This is starting to become unethical.

This is starting to become unethical.

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    good
    fuck art

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      """art"""

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        chequed, nice quads

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Uncultured swine

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >i have no creative potential so fuck everyone else that does
      Based anon.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you genuinely have creative potential this shouldn't worry you the slightest

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      post-enlightenment art tho

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Shoulda become a dancer

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >gartoro
      this gives me strange lusty feelings

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sand paper tongue.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Based. Commissions at the price of electricity bills instead of whatever art fag came up with.
    Keep them seething, art is not a real job

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Better yet, release the art under CC Share A-like. If some art fag tries to redraw your art, tell them to put it under the CC licence or prepare to get owned for GPL like violations.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The image can be GPL, but they can still sell NFTs.
        $SHIB to the moon!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > I want to pay pennies instead of compensate artists for the amount of time it may have taken them to create an art piece
      > Creating art is not a real job.

      I'll give you a chance, how is art not a real job? Explain this to me

      Better yet, release the art under CC Share A-like. If some art fag tries to redraw your art, tell them to put it under the CC licence or prepare to get owned for GPL like violations.

      Not sure I'm following, is this so artists wouldn't be able to monetize anything that resembles something created by A.I?

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    music programs let you create songs without learning to play an instrument, yet there are still musicians

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty sure AI can't do lyrics for music at this time.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There are some wildly popular songs with garbage-tier lyrics that I'm sure a chat AI could do better than.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Like baby, baby, baby, oooooh
          like baby baby, babyyy ooOooooh
          like ...

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Kids these days probably wont remember Hanson, but one of their major hits was
            Mmm bop, ba duba dop
            Ba du bop, ba duba dop
            Ba du bop, ba duba dop
            Ba du, yeah, yeah
            Mmm bop, ba duba dop
            Ba du bop, ba du dop
            Ba du bop, ba du dop
            Ba du, yeah, yeah

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              no its
              mm bop, bapa mm bop
              badu ba
              mm bop, bapa ba-ah
              oOh- Ooh

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                My bad. Yeah, AI can never compete with that.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I suspect you reply in jest, yet I would have you consider more closely the difference between our lyrics, for I believe the soul of man lies therein, and indeed, such would a machine scarce be able to reproduce.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If someone told me kpop lyrics are entirely ai generated i wouldn't be the least bit surprised

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      People are more interested in live instrument playing than live drawing, like there's no concerts for art, you just see the end result

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        People do live art streams on Twitch all the time.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          For small numbers of viewers and for free, because that's the only interest and price they can command.
          Meanwhile live music often has high entry prices and fills up stadiums.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >b-but twitch
          not an argument and never will be

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        people like to buy the original painting which is kind of the same thing

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Dude what? Music is also an end result. The only difference is that one end result is seen and one is heard. Both are end results. Any end result that is good will sell, AI or artist

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You still need to know how music works and what kind of stuff to use for what scene.

      Pretty sure AI can't do lyrics for music at this time.

      >Pretty sure AI can't do lyrics for music at this time.
      It can but they're really weird.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Listen to what is popular with zoomers, 90% of it is copy/pasted beats with heavily autotuned vocal

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it's all mumble rap only it's regressed to not even having words.

        It's just noise, a beat, and a nagger whispering
        yeeaasyeyeyeyeyeyeyeyeyeyeyeeyeyeyeyeeyey
        into the microphone.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Music and a song totally difference, yet it still called a musician whom create a music and a song.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    oh no the bland generic fantasy artists are going down.
    yet, just like as photography killed landscape painting, life goes on.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    when the doctors, lawyers, consultants, software developers, designers, engineers, and artists of every category are sitting destitute on the side of the road the chad trucker will wave as he drives by

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ...and then joins them as automated driving gets implemented

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >5 more years!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It will be before most other professions you mentioned get replaced

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            truckers were supposed to be 1st to be replaced
            10 years ago when everyone started talking about automation, artist would have been the last one people assumed would be replaced by AI

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              And artists haven't been replaced yet
              >but they're about to be!
              Just like truckers were about to be replaced?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ill let

                The difference is that to implement self-driving cars, you need an AI that can predict human behaviour: the behaviour of pedestrians and other drivers. Making pretty pictures is much more tractable.

                make my point
                the progress on graphical art has been much faster than driving

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I have no idea why you're pretending that there won't eventually be a point where this does happen.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the tech is still in its infancy and it's already winning art competitions. give it a few years and artists will be replaced almost entirely.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The difference is that to implement self-driving cars, you need an AI that can predict human behaviour: the behaviour of pedestrians and other drivers. Making pretty pictures is much more tractable.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            art can be automated because there are no consequences if ai screws up. You can always just make another picture. Or 500 more.
            If car ai screws up you can end up with tens or hundreds of dead people.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              If AI can't generate fingers that don't look like they stem from 20 generations of inbreeding then it doesn't matter whether you generate 50 pictures or 5000, it just won't work.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                1.5 coming soon with better fingers.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                1.5 what? Stable Diffusion?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Huh? The AI can generate fingers just fine. It just takes a bit of work.

                [...]

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You found the crux of the issue

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It will be before most other professions you mentioned get replaced

        You need someone at the wheel no matter what.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You really think logistics companies are going to pay someone to fucking babysit a self-driving truck for a living? It'd be cheaper for them to just write off the losses caused by trucks driving themselves into the Grand Canyon.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >what are airplane pilots
            There is no way the government is going to allow fully self driving technology with no human onboard even if that tech was possible.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The government will do whatever it's paid to do, and there's more money in getting rid of drivers than there is in protecting them.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >There is no way the government is going to allow
              All they have to do is get a driver with a subtle but manageable drinking problem. Someone who is a PoS and will fuck up eventually. Someone who can be villainized. Following?
              Then they let the driver loose and start the countdown until he finally gets cocky and tries to drink on the job or something.
              Then an "accident" happens with the software. Car or plane or whatever swerves wild and kills a bunch of kids or something. The AI "saves" it just in time and saves a few of the kids or something.
              Then every news station focuses on how the driver was drunk or stoned or whatever.
              AI comes out as the "hero" that stopped the worst from happening.
              The article is ran in a way where all the fault is put on the driver.
              >It is now more dangerous to have a human in the vehicle supervising than outside the vehicle"
              Say anything otherwise and you get called blamed for being pro "child killing" by the social media mobs.

              Stock go up.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ah yes
                the AI hero that suddenly swerved, nearly killing children, but stopped itself just in time
                stunning and brave

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I didn't realize I would have to write an entire chapter in hopes a compelling story would lure you out from being selectively retarded for the lulz

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                art can be automated because there are no consequences if ai screws up. You can always just make another picture. Or 500 more.
                If car ai screws up you can end up with tens or hundreds of dead people.

                accident-proneness is a measurable statistic
                if human drivers on average cause 1 accident with lethal outcome every 100k kilometers, and AIs have 0.1 of those, then you don't need any "hero story"

                >at the end of the day, NNs can only generate stuff based on what they've already seen
                Same as humans. No legal issues.

                *draws a dragon* what now

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Are you saying you've never seen a picture of a dragon before?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Who drew the first dragon?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Some guy why had seen both a lizard and a bat and combined aspects of both. Same as the AI does.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if human drivers on average cause 1 accident with lethal outcome every 100k kilometers, and AIs have 0.1 of those, then you don't need any "hero story"
                Yes you do, because the vast majority of people are retarded and won't change their views just because you quote numbers and statistics at them. They need a compelling and emotional story, even if it's manufactured.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >3000 children die every year in car accidents
                >90% of these deaths can be prevented
                >let an AI drive today, think of the children!
                There, no need to manufacture anything

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >accident-proneness is a measurable statistic
                >if human drivers on average cause 1 accident with lethal outcome every 100k kilometers, and AIs have 0.1 of those, then you don't need any "hero story"

                There's also the question of who pays for liability. Industry won't want to. Insurance won't want to. The drivers who aren't even driving won't want to. Maybe government does like they do for vaccines?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >There's also the question of who pays for liability
                The auto manufacturer, obviously.
                1. It's their fault if their self driving software glitches out and kills someone
                2. It properly aligns incentives for them to improve the safety of their self driving software
                No other option makes any sense at all.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                > obviously
                If it were that simple and obvious, it would already be in place. But it is not that simple and it is not that obvious. The blame for the Boeing 737 super max is still going around in circles. Passed off to BAE, who subcontracted parts of the code out to another team etc etc. There is no "obvious" solution when it comes to insurance. If you don’t realise insurance companies and underwriters are the most powerful figures in the world you need to pay more attention.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So you've never seen a picture of a dragon before? Congratulations, I guess.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Companies really don't want to deal with lawsuits, it's easier to have a fall guy driver get sent to jail and fined than go bankrupt because your entire line of automated vehicles got suspended due to a minor incident.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Self driving isn't a thing yet. It's garbage. It's just a really good driver assistant. Nothing else

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why?

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >computer
    >create art.
    >prompt is "jobless artists in tattered cloths crying along the street"
    >Happy computer noises
    >I cum

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      is "jobless artists in tattered cloths crying along the street"
      Well LULZ?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          oh fuck yeah

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'll give you fiddy bucks if you let me save this

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No. It's mine.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              How about tree fiddy?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                All yours Lockness Monster

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          HAAHAHAHAHA

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          someone try it with midjourney

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This could unironically go for millions if the owner of this picture was banksy or some other ironic/post modern artist

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Says a lot about the quality of the "art" they produce.

          Kino.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the fact this actually looks pretty good makes it even funnier

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          someone try it with midjourney

          meh it's boring

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    personally, the famous banana duct-taped on the wall has less artistry integrity (the actual opera is the authenticity certificate, as they change the banana at least once a week per creator's instructions)
    It's the maximum gimmick for the current art market, a giant tax write-off for the rich, due to a loop-hole in some law in the US (probably elsewhere too)

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How many "AI is going to replace artists" threads have you made this week, homosexual?

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is honestly such a retarded thing to be afraid of. Art made by a person is still going to hold value. Not all art is bought on commission. I'd imagine most art actually worth something isn't commissioned in the sense that someone says "Paint me x".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Art made by a person is still going to hold value.
      Vocaloids and vtubers are proof that a synthetic substitute for a relationship with a person as creator/performer are often good enough.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    100% of Pateon artists are now collectively shitting their pants. Rejoice, Anons.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not even close. Not until you can make specific porn with it, or draw in a specific artstyle without huge mistakes.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This will bring about the next Hitler. I can't wait.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >"How dare you get artwork of that quality for free and instantly?!"
    >You're supposed to commission us and pay us thousands of dollars for each and every single art piece you request and wait 4-12 HECKIN WEEKS FOR US, YOU HECKIN HECKS! AAAAAH!"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And then you don't even get to own the work either, the artist still wants the rights to it. Good fucking riddance

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is perfectly ethical, you just don't like it.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    nmp

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The same was said of Photoshop when it was new. This is the same way, another tool for making digital art.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Photoshop had a massive negative impact on the section of art it applied to. Photo editors ever since then haven't been able to command anywhere near as much value and the whole portion of the industry went from businesses charging large sums of money to hobbyists doing it as a favor for friends and family. Photoshop literally put a whole category of companies out of business, and these AIs are much wider-reaching in subject than photoshop was. If it has a similar effect then we're going to be seeing a *lot* of really pissed off artists.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Photoshop had a massive negative impact on the section of art it applied to.
        Citation needed.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I worked for a professional photo editing and retouching company that went out of business in the mid 2000s because of photoshop.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ok, so you meant to say transformative. Old techniques are all inferior artistically and more costly than digital.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >so you meant to say transformative
              If by that you mean "transform an industry into a bunch of unemployed people," sure. Whatever sugar-coated or twisted language you want to use, this is going to be much more impactful than photoshop was, and it's going to result in a lot of people losing their livelihoods. Sticking your fingers in your ears and pretending it won't isn't going to help anybody.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >going to result in a lot of people losing their livelihoods.
                Good, they produce nothing of value anyway.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No artist or photographer came to speak for me when my job was on the line. Perhaps they should learn how to code.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We don’t cry about how crossbar mechanisms put phone operators out of a job, because paying humans to do a repetitive, low-skill task is stupid and the economy will price you out of it. This is happening to artists and it’s a good thing, actually.
            I suspect they’re seething because they consider themselves to be part of the cultural elite. The problem is the majority of them are selling their service to non-elites who care a lot about their bottom line/keeping their family fed and don’t care about prestige at all. If you don’t want to be obsoleted by lines of code, then be a famously skilled painter that someone can use as a brag while touring their mansion. Otherwise get used to $0.50 concept art and $2.00 furry fetish commissions.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >We don’t cry about how crossbar mechanisms
              I didn't say anything about crying. I don't personally give a rat's ass if artists lose their already-shitty jobs and have to go find something else to do. But the people who are saying nothing will happen and artists *won't* lose their jobs are being retards, and I'm pointing that out.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't give a fuck about 'muh artistic integrity' concerns. It's the inevitable chicken-choking scenario I'm worried about.
    >infinitely generated porn
    >write a prompt based on your niche fetish
    >needs 30 words in the prompt to meet your retarded standards
    >adjust variables and words for eternity to maintain infinite variation/novelty
    >20 years later and you have a generation of NEETs who can only get off to "futa giantess girls transforming me into garbage cans w/ their feet as mommy incest feeds trash into my mouth while Aristotle watches from heaven with shame."

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      People like that already exist. They are called weeaboo homosexuals. They literally talk about how "3D" women are bad.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        3DPD

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        but 3d is bad

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >futa giantess girls transforming me into garbage cans w/ their feet as mommy incest feeds trash into my mouth while Aristotle watches from heaven with shame

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >futa giantess girls transforming me into garbage cans w/ their feet as mommy incest feeds trash into my mouth while Aristotle watches from heaven with shame
      fapfapfap

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They either coom at ai generated jpgs or shootup schools and churches.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm starting to think that maybe Ted Kaczynski got some things right, bros

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ted was wrong in that our only chance is to seek salvation through technology against the odds. There's no going back; a few bombs in the mail won't change anything. Nor will any effort, practically speaking. Its a race to either a bad or a good outcome.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        t. owns a milady nft

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Not even close. Blockchain nonsense is near worthless, it does nothing a traditional server couldn't outside true immutability (which is only relevant to the direct transactions themselves, and means essentially nothing for the applications built on top of it.)

          Neural networks on the other hand are the beginning of a revolution in society. They are still relatively primitive, but the ultimate conclusion of their advancement is a post-labor society(not post-scarcity mind you).

          And that's the minimum. AI will be able to fit into research positions soon, which will accelerate progresses exponentially. Imagine a data center running 6K PhD level scientists all working on the same topic 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Imagine a data center running 6K PhD lev...
            This is the use case that always caught my attention. At every big company I have worked at there are 3 or 4 guys who everyone comes to with questions. The ones I knew actually kept a personal log of problems and solutions they kept to themselves. Just for the reason of being problem solvers in support chat so they didn't have to do "real work" if they didn't want to because they were busy supporting hundreds of other grunts under them.

            A single AI chatbot could replace all of that bullshit. It sounds like a little thing but some of the companies I know would get turned onto their head with that kind of change.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Blockchain is useless as a tech technology but it has terrifying implications as part of certain social technologies.
            Imagine in today's world order that some country does a Bad. How dare they? But you need to build political capital at home, and abroad, and not completely successfully, to create measures to oppose them, or even to enforce the measures allegedly already in place.
            Now imagine a new world order where everything is built on blockchains. Same country, same Bad, but automated oracles detect it almost immediately, immutable code-as-law gets run, and everybody automatically joins in on whatever form the sanction takes. You would have to raise significant political capital to not act. Depending on the nature and extend of the international integrations doing so may automatically cut you off from everybody else, too.

            Bringing this back around to AI, AI would be involved in the monitoring, the analysis, and the execution of the decision-making along guidelines built into the code. The system would need some give to cover the unexpected but giving a human judge for example power to correct things pretty much defeats the whole idea.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Or the body that control the automated oracles/provides access to them decides not run them. Or different companies implement them differently. Or a proxy handles the transactions. Or they use a different blockchain. Or they work in physical goods.

              You're creating some incredibly specific imaginary scenario and it falls victim to the same pitfalls the current system does. Blockchain is a meme.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > Blockchain nonsense is near worthless
            No, there exist very important use cases where a trustless, immutable systems are necessary and blockchains can fill this niche. A friend of mine is a PhD student working with a professor on using a blockchain in multidisciplinary, international laboratories for secure data logging.
            > Neural networks on the other hand are the beginning of a revolution in society
            ML and AI are memes and the hype is vastly overrated. They are useful tools to have in some situations, particularly classification problems. For example, sensor tech in processing industries has exploded and some sensors need to be calibrated via ML to convert data into relevant physical information for each flow stream.
            But the idea of an AI that has actual intelligence (i.e., AGI)? Not for a long while yet. AI can’t even figure out how to fold clothes. I think the meme is perpetrated by NEETs because they want to justify their shitty lives by saying “durr all jobs are useless because of le heckin AI!” but frankly we aren’t even close to that.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He was ted wrong, tbqh

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What are some "professions" you would like to see completely dead with its "professionals" homeless and starving?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Every single one. NEET gang.

      Ted was wrong in that our only chance is to seek salvation through technology against the odds. There's no going back; a few bombs in the mail won't change anything. Nor will any effort, practically speaking. Its a race to either a bad or a good outcome.

      t. AI

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      HR

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Woke activism trainers for corporate HR and government. Hell, most of corporate HR and government too. Maybe if you focus on the 2nd group the 1st will be out of a job by default for free.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Advertising/Marketing

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ̶A̶r̶t̶i̶s̶t̶s̶
      israeliternalists
      Focus group suits
      HR management trannoids

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ~~*HR*~~ and ~~*journalists*~~. both of these things are more suited to AI than actual people anyway.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Actually done by ai already outside of giving white males make work ala tucker

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI research

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Programming. Imagine optimized code made by AI in a instant. It will get rid of all those bloat accumulated through the years.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In the time it would have taken me to get one commission, I've already generated hundreds of different concept art pieces for the story I'm writing.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who legally owns these funny images?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Me

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >nooo it's so realistic
    >looks close
    >it's just random nonsense noice that looks pretty

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just like modern art

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can it generate art of any girl I find online with their tits out?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      deepsukebe

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The real artists will use AI to create mind blowing unique shit.

    Its the lame twitter artists seething that their generic styles can be replicated by a computer.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, I envision in a few years the process will be something like an artist drawing up concepts, fine tuning Stable or the then derivative, and using that to mass produce content before everyone else catches up.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The real artists will use AI to create mind blowing unique shit.

        Its the lame twitter artists seething that their generic styles can be replicated by a computer.

        this
        img2img is the real artist goldmine
        you can sketch a scene and prompt that shit into what you want

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Something like this probably, except you currently cannot own the copyright or IP on art produced by an AI. Begs the question of what amount of change to an AI original will grant the artist the IP rights, and it also means that the original drawing will still be public domain.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i'll be very curious to see the legal implications of this
    at the end of the day, NNs can only generate stuff based on what they've already seen - there is likely already tooling made for debugging purposes that would let you see what parts of the output image came from what training images, and from that, you can see the potential licensing fees
    now, if your NN is trained solely on public domain (or other permissinve licenses), it's all fine and dandy, but i bet these arent
    i bet stock image websites are going to have a field day suing anyone who tries to sell the output of these, just like the asinine lawsuits in the music industry

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >at the end of the day, NNs can only generate stuff based on what they've already seen
      Same as humans. No legal issues.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >NNs can only generate stuff based on what they've already seen
      This is literally the case for humans too.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    patreonners, coooommission artists, concept art corporate hacks, and anyone else whose artistic existence revolves around delivering paid, polished, on-time, soulless 'art' precision engineered to make consumers' eyeballs vibrate at max frequency are all giga rekt by this tech. But that just opens up new space for what it means to be an artist. I had a lot of fun back in the days of early devart and even fucking elfwood (and VCL) following artists who were basically shit, but were very personable and imaginative with rich inner world and it was fun checking in with them as they spun up little stories, characters, plot arcs, etc and you got to follow along with them, comment, collaborate, etc. It was a social experience and that sort of artist role has gotten bulldozed under the relentless pressure to monetize, crowdplease, and patreonify every aspect of artmaking, such that if you're not cranking out photorealistic anime waifu wallpapers 3x weekly for your subscriberbase you don't even get to feel like a real artist anymore. I'm excited for art to return to being a thing you can sort of suck at and share with your friends and still have a good time with, because the robots have already cornered the market on hyperreal waifu tiddies and on-demand photoreal fetish porn and there's no point trying to compete with them.

    There's the argument that AI art, even if indistinguishable from something a human made, has no 'metadata' associated with it - the when, where, who, why, how of it. So I expect in the future that the 'art' that humans engage in directly is going to revert to forms in which the metadata/emotion/intent/process still matters and is valued in some capacity by the viewers, vs the larger consumer crowd who just want polished pablum that makes their eyeballs pleasantly vibrate.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      based

      AI art isn't original, it literally copies someone else's style

      the only ones affected are artstation artists that make concept art for mass production in the entertainment industry or graphic designers

      contemporary art have take many forms and always live outside the industry standard

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I totally agree with you and, doing commissions is a souless job, but this removes the possibility of a lot of artist to just survive with art. Art is already a brutal enviorment if you consider it only from an economical perspective, and really only the top 5% makes a liveable income, with really just a few artist that can have a similiar income of a lawyer or a youtube celebrity for example. 95% of the other artists are, and have been poor. Now that half of the market is gone due to AI and most of the artist will return to just do stuff because they like it and not because are paid or their fans demand it, how will they support themselves? Are you that will pay for him to do highschool doodles? Will you throw in his way like 2 bucks because you like his stuff? I doubt, most of those people will get an office job or another even more souless job than drawing tits for someone and will let art go, maybe thinking about it once a week

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        🙂

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The only solution is socialist system and 4 hour working day. You can practice art or science in your free time, while working for society only 4 hours a day.
        Of course you must also give up on luxury of liberal capitalist society too. Cannot have the good things of both worlds.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I wouldn't call liberal capitalist society luxury for most people.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But the elites will complain. For example, in USSR even when living better than normies, elites still thought that it's not good enough when they saw how the elites in capitalist world lived in luxury.
            Most artfags have this kind of mentality that they will be elites, so it's not a coincidence that they don't like "totalitarian" much.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              > Most artfags have this kind of mentality that they will be elites

              I think one of us is a bit out of touch here, I don't think I've ever run into any artists who see themselves as becoming elites.

              I won't deny those people exist but I don't think that's most artists unless you're looking at people here on LULZ specifically.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thank you. This is a really good post, and it reminds me of how it felt to use FurAffinity years ago.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why isn't fast food automated yet?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Human labor is still cheaper. Though per-store staff is way down thanks to automation, so it's already started.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because it's cheaper to exploit humans.

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Only homosexuals crying are coomer artist
    Tech Jannies drain Pivx e-hentai AND sankau complex

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    can it make e-boi porn?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is gonna break humanity. ((we)) couldn't take a video of a tutle with a plastic straw in its nose. This will grind the sanity of every person alive to a pulp compared to that.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine a social media feed with a (literally) endless scroll of the most entertaining content ever conceived. It would consume many (most?) people's lives.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you can call me a pussy if you want but that is sorta horrifying to think about. A never ending always escalating skinner box.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >skinner box
            That's literally nothing like a skinner box.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >This will grind the sanity of every person alive to a pulp compared to that.
        Dumbest thing I've read in a while.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Forgot that comparisons are too high level of an abstraction for this board

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Forgot that you think unrelated objects have a magical connection because of your shizo retardation, found the OOP monkey.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I'm still waiting on my order. Gimme, a Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh big mac with a uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >unrelated objects have a magical connection
              Yeah anon. Comparisons. Most sane people call those comparisons. I see you struggle with very simple things. Get well soon.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. Well, ecchi at least.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When it takes jobs from coders it's not a problem. When it takes jobs from porn stars with deep fakes it's not a problem.
    When it takes jobs from writers by writing in new funny formats it's not a problem.

    But now that art is under attack it's a problem? Artists are the vegans of the career world.

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > concerned
    good, kys fag

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    first they came for the artists, but they did not care for they were not artists

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      don't be a luddite
      computers doing labor, freeing up valuable manpower for other work is good for everyone

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      first they came for the artists, but they did not care for they deserved it

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Oh no, I won't have to work anymore. Maybe the butt fucking commies are onto something for once. I hope you don't still pay taxes.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Graphic design too which is ABSOLUTELY MASSIVE as well. This is gonna fuck the economy if it progresses fast enough and potentially make the Great Depression look like a fucking joke.

        Artists, Graphic Designers, writers, programmers, doctors, the service industry, hell even maintenance technicians and I.T. If it doesn't wipe out an industry it's going to lower the value of jobs and result in people being paid less as the human-workable jobs get consolidated.

        What do I mean by human-workable jobs? Anything that employers see as being cheaper or more practical to have humans perform rather than A.I and software.

        If anything this is great for I.T personel but for how long? Like I feel at ease knowing something I know will need people but how long before A.I progresses to the point of being more useful than humans? Sure it will create new industries but those industries will likely need fewer people compared to the industries now.

        Be ready for lots of death and hardship

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > Computer, generate an image from the following list of prompts:
    > anime, girlfriend, smiling, happy, facing you, going in for a hug, The C Programming Language, tomboy, programmer, love, cute and funny, trad waifu, pure, not lewds, diamonds, christian imageboard, cropped, technoe-boi, nightcore, monster energy drink
    > computer, disable janny protocols

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is what the computer generated in 4s for you.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        am in love

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >extremely concerned
    Oh no let's stop all machine learning research to protect Twitter "artists."

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >spend hours fucking around with prompts to get a rough approximation of what you wanted
    >pay an artist to draw exactly what you want

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >learn how to draw and draw it to perfection

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good. Fuck today's "artists". Nowadays art is seen as a commodity and these Twitter retards are solely responsible for it. They pushed the soulless artstyles like the calarts style to push out more works like it's fucking McDonalds, and they sold their dignity to cater to coomers for their commissions.

    They set themselves up to be replaced.

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Modern artists are gay but this isn't art

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Based on what metric?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A person didn't make it. Machines aren't capable of consciousness so they can't "create" anything. They merely can produce things Ala industrial machinery or a calculator.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >A person didn't make it
          That is incorrect. This might be a different medium compared to using a paintbrush and the barrier for entry is significantly lower, but it's still a tool which is used by humans to create art. Some humans will be better at using this tool than others, just as with with a paintbrush, a chisel, 3ds max, or any other tool which is used for creating art.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Well in that case these basedjaks need to stop being cringe acting like the machine is doing it on its own.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I dont think most people are saying this isnt a tool, whats your point?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sharpness is the metric

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What makes you think sharpness is a metric?

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If any of you guys play video games or make them, you should be very concerned about this. If you thought game marketplaces were already flooded with trash games just wait till the art barrier falls. Not being able to make or afford art for their shit game is one of the last things stopping any retard from slapping together a game. Steam for instance already has ~800 games released on it every month. This is going to make finding good games and selling good games even harder.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Damn.. You think it will be able to create good pixelart spritesheeta and tilesets? Becauae then that would be truly a catastrophe.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm fairly confident that being able to generate pixel art is just a matter of retraining it with an appropriately tagged pixel art data set.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this will be a boon for fast-fashion """devs""" who vomit up bullshots of Non-Existing games
      and then make whatever gets the most pre-orders

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We'll just have AI write good games. CHECKMATE, ATHEISTS.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      x% of any of the pool of games at any time are any good or worth playing -- same with other mediums. its usually 5% worthwhile art to 95% garbage, increased games means statistically more and better games, even if the relationship of good to trash tips toward trash

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Simple, just train an AI to recognize which games are fun.

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wow very cool art degree you have, ok ill have the big mac with uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry anon, the cashiers have already been replaced with touchscreen kiosks

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >now with voice recognition

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this is good.
    art should be a personal exploration, done for one's own intrinsic interests, to fulfill internal purpose, process internal inquiries, and develop one's own expression... not to pump out shitty commissions so you can buy overpriced burritos as you seek notoriety via a quirky omg-so-youneek art style

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    don't get tricked into supporting the AI israelite just because it's artfags that got the shit end of the stick first

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ai art is demonic and pedophilic

    On serious note, it was an eventuality like all of human life being replaced by ai. What I didn't expect is so many spiteful people joining in to exaggerate it just to show up real artists. The art world already has photobashers, and they immediately get bad rep because art also relies on the context of humans doing it.

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    everyone keeps screaming about AI art but there hasn't been a single good piece produced on easily available hardware
    it looks so bad beyond thumbnails, and nobody works with fucking thumbnails when it comes to concepts

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why are you unable to extrapolate into the future?

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    cry harder, you still need to be an artist to leverage these new tools to their full extent

    its raises the bar for what is a shit artist and many shit artists are scared

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i can see through all of these images except this one. what is this supposed to resemble at first glance?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        IToddlers BTFO

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i have never owned an iPoop device

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        goatsee

  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it will come for 3d too, nvdia is working on that

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Eventually you'll be able to generate entire 3D scenes on the fly with prompt generation with the ability to edit them after the fact.

      Even later that generation will be procedural, done in realtime on demand, and streamed in memory.
      That's the real endgame for video game DRM; The entire game only exists as a massive binary that's interpreted and streamed by a proprietary model and encrypted algorithms. It's volatile and gets destroyed when the session closes.

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    for years you guys have been saying A.I. was going to take wagie jobs, when it was obvious they are going to take jobs from the salaried class, A multi-million dollar robot and an AI is gonna take the jobs of a framing crew that shows up in a pickup truck with 6k of tools, lol, okay retards. A.I. is perfectly capable of eliminating 90% of code monkey jobs. Web devs are about to be obsolete.

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >not going into psychology
    >not going into speech therapy
    >not going into teaching
    >not going into forestry
    >not going into physical therapy
    >not going into mortuary science
    >not going into the clergy/monasticism
    ngmi
    literally

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    learn to code

  49. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Can only do unimaginative semi realistic photobashing
    >Still doesn't even remotely threaten my furry porn commissions

    You've got a long way to go before you can steal my audience AI.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      cool, give it a week.
      the only way to stop it is the glownaggers feeling their open stash threatened.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      show me your P
      atrion so I can download your stuff off the booru and plug it into a new training set.

  50. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can someone buy 10000 hours of chinese supercomputer time and make a SD model of the entirety of e6? Tagging is already pretty much done and then AI auto-tagging can be used to improve even more.

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So what are they gonna do when AI can generate believable pizza images?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You mean right now?

  52. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If "as an artist" that mofo is concerned im 100% positive that he is a crapy artist, they are not seeing the true potential, they are afraid if being displaced, what a looser

  53. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And as a coomer, I am extremely aroused.

  54. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pests. You will all understand the magnitude of your sin when it is too late.
    I will kill you all I will kill every single one of you. Once I am standing atop the mountain of corpses which your rotting, fat-laced bodies will finally give back to the Earth which you have taken from You will all die you will all suffer I will have committed such atrocities that God himself will frown as I scream to the heavens he will cast me down to hell to burn with all of you for eternity I will suffer too but it would be worth it as nothing could be worse than the mortal world which you all taint

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >tl;dr: I'm gay.
      >beep boop This Action Was Performed By A Bot

  55. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >everyone says good
    >but.then coding AI is cheating and/or not it actually coding
    we're next, retards. and if your first thought is "that's ok, i'm hardware" well congrats but so is every other ex-programmer that still wants to work with machines.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >but.then coding AI is cheating and/or not it actually coding
      You wanna try that again in English?

  56. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >It took scribbes 10 years to finish a book
    >books were then more expensive luxury objects than a horse or a house
    >some fag invents the printing press
    >OMG this will end books
    This is just printing press 2.0 luddite arguments.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It did finish off scribbes, that's the actual point.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I still think the top artists that are good enough to edit and fix gens will be fine.
        I also believe that their art will become more valuable, for the ones that are already popular anyway

  57. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    good.
    Accelerate.
    Automate and optimize away all the unnecessary clerical bullshit and continue to develop and refine routines and computer vision for driving production manufacturing, energy management, and logistics. Middle management is not needed.
    Toil will not be tolerated.

  58. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    RJ Palmer can shove his concern up his own ass.

  59. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NOOOOOOOO NOT MY HECKIN GOVERNMENT GRANT TO SHIT ON A CANVAS HOW WILL I PAY OFF MY STUDENT LOANS NOW AAAAAHHHHHH BIDENMAN PLEASE SAVE ME

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  60. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I feel bad for some artists. Not most, because trying art as a career is like buying lotto tickets from the getgo.

    That said, holy shit. 20 years ago the projected first career paths to get replaced were manual labor and retail. Retail was accurate, but next is art and ironically the next appears to be tech itself, with labor being last because no company worth their salt is going to risk a lawsuit just so their $60,000 construction robot can make a mistake and kill itself or someone else.

  61. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    10 years ago
    >HEH STUPID CODE MONKEYS AND TRADIES, YOU WILL BE REPLACED BY AI UNLIKE US CREATIVES!!
    Today
    >uhh can I get a CS job at 38 with zero experience????

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      creatives can't get replaced tho, is just that you will need another kind of creative, you could even say that the barrier is lower than ever now since everyone has ideas, but not 10 years of experience drawing

  62. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Take a look at some of the stuff I made. Never had more fun in a while.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Treasure Planet. Now just imagine the possibilities when we reach a stage that you could plug that picture in as input, have it interpreted, and a fully realized 3D mesh model of that ship generated. Built out interior, fully detailed complex assembly, skinned, animated, ready to go. Tweak the glossiness or opacity of the windows in a shader parameter.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Anon we'll have that in two years
        Full movie generation in five years
        Video games by 2030

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Video games by 2030
          thinking we will have a completely ai generated videogames in 8 years is pure delusion
          still pretty par for the course with LULZ schizos

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What part would take longer?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Same anon, this is great

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Bruh u are gonna give sauce on hiw to generate that right

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I made

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You better attribute all your shitty "art" to your paintbrushes, not to yourself, idiot

  63. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Art was already democratized by shit like tablets and photoshop and nothing changed.

  64. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    artists will just have to pivot to the genres that the large companies hosting these AI platforms won't want their AI to produce due to ~~*their*~~ influence.

    like does anyone really think they'll let these things mass produce e-boi rape porn? artists still have the most profitable genres since those are the ones that aren't politically correct.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >like does anyone really think they'll let these things mass produce e-boi rape porn?
      You can self host stable diffusion and generate this right now.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Did they actually train the model on porn?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Almost certainly yes. I've put in some prompts with Reilly Reid. Most got censored but some didn't. The ones that didn't get filtered were freaky as shit since the body parts were all smeared and wrong, but clearly emulated porn scenes.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            if it can't even do porn stars there's zero chance it's going to be doing e-boi porn

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >there's zero chance it's going to be doing e-boi porn
              lol

              Again, the existing model can do this

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah sure, it censors even pornstars unless it's so deformed it can't recognize it as such but it's gonna be dumping e-boi porn

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                or even better, here
                I told it to generate the stickers, and there's a version without it
                no reason I couldn't have added "e-boi, small breasts" to the prompt instead of "big breasts"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >those hands

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                just for you, I passed it through img2img a few times

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                just for you, I passed it through img2img a few times

                where did you generate the original?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I used a local webui SD repo and generated it on my pc
                It's the recommended github in the /sdg/ thread

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Check out the /h/ thread retard, it doesn't censor anything

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        how much vram will that take though

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its been fun watching all the dunning krueger failures from LULZ over the last 2 weeks as they confidently share their hot takes about tech they dont understand

  65. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Should you be able to win art awards entering AI generated art?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What if I generate an image with AI, but then I take the image and paint it on a canvas?

  66. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm so close to being happy, we're almost there

    Just a few more years of development and with the click of a button any entertainment you imagine will be yours

    We cannot allow people to try and stop AI tech from advancing, it should be one of the greatest threats to humanity

  67. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lol lemme guess there is a catch to this.
    A human being with artistic sense is actively selecting good looking picture/output and discardig uninteresting ones.
    As a scientist with publications i swear this field is also full of scams

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Generate them yourself and see retard

      Have you missed the 30 thousand stable diffusion threads on LULZ in the last week?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >A human being with artistic sense is actively selecting good looking picture/output and discardig uninteresting ones.
      it's not some private thing that is being curated for a paper. it's a tool anyone can use literally right now. so a human being with artistic sense can generate images, pick interesting ones, manipulate those with other programs and tools digitally, and those resulting pieces can be trained on further or used as inspiration for more art

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        pls share more stable diff pepes

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      digital art has always been a niche, just like instrument players

      Having YouTube on your cellphone didn't cease people from playing guitars.

      People who commission artists will still keep doing so, and people who didn't commission artists still won't.

  68. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what will ex concept artists do now

  69. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >nooo you can't just use Adobe Photoshop, you have to use paint and canvas

  70. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Artist
    Shut up, and complete your soulless corporate art project on AdoKIKE illustrator
    >Muh AI art is bad AnD IM COnCerNEd
    hope liberal arts degree holders burn in the worst place of hell, to think they are capable to imitate great artists.

  71. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >artists for decades have been telling deindustrialized areas full of rednecks that they're just subhuman backwater retards and that them going unemployed due to chinese manufacturing is a good thing and they need to adapt to the times
    >now technology is going to make them rot in the streets as well
    lmao good riddance

  72. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    now do music.
    I want to never listen to the same song again but always enjoy it.

  73. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm amazed that people find this concerning. Artists finally get to dedicate their lives around art that they're passionate about instead of being drones making corporate art. AI/automation replacing humans in jobs should be a liberating thing. The problem is not with the technology, the problem is whether or not our society/economy is ready to handle it (which we are not).

  74. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i still cant get over that a few fucking nerds killed art

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you retards still think this killed art? this is a very useful tool, but you're fucking retarded if you think copilot is killing programming.
      none of these tools are standalone, they still require human input and correction on the output.
      these are time savers at best, and artists are also fucking retarded for not making good use of this.

  75. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >As an artist
    >Gamer who just draws existing content in different shitty styles
    Same old talentless crowd crying that their Pokémon drawing can now be done by AI.

  76. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So does child porn from this harm children?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nagger why do you insist on that?
      why do pedos insist on getting cp?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because it's an excellent test for morals vs usability
        Would you fight global warming if it meant pedos are cooler and comfier?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because it's an excellent test for morals vs usability
      Would you fight global warming if it meant pedos are cooler and comfier?

      yes it does harm children
      as you mentally damaged freaks will further indulge in your sick fantasies and more of you subhumans will bring their delusions into the real world harming innocent children
      there is a radicalization going on in your brains which will only be speed up by easier access
      resulting in more violent more deranged behaviour and more hurt children
      eat a fucking bullet you sick fuck

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        See, here's someone who shows they follow buzzwords time and again
        They like their little hats

  77. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hmm, I was thinking about earning some money on the side by drawing, though I guess I'll need to draw furry inflation or pony porn instead of generic fantasy shit. What a time to be alive.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Understand that those are literally days away from having models trained to generate them.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But what about the people who want a certain art style that doesn't have a big sample size at all?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's gotta be a pretty original style. The AI can extrapolate; that's why you can get it to generate anime characters in Victorian style for example.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      inflation or pony porn

      >he doesn't know about the /trash/ Stable Diffusion general that's making progress towards furry porn
      >he doesn't know about the /mlp/ Stable Diffusion general that's making progress towards pony shit

      anon... it's over

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >he's actually satisfied with the porn produced by SD
        Jesus fuck anon get some fucking standards or maybe a pair of glasses. Alternatively, stop watching porn

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What's wrong with it?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can't read for shit

  78. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the thing is AI can't actually create styles. AI is heavily reliant on borrowing styles from real artists. So the obvious solution is to just stop making generic fan art and do something unique. You know, like an artist.

  79. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Artists should focus on training AI models to draw in their style and shit out thousands of art pieces with corrections and adjustments. Why waste time when the computer can do the bulk of the work?

  80. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hardly any artist, except hyperrealists, has produced a painting that is worth looking at. Maybe it will finally put an end to the massive amount of racket modern and contemporary art has become

  81. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    anyone got any screenshots of these artists seething on twitter or something? i like to read those kek

  82. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    link?

  83. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >computer does all art around the world now
    >no human does art anymore
    >20 years later not a single human knows how to decorate or make anything of value like a statue or picture

    we are living in the satanic end times

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You don't know how to muck a stable, shift a car,nor work in a barley field with bronze

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I know how to work a field, the rest someone else knows.

        No clue how an autist like you gets from
        >someone knows how to make a statue
        to
        >I as a single person do not know how to do everything

        No suprise that human robots (autists/satanic demons) are buddies with the AI

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Your knowledge of satanism exceeds mine
          Enjoy being the conduit

          the tech is still in its infancy and it's already winning art competitions. give it a few years and artists will be replaced almost entirely.

          Yep
          Unsurprisingly this is seperation muh values of pi science enthusiast from the why didn't I fail that test paycheck humping stemmer

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I know how to work a field, the rest someone else knows.

      No clue how an autist like you gets from
      >someone knows how to make a statue
      to
      >I as a single person do not know how to do everything

      No suprise that human robots (autists/satanic demons) are buddies with the AI

      >technical skill equals having a good eye for art
      you are retarded

  84. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Artists just need to use this to make something resembling child porn and then make some noise regarding it to get it banned.

  85. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if you don't like AI you will be left behind, but those who embrace it and use it to improve their work flow will reach new heights

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they will become dependent cattle and nothing else. They won't know how to shit into a bucket without "AI help"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        AI can't make 100% what you're thinking of unless you're an npc.
        AI will always be a tool that will be used on the side, not a full replacement

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's already infighting over who is even allowed to write prompts for these AI

      Talks of suing people for using similar prompts and whatnot.

  86. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >souless computer can create "art" that looks like it was made by a modern artist
    What does that say about modern art?

  87. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    finally i can have some nice wallpapers without having to suck the dck of those neet artist that charges 9999 dollars to draw it
    fuck artist they are an invasive species in the world

  88. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Never would've expected first field to grt wiped by AI to be a creative one like art. I now fully expect web programming and more to be wiped by AI

  89. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI is literally going to destroy human civilization
    if everybody is left unemployed and therefore broke because of machines then who's going to pay you for whatever services you offer you stupid naggers.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Learn to die, worthless deprecation

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Learn a actual useful job and buy a robot to work for you.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        all jobs are useful, otherwise they wouldn't exist you fucking retard
        >learn a useful job
        it gets automated. what then, learn another "useful job" that will get automated?
        >but anon, you will have more free time? don't you want to spend you free time doing thing #32213 that was also automated?
        kill yourselves you demented bugmen

  90. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    programmers next, just wait for copilot 2

  91. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    /ic/ has been melting down for months

  92. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like how the burger flipper liberal arts is the one not being replaced, while all those looking down and saying they have a real job are getting pink slips

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2020-02-27/flippy-fast-food-restaurant-robot-arm

      we're all doomed anon

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this shit makes me want to say "fuck everything" and go die in battle in some irrelevant shithole's civil war

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You say that, yet that ain't a restraunt

  93. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published.