You want him to share controlled demolition videos?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Tower 7 was absolutely a controlled demolition. No way that building goes down but the hotel across the street doesn’t get damaged.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Tower 7 was absolutely a controlled demolition. No way that building goes down but the hotel across the street doesn’t get damaged.
the problem is also larry silverstein admitted that he talked to 'firefighters' and they agreed to just 'pull it' and he said and we watched it come down. You can't do a controlled demo ad hoc. And wtc 1 and 2 collapsed in exactly same perfect way. That they even got away with it just with massive media propaganda is fucking sad, but they did.
Please tell me how many skyscrappers have been hit with an airliner at high speed? So I can find it as another example
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Please tell me how many skyscrappers collabsed exactly how building 7 did, due to fire or even those hit by bombs and missiles.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>due to fire
Are you blind or retarded Or just intentionaly ignoring the OPs picture?
A giant skycrapper collapsed next to the WT-7. That damaged the building pretty badly.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>That damaged the building pretty badly.
It didn't. The explosives that were rigged to bring it down in it's footprint were the culprit
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The Empire State Building ate a bomber once and was fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
retard
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The WTC's were built to withstand a crash from a fully loaded 707, which is 35 tons heavier than a 767.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
This
Building code needs to be changed. All buildings over 5 stories high must be made out of passports
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
No. 767 is heavier than 707.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
But can it fly at 500+mph at sea level?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
In practical term, they are the same aircraft.
STFU sophist
DELET THIS
permaban this poster >sar 1A still the truth
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>If you can believe that.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>a crash from a fully loaded 707 >that was expected to be flying at very slow speed lost in the fog. >thats the same as a much bigger plane flying at 400+mph >derp
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Actually, a white paper released on February 3, 1964 states that the Towers could have withstood impacts of jetliners traveling 600 mph.
'Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.'
John Skilling was the head structural engineer for the World Trade Center.
'Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure would still be there. '
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>'Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure would still be there. '
exactly what you would expect to have happened. And then someone gave a fucking demolition order! and the first building collapsed, and then demo order given for the second one. Right at the time it would probably start fizzling itself out.
So someone sat and watched that and gave the order at the opportune moment.
It's why everyone expected they would say it was muslim terrorists who did that also. BUT NO! just the jetfuel..
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
And, the buildings withstood the impact just fine, though people were stuck above the impact points in some cases.
What brought it down wasn't the impacts. It was the cumulative damage in combination with the fire (and maybe some code violations).
There also weren't any wide body passenger jets in 1964. WTC was hit by wide body jets, which are three times as heavy and carry at least double the fuel compared to anything flying in 64.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>post claim from 9/11 "research" >accepts it without question
post white paper then. Leslie Roberts said it was designed for a 180mph collision.
>Frank A. Demartini, the on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, who said on January 25, 2001:
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time....this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.”
wierd. he didnt wonder why the planes didnt bounce off lol
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The WTC ate the Boeing airplanes just fine. It was the full tanks of jet fuel burning for hours that caused them to collapse.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Nothing, these people are sick
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Clearly a controlled demolition.
Even at that resolution, you can see the flashes from the charges.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Just stop, nothing of the sort is in there nor needed for that to have occurred.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I hope you die a horrible covid death
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
don't waste your energy on 9/11 trolls and shills, speak to architects and engineers.
'...the company I work for certified the steel components used in the construction
of the WTC buildings. ...the results of these tests… indicate that the buildings should have easily
withstood the thermal stress caused by… burning [jet fuel, paper, etc.. (Ryan, 2004)
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
retard
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The full video of the collapse, the clip you show had molten metal flowing from the corner just seconds before collapse, but you cut the video because you are wacky and the truth make you feel dumb because you believed a lie for two decades. I dare you to find the original full length clip and examine and explain away liquid flowing steel.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>molten metal from JP-8 fire
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yeah that molten metal can only be explained by thermite
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Yeah that molten metal can only be explained by thermite
It collapsed into dust and become molten lava even several stories down beneath the basement level. This is not only a demolition but a PERFECTLY EXECUTED DEMOLITION of two of the largest buildings in the world, and wtc7 which wasn't a midget either and hit by nothing, collapsing in exactly same way.
It's so perfectly executed it's almost impressive. And you'd have to execute it perfectly, if you fuck up just a little bit, big parts of the towers were going to crash and hit so many things around them and totally destroy that whole area in a much bigger way, instead of it just turns to fucking dust and molten steel and 'lava'.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>burning material ejected
ITS METAL MOLTEN GUVNA
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
it should overturn. hope not all spainards are yhis retarded
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I've been monitoring this homosexual, he's posted this video in some other threads already, glowhomosexual from black cube disinfo sucursal located in Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana, one of the big towers there, or who the hell knows
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
after saying this, this thread will probably be saged to death with some proxy accounts posting retarded bullshit so I'll preemptively bumping each few minutes to fuck with the shill
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Consider this retard homosexual. >conspiracy theory
is a buzzword and a fraud term created to explain away the kennedy assasination as a normal event. It has no basis whatsoever. Conspiracy schizos is not any better.
Now consider the following. USA allow hijackers to fly planes into buildings, pentagon was not hit by airplane. As excuse to go to middle east, to destabilize it, and funnel muslim immigrants into europe with excuse of they being refugees. Because if they weren't, no europeans in their right mind would allow mass muslim immigration, since muslims have a 1300 year old history of trying to invade europe and install sharia law.
Since an airplane by itself cannot bring down buildings especially ones that large, they placed detonation charges all around the building and a bit after the planes had hit, detonated both of the towers killing everyone in the vicinity.
Wtc7 that was not hit by a plane also detonated on its own foot print.
It is impossible to have a freefall collapse of a building without it being demolished by carefully placed detonation charges.
The whole reason why demolition squads exist is because you can't just crash something into it and it falls on its own footprint. It does literally everything else if you don't implode it with careful precision.
You can look up demolitions gone wrong where they even get it wrong and so it falls on the side and hits all kinds of things it's not supposed to and all this type of shit.
The socalled pancake theory which became the official story, that the literal weight of the bearing structures collapsed and thus produced and ever increasing pancake of fast strength also falls short to explain why even the basement levels of both structures were on fire. You'd have to collapse the entire loadbearing structures in sequence to get it to fall on its own footprint.
wtc7 which was not hit by a plane did the precisely same thing. Freefall collapse (perfect demolition) implies that all the load bearing structures are no longer there, hence it falls with the normal speed of a falling object as if it was just falling down through the air.
look, they started blasting the sages with bullshit >every single time
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
the only one bullshitting here is you. You fucked up big time when you pretended as if it's normal for buildings to be hit by something or some explosion and then it demolishes automatically in free fall speed on its own footprint.
if that was the case, there would be no such thing as a demolition crew ever. Because nobody would fucking need them for anything. And there would also be no chance of demolitions going wrong like there's ofcourse thousands of videos off online where the charges don't explode in the right sequence so part of the building fucking falls down on the side and hits other buildings or things it wasn't supposed to.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
They are
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Los Illuminados detected
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
you can clearly see the main support beam slowly buckle from the heat. no explosion was needed. the intense heat from the burning jetfuel weakened the supports enough to fail and when that happened all that weight from the top slammed down unevenly on the rest of the floors causing them to buckle one by one.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
jet fuel burns off almost instantly. it’s not hard to understand, idiot. the fire was office furniture. >muh jet fuel melts steel beams
no, not unless you use a torch. it’s amazing how many homosexuals have never welded or used a forge. the concept of thermodynamics is always avoided by shills. your magical theory has an endless supply of jet fuel being focused like an oxyacetylene torch on the center columns. >b-b-but look at the fire
yeah there’s a bunch of orange sparks flying out the building right before it collapses. explain that shit retard and i’ll let you bury yourself and you can report back to your supervisor for some more pilpul
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
based kenedian.
also, buildings dont collapse into themselves when the lower part is intact.
also collapsing near freefall speed is EVEN MORE not possible.
i think its the people that dont change their own oil and dont know how to change wiper fluid are the onces thinking this is all possible without explosives
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
strong basement explosion before plane/rocket impact, supposed to be happening at the exact same time so it would not be noticed. hence this guy
also demo expert danny jowenko (who is now dead), was shown tower 7 collapsing and they didnt tell him it was on 911. he says 100% controlled demo.
but even without that, you can see it with your own eyes.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
that's why the Israelis were dancing, they had to time it just right and they nailed it
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
youre one of the dumbest people elive
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
no he spits facts.
tell me; do you change your own motoroil?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Did you know an oxy fuel torch doesn't actually melt the steel?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
True, Anyone can write random shit and pretend it’s real like you
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The twin towers also had a unique structural design. A typical skyscraper has a grid of columns supporting the floors. The twin towers wanted a column-free space for maximum lease flexibility so they made the entire exterior load-bearing panels, with floors spanning from the core to the exterior. When the planes hit they cut out entire sections of these load-bearing panels. Take a look at construction photos; these panels were pretty light but there were a lot of them. Once sections of the exterior wall were cut out, there was no redundant support and the long-span floor started to drop at the outside. Once the corner started to drop, it was a runaway freight train.
You can convince me Israel remote controlled the planes before you can convince me there were no planes, or that the collapse is impossible with planes only.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
if that's the case then the structual exterior on the side opposite the starting point of the collapse should have held and not collapsed. The building would tip over toward the collapse, where the failure was, and the non-failure parts should have held on, at least initially until the weight of the collapsing upper structure broke them.
Picture a tree with a wedge cut out of the trunk. It tips towards the wedge and the side opposite holds.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>3 building asymmetrically damaged >3 buildings symmetrically collapsed
It can happen…….riiiiiiiight?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
you guys are just speaking about nonsense. silversteinberg did all his research, on how to properly take down the towers. and then he purchased "terrorist insurance" just weeks prior. once you understand this "one simple trick" "doctors"will hate you"
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
A solid tree isn’t a good comparison. More like a very thin-walled pipe. A pipe with such a thin wall that it relies on a system of internal baffles to maintain its stiffness.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
And what is wrong with how they collapsed?
Everyone debating the jet fuel/steel beams issue is missing the point. Each floor was held in place with rivets which warped. The weight was carried by an exoskeleton and each floor was attached to this shell by mere rivets.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Everyone debating the jet fuel/steel beams issue is missing the point. Each floor was held in place with rivets which warped. The weight was carried by an exoskeleton and each floor was attached to this shell by mere rivets.
so it was built to collapse in free fall speed? all you have to do is damage several floors and you'd get a controlled demolition? The dumber things are said the more impressive it is you believe this pancake bullshit.
wtc7 also collapsed in exactly same perfect way.
If what you say is true just set several building levels on fire if the heat is intense enough. And add some miracle jetfuel aswell, and now the entire building collapses and turns to 'lava' even in the basement. Fucking impressive feat of engineering. How'd you like to work there?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>theyre made to fall like that
Retarded take
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Are you mentally ill, stupid or both? It was clearly a controlled demolition.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
It was a direct energy weapon
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Noone really knows. It was staring you right in the face the whole time. When LamperMan appears...no soul is safe.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
By now you could probably make a computer render and simulate the collapse all over again
In a monte carlo style
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yea, I've showed this video to conspiracy retards too. It's like they don't even see it. It's actually like they aren't interacting with reality in any way. Their eyes are open and they can talk, but there is no one behind the wheel. Like robots.
why would architects construct buldings like a stack of dominos? And even in this stack of dominos it doesn't all collapse as one. Absolutely retarded answer on every level
They do collapse from one side if you do that.
Dominos won't lean over, but they won't all collapse vertically at once. The collapse will progress inward from the failure point.
have you bothered looking up why this building collapsed?
chink retards digged a big depression in the ground right next to this building and after some rain the foundation fall to one side
>a building is not a domino piece
Can't believe i missed the retard saying this. Wait till you look at what the official story is.
Dominoed/pancaked all the way down to the basement levels that were basically molten metal/lava like shit. No demolition charges no thermite no nothing. Just add hot jetfuel to several upper floors. And collapsed perfectly on itself.
YES THAT'S THE OFFICIAL VERSION! feel stupid yet?
>a building is not a domino piece, if the foundation is not compromised it will never fall to only one side
...but it will fall straight down.
Got it.
Idiot.
>Yes, this is mainly thanks to gravity, which tends to pull things vertically downward.
So it would tip toward the damged side, meme flag israelite. Israel did 9/11
>are you trolling or you really that retarded?
He should ask you the same thing. At first i thought you were when you made this thread, now i'm not sure about that at all.
I want to hold you to the second comment you made, because you actually fucked yourself and you didn't even realize it.
>a building is not a domino piece
Can't believe i missed the retard saying this. Wait till you look at what the official story is.
Dominoed/pancaked all the way down to the basement levels that were basically molten metal/lava like shit. No demolition charges no thermite no nothing. Just add hot jetfuel to several upper floors. And collapsed perfectly on itself.
YES THAT'S THE OFFICIAL VERSION! feel stupid yet?
Then you say. >if the foundation is not compromised it will never fall to only one side
Exactly, it won't implode either all the way down to the basement either. The only way for wtc to have been a domino effect/pancake simply by adding jetfuel to the higher levels is. you put demolition explosives on almost all the levels, including thermite and things at the foundation, so you crush the foundation as you detonate the charges so it fall all the way down and the unimploded part of the structure meets the 'lava' below in the basement.
If you weren't to crush the foundation aswell, it would fall everywhere to all sides when it hits the bottom level, so you have to make the foundation be fucking molten lava, with something like thermite.
You almost explained it to yourself why the official explanation with just add jetfuel could not have caused this basically perfect demolition of some of the largest buildings in the world, on the same day, and then also wtc7 which wasn't hit by airplane and jetfuel was not a factor there. Fell in exactly same way.
>collapsed perfectly >40 other buildings damaged
is it genuine retardation or purposeful lying?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
perfectly >>40 other buildings damaged >is it genuine retardation or purposeful lying?
that's what a perfect demolition of such a large building looks like yes. You wouldn't want to see what an imperfect demolition of such a huge building would look like.
Both wtc1 and wtc2 collapsed perfectly at free fall speed on its own footprint. That's a perfect demolition. It doesn't mean you will get zero damage to any buildings. You can't turn every part of the structure to instant molten steel that just slides down into a hole.
Shits going to go flying to the sides obviously, but in a failed demo it's large parts of the entire building. And if you had that, it wouldn't fall like that.
Idk in what world you think you can perfectly demo a building that large and you think you can stand right across the street to it and be totally safe. Even if you did it perfectly.
And idk why you are even complaining with me pointing out that that's a perfect demo. You're the retards who believe that it was jetfuel that did all of it. They were standing right next to all these other fucking buildings with very little space between them.
>tells everyone, "everyone look away" throws passports down. "oh my god, look at this" they made family guy cut this scene.
Yeah that's literally retarded, cause they go with this bullshit theory that jet fuel and the airplane melted those buildings so they collapsed on itself even so much there's molten lava in basement, without demolition charges without thermite used without anything.
And then >oh a wild passport that just happened to be his, flew out of the window when the plane hit, right out of his fucking pocket. Intact so much they could tell who it was.
Was jihaadis, but it wasn't his fucking passport! that's so fucking stupid!
Melts entire wtc 1 and 2, except passports are made of fucking unobtainum temporarily till they fall on ground and are picked up mostly intact. >oh look what i found
or planted, like fucking 'sherlock holmes' straight from hell.
kek. steel doesn't behave like that. It sags, it thickens and then it hardens. Unless you are providing oxy acetylene thermite or therm nuclear temperatures you can never melt a continuously welded steel frame. It just conducts heat awat as fast as you can apply it. Anyone can see, far from generating enough heat the burning paraffin is simply creating tons of soot which is convecting heat and carbon away from the buildings frame. People just don't understand the physics.
>kek. steel doesn't behave like that. It sags, it thickens and then it hardens. Unless you are providing oxy acetylene thermite or therm nuclear temperatures you can never melt a continuously welded steel frame. It just conducts heat awat as fast as you can apply it. Anyone can see, far from generating enough heat the burning paraffin is simply creating tons of soot which is convecting heat and carbon away from the buildings frame. People just don't understand the physics.
They know most americans are easy to lie to it's why they came up with it. You got demo charges up and down those buildings and you using thermite at the same time just as you explained, only way you could ever do it.
These morons think jet fuel did this, and only jet fuel! Concentrated at the higher levels of the building where the planes hit.
The funniest of all is the official story was some young technician in the control room made a "mistake".
But back then, there was no movie shown with subtitles on French television. And the cut displayed is the moment when the death star is blown up. Total Cohencidence I guess.
OKC >bomb out side >side blown off >still standing
WTC1.0 >bomb in basement >underground garage made bigger >building still standing
WTC2.0 >third time a charm
20 years of conspiracy theories because americans are too fucking stupid to understand metal doesn't need to reach melting point to become weak and malleable. We've been hammering metal sticks into weapons and tools for thousands of years yet here we are.
I wish every 9/11 brought another terrorist plot that killed tens of thousands of you knuckle-dragging mouthbreathers.
Lmao is this from those videos of a blacksmith heating steel up and then bending it in a fundamentally different way to demonstrate muh "jet fuel CAN weaken steel beams" - he pulled a big smuggie and got lots of views for that video.. The fuel weakening beams theory doesnt line up with the precision cuts of steel beams at the bottom of BOTH buildings when they came down, and the fact all that remained of all of this are a few passports. As well as the fact passengers on board were calling their relatives to inform them of their impending demise. You actually believe that too. I hope a plane engine falls off the wing and lands on top of you- if they included that in the story you'd probably believe that happened too
?si=stLEo-ScWKeF973P
Was thermite used in 9/11?
Absolutely yes.
Did thermite cause the towers collapse?
Absolutely not.
The plane was a cover up that normal people would believe because they are idiots.
The thermite was a cover up that conspiracy theorists would believe because it's an obvious cause of destruction found all over the wreckage.
The reality is an energy weapon.
A reality almost nobody would believe even if they saw evidence.
It is the weapon of the great reset, it literally turns metal to dust.
Everything on earth could be returned to dust leaving only stone, trees, and anything blue
lol is that a picture of the maui, Hawaii fires? the one where they just set it on fire with a few bic lighters? And if they are using dews direct energy weapons then why load the entire place up with c4 and thermite? if you want plausible deniability, then you could still use the plane theory. but why take all the time to completely wire the entire building with explosives if youre just gonna use some "energy weapon".
"if youre good enough to get in here, then you would know that this doesnt do anything, its just a subline. bourne would know" "show me again"
100%
the towers melted into the bedrock, in videos you can see ibeams turn to dust as they fall. it was something much worse than jet fuel, and some a-rabs praising allah
Very convenient for the glowies to leave that part out. If WTC7 couldn't handle the heat generated from the other buildings then how the fuck did the passport survive
Or how the fuck did any of the other surrounding older buildings survive from this heat? Passports and older buildings can but not a couple decades old wtc7
Consider this retard homosexual. >conspiracy theory
is a buzzword and a fraud term created to explain away the kennedy assasination as a normal event. It has no basis whatsoever. Conspiracy schizos is not any better.
Now consider the following. USA allow hijackers to fly planes into buildings, pentagon was not hit by airplane. As excuse to go to middle east, to destabilize it, and funnel muslim immigrants into europe with excuse of they being refugees. Because if they weren't, no europeans in their right mind would allow mass muslim immigration, since muslims have a 1300 year old history of trying to invade europe and install sharia law.
Since an airplane by itself cannot bring down buildings especially ones that large, they placed detonation charges all around the building and a bit after the planes had hit, detonated both of the towers killing everyone in the vicinity.
Wtc7 that was not hit by a plane also detonated on its own foot print.
It is impossible to have a freefall collapse of a building without it being demolished by carefully placed detonation charges.
The whole reason why demolition squads exist is because you can't just crash something into it and it falls on its own footprint. It does literally everything else if you don't implode it with careful precision.
You can look up demolitions gone wrong where they even get it wrong and so it falls on the side and hits all kinds of things it's not supposed to and all this type of shit.
The socalled pancake theory which became the official story, that the literal weight of the bearing structures collapsed and thus produced and ever increasing pancake of fast strength also falls short to explain why even the basement levels of both structures were on fire. You'd have to collapse the entire loadbearing structures in sequence to get it to fall on its own footprint.
wtc7 which was not hit by a plane did the precisely same thing. Freefall collapse (perfect demolition) implies that all the load bearing structures are no longer there, hence it falls with the normal speed of a falling object as if it was just falling down through the air.
Even more criminal of this whole situation was how quickly they removed all the evidence so that there was no investigation possible of what happened. The allegation that thermite was used seems also plausible. Jet fuel cannot melt these steal beams. And all the fire you see is the fuel burning itself out from the airplanes, there's no doubt whatsoever that airplanes hit those buildings. But that doesn't explain how they later collapsed on their own footprint.
So you are looking at both a) airplanes involved b) demolition charges and thermite involved.
Then you got the strange case of larry silverstein, literally took out an insurance policy that covers this specific thing, very shortly before it even happened! Damn that's one heck of a lucky coincidence.
Then you also have the strange case of not only muslims celebrating which was obvious, them thinking actually that it was them that did it, and also israelis celebrating (moving systems). Anyone who know anything about muslims and israelites is they certainly wouldn't celebrate the same event for the same reason!
USA used that as an excuse to go to middle east and destabilize the region, leading to muslim immigration to europe under the refugee clause.
The pancake idiocy as in it gives way and then it increases speed due to the weight and just pancakes through the entire building, this would not happen in free fall speed since there would be more and more resistance from all the fucking steel that had not melted whatsoever, the further you get down, you would expect most of the base bottom structure to keep standing and it tilting to the side and hitting other buildings, which is exactly what happens when they fuck up a purpousful demo, doesn't explain how even the basement levels of wtc's looked as if they had melted or had some huge explosion happen, several feet down.
So it's airplanes + completely flawless demolition. And then ofcourse wtc7 not hit by anything.. collapsed in exactly same fashion aswell.
Do you really think the architects didn't account for a little terrorism when they designed these buildings?
Does no one remember the prior attacks on these fucking buildings?
>Do you really think the architects didn't account for a little terrorism when they designed these buildings? >Does no one remember the prior attacks on these fucking buildings?
well the point is, no building falls in free fall speed like that unless it's demolished. Not only that, but the demolition of such a GIGANTIC BUILDING had to be basically 100% perfect for it ever to happen that way!
So when they denied that muslim terrorists had placed also demo charges to demolish the entire buildings and the airplanes was just for shock and awe effect. You know it's someone in USA with a lot of power that knew a) attack was coming, maybe they didn't know precise day, maybe they knew the week, and then they had placed demo charges all over those fucking buildings including wtc7.
This is what made people freak out when they say >no there no muslim terrorists that planted demo charges in those buildings, it just collapsed by a mystical negative miracle by itself on its own footprint due to the airplanes
NOW I KNOW YOU'RE LYING.
In a purpousful demo which wtc and wtc7 was flawless demo. Whenever you see demos go wrong, it happens because they place the demo charges slightly wrong or they don't go off at the precise moment they should. This causes large parts of the building to fall to either side and hitting other nearby buildings.
So if you wanted to demolish wtc it had to be fucking flawless or it would literally fall and crush big parts of several buildings nearby.
I'd even say if the building hadn't been demolished i would totally say look it's those airplanes and nothing else. When that building fell like you would expect in a flawless demolition, you would expect them to say, not only the hijackers flew airplanes into them, but also other muslim terrorists had managed to place demolition charges in the building and the basement of both towers without anyone noticing!
Then then they come out and say nobody did that, and that's fucking fishy! This means someone ELSE than the muslim hijackers knew the attack was coming and took advantage of it to demolish the buildings. Made even more obvious by wtc7 demolished aswell that wasn't hit by anything.
Maybe the planes hit the buildings and the government made a decision to secretly demolish the buildings before they had an imperfect fall onto others around them. That would make sense. The government wouldn’t mention it to avoid conspiracy theories. I doubt it but being a contrarian.
>Maybe the planes hit the buildings and the government made a decision to secretly demolish the buildings before they had an imperfect fall onto others around them. That would make sense. The government wouldn’t mention it to avoid conspiracy theories. I doubt it but being a contrarian.
That's what my theory is. But here's the problem with what you're saying. This is not something you do in a matter of 30 minutes. This takes careful planning and days to setup and place charges and so on that way. So it could not have happened ad hoc whilst the buildings were in fire if that is your expectation.
So they would have to have placed the demo charges BEFORE the airplanes even hit. Which makes it now nefarious why would they do that.
It's precisely because they don't say well muslim terrorists managed to do that too and also in the basements. If they had said that, this is perfect now we just got to figure out how were they able to do that, i believe you cause that was a controlled demolition.
But they specifically said, no such thing had occured whatsoever! and so this implicates very powerful people in USA who had access to that infrastructure and that kind of material and did that cloak and dagger. And that gets now into this is a conspiracy!
There's no conspiracy about some lunatic muslims flying planes into buildings, i'm not with the retards who try to say there were no planes. But the planes are not the interesting parts, it's how did those buildings get demolished so perfectly, and it was 100% perfect it was FLAWLESS DEMO, when they claim they weren't!
> This is not something you do in a matter of 30 minutes. This takes careful planning and days to setup and place charges and so on that way. So it could not have happened ad hoc whilst the buildings were in fire if that is your expectation.
Negative. Good ideas lead to more questions. If the buildings were demolished then this is one possible explanation that might get mainstream acceptance which leads to more discovery and more questions.
>Negative. Good ideas lead to more questions. If the buildings were demolished then this is one possible explanation that might get mainstream acceptance which leads to more discovery and more questions.
i just explain it to you, why this is not something you can do in 30 minutes or an hour whilst the buildings are on fire. It's a stupid question you are asking. And they deny deliberately that they demolished them on purpose, they deny aswell that muslim terrorists did it aswell!
This is what the fucking problem is!
And wtc7 was not hit by plane, the only way you could demolish those buildings is if you knew the attack was coming in advance!
Just so you understand it, your expectation is, whilst building was on fire, they fear it would collapse in an uncontrolled way. So whilst everyone on fire, firefighters going up and down, people trying to flee. You have a demo team running around. >let's place explosives in both those towers so they come down in controlled fashion and not hit all kinds of other buildings.
THERE'S NO REPORTS OF THAT, also it would take over a day to fucking do! And you have to place them perfectly aswell.
SO it was not something the emergency demolition service or something could do ad hoc.
So this means whoever placed the charges, did it before the airplanes hit, they KNEW THE ATTACK WAS COMING, is why everyone was saying at the time, muslim terrorists also placed demo charges.
And then they come out and say, no there was no demo charges at all. WHAT? >it was the airplane, it was jetfuel, it was muh pancake.
WHAT IS GOING ON? WHAT IN THE WORLD!
> Just so you understand it, your expectation is, whilst building was on fire, they fear it would collapse in an uncontrolled way. So whilst everyone on fire, firefighters going up and down, people trying to flee. You have a demo team running around.
Thanks for explaining my expectations, kek. I was pointing out a narrative that normies and msm could accept. I understand the dynamics of what occurred and realize they can’t ad-hoc demo the buildings after the attack. It’s good for thought that could gain msm acceptance which might lead to the government biting and more questions. Quit boot looping.
>Thanks for explaining my expectations, kek. I was pointing out a narrative that normies and msm could accept. I understand the dynamics of what occurred and realize they can’t ad-hoc demo the buildings after the attack. It’s good for thought that could gain msm acceptance which might lead to the government biting and more questions. Quit boot looping.
it does not take a lot of fucking thinking or being any kind of demo expert to understand that you can't setup an adhoc demo of some of the tallest buildings in the world at the time, in a few hours. No you need atleast a day ATLEAST A DAY and you have it all mapped out and everybody know exactly where to go.
So it could not have happened unless they knew it in advance, so that would be muslim terrorists that also did that or someone else who had gained access to those buildings and placed it without anyone knowing.
There was nobody that come in. >we expect an attack maybe next week, so we going to rig the entire building for demolition just in case so if planes hit it doesn't fall and hit other buildings if you have a partial collapse of the structure. >btw. how you feel about going to work next week? you should totally do so.
I mean come the fuck on.
The planes are the least interesting thing of what happened. Infact i'd say the only interesting part of wtc attacks is how the fuck those buildings EVER FUCKING COLLAPSED LIKE A PERFECT DEMOLITION, and them denying any charges were ever set (which is impossible to happen without that being the case).
If you are dealing with people who can't figure out that you can't rig to perfectly demolish a building whilst its on fire, or in matter of 30 minutes and a few hours. Then you struggle to explain to same people why the moon is not made out of green cheese. There's no point to even argue with such individuals.
> If you are dealing with people who can't figure out that you can't rig to perfectly demolish a building whilst its on fire, or in matter of 30 minutes and a few hours.
Agreed BUT we’ve moved to the era of expert explanations so if ~~*experts*~~ claim it’s possible then normies bite.
To this point no demolition experts that make these claims because the establishment has dozens lined up to claim otherwise.
This is no different than how expert undertakers and morticians were consider lunes for raising concerns about the Covid vaccines’ rubbery clots.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
This is how a technocracy works!
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
To this point no demolition experts that make these claims because the establishment has dozens lined up to claim otherwise.
This is no different than how expert undertakers and morticians were consider lunes for raising concerns about the Covid vaccines’ rubbery clots.
Also how 50 intelligence officials claimed Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>To this point no demolition experts that make these claims because the establishment has dozens lined up to claim otherwise.
no they don't have anything but scream conspiracy theorist at you.
Don't start with covid vaccine, let's stick to the topic in question.
The only thing you need to focus on is forget airplanes. How the fuck did those buildings get perfectly demolished, including wtc7, when even if you wanted to do it and you were demo experts you wouldn't even have time to do it on that day. SO YOU HAD TO KNOW IT IN ADVANCE.
Someone demolished those buildings, if not muslim terrorists placed those demo charges without anybody noticing who did?
The planes themselves are red herring. Is why they say to people who say >how did those buildings come down >LOOK AT DA PLANES, DA PLANES DA JETFUEL
no, that's not what can do this. So who demolished those buildings if it wasn't muslim terrorists.
Had the morons just said muslim terrorists did that also they would maybe get away with it easier. But then the problem becomes, now everyone would be investigating anyone going in and out of those buildings the last few months, and if it was some muslim terrorists they would find out who the fuck placed those charges that would have to be in so many fucking places!
This is why they say DA PLANES, and there were no demo charges, cause then it wasn't investigated who placed them! Because if you investigated that you would find them. You would find some day where >oh this and that area shut down for maintenance and whatever
okay who performed that maintenance! and you'd find them so fucking quickly. And they'd have to suicide themselves with two shots in back of the head for not dragging them in to testify. >DA PLANE DA PLANE
fuck the planes it's irellevant.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
It’s obvious this was to go after Iraq to finish that war, then use US corporations to rebuild, enact the patriot act to spy on citizens, which then lead to the legalization of domestic propaganda in the 2013 defense act and here we are. I don’t think many on these boards believe the official normie 9/11 narratives. It’s obvious the government benefited the most from this event.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>It’s obvious this was to go after Iraq to finish that war, then use US corporations to rebuild, enact the patriot act to spy on citizens, which then lead to the legalization of domestic propaganda in the 2013 defense act and here we are. I don’t think many on these boards believe the official normie 9/11 narratives. It’s obvious the government benefited the most from this event.
Yes now we talking motive, what is motive. go to middle east, get oil reserves and other things, destabilize also region and funnel muslim immigrants to europe, and also israel was interested in destabilizing it to topple saddam, to get to syria to stop iran via syria from arming hezbollah. Hence israelis were celebrating when bush declared, we going to go to iraq.
Wasn't even iraqi terrorists did it. >we going to also go to afghanistan and get that fucking ben ladin.
okay that made atleast a little sense. >we need to control middle east to stop radical muslims from forming
the iraqis were also confused, first they are like celebrating when saddam was toppled. GO USA FUCK SADDAM! woohoo go USA. Then they realize, USA military not fucking leaving! Then the mood changed somewhat.
So motivations you can talk about those, but that's not the interesting part.
Stay with the interesting part, fuck the airplanes don't even matter.
Who demolished those buildings! who placed the charges that brought them down! the why isn't even that relevant.
If it's not muslim terrorists aswell then who?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
> Who demolished those buildings! who placed the charges that brought them down! the why isn't even that relevant.
If it's not muslim terrorists aswell then who?
It doesn’t matter. It’s likely a paid intelligence asset not directly connected to the US government in anyway. When you see conspiracies like this similar to Covid, it’s always best to identify the holes and then look at who it truly benefits. The details are somewhat irrelevant because the actual proof will be very hard to substantiate by design, so therefore is somewhat irrelevant. There’s no point in litigating whodunit.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>It doesn’t matter.
ofcourse it does. They kill several thousand american civilians in those towers when they demolished them.
If it was only those airplanes you'd maximum have a partial collapse of the delapidated upper levels of the structure. It was totally demolished so much that even the basement levels were like fucking fucking lava, which is why some argue thermite was used. I'd argue yeah for a building that size you'd have to use thermite also to demolish it.
Someone placed those charges that demolished those buildings which takes careful planning and several days to setup. So it takes prior knowledge of the hijackers planning to hijack those planes and fly them into the towers.
And wtc7 not hit by an airplane also perfectly demolished.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
No, it doesn’t. It’s a pointless exercise in futility. Absolutely doesn’t matter however, you have zero absolute knowledge and neither do I. We are intentionally kept in the dark, with only slight trailings of truth available at our disposal. The US government was clearly involved. They have the most upside here. Mystery solved.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
We are a nation of over 300 million people and we just let a handful of retards tell us how to live our lives and dictate what we can and cant do.
Americans (me being one) are truly the biggest pussies and LARP about the 2nd amendment. We wont do shit.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Really weird that you brought up gun rights? You’re not a fed are you? Lmao. Actually, you come from a long line of retards that let a small group dictate how their lives are structured, controlling what they can and can’t do. This is about reading between the lines of knowing the truth so you can take appropriate actions for your family. It’s likely the only real revolution that will ever occur for us will be based on someone developing and unbridled military AI model, or such a devastating, natural disaster, that it changes the ruling parties of the Earth. It’s pretty unlikely that will happen.
>a day >Try a month or more
I'm just saying atleast a day to illustrate how it's fucking impossible to do ON THE DAY IN QUESTION whilst everyone fleeing and there's dead people and firefighters and everything running in and out of those buildings.
This is why the reason they denied that muslim terrorists did that also, that they placed those charges. Is what fucked these people. Because it had to be someone! WHO THE FUCK WAS IT. Whoever it was knew the attack was coming!
I don't even care about the airplanes that's just a total distraction. And is certainly not some wild theory how a jihaadi who regularly strap on bombs and go blow themselves up in some market or something in middle east, might hijack a plane and fly into the building for the sake of allah and scream allahu akhbar.
the building completely imploded into its basement, starting with the center columns. just like a demolotion. just like the other two buildings. fuck you kike
disingenuous, all conspiracytards use a trimmed video of the WT7 collapse that don't include the moment when you can see that the left corner is the one that collapse first dragging the rest of the structure
How come you didnt include the part where Jawenko clearly says the Twin Towers COULNDT have been a controlled demolition...how does that fit your narrative??
The key to solving 911 riddle is war games run on the exact time simulating hijacked airplanes hitting twin towers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_operations_and_exercises_on_September_11,_2001
How passengers made their phone calls
Using preplanted pico cells
Deleted answer from quora
https://archive ph/dsssj
Flight 93 was supposed to hit wtc 7,but it was accidently shot in the air by a fighter plane,inspite of strict orders from to ground all planes.Then they put its debris in a field and made up a story about passengers overpowering hijackers.The fighter pilot's name was something Peter Ruse(can't remember it exactly but a high school photo of him was posted),he died due an heart attacks in that december.
2001-1968=33
In the Year 1968: >2001: A Space Odyssey was released >Breaking of ground for the construction of the twin towers >AT&T makes 911 the national emergency dialing number >George W Bush (Skull and Bones) graduates from Yale >New York "jets " win their only superbowl that season ,creating speculation match might be fixed >David Rockefeller on the cover of Newsweek magazine 1967 with watch set to 911
They have planned the destruction of twin towers at the time of construction itself.
So they must have put some structural loop holes at the time of building it for the ease of destruction
>Just before plane hit they were talking about famous pilot Howard Hughes
>Bush in classrooom just before 911 with black students chanting in some ritualistic manner
words sounding very similar to "plane","must","hit","steel".
I remember this but it's like they attempt to scrub it all from memory. There was a flight shot down before it could hit it's destination.
I was watching this shit live when I was 17.
I also remember the memory holing of it and the bogus overpowering the hijackers bullshit story they replaced it with.
I also remember the pentagon getting hit with something too small to create the damage it did to the building.
Also, a plan this massive would have to have backups. If there were even planes involved at ALL, Silverstein and his gang of merry israelites would need a backup if the planes missed their targets which was very likely a possibility.
Backups such as "Fires started from the debris of the crashes caused the buildings to collapse", so, create fires in the buildings, simple job compared to crashing planes in them. A simple plan B.
And it's also now it's been so long ago they covered all the traces, hence this massive brainwashing campaign and total fucking clampdown on anyone asking questions. >we must not tolerate any conspiracy theorists
As george bush said at the time. >that leads them away from the guilt away from the terrorists.
Ofcourse these muslims flew airplanes into the buildings. It's impossible to fucking fake, and those who pretend to say there were no airplanes might aswell be working for the people that cover this up.
Who placed the charges that demolished those buildings! They fucked themselves when they said nobody did not even muslim terrorists not nobody. Now they were stuck with this stupid explanation that makes no sense whatsoever.
Does anybody have the cartoon that was Larry Silverstein wanting to get
rid of that pesky building so calls “1800 pull it” or something? Hilarious. Totally scrubbed
The airplanes were also distraction and the muslims themselves probably thought it ended there. That's sufficient enough of a jihaadi attack to fly two gigantic passenger aircrafts into the towers.
Then someone knew the attack was coming and demolished the buildings.
is why i say forget the airplanes. If nothing hit those buildings and they came down the same way there would be ZERO PERSON IN THE WORLD WHO WOULD EVER SAY ANYTHING BUT. >this was a controlled demolition
because that's exactly the only thing that can do that. And it was FLAWLESS.. they did it 100% flawless, it came down perfectly, so it was perfectly placed perfectly planned and perfectly executed.
So credit where it's due i guess to the evil fucks that did it with people still in the buildings. Because that's a perfect demolition of some of the biggest buildings in the world. The bigger the building the harder it is to pull it off flawless btw. So it was a perfectly fucking executed demolition..
And the airplanes knewing the hijackers were going to do that, was used as the distraction. They played the fucking hijackers like a fiddle, and they got the blame for that too.
AFTER READING WORLD TRADE CENTER #911TRUTH CONSPIRACIES TODAY I AM FINALLY CONVINCED! Children who cant even remember 9/11/2001 have it all figured out! it was israel, bush and bombs! stupid goddamn kids
You are trying to find logic in a board that is mainly retards that think they are smart so they reply to everything with satire and will object to everything you say just to get a rise out of you and retards who take the first retards at face value and believe the earth is flat and horse paste cures the "fake flu".
>You are trying to find logic in a board that is mainly retards that think they are smart so they reply to everything with satire and will object to everything you say just to get a rise out of you and retards who take the first retards at face value and believe the earth is flat and horse paste cures the "fake flu".
/misc/ is not one person. Whilst most people here are like that.
And you certainly are not mr. logic here either. Neither is OP.
You're so stupid you don't even realize that those buildings were demolished perfectly btw. And the bigger the building the more difficult it is to pull off. And the whole issue is why the fuck didn't they just say it was muslim terrorists that placed those charges. Precisely cause it wasn't, who did? shut up conspiracy theorists, my airplanes muh jetfuel. All that fire on the upper level it's because the jetfuel is fucking burning itself out dipshit.
It was alien chuchu magic that destroyed the buildings. One of them was on a Joe Rogan episode. Your opinion is discarded because of the memeflag anyway.
>It was alien chuchu magic that destroyed the buildings. One of them was on a Joe Rogan episode. Your opinion is discarded because of the memeflag anyway.
bloobloo retard. These fucking fraud things are clearly things made up by idiots trying to explain it way by making it ridiculous on purpose.
I'm not denying planes hit, that hijackers hijacked the airplanes. The only question i have is who placed the demolition explosives and the other things needed to pull it off, if that wasn't muslim terrorists aswell.
That you don't want to know that, well that's your fucking problem, because someone fucking did!
ALIEN DISCLOSURE IMMINENT UFO ARRIVAL VERY SOON 2023 QAnon
Q
Dear Sirs, a very important classified video will be leaked before Full Alien Disclosure Occurs in the Months Sept Nov 2023 Official Global Arrival Date please review attached Transcripts
I'm Formerly employee in DEEPSTATE Government Best Regards Goodluck.
Aliens UFO DID 911 TRUTH
When 9/11 happened, news in Australia initially reported that the US was attacked by aliens. There used to be videos of metal orbs flying right through the buildings coming from above instead of directly towards., RESEARCH THE FLAT EARTH.
I have a rare redpill for new and moderate 9/11 truth seekers: BUILDING 6 that you never hear about. It exploded BEFORE the two towers fell. The photo evidence proves it as does the video evidence taken by Rick Siegel:
>These threads are sickenlingly hilarious, a bunch of children who cant even remember 911 all know exactly how it happened. Lol fuck you all.
right you know how old people are on an anonymous image boards where geolocation and everything is easily spoofed aswell? Full of shit is what you are.
Understand its all mutt cope because they cant handle the fact that a few dirty arabs commondered their aircraft and brought down some buildings. Easier to swallow if these homosexuals blame their government for it
>Silverstein literally said he had the fire dep on the phone who told him the building was badly damaged and so he took the decision to "pull it".
yeah that's a video of this retard saying that, here's the problem which he was too stupid to realize. Even a much smaller building like wtc7 you can't just demo a building ad hoc that fast. You'd have to set it up in advance. Minimum a day before. Let alone the two wtc towers. This means they knew the attack was coming. And the idiot himself even took an insurance policy that covered such things. If anyone had a few braincells they'd go interrogate him after he said that. >which firefighters did you talk to who said they could demo wtc7 like that? i'd like to talk to them silverstein.
I believe a plane hit the building. I also believe the government groomed a few men into having the desire to drive a plane into the buildings. I also believe that the government set them up for success.
9/11 was an Israeli masterminded false flag, with help from traitors in the WH, Pentagon, FBI, CIA & NSA. Along with generous help from the ~~*MSM*~~.
my theory is:
2 hijackers plan to fly commercial planes into building.
someone in USA with foreknowledge of that event sets it up to make it deliberately worse than it is, by rigging demo charges in both wtc 1 and 2, and also wtc7 which takes atleast a day to do. I'm just sticking to atleast a day to make you to realize it's impossible to do the day in question, even to wtc7 which larry silverstein stupidly overspoke and said they pulled building 7 cause 'too much damage' not realizing the dufus that you can't just set it up ad hoc so fast on the day in question in a matter of a few hours.
Something hit the pentagon which wasn't an airplane, again to make the attack worse than it actually was.
So in my view it's a mix of actual jihadis and elements in US government or military that took advantage of this and made it deliberately worse than it was, and also allowed it to happen to have excuse to do so.
So they killed several thousand people on purpose, when the demolition order for those two towers came, used the actual hijacked planes as a distraction. And then failed to blame muslim terrorists for setting up the demolition charges aswell. Because had they how did they get access and who let them.
So they came up with this bullshit pancake theory instead.
SOMEONE DEMOLISHED THOSE BUILDINGS, and when you say nobody did, not even muslim terrorists, i know you are fucking lying.
And the first one i would have talked to was larry silverstein who said that they agreed to 'pull' wtc7, you can't just do that on the day in question.
And then i'd talk to people at the pentagon who false flagged themselves with what looks like an impact from a cruise missile/missile of sorts.
Pentagon was the only place i don't think a plane was involved. There's fucking nothing coming near hitting pentagon without being shot down. How fucking stupid do they think people are, very stupid apparently.
Tfw ITT is full of chinks accustomed to commie carboard blocks falling like solids, not knowing proper buildings projects are made in a way to make the thing fall into itself to avoid further damage in the surroundings (since Vitruvius, you know?). Let's talk about lucky Larry instead, that's something falling out of place!
>Tfw ITT is full of chinks accustomed to commie carboard blocks falling like solids, not knowing proper buildings projects are made in a way to make the thing fall into itself to avoid further damage in the surroundings
it's made to perfectly demolish on itself, the two biggest towers in the world at that time, and also wtc7? All the way down to the basement that also turned to basically molten lava. With zero demolition charges and zero thermite used.
That's some genius engineering. NOT, because if all it takes to accomplish that is jet fuel and using it to set fire to a few upper levels. This is dumbass engineering to the nth degrees.
Please provide the source for wtc 1 and 2 was designed to perfectly self demolish if its upper levels got hot enough. I'd love to see it. Also do the same for wtc7.
>Tfw ITT is full of chinks accustomed to commie carboard blocks falling like solids, not knowing proper buildings projects are made in a way to make the thing fall into itself to avoid further damage in the surroundings
it's made to perfectly demolish on itself, the two biggest towers in the world at that time, and also wtc7? All the way down to the basement that also turned to basically molten lava. With zero demolition charges and zero thermite used.
That's some genius engineering. NOT, because if all it takes to accomplish that is jet fuel and using it to set fire to a few upper levels. This is dumbass engineering to the nth degrees.
Please provide the source for wtc 1 and 2 was designed to perfectly self demolish if its upper levels got hot enough. I'd love to see it. Also do the same for wtc7.
>Please provide the source for wtc 1 and 2 was designed to perfectly self demolish if its upper levels got hot enough. I'd love to see it. Also do the same for wtc7.
Just ask your trusted architect memeflag
so no sources then. I'd expect you to provide atleast 1 fucking source, just any source, for that wtc 1 and 2 were designed to if the upper levels become hot enough the whole thing just pancakes and turns into molten lava into the basement. WITHOUT THERMITE, without demo explosives without any kind of demolition setup. Don't you realize what you're saying.
A fire started by jetfuel at the upper levels could then cause the entire building to go down and even melt the entire basement, that's fucking the dumbest feat of engineering ever.
The upper levels were not supposed to fall into the lower ones. The crash compromised the main structure supporting those higher levels. Fire just helped, but the main damage was made from the first explosion. The second plane hit the tower in a worse spot compared to the first one, that's why it collapsed earlier. Maybe the first tower could have survived if the second one didn't fall right next to it. Idk about the molten lava, I'm not trying to deny they put something in the basement. Maybe otger anons have explainations for that. This dorsn't change the fact buildings (especially high rise) are designed to collapse on the inside and not like a tree or a chink condo
>Idk about the molten lava, I'm not trying to deny they put something in the basement. Maybe otger anons have explainations for that. This dorsn't change the fact buildings (especially high rise) are designed to collapse on the inside and not like a tree or a chink condo
it collapsed all the way down to beneath the basement levels that was basically molten lava. >i'm not trying to deny they put something in the basement.
Finally some fucking progress. Also now realize they could not do this either that it fall like that unless they actually demo'd it with precision charges and thermite. Because it'd not fully collapse but stop and have parts of it break off. The way it fell down was as if nothing was below the other levels, as if they just gave way, hence they say pancake or domino whatever you prefer. This could not happen with simply jetfuel. Especially with the entire basement being gone.
But let's go with yours they placed something in the basement for example, if that's the only concession you willing to make? WHO? because the official story is, no demo charges no thermite no nothing, not even muslim terrorists placed anything like that. And you'd have to place it in advance atleast a day before which means you knew the attack was coming.
And then ofcourse you have mr. larry silverstein who said they pulled wtc7, how? who set those charges? fell in exactly same way too. Also requiring foreknowledge of the attack.
Again, I'm not supporting the official version, but the domino effect of upper floors smashing onto the lower ones is very plausible. The structure wasn't very solid, and it was mainly open spaces with the lift area in the middle. There weren't solid walls except for the exterior steel beams
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>The structure wasn't very solid, and it was mainly open spaces with the lift area in the middle.
it's unreasonable to think that floor plates of that size were not supported except on their outer edge.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Yeah, that lift shaft bllsht is what the glowie shills always tout. It's pulled from early obfuscations of the core geometry put out by the official sources where they minimise or hide the core. Obviously it's a big problem for their version.
https://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/
Trouble with this is that the core actually carried two thirds of the live loads, and was substantially stronger than the exterior columns. In addition the upper stories were only designed to carry the live loads of the stories above and so they were incapable of crushing the lower levels. You can actually see them spilling over the sides as they encounter the intact portion. The whole building was designed like that to resist wind sheer. It was actually capable of carrying three times the live loads. It's inconceivable that any part of the plane apart from the turbine shafts could have significantly damaged the core which was composed of 47 continuously welded and cross braced steel columns. It should have carried on standing.
THE INFORMATION THE israelite AND GLOWnaggerS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW. >5 dancing Israelis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLnKiTmO64c >200 mossad agents arrested and interrogated during 9/11 investigation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUt_3pcc4Ww >Israelis George Washington Bridge Bomb Van https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPixLOclB9Y >Lucky Larry Silverstein https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVlVG8C18yY >$2.3 Trillion Missing from the Pentagon / DoD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU >WTC 7 collapsed by fire https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xd7tqpwdlpQ >Lucky Larry Silverstein "Pull it" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq-0JIR38V0
WITH israeliteS, YOU LOSE.
It sounds like most people here are trying to make sense of the "official story" and what actually happened. whether they did their 3rd grade 2001 level CGI and made it look like a plane. or whether it was a missle. or whether nothing actually hit it at all and it was just blown up. or all 3 happened at once and thats why were still arguing about it. None of that matters, as we all know it was an inside job. personally i dont give a shit what you think happened because it doesnt matter. they fucking took all of those buildings down to achieve a goal. but they had to have the entire population on their side to agree to absolute and total surveillance. and they did it.
For years they subtly inserted the idea of planes hitting the towers causing fire into the minds of the masses
Pre programming a response and belief so nobody would have any thoughts of their own on the subject
Life imitates art
Who knows how many subtle messages they've inserted into media for you to believe
Every reaction, every belief, every opinion you hold could be created by media
This is why I never watch any media on TV/theater/music
I am capable of my own thoughts and actions unlike you
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
it's called brainwashing very noticeable during the plandemic
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Not DURING the pandemic
BEFORE the pandemic
Training people to believe doctors know what's best and medical science is too complicated to even ask questions
Vaccinations at birth and through life
Teaching people this is normal and questioning it is absurd
Predictive programming
They train you on television, movies, and music with subtle hints
Like you watch show after show after show with subtle cuckold themes like Bella and the bull dogs
Then it happens to you in real life
The natural human response is to self destruct/attack them
But because of your predictive programming you will believe it's okay, you might even blurt out a line you heard in a show/song as response to the sight
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
The thickest steel beams ever created
Capable of withstanding airplane crash
Turned to dust before your eyes
And everyone said "must have been a plane/bomb"
Predictive programming
TV/media made you believe this was the case before it even happened because of subtle programming like
Imagine you are an insurance broker. you just woke up on monday morning and one of your clients calls you and says he wants to take out a billion dollar policy for "terrorist attacks" you start fumbling through your paperwork because you didnt know that even existed. a few weeks later, this improbable scenario unfolds right before your very eyes. hey, its your fault (insurance companies) you should have never offered the coverage. Its fucking hilarious, you wont offer "flood" insurance to some regular fucker, but you will pay out for an obvious scam. "an act of god" and " an act of israelites" completely different get your fucking terms correct
A fellow insurance industry knower, this is a rarity on pol. Larry is truly the luckiest man alive for getting that policy so close to a triggering event!
Even more criminal of this whole situation was how quickly they removed all the evidence so that there was no investigation possible of what happened. The allegation that thermite was used seems also plausible. Jet fuel cannot melt these steal beams. And all the fire you see is the fuel burning itself out from the airplanes, there's no doubt whatsoever that airplanes hit those buildings. But that doesn't explain how they later collapsed on their own footprint.
So you are looking at both a) airplanes involved b) demolition charges and thermite involved.
Then you got the strange case of larry silverstein, literally took out an insurance policy that covers this specific thing, very shortly before it even happened! Damn that's one heck of a lucky coincidence.
Then you also have the strange case of not only muslims celebrating which was obvious, them thinking actually that it was them that did it, and also israelis celebrating (moving systems). Anyone who know anything about muslims and israelites is they certainly wouldn't celebrate the same event for the same reason!
USA used that as an excuse to go to middle east and destabilize the region, leading to muslim immigration to europe under the refugee clause.
that's just desinfo
the wtc was fully covered against terrorist attacks damage even before the 1993 terrorist attack, in that time the insurance companies paid for the damage
With all the information available the goyim are to busy witnessing endless horrors to ever think a plan of action to make it stop
The weapons test at 9/11 was a huge success
Although it happened before the eyes of thousands of people, noone has come to the conclusion it was an inside job except fringe minority groups
Nobody can stop the israelites
Nobody would even think of it
Is it too late to stop them?
Absolutely not.
But you won't
You won't do shit
israelites are God's chosen people
And then when the order was given, as the firefighters and others said, they heard this boom and then pop pop pop pop pop and the building just fucking collapsed in freefall speed and everyone ofcourse fucking running like crazy WTF WTF!!!
>What sound do you expect snapping steel beams to make? Honk honk honk?
Again, I'm not supporting the official version, but the domino effect of upper floors smashing onto the lower ones is very plausible. The structure wasn't very solid, and it was mainly open spaces with the lift area in the middle. There weren't solid walls except for the exterior steel beams
>Again, I'm not supporting the official version, but the domino effect of upper floors smashing onto the lower ones is very plausible.
I'll take both of you since that's pretty much the same argument.
Right down to under the basement just collapsing at free fall speed? This is what you do in a demolition btw. Again we're back at this bullshit that it was designed to collapse like that by itself. Built in demo basically.
If no airplane ever hit any of those buildings and they collapsed on themselves like that, what would you say it was? You know it. Same with wtc7 which wasn't hit by a plane.
If it's build like it's made of sticks and all it takes is hot jetfuel on the upper levels to get every single level to collapse on itself right down to the basement, how is it even up to building code at all?
They demo'd this on purpose to put the blame on the hijackers which they knew were going to attack those buildings anyways. To make it deliberately worse. Someone sat there and pressed the button, two times, and then third time with wtc7.
there's only one way to settle the debate.
reconstruct a like-for-like version of the towers and crash two unmanned Boeing planes into them, in the name of science
Ignore all the shills in this thread
Buildings can collapse due to fire, but from what Ive seen outside 9/11, it needs to be roughly 100x more intense than the 9/11 buildings
Examples:
Contrast that to WTC7, from this angle you cant even see the fire, yet it falls directly down with no real deviation
Extremely unprecedented, never seen a collapse like this except for the 9/11 buildings
Random derelicts vs cutting edge construction in one of the richest places on earth
>still falls vertically
a building is not a domino piece, if the foundation is not compromised it will never fall to only one side
source on that claim?
>source on that claim?
physics
build a structure of dominoes like pic related and try to make it collapse from only one side
Kek. I dare you to find a video of a building collapsing the same way as the towers.
You want him to share controlled demolition videos?
Tower 7 was absolutely a controlled demolition. No way that building goes down but the hotel across the street doesn’t get damaged.
>Tower 7 was absolutely a controlled demolition. No way that building goes down but the hotel across the street doesn’t get damaged.
the problem is also larry silverstein admitted that he talked to 'firefighters' and they agreed to just 'pull it' and he said and we watched it come down. You can't do a controlled demo ad hoc. And wtc 1 and 2 collapsed in exactly same perfect way. That they even got away with it just with massive media propaganda is fucking sad, but they did.
And what is wrong with how they collapsed?
So you cant. got it.
Please tell me how many skyscrappers have been hit with an airliner at high speed? So I can find it as another example
Please tell me how many skyscrappers collabsed exactly how building 7 did, due to fire or even those hit by bombs and missiles.
>due to fire
Are you blind or retarded Or just intentionaly ignoring the OPs picture?
A giant skycrapper collapsed next to the WT-7. That damaged the building pretty badly.
>That damaged the building pretty badly.
It didn't. The explosives that were rigged to bring it down in it's footprint were the culprit
The Empire State Building ate a bomber once and was fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash
retard
The WTC's were built to withstand a crash from a fully loaded 707, which is 35 tons heavier than a 767.
This
Building code needs to be changed. All buildings over 5 stories high must be made out of passports
No. 767 is heavier than 707.
But can it fly at 500+mph at sea level?
In practical term, they are the same aircraft.
STFU sophist
permaban this poster
>sar 1A still the truth
>If you can believe that.
>a crash from a fully loaded 707
>that was expected to be flying at very slow speed lost in the fog.
>thats the same as a much bigger plane flying at 400+mph
>derp
Actually, a white paper released on February 3, 1964 states that the Towers could have withstood impacts of jetliners traveling 600 mph.
'Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.'
John Skilling was the head structural engineer for the World Trade Center.
'Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure would still be there. '
>'Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure would still be there. '
exactly what you would expect to have happened. And then someone gave a fucking demolition order! and the first building collapsed, and then demo order given for the second one. Right at the time it would probably start fizzling itself out.
So someone sat and watched that and gave the order at the opportune moment.
It's why everyone expected they would say it was muslim terrorists who did that also. BUT NO! just the jetfuel..
And, the buildings withstood the impact just fine, though people were stuck above the impact points in some cases.
What brought it down wasn't the impacts. It was the cumulative damage in combination with the fire (and maybe some code violations).
There also weren't any wide body passenger jets in 1964. WTC was hit by wide body jets, which are three times as heavy and carry at least double the fuel compared to anything flying in 64.
>post claim from 9/11 "research"
>accepts it without question
post white paper then. Leslie Roberts said it was designed for a 180mph collision.
>Frank A. Demartini, the on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, who said on January 25, 2001:
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time....this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.”
wierd. he didnt wonder why the planes didnt bounce off lol
The WTC ate the Boeing airplanes just fine. It was the full tanks of jet fuel burning for hours that caused them to collapse.
Nothing, these people are sick
Clearly a controlled demolition.
Even at that resolution, you can see the flashes from the charges.
Just stop, nothing of the sort is in there nor needed for that to have occurred.
I hope you die a horrible covid death
don't waste your energy on 9/11 trolls and shills, speak to architects and engineers.
'...the company I work for certified the steel components used in the construction
of the WTC buildings. ...the results of these tests… indicate that the buildings should have easily
withstood the thermal stress caused by… burning [jet fuel, paper, etc.. (Ryan, 2004)
retard
The full video of the collapse, the clip you show had molten metal flowing from the corner just seconds before collapse, but you cut the video because you are wacky and the truth make you feel dumb because you believed a lie for two decades. I dare you to find the original full length clip and examine and explain away liquid flowing steel.
>molten metal from JP-8 fire
Yeah that molten metal can only be explained by thermite
>Yeah that molten metal can only be explained by thermite
It collapsed into dust and become molten lava even several stories down beneath the basement level. This is not only a demolition but a PERFECTLY EXECUTED DEMOLITION of two of the largest buildings in the world, and wtc7 which wasn't a midget either and hit by nothing, collapsing in exactly same way.
It's so perfectly executed it's almost impressive. And you'd have to execute it perfectly, if you fuck up just a little bit, big parts of the towers were going to crash and hit so many things around them and totally destroy that whole area in a much bigger way, instead of it just turns to fucking dust and molten steel and 'lava'.
>burning material ejected
ITS METAL MOLTEN GUVNA
it should overturn. hope not all spainards are yhis retarded
I've been monitoring this homosexual, he's posted this video in some other threads already, glowhomosexual from black cube disinfo sucursal located in Madrid, Paseo de la Castellana, one of the big towers there, or who the hell knows
after saying this, this thread will probably be saged to death with some proxy accounts posting retarded bullshit so I'll preemptively bumping each few minutes to fuck with the shill
look, they started blasting the sages with bullshit
>every single time
the only one bullshitting here is you. You fucked up big time when you pretended as if it's normal for buildings to be hit by something or some explosion and then it demolishes automatically in free fall speed on its own footprint.
if that was the case, there would be no such thing as a demolition crew ever. Because nobody would fucking need them for anything. And there would also be no chance of demolitions going wrong like there's ofcourse thousands of videos off online where the charges don't explode in the right sequence so part of the building fucking falls down on the side and hits other buildings or things it wasn't supposed to.
They are
Los Illuminados detected
you can clearly see the main support beam slowly buckle from the heat. no explosion was needed. the intense heat from the burning jetfuel weakened the supports enough to fail and when that happened all that weight from the top slammed down unevenly on the rest of the floors causing them to buckle one by one.
jet fuel burns off almost instantly. it’s not hard to understand, idiot. the fire was office furniture.
>muh jet fuel melts steel beams
no, not unless you use a torch. it’s amazing how many homosexuals have never welded or used a forge. the concept of thermodynamics is always avoided by shills. your magical theory has an endless supply of jet fuel being focused like an oxyacetylene torch on the center columns.
>b-b-but look at the fire
yeah there’s a bunch of orange sparks flying out the building right before it collapses. explain that shit retard and i’ll let you bury yourself and you can report back to your supervisor for some more pilpul
based kenedian.
also, buildings dont collapse into themselves when the lower part is intact.
also collapsing near freefall speed is EVEN MORE not possible.
i think its the people that dont change their own oil and dont know how to change wiper fluid are the onces thinking this is all possible without explosives
strong basement explosion before plane/rocket impact, supposed to be happening at the exact same time so it would not be noticed. hence this guy
also demo expert danny jowenko (who is now dead), was shown tower 7 collapsing and they didnt tell him it was on 911. he says 100% controlled demo.
but even without that, you can see it with your own eyes.
that's why the Israelis were dancing, they had to time it just right and they nailed it
youre one of the dumbest people elive
no he spits facts.
tell me; do you change your own motoroil?
Did you know an oxy fuel torch doesn't actually melt the steel?
True, Anyone can write random shit and pretend it’s real like you
The twin towers also had a unique structural design. A typical skyscraper has a grid of columns supporting the floors. The twin towers wanted a column-free space for maximum lease flexibility so they made the entire exterior load-bearing panels, with floors spanning from the core to the exterior. When the planes hit they cut out entire sections of these load-bearing panels. Take a look at construction photos; these panels were pretty light but there were a lot of them. Once sections of the exterior wall were cut out, there was no redundant support and the long-span floor started to drop at the outside. Once the corner started to drop, it was a runaway freight train.
You can convince me Israel remote controlled the planes before you can convince me there were no planes, or that the collapse is impossible with planes only.
if that's the case then the structual exterior on the side opposite the starting point of the collapse should have held and not collapsed. The building would tip over toward the collapse, where the failure was, and the non-failure parts should have held on, at least initially until the weight of the collapsing upper structure broke them.
Picture a tree with a wedge cut out of the trunk. It tips towards the wedge and the side opposite holds.
>3 building asymmetrically damaged
>3 buildings symmetrically collapsed
It can happen…….riiiiiiiight?
you guys are just speaking about nonsense. silversteinberg did all his research, on how to properly take down the towers. and then he purchased "terrorist insurance" just weeks prior. once you understand this "one simple trick" "doctors"will hate you"
A solid tree isn’t a good comparison. More like a very thin-walled pipe. A pipe with such a thin wall that it relies on a system of internal baffles to maintain its stiffness.
Everyone debating the jet fuel/steel beams issue is missing the point. Each floor was held in place with rivets which warped. The weight was carried by an exoskeleton and each floor was attached to this shell by mere rivets.
>Everyone debating the jet fuel/steel beams issue is missing the point. Each floor was held in place with rivets which warped. The weight was carried by an exoskeleton and each floor was attached to this shell by mere rivets.
so it was built to collapse in free fall speed? all you have to do is damage several floors and you'd get a controlled demolition? The dumber things are said the more impressive it is you believe this pancake bullshit.
wtc7 also collapsed in exactly same perfect way.
If what you say is true just set several building levels on fire if the heat is intense enough. And add some miracle jetfuel aswell, and now the entire building collapses and turns to 'lava' even in the basement. Fucking impressive feat of engineering. How'd you like to work there?
>theyre made to fall like that
Retarded take
Are you mentally ill, stupid or both? It was clearly a controlled demolition.
It was a direct energy weapon
Noone really knows. It was staring you right in the face the whole time. When LamperMan appears...no soul is safe.
By now you could probably make a computer render and simulate the collapse all over again
In a monte carlo style
Yea, I've showed this video to conspiracy retards too. It's like they don't even see it. It's actually like they aren't interacting with reality in any way. Their eyes are open and they can talk, but there is no one behind the wheel. Like robots.
>aluminum cans did this
NOW THATS A LOTTA DAMAGE!
>Kek. I dare you to find a video of a building collapsing the same way as the towers.
Grand opening.
>You want him to share controlled demolition videos?
Grand closing.
buildings aren't built like that
Yes, true, but it still wont be as perfectly vertical as the towers were.
why would architects construct buldings like a stack of dominos? And even in this stack of dominos it doesn't all collapse as one. Absolutely retarded answer on every level
>structure of dominoes
yes, steel-concrete is like dominoes. fuckin genius
How far can you fetch?
3rd tower was not hit by a plane nor the other buildings
Nor BY* the other buildings. Support that claim with your first claim
The heat generated from the first 2 weakened the structure of WTC7
Lmao. More like the third plane didn’t arrive and plans were already made.
Are you saying this with a serious face?
yeah
Four buildings went poof on 9.11
he hasn't seen the Chinese videos
Go back to wating tables manolo, fucking midget brain mongoloid siesta nagger
They do collapse from one side if you do that.
Dominos won't lean over, but they won't all collapse vertically at once. The collapse will progress inward from the failure point.
Look guys, a spanish jude!
Observe his little judaism
El jude espanol
GLUE EVERY DOMINO TOGETHER THEN REPEAT YOUR homosexual EXPERIMENT
Good lord you’re fucking retarded.
>pHySicS.
Its called physics you obese retarded cunt
Fucking moron
Then why do building demolitions always make sure to destroy all support columns? Couldn't they save time and money by just blowing up one?
To prevent shit like a piece of burning twin tower debris crashing into WTC 7 causing it later to collapse
this utter bullshit
Civ engineer here
Retarded spic. XD
>~~*Experts*~~ say
lol said the scorpion
it was just sleepy bro
have you bothered looking up why this building collapsed?
chink retards digged a big depression in the ground right next to this building and after some rain the foundation fall to one side
i didnt even have to click or do any research and i knew it was china.
>a building is not a domino piece
Can't believe i missed the retard saying this. Wait till you look at what the official story is.
Dominoed/pancaked all the way down to the basement levels that were basically molten metal/lava like shit. No demolition charges no thermite no nothing. Just add hot jetfuel to several upper floors. And collapsed perfectly on itself.
YES THAT'S THE OFFICIAL VERSION! feel stupid yet?
Buttfuck me?
berg
That still didn't help it not fall vertically.
>a building is not a domino piece, if the foundation is not compromised it will never fall to only one side
...but it will fall straight down.
Got it.
Idiot.
Retard
falls vertically
Yeah, that's gravity, that's how things fall where I live. Do things fall sideways where you live?
there are other forces besides gravity, you know.
idiot
fpbp
Trees don’t fall vertically when you chop them down they fall over at the point you cut them at
fpbp
>2 planes
>3 building
>3 asymmetrical damages
>3 symmetrical collapses
Your picture is a loaded question.
It didn't though
at free fall speed
When you fall down do you fall in slow motion?
Everything falls at 9.8m/s^2 unless there is something in its path like the rest of the building
DELET THIS
>feds HATE him for this simple observation.
"this one simple trick" "and thats why its a good thing"
>internal collapse clealry evident as penthouse falls first
>expects the building to topple over
Yes, this is mainly thanks to gravity, which tends to pull things vertically downward.
>Yes, this is mainly thanks to gravity, which tends to pull things vertically downward.
So it would tip toward the damged side, meme flag israelite. Israel did 9/11
>doesn't understand physics
naggers
Your government hates you
As much as yours hates you?
>pic rel July 2008
15 years ago you were already getting enriched.
>office fires
>No 7777
fail
>nobody checking the 77 reply
What the fuck
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Wow, what a lucky plane. Shame that it was a glownagger psyop, would've made me happy if some of them died
>Disclose.tv twitter pushing WT7 inside job
Premature Bomb damage is perfectly inline with the grand conspiracy.
They found the passports of the hijackers in the rubble
Make this make sense with everything else
It was planted by the guy who "found" it. That means they knew about the attack beforehand. 9/11 was a false-flag operation.
>pic related
Small hat people
are you trolling or you really that retarded?
electrical fuse is a completely different thing from an explosive fuse
>are you trolling or you really that retarded?
He should ask you the same thing. At first i thought you were when you made this thread, now i'm not sure about that at all.
I want to hold you to the second comment you made, because you actually fucked yourself and you didn't even realize it.
>a building is not a domino piece
Can't believe i missed the retard saying this. Wait till you look at what the official story is.
Dominoed/pancaked all the way down to the basement levels that were basically molten metal/lava like shit. No demolition charges no thermite no nothing. Just add hot jetfuel to several upper floors. And collapsed perfectly on itself.
YES THAT'S THE OFFICIAL VERSION! feel stupid yet?
Then you say.
>if the foundation is not compromised it will never fall to only one side
Exactly, it won't implode either all the way down to the basement either. The only way for wtc to have been a domino effect/pancake simply by adding jetfuel to the higher levels is. you put demolition explosives on almost all the levels, including thermite and things at the foundation, so you crush the foundation as you detonate the charges so it fall all the way down and the unimploded part of the structure meets the 'lava' below in the basement.
If you weren't to crush the foundation aswell, it would fall everywhere to all sides when it hits the bottom level, so you have to make the foundation be fucking molten lava, with something like thermite.
You almost explained it to yourself why the official explanation with just add jetfuel could not have caused this basically perfect demolition of some of the largest buildings in the world, on the same day, and then also wtc7 which wasn't hit by airplane and jetfuel was not a factor there. Fell in exactly same way.
>collapsed perfectly
>40 other buildings damaged
is it genuine retardation or purposeful lying?
perfectly
>>40 other buildings damaged
>is it genuine retardation or purposeful lying?
that's what a perfect demolition of such a large building looks like yes. You wouldn't want to see what an imperfect demolition of such a huge building would look like.
Both wtc1 and wtc2 collapsed perfectly at free fall speed on its own footprint. That's a perfect demolition. It doesn't mean you will get zero damage to any buildings. You can't turn every part of the structure to instant molten steel that just slides down into a hole.
Shits going to go flying to the sides obviously, but in a failed demo it's large parts of the entire building. And if you had that, it wouldn't fall like that.
Idk in what world you think you can perfectly demo a building that large and you think you can stand right across the street to it and be totally safe. Even if you did it perfectly.
And idk why you are even complaining with me pointing out that that's a perfect demo. You're the retards who believe that it was jetfuel that did all of it. They were standing right next to all these other fucking buildings with very little space between them.
tells everyone, "everyone look away" throws passports down. "oh my god, look at this" they made family guy cut this scene.
>tells everyone, "everyone look away" throws passports down. "oh my god, look at this" they made family guy cut this scene.
Yeah that's literally retarded, cause they go with this bullshit theory that jet fuel and the airplane melted those buildings so they collapsed on itself even so much there's molten lava in basement, without demolition charges without thermite used without anything.
And then
>oh a wild passport that just happened to be his, flew out of the window when the plane hit, right out of his fucking pocket. Intact so much they could tell who it was.
Was jihaadis, but it wasn't his fucking passport! that's so fucking stupid!
Melts entire wtc 1 and 2, except passports are made of fucking unobtainum temporarily till they fall on ground and are picked up mostly intact.
>oh look what i found
or planted, like fucking 'sherlock holmes' straight from hell.
kek. steel doesn't behave like that. It sags, it thickens and then it hardens. Unless you are providing oxy acetylene thermite or therm nuclear temperatures you can never melt a continuously welded steel frame. It just conducts heat awat as fast as you can apply it. Anyone can see, far from generating enough heat the burning paraffin is simply creating tons of soot which is convecting heat and carbon away from the buildings frame. People just don't understand the physics.
>kek. steel doesn't behave like that. It sags, it thickens and then it hardens. Unless you are providing oxy acetylene thermite or therm nuclear temperatures you can never melt a continuously welded steel frame. It just conducts heat awat as fast as you can apply it. Anyone can see, far from generating enough heat the burning paraffin is simply creating tons of soot which is convecting heat and carbon away from the buildings frame. People just don't understand the physics.
They know most americans are easy to lie to it's why they came up with it. You got demo charges up and down those buildings and you using thermite at the same time just as you explained, only way you could ever do it.
These morons think jet fuel did this, and only jet fuel! Concentrated at the higher levels of the building where the planes hit.
israelites rule us
>rare vhs recording from french television during the live broadcast
kek
The funniest of all is the official story was some young technician in the control room made a "mistake".
But back then, there was no movie shown with subtitles on French television. And the cut displayed is the moment when the death star is blown up. Total Cohencidence I guess.
I recorded it on vhs too. I wonder if its still floating around somewhere.
Did it glitched and showed something it didn't had to?
>the chewbacca argument
Why is chewbacca on endor
did not collapse
A much much smaller building with a different construction method (conrete reinforced beams vs steel beams)
>concrete reinforced vs steel
steel is much much stronger than concrete. you’re actually stupid, it’s painful.
Reinforced concrete is stronger in its own ways... skyscrapers use steel structure because of the height.
>with a different construction method
Kek So I have to build another WTC building to prove 9/11 was an inside job to you?
Yeah - theres nothing that will convince you then
FUCKING LOL
Lucky there’s already one in Tulsa Oklahoma. Same architect, same blueprint. Only 50 stories tall.
Shouldn’t there be a large crater in the street? 2mvg4n
He shaped the explosive when packing it so most of the blast when horizontal (with most going into the building).
no heat from fire, silly little chud.
you're loyal to tel aviv. its ok. you get paid enough for your family?
All of those little babies were murdered to destroy the Clinton papers. Who do the Clintons serve?
An unrelated event.
Another coincidence
Dumb example. The blast of the OKC bombing occurred more or less outside of the building.
OKC
>bomb out side
>side blown off
>still standing
WTC1.0
>bomb in basement
>underground garage made bigger
>building still standing
WTC2.0
>third time a charm
Did the building across the street get destroyed like this one?
>the meme bootlickers don't want you to see
This. The official narrative is such obvious bullshit. The investigation was a whitewash and no one has ever been held accountable.
20 years of conspiracy theories because americans are too fucking stupid to understand metal doesn't need to reach melting point to become weak and malleable. We've been hammering metal sticks into weapons and tools for thousands of years yet here we are.
I wish every 9/11 brought another terrorist plot that killed tens of thousands of you knuckle-dragging mouthbreathers.
Well said anon
Lmao is this from those videos of a blacksmith heating steel up and then bending it in a fundamentally different way to demonstrate muh "jet fuel CAN weaken steel beams" - he pulled a big smuggie and got lots of views for that video.. The fuel weakening beams theory doesnt line up with the precision cuts of steel beams at the bottom of BOTH buildings when they came down, and the fact all that remained of all of this are a few passports. As well as the fact passengers on board were calling their relatives to inform them of their impending demise. You actually believe that too. I hope a plane engine falls off the wing and lands on top of you- if they included that in the story you'd probably believe that happened too
The towers being destroyed but the passports surviving might be the clowniest detail of all.
>mexican intellectual
unironically it that phenomena it's called creep of metals
?si=stLEo-ScWKeF973P
Was thermite used in 9/11?
Absolutely yes.
Did thermite cause the towers collapse?
Absolutely not.
The plane was a cover up that normal people would believe because they are idiots.
The thermite was a cover up that conspiracy theorists would believe because it's an obvious cause of destruction found all over the wreckage.
The reality is an energy weapon.
A reality almost nobody would believe even if they saw evidence.
It is the weapon of the great reset, it literally turns metal to dust.
Everything on earth could be returned to dust leaving only stone, trees, and anything blue
lol is that a picture of the maui, Hawaii fires? the one where they just set it on fire with a few bic lighters? And if they are using dews direct energy weapons then why load the entire place up with c4 and thermite? if you want plausible deniability, then you could still use the plane theory. but why take all the time to completely wire the entire building with explosives if youre just gonna use some "energy weapon".
"if youre good enough to get in here, then you would know that this doesnt do anything, its just a subline. bourne would know" "show me again"
100%
the towers melted into the bedrock, in videos you can see ibeams turn to dust as they fall. it was something much worse than jet fuel, and some a-rabs praising allah
Wow that's cool, in sync free fall speed.
hahhahahhHAHAHHAA
Fuck I can’t wait to smoke glowies
They should have made the towers out of passports
?si=0ehrUowyLm2pNzQB
Very convenient for the glowies to leave that part out. If WTC7 couldn't handle the heat generated from the other buildings then how the fuck did the passport survive
Or how the fuck did any of the other surrounding older buildings survive from this heat? Passports and older buildings can but not a couple decades old wtc7
It was certainly on fire.
Fire.
Consider this retard homosexual.
>conspiracy theory
is a buzzword and a fraud term created to explain away the kennedy assasination as a normal event. It has no basis whatsoever. Conspiracy schizos is not any better.
Now consider the following. USA allow hijackers to fly planes into buildings, pentagon was not hit by airplane. As excuse to go to middle east, to destabilize it, and funnel muslim immigrants into europe with excuse of they being refugees. Because if they weren't, no europeans in their right mind would allow mass muslim immigration, since muslims have a 1300 year old history of trying to invade europe and install sharia law.
Since an airplane by itself cannot bring down buildings especially ones that large, they placed detonation charges all around the building and a bit after the planes had hit, detonated both of the towers killing everyone in the vicinity.
Wtc7 that was not hit by a plane also detonated on its own foot print.
It is impossible to have a freefall collapse of a building without it being demolished by carefully placed detonation charges.
The whole reason why demolition squads exist is because you can't just crash something into it and it falls on its own footprint. It does literally everything else if you don't implode it with careful precision.
You can look up demolitions gone wrong where they even get it wrong and so it falls on the side and hits all kinds of things it's not supposed to and all this type of shit.
The socalled pancake theory which became the official story, that the literal weight of the bearing structures collapsed and thus produced and ever increasing pancake of fast strength also falls short to explain why even the basement levels of both structures were on fire. You'd have to collapse the entire loadbearing structures in sequence to get it to fall on its own footprint.
wtc7 which was not hit by a plane did the precisely same thing. Freefall collapse (perfect demolition) implies that all the load bearing structures are no longer there, hence it falls with the normal speed of a falling object as if it was just falling down through the air.
Even more criminal of this whole situation was how quickly they removed all the evidence so that there was no investigation possible of what happened. The allegation that thermite was used seems also plausible. Jet fuel cannot melt these steal beams. And all the fire you see is the fuel burning itself out from the airplanes, there's no doubt whatsoever that airplanes hit those buildings. But that doesn't explain how they later collapsed on their own footprint.
So you are looking at both a) airplanes involved b) demolition charges and thermite involved.
Then you got the strange case of larry silverstein, literally took out an insurance policy that covers this specific thing, very shortly before it even happened! Damn that's one heck of a lucky coincidence.
Then you also have the strange case of not only muslims celebrating which was obvious, them thinking actually that it was them that did it, and also israelis celebrating (moving systems). Anyone who know anything about muslims and israelites is they certainly wouldn't celebrate the same event for the same reason!
USA used that as an excuse to go to middle east and destabilize the region, leading to muslim immigration to europe under the refugee clause.
The pancake idiocy as in it gives way and then it increases speed due to the weight and just pancakes through the entire building, this would not happen in free fall speed since there would be more and more resistance from all the fucking steel that had not melted whatsoever, the further you get down, you would expect most of the base bottom structure to keep standing and it tilting to the side and hitting other buildings, which is exactly what happens when they fuck up a purpousful demo, doesn't explain how even the basement levels of wtc's looked as if they had melted or had some huge explosion happen, several feet down.
So it's airplanes + completely flawless demolition. And then ofcourse wtc7 not hit by anything.. collapsed in exactly same fashion aswell.
Do you really think the architects didn't account for a little terrorism when they designed these buildings?
Does no one remember the prior attacks on these fucking buildings?
>Do you really think the architects didn't account for a little terrorism when they designed these buildings?
>Does no one remember the prior attacks on these fucking buildings?
well the point is, no building falls in free fall speed like that unless it's demolished. Not only that, but the demolition of such a GIGANTIC BUILDING had to be basically 100% perfect for it ever to happen that way!
So when they denied that muslim terrorists had placed also demo charges to demolish the entire buildings and the airplanes was just for shock and awe effect. You know it's someone in USA with a lot of power that knew a) attack was coming, maybe they didn't know precise day, maybe they knew the week, and then they had placed demo charges all over those fucking buildings including wtc7.
This is what made people freak out when they say
>no there no muslim terrorists that planted demo charges in those buildings, it just collapsed by a mystical negative miracle by itself on its own footprint due to the airplanes
NOW I KNOW YOU'RE LYING.
Nice
witnessed digits of truth.
true fact: the buildings were designed to withstand the impact of a fully fueled 707.
In a purpousful demo which wtc and wtc7 was flawless demo. Whenever you see demos go wrong, it happens because they place the demo charges slightly wrong or they don't go off at the precise moment they should. This causes large parts of the building to fall to either side and hitting other nearby buildings.
So if you wanted to demolish wtc it had to be fucking flawless or it would literally fall and crush big parts of several buildings nearby.
I'd even say if the building hadn't been demolished i would totally say look it's those airplanes and nothing else. When that building fell like you would expect in a flawless demolition, you would expect them to say, not only the hijackers flew airplanes into them, but also other muslim terrorists had managed to place demolition charges in the building and the basement of both towers without anyone noticing!
Then then they come out and say nobody did that, and that's fucking fishy! This means someone ELSE than the muslim hijackers knew the attack was coming and took advantage of it to demolish the buildings. Made even more obvious by wtc7 demolished aswell that wasn't hit by anything.
Maybe the planes hit the buildings and the government made a decision to secretly demolish the buildings before they had an imperfect fall onto others around them. That would make sense. The government wouldn’t mention it to avoid conspiracy theories. I doubt it but being a contrarian.
>Maybe the planes hit the buildings and the government made a decision to secretly demolish the buildings before they had an imperfect fall onto others around them. That would make sense. The government wouldn’t mention it to avoid conspiracy theories. I doubt it but being a contrarian.
That's what my theory is. But here's the problem with what you're saying. This is not something you do in a matter of 30 minutes. This takes careful planning and days to setup and place charges and so on that way. So it could not have happened ad hoc whilst the buildings were in fire if that is your expectation.
So they would have to have placed the demo charges BEFORE the airplanes even hit. Which makes it now nefarious why would they do that.
It's precisely because they don't say well muslim terrorists managed to do that too and also in the basements. If they had said that, this is perfect now we just got to figure out how were they able to do that, i believe you cause that was a controlled demolition.
But they specifically said, no such thing had occured whatsoever! and so this implicates very powerful people in USA who had access to that infrastructure and that kind of material and did that cloak and dagger. And that gets now into this is a conspiracy!
There's no conspiracy about some lunatic muslims flying planes into buildings, i'm not with the retards who try to say there were no planes. But the planes are not the interesting parts, it's how did those buildings get demolished so perfectly, and it was 100% perfect it was FLAWLESS DEMO, when they claim they weren't!
> This is not something you do in a matter of 30 minutes. This takes careful planning and days to setup and place charges and so on that way. So it could not have happened ad hoc whilst the buildings were in fire if that is your expectation.
Negative. Good ideas lead to more questions. If the buildings were demolished then this is one possible explanation that might get mainstream acceptance which leads to more discovery and more questions.
they planned months ahead.
months before 911 elevator "maintenance" was done where the whole floor would be sealed off from the public. floor by floor.
ofcourse they prepared all this
>they planned months ahead
Bush Sr NWO speech on 9/11 1991 10yrs prior what a coincidence
>Negative. Good ideas lead to more questions. If the buildings were demolished then this is one possible explanation that might get mainstream acceptance which leads to more discovery and more questions.
i just explain it to you, why this is not something you can do in 30 minutes or an hour whilst the buildings are on fire. It's a stupid question you are asking. And they deny deliberately that they demolished them on purpose, they deny aswell that muslim terrorists did it aswell!
This is what the fucking problem is!
And wtc7 was not hit by plane, the only way you could demolish those buildings is if you knew the attack was coming in advance!
Just so you understand it, your expectation is, whilst building was on fire, they fear it would collapse in an uncontrolled way. So whilst everyone on fire, firefighters going up and down, people trying to flee. You have a demo team running around.
>let's place explosives in both those towers so they come down in controlled fashion and not hit all kinds of other buildings.
THERE'S NO REPORTS OF THAT, also it would take over a day to fucking do! And you have to place them perfectly aswell.
SO it was not something the emergency demolition service or something could do ad hoc.
So this means whoever placed the charges, did it before the airplanes hit, they KNEW THE ATTACK WAS COMING, is why everyone was saying at the time, muslim terrorists also placed demo charges.
And then they come out and say, no there was no demo charges at all. WHAT?
>it was the airplane, it was jetfuel, it was muh pancake.
WHAT IS GOING ON? WHAT IN THE WORLD!
> Just so you understand it, your expectation is, whilst building was on fire, they fear it would collapse in an uncontrolled way. So whilst everyone on fire, firefighters going up and down, people trying to flee. You have a demo team running around.
Thanks for explaining my expectations, kek. I was pointing out a narrative that normies and msm could accept. I understand the dynamics of what occurred and realize they can’t ad-hoc demo the buildings after the attack. It’s good for thought that could gain msm acceptance which might lead to the government biting and more questions. Quit boot looping.
>Thanks for explaining my expectations, kek. I was pointing out a narrative that normies and msm could accept. I understand the dynamics of what occurred and realize they can’t ad-hoc demo the buildings after the attack. It’s good for thought that could gain msm acceptance which might lead to the government biting and more questions. Quit boot looping.
it does not take a lot of fucking thinking or being any kind of demo expert to understand that you can't setup an adhoc demo of some of the tallest buildings in the world at the time, in a few hours. No you need atleast a day ATLEAST A DAY and you have it all mapped out and everybody know exactly where to go.
So it could not have happened unless they knew it in advance, so that would be muslim terrorists that also did that or someone else who had gained access to those buildings and placed it without anyone knowing.
There was nobody that come in.
>we expect an attack maybe next week, so we going to rig the entire building for demolition just in case so if planes hit it doesn't fall and hit other buildings if you have a partial collapse of the structure.
>btw. how you feel about going to work next week? you should totally do so.
I mean come the fuck on.
The planes are the least interesting thing of what happened. Infact i'd say the only interesting part of wtc attacks is how the fuck those buildings EVER FUCKING COLLAPSED LIKE A PERFECT DEMOLITION, and them denying any charges were ever set (which is impossible to happen without that being the case).
If you are dealing with people who can't figure out that you can't rig to perfectly demolish a building whilst its on fire, or in matter of 30 minutes and a few hours. Then you struggle to explain to same people why the moon is not made out of green cheese. There's no point to even argue with such individuals.
> If you are dealing with people who can't figure out that you can't rig to perfectly demolish a building whilst its on fire, or in matter of 30 minutes and a few hours.
Agreed BUT we’ve moved to the era of expert explanations so if ~~*experts*~~ claim it’s possible then normies bite.
To this point no demolition experts that make these claims because the establishment has dozens lined up to claim otherwise.
This is no different than how expert undertakers and morticians were consider lunes for raising concerns about the Covid vaccines’ rubbery clots.
This is how a technocracy works!
Also how 50 intelligence officials claimed Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.
>To this point no demolition experts that make these claims because the establishment has dozens lined up to claim otherwise.
no they don't have anything but scream conspiracy theorist at you.
Don't start with covid vaccine, let's stick to the topic in question.
The only thing you need to focus on is forget airplanes. How the fuck did those buildings get perfectly demolished, including wtc7, when even if you wanted to do it and you were demo experts you wouldn't even have time to do it on that day. SO YOU HAD TO KNOW IT IN ADVANCE.
Someone demolished those buildings, if not muslim terrorists placed those demo charges without anybody noticing who did?
The planes themselves are red herring. Is why they say to people who say
>how did those buildings come down
>LOOK AT DA PLANES, DA PLANES DA JETFUEL
no, that's not what can do this. So who demolished those buildings if it wasn't muslim terrorists.
Had the morons just said muslim terrorists did that also they would maybe get away with it easier. But then the problem becomes, now everyone would be investigating anyone going in and out of those buildings the last few months, and if it was some muslim terrorists they would find out who the fuck placed those charges that would have to be in so many fucking places!
This is why they say DA PLANES, and there were no demo charges, cause then it wasn't investigated who placed them! Because if you investigated that you would find them. You would find some day where
>oh this and that area shut down for maintenance and whatever
okay who performed that maintenance! and you'd find them so fucking quickly. And they'd have to suicide themselves with two shots in back of the head for not dragging them in to testify.
>DA PLANE DA PLANE
fuck the planes it's irellevant.
It’s obvious this was to go after Iraq to finish that war, then use US corporations to rebuild, enact the patriot act to spy on citizens, which then lead to the legalization of domestic propaganda in the 2013 defense act and here we are. I don’t think many on these boards believe the official normie 9/11 narratives. It’s obvious the government benefited the most from this event.
>It’s obvious this was to go after Iraq to finish that war, then use US corporations to rebuild, enact the patriot act to spy on citizens, which then lead to the legalization of domestic propaganda in the 2013 defense act and here we are. I don’t think many on these boards believe the official normie 9/11 narratives. It’s obvious the government benefited the most from this event.
Yes now we talking motive, what is motive. go to middle east, get oil reserves and other things, destabilize also region and funnel muslim immigrants to europe, and also israel was interested in destabilizing it to topple saddam, to get to syria to stop iran via syria from arming hezbollah. Hence israelis were celebrating when bush declared, we going to go to iraq.
Wasn't even iraqi terrorists did it.
>we going to also go to afghanistan and get that fucking ben ladin.
okay that made atleast a little sense.
>we need to control middle east to stop radical muslims from forming
the iraqis were also confused, first they are like celebrating when saddam was toppled. GO USA FUCK SADDAM! woohoo go USA. Then they realize, USA military not fucking leaving! Then the mood changed somewhat.
So motivations you can talk about those, but that's not the interesting part.
Stay with the interesting part, fuck the airplanes don't even matter.
Who demolished those buildings! who placed the charges that brought them down! the why isn't even that relevant.
If it's not muslim terrorists aswell then who?
> Who demolished those buildings! who placed the charges that brought them down! the why isn't even that relevant.
If it's not muslim terrorists aswell then who?
It doesn’t matter. It’s likely a paid intelligence asset not directly connected to the US government in anyway. When you see conspiracies like this similar to Covid, it’s always best to identify the holes and then look at who it truly benefits. The details are somewhat irrelevant because the actual proof will be very hard to substantiate by design, so therefore is somewhat irrelevant. There’s no point in litigating whodunit.
>It doesn’t matter.
ofcourse it does. They kill several thousand american civilians in those towers when they demolished them.
If it was only those airplanes you'd maximum have a partial collapse of the delapidated upper levels of the structure. It was totally demolished so much that even the basement levels were like fucking fucking lava, which is why some argue thermite was used. I'd argue yeah for a building that size you'd have to use thermite also to demolish it.
Someone placed those charges that demolished those buildings which takes careful planning and several days to setup. So it takes prior knowledge of the hijackers planning to hijack those planes and fly them into the towers.
And wtc7 not hit by an airplane also perfectly demolished.
No, it doesn’t. It’s a pointless exercise in futility. Absolutely doesn’t matter however, you have zero absolute knowledge and neither do I. We are intentionally kept in the dark, with only slight trailings of truth available at our disposal. The US government was clearly involved. They have the most upside here. Mystery solved.
We are a nation of over 300 million people and we just let a handful of retards tell us how to live our lives and dictate what we can and cant do.
Americans (me being one) are truly the biggest pussies and LARP about the 2nd amendment. We wont do shit.
Really weird that you brought up gun rights? You’re not a fed are you? Lmao. Actually, you come from a long line of retards that let a small group dictate how their lives are structured, controlling what they can and can’t do. This is about reading between the lines of knowing the truth so you can take appropriate actions for your family. It’s likely the only real revolution that will ever occur for us will be based on someone developing and unbridled military AI model, or such a devastating, natural disaster, that it changes the ruling parties of the Earth. It’s pretty unlikely that will happen.
>a day
Try a month or more
>a day
>Try a month or more
I'm just saying atleast a day to illustrate how it's fucking impossible to do ON THE DAY IN QUESTION whilst everyone fleeing and there's dead people and firefighters and everything running in and out of those buildings.
This is why the reason they denied that muslim terrorists did that also, that they placed those charges. Is what fucked these people. Because it had to be someone! WHO THE FUCK WAS IT. Whoever it was knew the attack was coming!
I don't even care about the airplanes that's just a total distraction. And is certainly not some wild theory how a jihaadi who regularly strap on bombs and go blow themselves up in some market or something in middle east, might hijack a plane and fly into the building for the sake of allah and scream allahu akhbar.
The planes were a massive distraction!
it takes months to plan a controlled demolition of a large building.
Yes it takes time
the building completely imploded into its basement, starting with the center columns. just like a demolotion. just like the other two buildings. fuck you kike
100%
disingenuous, all conspiracytards use a trimmed video of the WT7 collapse that don't include the moment when you can see that the left corner is the one that collapse first dragging the rest of the structure
Still looks like a perfect demo m8. You didn’t prove anything
wtf are you even talking about. its no discussion.
they where all blow up with a controlled demolition.
if you think otherwise you're ether a kike or you never changed you own motoroil
nice spacing, now go back
ok satan
Go back, homosexual.
Perfectly demolished with explosives strategically placed.
Gallego, Larry Silverstein himself (owner of the building) confessed that it was a demolition controlled by firefighters.
How come you didnt include the part where Jawenko clearly says the Twin Towers COULNDT have been a controlled demolition...how does that fit your narrative??
here time stamped. How will you wave this away?
?si=Sy5Jyda3Eyjt4Azn&t=65
Danny died when his car struck a tree.
everyone always forgets about me..
The key to solving 911 riddle is war games run on the exact time simulating hijacked airplanes hitting twin towers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_operations_and_exercises_on_September_11,_2001
How passengers made their phone calls
Using preplanted pico cells
Deleted answer from quora
https://archive ph/dsssj
Flight 93 was supposed to hit wtc 7,but it was accidently shot in the air by a fighter plane,inspite of strict orders from to ground all planes.Then they put its debris in a field and made up a story about passengers overpowering hijackers.The fighter pilot's name was something Peter Ruse(can't remember it exactly but a high school photo of him was posted),he died due an heart attacks in that december.
2001-1968=33
In the Year 1968:
>2001: A Space Odyssey was released
>Breaking of ground for the construction of the twin towers
>AT&T makes 911 the national emergency dialing number
>George W Bush (Skull and Bones) graduates from Yale
>New York "jets " win their only superbowl that season ,creating speculation match might be fixed
>David Rockefeller on the cover of Newsweek magazine 1967 with watch set to 911
They have planned the destruction of twin towers at the time of construction itself.
So they must have put some structural loop holes at the time of building it for the ease of destruction
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/338666709/
https://www.docdroid.net/e2awGur/september-11-the-fate-of-the-passengers-pdf
>Just before plane hit they were talking about famous pilot Howard Hughes
>Bush in classrooom just before 911 with black students chanting in some ritualistic manner
words sounding very similar to "plane","must","hit","steel".
I remember this but it's like they attempt to scrub it all from memory. There was a flight shot down before it could hit it's destination.
I was watching this shit live when I was 17.
I also remember the memory holing of it and the bogus overpowering the hijackers bullshit story they replaced it with.
I also remember the pentagon getting hit with something too small to create the damage it did to the building.
Also, a plan this massive would have to have backups. If there were even planes involved at ALL, Silverstein and his gang of merry israelites would need a backup if the planes missed their targets which was very likely a possibility.
Backups such as "Fires started from the debris of the crashes caused the buildings to collapse", so, create fires in the buildings, simple job compared to crashing planes in them. A simple plan B.
And it's also now it's been so long ago they covered all the traces, hence this massive brainwashing campaign and total fucking clampdown on anyone asking questions.
>we must not tolerate any conspiracy theorists
As george bush said at the time.
>that leads them away from the guilt away from the terrorists.
Ofcourse these muslims flew airplanes into the buildings. It's impossible to fucking fake, and those who pretend to say there were no airplanes might aswell be working for the people that cover this up.
Who placed the charges that demolished those buildings! They fucked themselves when they said nobody did not even muslim terrorists not nobody. Now they were stuck with this stupid explanation that makes no sense whatsoever.
Take your meds you anarchist schizo
I will never forgive israelites for destroying the WTC, and effectively preventing me from touring the WTC forever
Does anybody have the cartoon that was Larry Silverstein wanting to get
rid of that pesky building so calls “1800 pull it” or something? Hilarious. Totally scrubbed
For You tremor shitkike.
The airplanes were also distraction and the muslims themselves probably thought it ended there. That's sufficient enough of a jihaadi attack to fly two gigantic passenger aircrafts into the towers.
Then someone knew the attack was coming and demolished the buildings.
is why i say forget the airplanes. If nothing hit those buildings and they came down the same way there would be ZERO PERSON IN THE WORLD WHO WOULD EVER SAY ANYTHING BUT.
>this was a controlled demolition
because that's exactly the only thing that can do that. And it was FLAWLESS.. they did it 100% flawless, it came down perfectly, so it was perfectly placed perfectly planned and perfectly executed.
So credit where it's due i guess to the evil fucks that did it with people still in the buildings. Because that's a perfect demolition of some of the biggest buildings in the world. The bigger the building the harder it is to pull it off flawless btw. So it was a perfectly fucking executed demolition..
And the airplanes knewing the hijackers were going to do that, was used as the distraction. They played the fucking hijackers like a fiddle, and they got the blame for that too.
AFTER READING WORLD TRADE CENTER #911TRUTH CONSPIRACIES TODAY I AM FINALLY CONVINCED! Children who cant even remember 9/11/2001 have it all figured out! it was israel, bush and bombs! stupid goddamn kids
I literally watched people jump out of the towers live, and giggled as i went to school
wow ur so cool
homosexual edgelord
You are trying to find logic in a board that is mainly retards that think they are smart so they reply to everything with satire and will object to everything you say just to get a rise out of you and retards who take the first retards at face value and believe the earth is flat and horse paste cures the "fake flu".
>You are trying to find logic in a board that is mainly retards that think they are smart so they reply to everything with satire and will object to everything you say just to get a rise out of you and retards who take the first retards at face value and believe the earth is flat and horse paste cures the "fake flu".
/misc/ is not one person. Whilst most people here are like that.
And you certainly are not mr. logic here either. Neither is OP.
You're so stupid you don't even realize that those buildings were demolished perfectly btw. And the bigger the building the more difficult it is to pull off. And the whole issue is why the fuck didn't they just say it was muslim terrorists that placed those charges. Precisely cause it wasn't, who did? shut up conspiracy theorists, my airplanes muh jetfuel. All that fire on the upper level it's because the jetfuel is fucking burning itself out dipshit.
It was alien chuchu magic that destroyed the buildings. One of them was on a Joe Rogan episode. Your opinion is discarded because of the memeflag anyway.
>It was alien chuchu magic that destroyed the buildings. One of them was on a Joe Rogan episode. Your opinion is discarded because of the memeflag anyway.
bloobloo retard. These fucking fraud things are clearly things made up by idiots trying to explain it way by making it ridiculous on purpose.
I'm not denying planes hit, that hijackers hijacked the airplanes. The only question i have is who placed the demolition explosives and the other things needed to pull it off, if that wasn't muslim terrorists aswell.
That you don't want to know that, well that's your fucking problem, because someone fucking did!
Too long, didn't read. Plus memeflag.
well we see what your point of being here is, lying troll, and then you come here and accuse others of what you do yourself.
ALIEN DISCLOSURE IMMINENT UFO ARRIVAL VERY SOON 2023 QAnon
Q
Dear Sirs, a very important classified video will be leaked before Full Alien Disclosure Occurs in the Months Sept Nov 2023 Official Global Arrival Date please review attached Transcripts
I'm Formerly employee in DEEPSTATE Government Best Regards Goodluck.
Aliens UFO DID 911 TRUTH
When 9/11 happened, news in Australia initially reported that the US was attacked by aliens. There used to be videos of metal orbs flying right through the buildings coming from above instead of directly towards., RESEARCH THE FLAT EARTH.
I posted this one yesterday:
I have a rare redpill for new and moderate 9/11 truth seekers: BUILDING 6 that you never hear about. It exploded BEFORE the two towers fell. The photo evidence proves it as does the video evidence taken by Rick Siegel:
?si=0ErUwUZfzcFayC1o
These threads are sickenlingly hilarious, a bunch of children who cant even remember 911 all know exactly how it happened. Lol fuck you all.
Do you remember WT7?
>why do people still have a memory outside of our narrative
>These threads are sickenlingly hilarious, a bunch of children who cant even remember 911 all know exactly how it happened. Lol fuck you all.
right you know how old people are on an anonymous image boards where geolocation and everything is easily spoofed aswell? Full of shit is what you are.
Im 43. It was an inside job.
Me too sophomore in uni at the time
Understand its all mutt cope because they cant handle the fact that a few dirty arabs commondered their aircraft and brought down some buildings. Easier to swallow if these homosexuals blame their government for it
> simple is a simple does…
Silverstein literally said he had the fire dep on the phone who told him the building was badly damaged and so he took the decision to "pull it".
It takes weeks to pull a building therefore you can go back to your pedo threads Moshe. I'm sure schizos were also wrong the on the dancing israelis.
>Silverstein literally said he had the fire dep on the phone who told him the building was badly damaged and so he took the decision to "pull it".
yeah that's a video of this retard saying that, here's the problem which he was too stupid to realize. Even a much smaller building like wtc7 you can't just demo a building ad hoc that fast. You'd have to set it up in advance. Minimum a day before. Let alone the two wtc towers. This means they knew the attack was coming. And the idiot himself even took an insurance policy that covered such things. If anyone had a few braincells they'd go interrogate him after he said that.
>which firefighters did you talk to who said they could demo wtc7 like that? i'd like to talk to them silverstein.
9/11 changed everything, and for the worse, and i'm not even being ironic.
israelites did 9/11
Any other information is just fluff
I'll be honest I've never seen this image before and it's very compelling
I believe a plane hit the building. I also believe the government groomed a few men into having the desire to drive a plane into the buildings. I also believe that the government set them up for success.
my theory is:
2 hijackers plan to fly commercial planes into building.
someone in USA with foreknowledge of that event sets it up to make it deliberately worse than it is, by rigging demo charges in both wtc 1 and 2, and also wtc7 which takes atleast a day to do. I'm just sticking to atleast a day to make you to realize it's impossible to do the day in question, even to wtc7 which larry silverstein stupidly overspoke and said they pulled building 7 cause 'too much damage' not realizing the dufus that you can't just set it up ad hoc so fast on the day in question in a matter of a few hours.
Something hit the pentagon which wasn't an airplane, again to make the attack worse than it actually was.
So in my view it's a mix of actual jihadis and elements in US government or military that took advantage of this and made it deliberately worse than it was, and also allowed it to happen to have excuse to do so.
So they killed several thousand people on purpose, when the demolition order for those two towers came, used the actual hijacked planes as a distraction. And then failed to blame muslim terrorists for setting up the demolition charges aswell. Because had they how did they get access and who let them.
So they came up with this bullshit pancake theory instead.
SOMEONE DEMOLISHED THOSE BUILDINGS, and when you say nobody did, not even muslim terrorists, i know you are fucking lying.
And the first one i would have talked to was larry silverstein who said that they agreed to 'pull' wtc7, you can't just do that on the day in question.
And then i'd talk to people at the pentagon who false flagged themselves with what looks like an impact from a cruise missile/missile of sorts.
Pentagon was the only place i don't think a plane was involved. There's fucking nothing coming near hitting pentagon without being shot down. How fucking stupid do they think people are, very stupid apparently.
9/11 was an Israeli masterminded false flag, with help from traitors in the WH, Pentagon, FBI, CIA & NSA. Along with generous help from the ~~*MSM*~~.
Tfw ITT is full of chinks accustomed to commie carboard blocks falling like solids, not knowing proper buildings projects are made in a way to make the thing fall into itself to avoid further damage in the surroundings (since Vitruvius, you know?). Let's talk about lucky Larry instead, that's something falling out of place!
>Tfw ITT is full of chinks accustomed to commie carboard blocks falling like solids, not knowing proper buildings projects are made in a way to make the thing fall into itself to avoid further damage in the surroundings
it's made to perfectly demolish on itself, the two biggest towers in the world at that time, and also wtc7? All the way down to the basement that also turned to basically molten lava. With zero demolition charges and zero thermite used.
That's some genius engineering. NOT, because if all it takes to accomplish that is jet fuel and using it to set fire to a few upper levels. This is dumbass engineering to the nth degrees.
Please provide the source for wtc 1 and 2 was designed to perfectly self demolish if its upper levels got hot enough. I'd love to see it. Also do the same for wtc7.
Thanls for the confirmation chang
>Please provide the source for wtc 1 and 2 was designed to perfectly self demolish if its upper levels got hot enough. I'd love to see it. Also do the same for wtc7.
Just ask your trusted architect memeflag
so no sources then. I'd expect you to provide atleast 1 fucking source, just any source, for that wtc 1 and 2 were designed to if the upper levels become hot enough the whole thing just pancakes and turns into molten lava into the basement. WITHOUT THERMITE, without demo explosives without any kind of demolition setup. Don't you realize what you're saying.
A fire started by jetfuel at the upper levels could then cause the entire building to go down and even melt the entire basement, that's fucking the dumbest feat of engineering ever.
The upper levels were not supposed to fall into the lower ones. The crash compromised the main structure supporting those higher levels. Fire just helped, but the main damage was made from the first explosion. The second plane hit the tower in a worse spot compared to the first one, that's why it collapsed earlier. Maybe the first tower could have survived if the second one didn't fall right next to it. Idk about the molten lava, I'm not trying to deny they put something in the basement. Maybe otger anons have explainations for that. This dorsn't change the fact buildings (especially high rise) are designed to collapse on the inside and not like a tree or a chink condo
>Idk about the molten lava, I'm not trying to deny they put something in the basement. Maybe otger anons have explainations for that. This dorsn't change the fact buildings (especially high rise) are designed to collapse on the inside and not like a tree or a chink condo
it collapsed all the way down to beneath the basement levels that was basically molten lava.
>i'm not trying to deny they put something in the basement.
Finally some fucking progress. Also now realize they could not do this either that it fall like that unless they actually demo'd it with precision charges and thermite. Because it'd not fully collapse but stop and have parts of it break off. The way it fell down was as if nothing was below the other levels, as if they just gave way, hence they say pancake or domino whatever you prefer. This could not happen with simply jetfuel. Especially with the entire basement being gone.
But let's go with yours they placed something in the basement for example, if that's the only concession you willing to make? WHO? because the official story is, no demo charges no thermite no nothing, not even muslim terrorists placed anything like that. And you'd have to place it in advance atleast a day before which means you knew the attack was coming.
And then ofcourse you have mr. larry silverstein who said they pulled wtc7, how? who set those charges? fell in exactly same way too. Also requiring foreknowledge of the attack.
Again, I'm not supporting the official version, but the domino effect of upper floors smashing onto the lower ones is very plausible. The structure wasn't very solid, and it was mainly open spaces with the lift area in the middle. There weren't solid walls except for the exterior steel beams
>The structure wasn't very solid, and it was mainly open spaces with the lift area in the middle.
it's unreasonable to think that floor plates of that size were not supported except on their outer edge.
Yeah, that lift shaft bllsht is what the glowie shills always tout. It's pulled from early obfuscations of the core geometry put out by the official sources where they minimise or hide the core. Obviously it's a big problem for their version.
https://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/
picrel
Trouble with this is that the core actually carried two thirds of the live loads, and was substantially stronger than the exterior columns. In addition the upper stories were only designed to carry the live loads of the stories above and so they were incapable of crushing the lower levels. You can actually see them spilling over the sides as they encounter the intact portion. The whole building was designed like that to resist wind sheer. It was actually capable of carrying three times the live loads. It's inconceivable that any part of the plane apart from the turbine shafts could have significantly damaged the core which was composed of 47 continuously welded and cross braced steel columns. It should have carried on standing.
Why does suddenly everyone care about 9/11?
>Why does suddenly everyone care about 9/11?
have you forgotten what day it is?
noice
magical
try and find this online anymore
Israeli israeli kids dressed as the Twin Towers to celebrate Purim. They think this shit is funny.
Who funded the creation of Israel? The UK. Who was an intrinsic part of the creation of the "CIA"? The UK.
Do you understand now?
>Do you understand now?
Yeah. You want to minimize Israel's guilt.
>one time I broke my pinky toe and my entire body immediately imploded into my socks
>The picture 9/11 conspiracy schizos don't want you to see
Is that WTC7?
THE INFORMATION THE israelite AND GLOWnaggerS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW.
>5 dancing Israelis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLnKiTmO64c
>200 mossad agents arrested and interrogated during 9/11 investigation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUt_3pcc4Ww
>Israelis George Washington Bridge Bomb Van https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPixLOclB9Y
>Lucky Larry Silverstein https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVlVG8C18yY
>$2.3 Trillion Missing from the Pentagon / DoD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU
>WTC 7 collapsed by fire https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xd7tqpwdlpQ
>Lucky Larry Silverstein "Pull it" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq-0JIR38V0
WITH israeliteS, YOU LOSE.
It sounds like most people here are trying to make sense of the "official story" and what actually happened. whether they did their 3rd grade 2001 level CGI and made it look like a plane. or whether it was a missle. or whether nothing actually hit it at all and it was just blown up. or all 3 happened at once and thats why were still arguing about it. None of that matters, as we all know it was an inside job. personally i dont give a shit what you think happened because it doesnt matter. they fucking took all of those buildings down to achieve a goal. but they had to have the entire population on their side to agree to absolute and total surveillance. and they did it.
>we all know it was an inside job
Correct
>we all know it was an inside job
Arnold: "Fuck your freedoms"
I stand corrected:
Arnold: "Screw your freedom"
>juice
>orange
For years they subtly inserted the idea of planes hitting the towers causing fire into the minds of the masses
Pre programming a response and belief so nobody would have any thoughts of their own on the subject
Life imitates art
Who knows how many subtle messages they've inserted into media for you to believe
Every reaction, every belief, every opinion you hold could be created by media
This is why I never watch any media on TV/theater/music
I am capable of my own thoughts and actions unlike you
it's called brainwashing very noticeable during the plandemic
Not DURING the pandemic
BEFORE the pandemic
Training people to believe doctors know what's best and medical science is too complicated to even ask questions
Vaccinations at birth and through life
Teaching people this is normal and questioning it is absurd
Predictive programming
They train you on television, movies, and music with subtle hints
Like you watch show after show after show with subtle cuckold themes like Bella and the bull dogs
Then it happens to you in real life
The natural human response is to self destruct/attack them
But because of your predictive programming you will believe it's okay, you might even blurt out a line you heard in a show/song as response to the sight
The thickest steel beams ever created
Capable of withstanding airplane crash
Turned to dust before your eyes
And everyone said "must have been a plane/bomb"
Predictive programming
TV/media made you believe this was the case before it even happened because of subtle programming like
Too bad Larry admitted to pulling it on camera
Imagine you are an insurance broker. you just woke up on monday morning and one of your clients calls you and says he wants to take out a billion dollar policy for "terrorist attacks" you start fumbling through your paperwork because you didnt know that even existed. a few weeks later, this improbable scenario unfolds right before your very eyes. hey, its your fault (insurance companies) you should have never offered the coverage. Its fucking hilarious, you wont offer "flood" insurance to some regular fucker, but you will pay out for an obvious scam. "an act of god" and " an act of israelites" completely different get your fucking terms correct
A fellow insurance industry knower, this is a rarity on pol. Larry is truly the luckiest man alive for getting that policy so close to a triggering event!
that's just desinfo
the wtc was fully covered against terrorist attacks damage even before the 1993 terrorist attack, in that time the insurance companies paid for the damage
youre missing the point dude. it doesnt matter when. the only "terrorist attacks" that exist are the ones they make.
With all the information available the goyim are to busy witnessing endless horrors to ever think a plan of action to make it stop
The weapons test at 9/11 was a huge success
Although it happened before the eyes of thousands of people, noone has come to the conclusion it was an inside job except fringe minority groups
Nobody can stop the israelites
Nobody would even think of it
Is it too late to stop them?
Absolutely not.
But you won't
You won't do shit
israelites are God's chosen people
And then when the order was given, as the firefighters and others said, they heard this boom and then pop pop pop pop pop and the building just fucking collapsed in freefall speed and everyone ofcourse fucking running like crazy WTF WTF!!!
What sound do you expect snapping steel beams to make? Honk honk honk?
>What sound do you expect snapping steel beams to make? Honk honk honk?
>Again, I'm not supporting the official version, but the domino effect of upper floors smashing onto the lower ones is very plausible.
I'll take both of you since that's pretty much the same argument.
Right down to under the basement just collapsing at free fall speed? This is what you do in a demolition btw. Again we're back at this bullshit that it was designed to collapse like that by itself. Built in demo basically.
If no airplane ever hit any of those buildings and they collapsed on themselves like that, what would you say it was? You know it. Same with wtc7 which wasn't hit by a plane.
If it's build like it's made of sticks and all it takes is hot jetfuel on the upper levels to get every single level to collapse on itself right down to the basement, how is it even up to building code at all?
They demo'd this on purpose to put the blame on the hijackers which they knew were going to attack those buildings anyways. To make it deliberately worse. Someone sat there and pressed the button, two times, and then third time with wtc7.
Remember when the American government wanted to build a mosque on ground zero of the WTC?
That was awesome
happy holiday my israeli elite bros!!! halleluyah !
No one fucking cares anymore dumb cunt homosexuals
there's only one way to settle the debate.
reconstruct a like-for-like version of the towers and crash two unmanned Boeing planes into them, in the name of science
?si=0jbYLp_MhPHF8YDy
Ignore all the shills in this thread
Buildings can collapse due to fire, but from what Ive seen outside 9/11, it needs to be roughly 100x more intense than the 9/11 buildings
Examples:
Contrast that to WTC7, from this angle you cant even see the fire, yet it falls directly down with no real deviation
Extremely unprecedented, never seen a collapse like this except for the 9/11 buildings
Random derelicts vs cutting edge construction in one of the richest places on earth
Link to WTC 7 collapse