Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043
Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043
Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418963/#:~:text=Pregnant%20women%20who%20were%2015,fetal%20growth%2C%20and%20fetal%20distress.
The most significant differences were in 11-14 year olds by far. 15-19 year olds are mostly comparable to 20-24 year olds, and 20-24 year olds are similar to 25-29 year olds.
>.nih.gov
What else would you expect from that source besides lies?
The thought of getting a teen pregnant makes me uncontrollably erect
So what are they lying about and why does it matter?
>Results
>In analyses that controlled for demographics and clinical confounders, we found that complications with the highest odds among women, 11–18 years of age, compared to 25–29 year old women, included preterm delivery, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and mild preeclampsia. Pregnant women who were 15–19 years old had greater odds for severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, poor fetal growth, and fetal distress. Pregnant women who were ≥35 years old had greater odds for preterm delivery, hypertension, superimposed preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and decreased risk for chorioamnionitis. Older women (≥40 years old) had increased odds for mild preeclampsia, fetal distress, and poor fetal growth.
I assume because they'll probably use it to try raising age of consent again or something stupid like that
OP can break down and explain your points a little further?
haaa!
25 should be the age of consent
and premarital sex should be banned
Is raising age of consent going to change teen pregnancy outcomes by that much?
Usually about the creation of more and more laws that make everyone into criminals for simply existing. look how they sifted the legal drinking age
There's mostly old data from the mid 90s available to go back on. One of the most recent studies on partner age had incomplete data. Anyhow, the type of older person that would start a relationship with a teen is likely going to attempt it regardless of consent laws. We already have them, and teen pregnancies are still around. They've lessened significantly in the past 3 decades, but that's probably more of a testament to the focus on education and contraception.
See there's a lot of good data from cattle breeding that's relevant here.
biggest risk factor for dystocia in young heifers calving for the first time is being undersized and not having the proper pelvic development. i's typically why heavy breeds like charaolais aren't used as a crossing sire on maiden heifers
Plenty of studies on the effect of nutrition on optimal frame development and when the best time to start fertilising heifers is for their growth to be developed enough when they calve down and the feed requirements to reach it, but with cattle we're talking about maybe calving at only two years old and approx 90% of mature size so it's not a direct comparison other than the birth canal imposing the major limit
are they laughing at you too?
Instead of raising age of consent, they should make marriage mandatory by age 13, no divorces allowed
But that won't satisfy post-wall and near-wall women who want to devalue the marketplace price of young women.
I support this notion.
How do we make it happen?
Just sit back and wait for the collapse of our failing feminist society, and then for the creation of a new, more patriarchal one to replace it (because patriarchy is the only ideology that can build and maintain new societies).
https://sci-hub.se/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26055426/
They also lie very blatantly about teen moms producing more autistic babies, the data indicates teen moms have similar rates as moms in their twenties and early thirties. Teen dads oddly have some higher rates of autistic babies, but not by a crucial amount. So the one study middle-aged 40 year old hags with rotting meat flaps for faces like to cite is void.
https://sci-hub.se/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26055426/
Worth noting the study is funded by Autism Speaks, a wholly unreliable organization.
>Autism
the increase in vaccines and toxins are to blame for that. Autism was basically non-existent less than a century ago.
>muh vaccine autism!
Are a psyop to make people who are concerned about the actual chemical that causes autism (BPA) look bad by associating them with mentally ill crackpots.
Are you proud of being a useful idiot?
>The most significant differences were in 11-14 year olds by far. 15-19 year olds are mostly comparable to 20-24 year olds, and 20-24 year olds are similar to 25-29 year olds.
Seems to me like there are somewhat significant differences between 15-19 and 20-24 too. Not too big, but none of the differences are too big. However, I wonder how much these differences are due to first-time-birthers. A 30-year-old giving birth has probably done so before, and she has survived and been fine. An 18-year-old almost certainly gives birth for the first time, and she might suffer complications and never give birth again.