41 thoughts on “These guys mog you

  1. Anonymous says:

    the sterility of suburbia seeps into their fits like a cancer. there are no clothes they could wear that would look good.

    • Anonymous says:

      What do you think of the third from the right’s (brown pants, grey jacket, blue shirt) colour scheme? I can’t tell if it’s good or not; I’m trying to learn.

      • Anonymous says:

        1.Hint: Study the fits of the chaps wearing the black leather dress shoes with matching black belts, and the full coordinated suit pants and jackets with ties. Best dressed of group.

        2. Third from right doesn’t look /fashion/ because the top portion is blue color scheme while bottom portion is brown and earth tones.

        As a general rule, black blue and grey fabric is paired with black belt and shoes: traditional pairing scheme.

        Earth tone fabrics are paired with brown shoes traditionally, *although the recent fashion trend is to make brown leather shows an all-purpose color* Not a personal fan of this as brown is NOT traditionally a dressy color: OLD FASHION ADAGE: "NO BROWN IN TOWN" (i.e., Brown is not dressy or professional enough to wear into The City.)

        Third from right could make his fit work by switching out brown shoes for black leather shoes with matching black belt. This would be much more coordinated /fashion/ imo.

      • Anonymous says:

        it’s all about the drip and the sauce, you don’t know the first thing about fashion, i suggest spending $3000 on designer labels

  2. Anonymous says:

    they all look ok enough, the 3 sunglasses are cringe and second left kyle rittenhouse looking ass needs to get better fitting pants and ditch the coat. The rest isnt really good or bad. I like the bald guy fit and the carsalesman 3rd to right.

    easy 7/10

  3. Anonymous says:

    they all look socially awkward, you can spot it in these dudes a mile away, is this some kind of PUA meet up or something? thats the vibes i’m getting

    • Anonymous says:

      Filename says champs league meetup so I assume their just football fans, not exactly known for their fashionable clothes…

  4. Anonymous says:

    British housing is utterly grim. How did the land that inspired the tales of knights and castles and gallantry become… whatever this is?

    • Anonymous says:

      those are some particularly soulless new builds, thats where we keep our lobotomised suburbanites, yes we are that cruel
      …meanwhile i’m living in a beautiful apartment thats over 250 years old
      >inb4 americans
      mate, my house is older than your entire country

      • Anonymous says:

        Checked, but what if you don’t want to live in a disgusting rowhouse or an apartment? Say what you will about us butgers but we have the option to live in the outskirts (not suburbs mind you, which are just as soulless as anything you have in bongland) where you can have a few acres of breathing room between you and your neighbors with relatively easy access either to a city or nature. Whereas the impression I get of ingerland (CAMOOOON) is that you either live nuts-to-butts with your neighbors in a row or apartment or way the heck out there on an actual farm with no gradient inbetween.

        • Anonymous says:

          you just see what LULZ shows you. Something like this isn’t uncommon in the South. May appeal to you. Dunno about norf but most brits on LULZ appear to be from there.

        • Anonymous says:

          i grew up in the city but i moved into a cheap rental in the suburbs at 19 and it was hecking boring, nothing open past 10pm, travelling over an hour every day, having no social life unless i crashed with friends… i bought my current apartment for 200k (its worth well over 300 at this point) literally have an art gallery and cinema on the same street and the underground is 2 streets away, i could never go back to living in a detached house surrounded by boring families and deanos, it makes me want to die.

          can i just talk about how shit american cities are, everything is spaced so far apart you can’t walk anywhere, there is no underground, half the time they don’t even bother putting sidewalks in, nobody feels part of a community and they carry guns, shits hecking sad.

        • Anonymous says:

          >disgusting rowhouse
          the most sought after housing is high end terraces in the UK, it strikes the perfect balance between close distance to the city centre, while still having a garden.

        • Anonymous says:

          Housing in the UK is awful. There are American style houses with high ceilings and a large parcel of land but they’re in the middle of nowhere.

          • Anonymous says:

            >there are detached rural houses but they’re in the middle of nowhere
            yes? you can’t have a big house with a big lot near the city that’s also affordable. not even most americans can get that. instead they have suburban commuter towns where almost all of the buildings are detached housing, which means you need the added expense of a car because no grocery stores or restaurants or jobs or social activities will be within walking distance.

  5. Anonymous says:

    >Those badges

    Those are premier ticket badges for a Racecourse. In fact they look like the ones at my place of work. It’s not a brag but I see these guys all the time and i’m not mogged by them. These are just normal lads. Not Deanos, not chavs, not posh, just normal lads who’ve dressed up for a day at the races. Nothing wrong with that. They’re just guys with a "special occasion" suit that don’t really give much of a heck about what it looks like, just that they have one for any eventuality where it might be necessary. When LULZ crosses the boundary between internet curiosity and real life it reminds me how hecking weird and autistic it is. In fact, the more I look at this pic, the more I recognise some of these guys. Are they from in or around the Newbury area by any chance?

  6. Anonymous says:

    I think third to left with the pufferjacket has done it poorly. You can show off your personality and an intentional "I don’t like to dress formal" whilst still obeying the rules of formal dressing. There are better ways of showing that he doesn’t identify with wearing a suit. the puffer is just out of place

  7. Anonymous says:

    >1
    Shoes and belt clash.
    Skinny fit makes his hips look huge and head look small.
    The suit is too formal.
    >2
    The shoes don’t match the rest of the outfit.
    The shirt is too dark.
    Coat is too casual.
    >3
    Good, but underdressed which is worse than being overdressed.
    >4
    Can’t see, but standing in the back makes him unconfident.
    >5
    Good, but brown belt and shoes would have worked better.
    Trousers are slightly too long.
    >6
    Shoes are ridiculously long.
    Would probably work better without the tie or a more subtle one.
    >7
    Looks very sloppy, more posture and expression than anything else.
    Looks odd without a jacket.
    >8
    Shoes and belt clash.
    Trousers are too long and fit weirdly.
    >9
    Shoes and belt clash.
    The shirt is too close too grey.
    >10
    Suit is too small and doesn’t fit properly.
    Square toed shoes are awful.

    5 is the only one who looks comfortable and has done well. 9 looks comfortable but hasn’t done well. I would say 2 has missed the mark by the most, nothing of his really works.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Jon Anik prolly has the best fit,
    for me the worst are the guy with the vest and the guy next to him. that shirt is hard on eyes, coat seems like he stole it from his dad and the shoes are cherry on top.

  9. Anonymous says:

    Cheap wage slave apparel. They can’t afford anything but off-the-rack stuff from H&M or worse, JC Penney. Those fits were chosen for them by their moms, or at best, girlfriends.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *