TIK's latest video just dropped

Get in here lads, he's talking about everyone's favorite war criminal.

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Stopped watching after TIK again claimed the Nazis were socialist

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Only redditors get mad about this

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      but the nazis were socialist

      not marxist-socialist, but socialist. nobody who isn't a marxist-socialist disputes this because people who aren't marxist-socialists realize that the term has a logical, broader definition that is a superset of marxist-socialism.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [log in to view media]

      his natzees are socialist video is actually completely fine, hes just been getting into the alt-right/ancap grifter territory more and more recently. I saw a comment mentioning VGHKRAINA when it happened and TIK just fucking replied with that Victoria Nuland phone call that is supposedly the MGS2 ending codec call tier "revelation" heralded by vatniks and tankies that is so lacking in substance (it's literally just them trying to arrange meetings and seeing who are the important players) it means what you want it to be. I think the point of no return was his "Hitler was a member of the communist party" video, which, while an interesting proposition, doesn't have concrete sourcing and its obvious TIK is just playing it off for his audience and own rhetoric. His autism is still entertaining though.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        tik isn't a grifter bro. in one of his vids he cheekily refers to the polonium poisoning incident when talking about putins statements about ww2.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Can’t believe someone else remembers that game

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      socialism along racial lines is still socialism

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >they were bad
    >why?
    >well they threw still living babies on fires, source? my ass
    >uh also they herded 1 million slavs into barns and set them on fire, source? my ass
    >uh also the uh. dogs and pigs of the villages would go to the barns and eat the human flesh
    >uh also since they imported so many slavs germany became ethnically slavic lol so lol about that genetic superiority lol
    >uh one of the people uh escaped from one of these barns and uh survived and that's how we know what happened to a million people
    >uh like the uh source of this all is uh soviet propaganda but please don't look into this
    holocaust tier testimony

    Trash tier video

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [log in to view media]

      I have yet to hear any refutation of his actual points.

      No, REEEEEEing at Timothy Snyder for being more widely read than your LULZ infographs doesn't count.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Refutation of what? Propaganda? Muh babies being thrown on fires? Muh millions of dead slavs all miraculously killed in the same way, burning barns? (Source: Soviet excavations). Fuck off

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [log in to view media]

          >Propaganda?

          Yes, because the Nazis NEVER EVER pulled smoke out of their asses, amirite?

          >Muh babies being thrown on fires? Muh millions of dead slavs all miraculously killed in the same way, burning barns? (Source: Soviet excavations).

          Personal accounts of the same event by multiple individuals who were not on the same side and often didn't speak the same language.

          If they're separately giving accounts that are all fairly consistent, chances are that is in fact, what actually fucking happened. And no amount of SEETHING about garden gnomes, Poles, and Russians by you is going to change that.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >what about the nahtzees
            Nobody's talking about nazi propaganda
            >If they're separately giving accounts that are all fairly consistent
            Except it's not, it's propaganda. At best one person said it and then it became the whole narrative, you can easily tell with how it's set up like an atrocity story and not like any sort of recollection of actual events. It's broad generalizations extrapolated from the most heinous version shit out from some soviet's asshole

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >you can easily tell with how it's set up like an atrocity story and not like any sort of recollection of actual events
              but you haven't read the actual interviews were these stories are given. what specifically do you think reveals it is a hoax?
              >It's broad generalizations extrapolated
              no there are specific stories about specific events and specific places involving specific people.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What is the underlying claim, that is the propaganda. The underlying claim is that they somehow miraculously killed millions Belarussians, almost all by trapping them in the largest barn of the village, setting it on fire and then shooting it. Their source for this is (((Soviet Excavations))). I don't care if one guy says that he saw pigs eating flesh. I don't care if one woman say she saw babies being thrown on a fire. But when you try and claim that millions of people all underwent that just because of a handful of testimonies you can fuck off. If you want to prove millions of people were killed by a ragtag group of poachers you better have hard evidence and not "we (The Soviets) found some burned down barns".

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no one claimed that the dirlewanger brigade killed millions, and well armed military men killing tens of thousands of mostly defenseless civilians over a period of 1-2 years is not hard to believe. why do you lie so much?
                do you think timothy snyder just sat behind his desk making this all up?
                >Their source for this is (((Soviet Excavations)))
                again, why do you lie so much? what is it that makes you feel so comfortable just making things completely up on the spot? the source for the actions of the dirlewanger brigade is not just soviet excavations but tons of witness testimony, letters and reports. snyder lists his sources in his book, but you just claim instantly that it's all lies and all based on soviet excavations.

                you can deny basically all of history using your "method".

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Right he just added a quote from the author of the book he was citing that said that the Germans killed millions of people right after he was just talking about dirlewanger, which hopefully wasn't on purpose.
                >why do you lie
                I'm not lying about him citing the soviets

                TIK also says "if they didn't have guns they weren't partisans". Which is completely retarded for somebody of his supposed understanding to say.

                Here's the direct quote from the video:

                "The exhumation report of the Soviet investigating commission mentions, besides the number of villages and the number killed in each, that neither cartridges nor projectiles were found, and it concluded that the two thousand victims had been burned alive in barns."

                So yes, the author is literally citing Soviets. Everything else in the video is practically hearsay

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                he says outright in the vid that the dirlewanger brigade killed 10s of thousands, not millions. why do you lie so much?
                citing the soviets doesn't mean our only source for dirlewanger brigade massacres are soviet excavations. why do you lie so much?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Right he just added a quote from the author of the book he was citing that said that the Germans killed millions of people right after he was just talking about dirlewanger, it was my misunderstanding. I'm not here to play semantics with a homosexual

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah, you're here to lie.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Would you like me to give you the time where he says millions of slavs were killed right after talking about Dirlewanger killing slavs? Or how about the timestamp to the quote where the author admits he's citing soviet reports?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                dirlewanger brigade is outright stated to have killed 10s of thousands, not millions. it is a lie to say that our source for the actions of the dirlewanger brigade is soviet excavations, that is one source, corraborating a number of other sources.

                what is it about you that is defective that makes you lie so readily? is it that you came here from someplace else with the specific purpose to lie? what is it?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well what isn't a lie is that most of the video comes from one or two books and focusses on "barn murders" and the source for the "barn murders" is soviet propaganda. If you want to debate numbers go ahead

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you've already lied about numbers multiple times.
                >and the source for the "barn murders" is soviet propaganda
                you literally just made that up for this thread.

                there are many examples of nazi german barn massacres, they also happened in western europe.
                https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/gardelegen
                https://www.france24.com/en/20140108-german-charged-nazi-french-massacre-world-war-oradour-sur-Glane

                now explain to us, what is it about you that is defective that makes you lie so readily?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No you've called me a liar over and over because I pointed out how the video leads people to the misunderstanding that the author is claiming that dirlewanger killed millions of people, which I already said was my misuderstanding. Are you mentally ill?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                everybody can read the thread. what is it about you that is defective that makes you lie so readily even when it's easy to see you're straight out lying?
                I'm very curious actually. anybody? explain this subhumans disgraceful behaviour.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >he just added a quote from the author of the book he was citing that said that the Germans killed millions of people right after he was just talking about dirlewanger, which hopefully wasn't on purpose.
                >it was my misunderstanding. I'm not here to play semantics with a homosexual
                now if you are over spamming "liar liar liar" do you have an actual argument?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                explain to us what makes you lie so readily?

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You are mentally retarded

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                Hes just a low IQ scumbag, probably a teenager too. You make quality posts, but don't waste your time on that guy. Thousands of delusional Natsocs around

                Here's a direct quote from the video:

                >...women and children should be shot. 8 million people became slave laborers in the Reich. Lots of unfit men, women and children were killed. German men went abroad an killed millions of "subhumans"...
                >Over the course of the next year Dirlewanger battalion participated 11 operations which resulted in the destruction of 5 gnomish ghettos and numerous partisan camps, but also regular villages. The forty-nine camps destroyed during the operation by the reconnaissance and pursuit commandos were merely the tip of the iceberg, concealing a genocidal operation behind the mask of antipartisan struggle.

                Forgive me if I'm wrong but that's worded to make it sound like Dirlewanger was personally responsible for killing millions of civilians, which is false

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Forgive me if I'm wrong but that's worded to make it sound like Dirlewanger was personally responsible for killing millions of civilians
                You're just retarded.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Am I? I don't think I am, can you refute what I said? You can't because it's a direct quote from the video

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                Am I? I don't think I am, can you refute what I said? You can't because it's a direct quote from the video

                TIK literally gave an estimate for the number of people whose deaths the Dirlewanger Brigade was responsible for at the end of the video and it was 60,000.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, 10 minutes later in the video. So for a third of the video the only number you've heard was "millions of civilians" and then "Dirlewanger". Then he says "uh actually it was 60,000 partisans MAX". Then he says only 2,000 people MAX died in the barns despite claiming if was Dirlewanger's favorite way to kill people. If it was his favorite way to kill people why did he only kill 3% of partisans that way according to Soviet sources?

                Are all his videos this disingenuous, or is it only when he uses shifty authors as his source material.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                >Then he says only 2,000 people MAX died in the barns despite claiming if was Dirlewanger's favorite way to kill people
                why are you such a fucking liar?

                ?t=912
                it refers to the people killed in FEBRUARY 43.

                zinaida piluj was a belarusian eye witness to a village extermination, she gave her testimony to WEST german ZStL in 61 as you can find searching through ingraos book. she is directly cited in the vid. as is a polish woman, and german soldiers involved in warsaw later. that's just in the vid alone.

                what is it about you that is defective that makes you lie so shamelessly? explain this to us you reprehensible subhuman.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Only have evedence of a few thousand deaths
                >YEAH BUT WE ESTIMATE HE KILLED TEN BILLION GORILLION JUST BECAUSE HE WAS SUCH A BAD GUY
                So it really is just Holocaust historical revisionism

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A few thousand killed in one month.

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah? So how do they go from ~10,000 paritsans killed to 60,000 civilians killed? Using TIK's wonderful determination tool for what a partisan is; i.e. "If you hide your guns you're no longer a partisan." I can understand how one could come to think so many civilians died

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Hes just a low IQ scumbag, probably a teenager too. You make quality posts, but don't waste your time on that guy. Thousands of delusional Natsocs around

              • 4 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >can't argue without semantics and screeching liar
                Who's underage?

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >At best one person said it and then it became the whole narrative
              again that doesn't work if stories are coming from tons of different people from different backgrounds, speaking different languages.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            second best poster on LULZ

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              [log in to view media]

              W-Who's the best?!

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes, because the Nazis NEVER EVER pulled smoke out of their asses, amirite?
            You and I know damn well that these trannies only pretend to disbelieve this.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      do you just outright deny any historical event that is politically inconvenient? what actually counts as evidence for you to believe something happened in history?

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    English historians are renowned to be incredibly accurate and non-bias. All me information comes from the Anglosphere.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      where do those guys who make those infographs you're so fond of come from?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >history is le....written by the victors...
      The rally cry of losers.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dirlewanger was a terrible man according to sources, so any exaggeration is justify to raise awareness of how terrible the Nazis were.
    He's doing everyone a service by not treating this historical case fairly.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >WORST
    Peculiar way of spelling GREATEST

Your email address will not be published.