>nutmegs into your life
>and your heart
Also, how is he as a historian? His channel is at least comfy, I'll give him that.
Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |
Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |
>nutmegs into your life
>and your heart
Also, how is he as a historian? His channel is at least comfy, I'll give him that.
Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |
Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |
I love this channel, the vibes are so comfy. But idk about the historicity.
Orange Fool
was it on purpose?
>it’s a clickbait episode
>You seriously voted for that zog dog, i mean "Orange Fool"
I can't speak to how good he is as a historian, but he does cover some interesting topics:
Fricking US colonists cooking Indian curry is insane to think about.
It was Americans cooking English curries that the English were making in imitation of Indian Curries.
you're correct, but it's crazy to think there was that sort of cultural exchange going on between India to Britain and then to the Americas that early.
curry isn't even indian
wtf? I want open borders now
I learned a lot from the salt pork video. It seemed well researched. High quality stuff really.
For me, it's tasting history woth Max Miller.
ah yes, how I learned ketchup came from europeans trying to copy asian fish sauces apparently???
Don't know why, but I literally cannot stand that homosexual. I've told youtube to never recommend his videos to me.
He was a Disney employee before becoming a Youtuber, and it caused him to have a weird sort of corporate fakeness.
I like him but I see why others wouldn't. Not easy for IQfy autists to click with an extroverted personality.
Yes he sucks wieners and tries to be le funny but his videos are well researched. I'm impressed about the ammount of primary sources he mentions. Just disregard the topic whenever he talks about the Spanish Inquisition. Almost no one gets it right besides actual spanish and hispanoamerican historians.
Yeah, I noticed that the couple times I did watch his videos, but the absolute homosexualry was just so offputting I couldn't get past it. The comments didn't even have any good history discussion, just a bunch of gays and women simping over him.
Any other good food historians you know of? I often save the videos to try the recipe myself, and will even write it down if it's good.
>The comments didn't even have any good history discussion, just a bunch of gays and women simping over him.
If he was some average or ugly looking dude he'd be less popular and the comments would be more relevant to the subject matter. If you can recognise that a particular YouTuber is conventionally attractive, you can usually just skip the content if you're looking for actual discussion.
He's generally pretty good from what I can tell. He often straight up reads the recipe verbatim from the historical cookbook he's using (and even cites the cookbook being used; author and date of original publishing included). Granted, he sometimes has to substitute the odd ingredient for practical reasons (just try and find historically accurate pippins in modern day Indiana, I dare you). And the recipes he uses are rather vague so he often has to figure out or guess the details at times. But that's just how those old recipes work.
Good mix of IQfy and IQfy
I actually like the fact he doesn't get political (he did once) but I just learning about historical recipes