This is a paradoxical question. It can't be directly answered, we need certain parameters to know for sure. However, we can theorize over if an entity exists, but is not a thing.
Theoretically, which of the two is more parasitical?
>we can theorize over if an entity exists, but is not a thing.
Yes, that's the question. Can you think of things what are not things? And I don't merely mean the intangible. >parasitical
Why does that matter? Isn't a parasite a thing?
I think a much more interesting question would be if we could explain paradoxes. Why do they exists? What's their origin?
Paradoxes exist because you can't define how a system works from within that system. You must have unprovable axioms at the base of any universal logical system.
>Paradoxes exist because you can't define how a system works from within that system. You must have unprovable axioms at the base of any universal logical system.
I am not a learned person, I will attempt to form a theory based on this.
Then I ask you, would it be beneficial for a parasite in any form (theoretical or real) for this to be the case?
>Yes, that's the question. Can you think of things what are not things? And I don't merely mean the intangible
If it is beneficial from the perspective of a parasite, then I can think of things that are not things. Otherwise I can not.
Is it beneficial for a parasite to know of the concept of paradoxes?
Knew you were a hack, what a fucking waste of my time. Sell that shi to the white boomer Facebook moms because over here we ain't buying that shit! You think I was born in the 60s? Fuck off.
Your parasite is most likely anger.
Keep in mind however, I do not mean my replies as insults, but I am by no means a psychiatrist. I do not know how to put these things in mild terms, I certainly do not know technical terms.
I don't know where this division of parasitic and symbiotic comes from in your methodology.
but my penis can be used either for raising a family of my own, or inserting offspring into the nests of others much like the savvy cuckoo bird.
so, yes it could be used for parasitic purposes. but I don't necessarily intend to.
>I don't know where this division of parasitic and symbiotic comes from in your methodology.
Everything has always been parasitical in nature. Evolution is about being the strongest parasite, everything from atoms to stellar objects parasite on those weaker than themselves to create the universe you're living in today.
I cannot answer that because it is a biological question. I'm genuinely not even sure! However we can work out a theory.
Was there anything before RNA that parasited on each other?
>The RNA world is a hypothetical stage in the evolutionary history of life on Earth, in which self-replicating RNA molecules proliferated before the evolution of DNA and proteins.
Judging by this description I'd say RNA was formed because it was parasitical in nature.
In short, everything in nature is parasitical but you have to think of it at a truly fundamental level. There are several worst case scenarios for what this means so I hope I'm not making a mistake by sharing it.
I may not be able to utilize the theory perfectly because I am not very well read. I am sure that if Plato was here with us he could blow your minds.
>everything in nature is parasitical
What about the Universe itself? It is all matter, and does not have anything that it can use as a host.
The universe is a thing that is not a parasite.
As far as I know, all theories show that everything in the universe is parasitical. Gravity may be one of the strongest parasitical force as it consumes everything.
But I am certainly not an astrophysicist,so I'm not sure if I can answer your question on a deeper level, but I can attempt to theorize further if you wish so.
It's very important that you do so. I'm not convinced that things are inherently parasitical if something can be so universal that there is nothing that it could use as a host.
Eventually everything will be consumed one way or another. From what I know about astrology the last objects in the universe will be black holes which then consume each other. What happens after is merely theory. But it can be theorized. just like how the birth of the universe can be theorized.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I think the great thinkers should use a parasitical universe as the base when they theorize about what came before and what comes after. In nature there's always one kind of parasite that eventually rises to the top one way or another, which may change thing in a great way.
This works from everything about the universe to mundane things in your daily life.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
But black holes are just a part of the universe, not the whole thing. The whole universe itself is the host. By the nature of the universe being a superset, it can't be a parasite.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
But as far as we know that is the case. There is even some kind of great attractor that can't yet be explained that sounds very much parasitical to me.
Please give me any facts that I can work on though, I don't know enough about space to know if I'm on the right track.
Please, ask questions if I don't make sense to you. I will try my best to explain it.
But also think of me as a video game character with 1 INT, 1 WIS but 10 LCK who just accidentally built a nuke in his basement.
What I am saying that I can not hand you miracles. My goal in life is not to achieve immortality, I can only hope that learned people will come together and attempt it.
I don't think immortality is theoretically impossible as i0t would be a huge parasitical trait.
I cannot tell you where or when though, I am not learned in biology.
However if you wish to I can attempt to form a theory.
Thank you, it should be interesting to put it to the test. So let me ask, is immortality from a biological perspective possible? Including theoretically.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yes, there are many organisms that are already biologically immortal, or close to it. Therefore it is theoretically possible. However it is not clear if it is possible as well in humans. There are hints that suggest it is, because for example we can cause reprogramming of terminally differentiated cells into pluripotent states and get complete regeneration from there in many ways. But that's just a stone on the road, and it's not clear if a wall won't appear somewhere.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
In that case I stand for what I said before. I think immortality is possible in nature because of the great traits it would give to parasitical behaviour.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
As for when, I think as soon someone at the top can reach new heights by controlling immortality.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
If it's theoretically possible with modern technology, I think the only reason we don't have medical immortality right now is because it's not needed to ensure the power status of the world.
It will only be released when needed.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The parasite is content, entertained, well fed. It will not even be thinking about tomorrow. Yet, when death comes the parasite thinks "why didn't I work on achieving immortality"
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I think LULZ understand this subconsciously. They are working on bettering themselves if just to live one day longer.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
LULZ heavily advocates for roids, which greatly shortens your lifespan.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The problem is that it's too lucrative to scam people with immortality ventures instead of spending time and effort to actually do the research. As a result 100% of current immortality research in academia is a hard-scam, while in industry it's snake oil peddling skin care products that mostly do nothing.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yes, money is a huge part of this. The parasite love money
LULZ heavily advocates for roids, which greatly shortens your lifespan.
I would personally advice against that. I'm sure those people have their reasons, and if you wish to I can attempt to form a theory behind why. But it would be nice if to have a psychologist around who could conform if I'm on the right track or not.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>The parasite love money
The reasoning being that with money it has become extremely easy to manipulate people. Manipulation, especially on the grand scale, is a great way to consume those below you.
Some people can not resist. They are driven by something, I call it a parasite lacking a better word. Those who embraces their need to consume become horrible people like murderers and thieves who put their own need first.
I'm sorry, I will not answer personal questions.
If I wanted to know the same about your mother, I would ask "is she parasiting on someone or something?"
This is not a question I can answer because I don't know your mom personally. I didn't have time to get to know her that well last night
My question is if you know everything there is to know about everything, then >a: why don't you just kys since there's nothing more to learn, no experience will feel "real" because you should already know it >b: why aren't you rich?
>a: why don't you just kys since there's nothing more to learn, no experience will feel "real" because you should already know it
I am not an intelligent person. Imagine giving a toddler the number 3 and telling him to write out 100 decimals of pi.
I can use the theory of everything to build a theory based on my knowledge, but that's it. I'm sure there are smarter people out there who have come to the same conclusion and are exploiting it as we speak.
I am not yet rich, I can only hope I'm smart and cruel enough to find the loopholes.
To become rich you need to exploit people's weaknesses. Convince them to buy your product using psychology, lie to them to make them give money. If you're able to be a parasite and consume everyone below you it is very easy to become rich. Depending on your method it may be morally wrong though.
>muh exploit, you have to be evil, I could if I wanted to...
What an absolute pile of bullshit. If you actually had a "theory of everything" you could be an expert at any topic, you could literally teach everyone on earth how to live their lives better, and make honest money off of that. You could be the second coming of Christ by telling every single individual how to stop being miserable and poor. You're just a coping fedorapilled nobody who's never going to make it.
Where in this thread have I said I'm all knowing? I can create theories based on what I know with a simple formula, but I can't tell if they are true or not. That is why I'm constantly asking you to give me facts to rely on. I need to learn to truly understand.
Which is why I said you could be an expert at any topic. Just spend like half a year gathering info about the area of your choosing, and you should have it sussed completely. But you're not particularly good at any specific thing, are you? You're probably one of those people who's in his mid 20s with no actual skills, dabbled a little bit in this and that, music production, video editing, social media bullshittery, started writing a book and it's been sitting at 20 pages of pointless rambling for several years, etc. I only opened the thread to inform you about the visceral disgust that people like you make most other people feel. You sound like a total parasite
>Which is why I said you could be an expert at any topic
I could! That's what I am attempting.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
To clarify, I think I can accurately guess the answer to any topic using the formula.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I think the "formula" you're referring to is just what everyone else calls "thinking", and you're not necessarily better at doing this than anyone else. Someone working their whole lives at walmart will still have critical thinking skills, and they'll have a "formula" for deciding what's true and what isn't, but they're not necessarily correct about most things.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
It's okay to reject the idea, without a sample size I can't tell how large the accuracy is.
But if you wish to attempt it feel free to ask me about any topic.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Ok, why are all large western corporations so outspoken about their support for lgbtq+ rights and ethnic diversity?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
This is a very obvious form of parasitism. It is the result of the privilege of the loud minority.
These are people who form their lives around their identity and they're willing to claw the way to the top. They are willing and able to infiltrate every aspect of culture they can in order to make their voices heard.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
that's just a midwit take
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Am I wrong, though?
As I have said before, someone more learned could utilize this knowledge better than me. Unfortunately you're stuck with me. I'm basically just like one of the infinite monkeys who happened to print a certain string of text.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yes.
There is some biggest thing out there, and no biggest thing can be a parasite -- it must be a host.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
There is no such thing as a host. Everything all the way from the cellular level parasitize in some way or another on each other. You're not even the host of your own body, just a series of parasites all the way up to "you", and even you are a parasite trying to work yourself up to the top on our society, which too is very parasitical.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
You're free to test it on any topic you wish though. Always ask yourself which is the greater parasite in any scenario.
To become rich you need to exploit people's weaknesses. Convince them to buy your product using psychology, lie to them to make them give money. If you're able to be a parasite and consume everyone below you it is very easy to become rich. Depending on your method it may be morally wrong though.
Does a rock seem parasitical to you? No, because it is much weaker than you. You smash it and construct buildings of it. You're the greater parasite.
Were the roles reversed, the rock would undoubtedly eat you.
The spice in dune is just a gadget to represent the real truth, he who controls the X controls Y.
This applies to the world, to find the truth you need to find out not only what controls the masses, but also what controls you.
Follow the israelite says the man on LULZ
Follow the nagger says the man on funnyjunk
Follow the money says the man on tv
I reject these ideas
I say follow the food.
In regard of paradoxes as people were asking about earlier, being able to think in abstract terms definitely gives us an evolutionary edge. Evolution is also very parasitical in nature.
Another question would be can we somehow solve these paradoxes thinking in terms of parasites?
I think autism is basically a form of weak parasite. They're basically the opposite of parasitical, they expect people to be truthful and don't understand that they can lie.
This could be a leftover way of thinking before the strongest parasite evolved the ability to lie.
Nah, I'm good. I've gotten gooder at rolling bones and oneiromancy Thanks tho 🙂
You're welcome my friend.
Is there some entity which exists, but is not a thing?
This is a paradoxical question. It can't be directly answered, we need certain parameters to know for sure. However, we can theorize over if an entity exists, but is not a thing.
Theoretically, which of the two is more parasitical?
>we can theorize over if an entity exists, but is not a thing.
Yes, that's the question. Can you think of things what are not things? And I don't merely mean the intangible.
>parasitical
Why does that matter? Isn't a parasite a thing?
Paradoxes exist because you can't define how a system works from within that system. You must have unprovable axioms at the base of any universal logical system.
>Paradoxes exist because you can't define how a system works from within that system. You must have unprovable axioms at the base of any universal logical system.
I am not a learned person, I will attempt to form a theory based on this.
Then I ask you, would it be beneficial for a parasite in any form (theoretical or real) for this to be the case?
>Yes, that's the question. Can you think of things what are not things? And I don't merely mean the intangible
If it is beneficial from the perspective of a parasite, then I can think of things that are not things. Otherwise I can not.
Is it beneficial for a parasite to know of the concept of paradoxes?
I think a much more interesting question would be if we could explain paradoxes. Why do they exists? What's their origin?
Is this question false?
Is any part of the involved more parasitical than the other?
How do I become the basedest cunt of any room I walk into? I want to be Him. I want to be That Guy.
You are a parasite. Don't be selfish, be more humble.
Knew you were a hack, what a fucking waste of my time. Sell that shi to the white boomer Facebook moms because over here we ain't buying that shit! You think I was born in the 60s? Fuck off.
Your parasite is most likely anger.
Keep in mind however, I do not mean my replies as insults, but I am by no means a psychiatrist. I do not know how to put these things in mild terms, I certainly do not know technical terms.
why my dick a big?
Can your big dick be used for parasitic purposes?
I don't know where this division of parasitic and symbiotic comes from in your methodology.
but my penis can be used either for raising a family of my own, or inserting offspring into the nests of others much like the savvy cuckoo bird.
so, yes it could be used for parasitic purposes. but I don't necessarily intend to.
You are not a parasite. Use your big dick for good my friend. Start a family and raise them well.
Everyone here should respect those who realize they're able to do evil but chooses to resist. Even more so if they are also able to do good.
>I don't know where this division of parasitic and symbiotic comes from in your methodology.
Everything has always been parasitical in nature. Evolution is about being the strongest parasite, everything from atoms to stellar objects parasite on those weaker than themselves to create the universe you're living in today.
damn that's a deep insight man.
however, whatever happened to the life forms that preceded RNA?
I cannot answer that because it is a biological question. I'm genuinely not even sure! However we can work out a theory.
Was there anything before RNA that parasited on each other?
>The RNA world is a hypothetical stage in the evolutionary history of life on Earth, in which self-replicating RNA molecules proliferated before the evolution of DNA and proteins.
Judging by this description I'd say RNA was formed because it was parasitical in nature.
Can you explain your theory of everything?
In short, everything in nature is parasitical but you have to think of it at a truly fundamental level. There are several worst case scenarios for what this means so I hope I'm not making a mistake by sharing it.
I may not be able to utilize the theory perfectly because I am not very well read. I am sure that if Plato was here with us he could blow your minds.
>everything in nature is parasitical
What about the Universe itself? It is all matter, and does not have anything that it can use as a host.
The universe is a thing that is not a parasite.
As far as I know, all theories show that everything in the universe is parasitical. Gravity may be one of the strongest parasitical force as it consumes everything.
But I am certainly not an astrophysicist,so I'm not sure if I can answer your question on a deeper level, but I can attempt to theorize further if you wish so.
It's very important that you do so. I'm not convinced that things are inherently parasitical if something can be so universal that there is nothing that it could use as a host.
Eventually everything will be consumed one way or another. From what I know about astrology the last objects in the universe will be black holes which then consume each other. What happens after is merely theory. But it can be theorized. just like how the birth of the universe can be theorized.
I think the great thinkers should use a parasitical universe as the base when they theorize about what came before and what comes after. In nature there's always one kind of parasite that eventually rises to the top one way or another, which may change thing in a great way.
This works from everything about the universe to mundane things in your daily life.
But black holes are just a part of the universe, not the whole thing. The whole universe itself is the host. By the nature of the universe being a superset, it can't be a parasite.
But as far as we know that is the case. There is even some kind of great attractor that can't yet be explained that sounds very much parasitical to me.
Please give me any facts that I can work on though, I don't know enough about space to know if I'm on the right track.
Please, ask questions if I don't make sense to you. I will try my best to explain it.
But also think of me as a video game character with 1 INT, 1 WIS but 10 LCK who just accidentally built a nuke in his basement.
How do I achieve biological immortality?
You are a parasite. You're too greedy, however you could achieve greatness if you used your greed to research immortality for the greater good.
That's literally what I'm doing right now though. So you're saying it won't work but I will an hero?
Anon, please. I am not a psychologist. I can only urge you to resist the parasite. Try your best to become a better man.
This is one of the fears I have from exposing this. Some people can't handle the parasite within and I am powerless to help!
What I am saying that I can not hand you miracles. My goal in life is not to achieve immortality, I can only hope that learned people will come together and attempt it.
I don't think immortality is theoretically impossible as i0t would be a huge parasitical trait.
I cannot tell you where or when though, I am not learned in biology.
However if you wish to I can attempt to form a theory.
I am learned in biology (since I'm not joking when I say I am working on this right now), so I'm all ears about your theory my dude.
Thank you, it should be interesting to put it to the test. So let me ask, is immortality from a biological perspective possible? Including theoretically.
Yes, there are many organisms that are already biologically immortal, or close to it. Therefore it is theoretically possible. However it is not clear if it is possible as well in humans. There are hints that suggest it is, because for example we can cause reprogramming of terminally differentiated cells into pluripotent states and get complete regeneration from there in many ways. But that's just a stone on the road, and it's not clear if a wall won't appear somewhere.
In that case I stand for what I said before. I think immortality is possible in nature because of the great traits it would give to parasitical behaviour.
As for when, I think as soon someone at the top can reach new heights by controlling immortality.
If it's theoretically possible with modern technology, I think the only reason we don't have medical immortality right now is because it's not needed to ensure the power status of the world.
It will only be released when needed.
The parasite is content, entertained, well fed. It will not even be thinking about tomorrow. Yet, when death comes the parasite thinks "why didn't I work on achieving immortality"
I think LULZ understand this subconsciously. They are working on bettering themselves if just to live one day longer.
LULZ heavily advocates for roids, which greatly shortens your lifespan.
The problem is that it's too lucrative to scam people with immortality ventures instead of spending time and effort to actually do the research. As a result 100% of current immortality research in academia is a hard-scam, while in industry it's snake oil peddling skin care products that mostly do nothing.
Yes, money is a huge part of this. The parasite love money
I would personally advice against that. I'm sure those people have their reasons, and if you wish to I can attempt to form a theory behind why. But it would be nice if to have a psychologist around who could conform if I'm on the right track or not.
>The parasite love money
The reasoning being that with money it has become extremely easy to manipulate people. Manipulation, especially on the grand scale, is a great way to consume those below you.
Some people can not resist. They are driven by something, I call it a parasite lacking a better word. Those who embraces their need to consume become horrible people like murderers and thieves who put their own need first.
is your mom a parasite ?
I'm sorry, I will not answer personal questions.
If I wanted to know the same about your mother, I would ask "is she parasiting on someone or something?"
This is not a question I can answer because I don't know your mom personally. I didn't have time to get to know her that well last night
i admit you owned me
My question is if you know everything there is to know about everything, then
>a: why don't you just kys since there's nothing more to learn, no experience will feel "real" because you should already know it
>b: why aren't you rich?
>a: why don't you just kys since there's nothing more to learn, no experience will feel "real" because you should already know it
I am not an intelligent person. Imagine giving a toddler the number 3 and telling him to write out 100 decimals of pi.
I can use the theory of everything to build a theory based on my knowledge, but that's it. I'm sure there are smarter people out there who have come to the same conclusion and are exploiting it as we speak.
I am not yet rich, I can only hope I'm smart and cruel enough to find the loopholes.
>muh exploit, you have to be evil, I could if I wanted to...
What an absolute pile of bullshit. If you actually had a "theory of everything" you could be an expert at any topic, you could literally teach everyone on earth how to live their lives better, and make honest money off of that. You could be the second coming of Christ by telling every single individual how to stop being miserable and poor. You're just a coping fedorapilled nobody who's never going to make it.
Where in this thread have I said I'm all knowing? I can create theories based on what I know with a simple formula, but I can't tell if they are true or not. That is why I'm constantly asking you to give me facts to rely on. I need to learn to truly understand.
Which is why I said you could be an expert at any topic. Just spend like half a year gathering info about the area of your choosing, and you should have it sussed completely. But you're not particularly good at any specific thing, are you? You're probably one of those people who's in his mid 20s with no actual skills, dabbled a little bit in this and that, music production, video editing, social media bullshittery, started writing a book and it's been sitting at 20 pages of pointless rambling for several years, etc. I only opened the thread to inform you about the visceral disgust that people like you make most other people feel. You sound like a total parasite
>Which is why I said you could be an expert at any topic
I could! That's what I am attempting.
To clarify, I think I can accurately guess the answer to any topic using the formula.
I think the "formula" you're referring to is just what everyone else calls "thinking", and you're not necessarily better at doing this than anyone else. Someone working their whole lives at walmart will still have critical thinking skills, and they'll have a "formula" for deciding what's true and what isn't, but they're not necessarily correct about most things.
It's okay to reject the idea, without a sample size I can't tell how large the accuracy is.
But if you wish to attempt it feel free to ask me about any topic.
Ok, why are all large western corporations so outspoken about their support for lgbtq+ rights and ethnic diversity?
This is a very obvious form of parasitism. It is the result of the privilege of the loud minority.
These are people who form their lives around their identity and they're willing to claw the way to the top. They are willing and able to infiltrate every aspect of culture they can in order to make their voices heard.
that's just a midwit take
Am I wrong, though?
As I have said before, someone more learned could utilize this knowledge better than me. Unfortunately you're stuck with me. I'm basically just like one of the infinite monkeys who happened to print a certain string of text.
Yes.
There is some biggest thing out there, and no biggest thing can be a parasite -- it must be a host.
There is no such thing as a host. Everything all the way from the cellular level parasitize in some way or another on each other. You're not even the host of your own body, just a series of parasites all the way up to "you", and even you are a parasite trying to work yourself up to the top on our society, which too is very parasitical.
You're free to test it on any topic you wish though. Always ask yourself which is the greater parasite in any scenario.
To become rich you need to exploit people's weaknesses. Convince them to buy your product using psychology, lie to them to make them give money. If you're able to be a parasite and consume everyone below you it is very easy to become rich. Depending on your method it may be morally wrong though.
Everything about the universe is parasitical in one way or another.
Does a rock seem parasitical to you? No, because it is much weaker than you. You smash it and construct buildings of it. You're the greater parasite.
Were the roles reversed, the rock would undoubtedly eat you.
The spice in dune is just a gadget to represent the real truth, he who controls the X controls Y.
This applies to the world, to find the truth you need to find out not only what controls the masses, but also what controls you.
Follow the israelite says the man on LULZ
Follow the nagger says the man on funnyjunk
Follow the money says the man on tv
I reject these ideas
I say follow the food.
In regard of paradoxes as people were asking about earlier, being able to think in abstract terms definitely gives us an evolutionary edge. Evolution is also very parasitical in nature.
Another question would be can we somehow solve these paradoxes thinking in terms of parasites?
I think autism is basically a form of weak parasite. They're basically the opposite of parasitical, they expect people to be truthful and don't understand that they can lie.
This could be a leftover way of thinking before the strongest parasite evolved the ability to lie.