As picrel states, the unbeliever is unable to obey God. The unbeliever is evil and not able to do anything good without God's help thus the scenario of a good unbeliever does not exist.
There is No Such thing as a "Good Unbeliever"
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
You know you can just copy-paste this text right? No need to make schizopics.
he MUST make schizopics, otherwise it does not look official enough.
> this is true because this ancient book says so
so if god forces people who don't believe in him to do good things, why doesn't he just make everybody be good and believe in him, you can't even argue with the usual cope of muh freewill because in this case you pretty much already admitted he doesn't care about freewill
God wishes to teach people dependence upon him, total dependence. If you are unable to do any good without His help, this means you must depend upon Him totally.
Unironically yes.
>Unironically yes.
You just admitted to being an idiot lol.
I'm not being an idiot though and the author is correct in his theology and assessment of mankind.
Yes you are lol. Taking the word of ancient book uncritically and proclaiming it as the ultimate truth is the peak of stupidity. If you were born in Asia you'd have read Buddhist texts instead and uncritically accepted those as ultimate truth. There is zero proof for your religion.
There's unironic proof about things like the global flood and there's Biblical archeology too.
>There's unironic proof about things like the global flood
Made up shit by coping Christians isn't "evidence."
Just because you have a handful of "scientists" who interpret things to fit their faith, does not mean you have proof something.
If a crime scene investigator sees bullets in a corpse and proclaims that it is proof that lead lumps can spontaneously form in the human body you wouldn't take that seriously either.
If you saw a clock on the road, you would conclude someone made that clock, yet this world is different somehow why?
You people always pull this exact same shit. Clearly you believe that not EVERYTHING has to have been created because your cognitive dissonance prevents you from applying that logic to your own god. You'll vehemently claim (not even argue, you guys just assert) that your god has always existed.
So if we've established that apparently some things can come from nothing, why not apply that logic to whatever came together to form the universe?
How does it make sense to just arbitrarily introduce some eternal, invisible deity that you have no proof for just because ancient people who didn't even know what stars were wrote it down?
Because God is eternal and it's clear. The difference between God and the universe is God is supernatural. The universe is not supernatural. There is a distinction between that of nature and that of the supernatural.
God is SUPERNATURAL
Do you have anyone at all you could talk about your new theology hobby with IRL?
do you really think anybody who spends their time posting their schizo religious blog on here has any friends to talk to
Where’s the one with the fat native?
I would go furthermore and point out that nobody in general is a good person.
I agree. We can only do good with God's help. Without God's help we fall to temptation every single time as picrel says.
rephrase that as "no such thing as a good "unbelieving human""
otherwise one would think unbelievers a separate noun from humans.
Why are popes and priests and etc so shit at their job that they can't make everyone on Earth believe? Don't they have the divinity of Apostolic tradition backing their teachings?
The author holds that God puts evil people into power.