sending geriatrics and teenage boys to the front and are on their like 8th round of consrcipts, all the professional hohol army are all long KIA

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Really pathetic Russia still can’t advance more than 100m a day then.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I heard they don't even have ammunition now and have resorted to charging positions with shovels.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Lack of progress is what it is, all the rest is cope.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Checked

            dude, the fuckin hohols are sending geriatrics and teenage boys to the front and are on their like 8th round of consrcipts, all the professional hohol army are all long KIA

            Do you have a single fact to back that up?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Kek, hohols coping hard in this thread... Like pre-war hoholand got around ~200k active military with ability to conscript ~900k from reserves with total capability of ~6mil men capable for service. Now we're watching bizare videos od hohols disguised in ambulance kidnapping people from streets in their 8th wave of mobilization. And all of this vs what? ~250k initial army + ~300k conscripts almost a year later. Yeah, Russians are using "human wave tactics leveraging their superior number advantage". I don't know how fucking stupid you have to be to believe such bullshit, but average amerimut nagger IQ seems close to that.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Just take Bakhmut already and stop coping with conjured casualty figures. All it does is make Russia seem even more pathetic by not being able to advance despite killing all the enemy in droves

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Just take Bakhmut already and stop coping with conjured casualty figures.
              Kekw, cope harder nagger. Not only the only ones coping with imaginary numbers are hohols themselves calling that almost all Russia forces dead or wounded, but also using numerous advantage to prolong defense of such "insignificant" positions like Bakhmut.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why can’t they take Bakhmut despite inflicting such massive casualties? It’s pathetic and you only make it more pathetic with the cope

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I knew mutts are bad at math, but hell, this is just another level.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why can’t they just take Bakhmut? Just do it already and stop talking.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                City is still heavily fortified and the Ukrainians have been preparing it since 2014. Why lose soldiers when they can encircle it and force the 12k soldiers inside to surrender?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Why lose soldiers when they can encircle it and force the 12k soldiers inside to surrender?
                I dunno, why haven’t they encircled it? Why didn’t they encircle Lysychansk but just let the holhols withdraw to new lines that have held ever since?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            On top of that 50% of their pre-war population fucked off and live abroad now lmao. hohol land is a dead nation, not that it was a real one to begin with

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous
  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    bot thread

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine 400,000 casualties

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russia has 15k documentable, so something around 20-30k total. Ukraine according to conservatie estimates should be breaking into 6 digit territory by now. So between 1:3 and 1:5 would be a reasonable estimate.

    >but nothing for ukkie loses; why is this info so hard to find?
    I dont think anyone is counting them at all. I mean think about it, what would this information be good for? Nothing. And if it got accidently leaked you are in big trouble. Independent investigation is impossible, because Ukraine has basically entered North Korea mode.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I really dont get why people obsess over casualty numbers. Always reeks of cope

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Both are above 100k, at least if our dnr and lnr people are included. And hohols have also their western retard mercenaries.
    I would say that since there have been many conferences about giving them tanks and more and more shit, that those were a reaction to actual Russian victories and that even some German paper quoted German intelligence that Ukrainians had insane losses.
    So my estimate is 200 k dead Russians and 300 k dead Ukrainians and mercenaries .
    Maybe it’s my wishful thinking but I think I am quite close to the truth.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds plausible

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Half a million dead for a shitty war
      Thats fuck up

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think you can trust mossad on this one. they aren't going to lie to themselves. they need to know who is winning to support them

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Im totally going to believe a israeli paper

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Aye, smells fishy

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >the country that has been losing terrtiroy and begging 30 countries every 5 minutes for more shit is definitely killing as much as their counterpart
    god damn i wish i got paid to be retarded

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Russia has been losing territory since September of last year and is indeed begging the chinks for help and equipment, same as North Korea, Iran, and a dozen shitholes in Africa that have ancient Russian weapons

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >losing territory means having more territory than before
      vatniks have gone full double speak

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        +1

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah lying ukies and Russian MoD actually listing the real numbers. But hey, getting outgunned in everything 10 to 1, it's comprensibile to have a 18:1 kda

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The military loss data of Russia and Ukraine disclosed by Mossad, Israel’s world-renowned intelligence agency:

    Russian military losses: 23 aircraft, 56 helicopters, 200 drones, 889 tanks and armored vehicles, 427 artillery pieces, 12 air defense systems, 18,480 killed, 44,500 injured, and 323 captured. The number of soldiers involved in the war was 418,000.

    Ukraine lost 302 aircraft, 212 helicopters, 2,750 drones, 6,320 tanks and armored vehicles, 7,360 cannons, 497 air defense systems, 157,000 killed, 234,000 injured, 17,230 prisoners, and 734,000 soldiers, is in the ninth domestic mobilization of 100,000 soldiers to fill the gap.

    234 NATO officers, trainers, and agents died (US, UK)

    2458 NATO soldiers died (Poland, Germany, Lithuania…)
    A total of 5360 mercenaries died.

    https://www.techarp.com/facts/mossad-nato-losing-ukraine-war/

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Viral fake claim
      https://www.techarp.com/facts/mossad-nato-losing-ukraine-war/?amp=1

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://factcheck.ge/en/story/41613-disinformation-according-to-the-data-of-israeli-intelligence-russia-killed-157-000-ukrainian-troops-and-over-1-500-nato-military-personnel-in-ukraine

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *