LULZ / Misc

The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha

Can someone explain to a retarded burger like me how this German house came to be he royal family of the United Kingdom and all bong subjects? Why do the bongs willingly bow down to jerryies?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty simple. A daughter of James I married a German prince in the 17th century and when they ran out of Protestant heirs they chased down the descendants of that match which was George I.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unrelated subject: WTF Charles' face

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is correct but also everyone has been illegitimate since edward iv

      The Angles ARE the English. England is a corruption of the Land of the Angles. Anglo-Saxons never avtually existed, that is a 19th century archeological distinction. The Angles, Saxons and Jutes wete at war with each other for 4 and a half centuries until the Heptarchy ended and power consolidated in the Angle kingdoms of Essex, Wessex and Sussex.

      incorrect, i will not stand for this we wuzzing. genetic testing proves that the english are still majority celtic. even in the south east german/nordic/french levels are still low

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >genetic testing proves that the english are still majority celtic
        Wrong. We are about 20% Celtic. The majority is Anglo-Saxon, with a bit of Norse and a dollop of pre-Celtic (going back a very long way).

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >pre-Celtic
          wtf is that?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The world didn't begin with the Celts. The Celts have been in Britain since roughly 500BC (IIRC), i.e., a minor fraction of the time since the last ice-age.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >this is correct
        you have to go back.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if lil Donnie's a pumpkin then what does that make Charlie?

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There hasn't been an English king since 1066

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      so the bongs are a nation of cucks who worship foreign kings?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, actually.
        Harold Godwinson was the last English King.
        William the Bastard - Richard III: French
        Tudor Dynasty: Welsh
        Stuarts: Scottish
        William of Orange: Dutch
        Anne: A Stuart
        George I - Elizabeth II, the Current Monarch: German

        The Brits talk about how they were never conquered, but they've been ruled by Foreigners for 1,000 years.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          wow that is absolutely pathetic. I am glad we revolutioned to get these proto-globohomos off our back.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And now you're the globohomo. Ironic.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              There are three things you can count on in life-
              death, taxes, and globohomo subverting your nations.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No I'm talking literally. You're the global homosexual, fucking men all around the world you homosexual!

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're one to talk, Finland.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No not the country. You! You're the globohomo! You as a person! Look at mirror what do you see? A homosexual thats what! Hahahahaha

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                ok globohomo

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're homosexual, homosexual. Maybe you should have a nice day? You're father would be proud, if he even knows you.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                are you a glown-word or just retarded? Calm down finnfag, your mongoloid people don't even have a royal family.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >wow that is absolutely pathetic. I am glad we revolutioned to get these proto-globohomos off our back.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Harold Godwinson was the last English King.
          Ok but this guy was Anglo Saxon-weren't the Anglo-Saxons themselves from Germany, Netherlands and Denmark? So Harold Godwinson was a foreign invader king too.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The Angles ARE the English. England is a corruption of the Land of the Angles. Anglo-Saxons never avtually existed, that is a 19th century archeological distinction. The Angles, Saxons and Jutes wete at war with each other for 4 and a half centuries until the Heptarchy ended and power consolidated in the Angle kingdoms of Essex, Wessex and Sussex.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >the Angle kingdoms of Essex, Wessex and Sussex
              .. those are the Saxon kingdoms. East Saxon, West Saxon and South Saxon.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Don't try to educate an American.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >The Angles, Saxons and Jutes wete at war with each other for 4 and a half centuries until the Heptarchy ended and power consolidated in the Angle kingdoms of Essex, Wessex and Sussex.
              But who is in charge of Buttsex?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Anglo-Saxons never avtually existed, that is a 19th century archeological distinction.
              Don't be silly. The term "Anglo-Saxon" was sometimes (but not often) used in Anglo-Saxon times. More usually, they just called themselves "englisc" or "angelcynn".

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If you can find me a single, solitary attested contemponaeous source for any Angle or Saxon calling themselves "Angle-Saxon" between the time of Alfred the Great and the Conquest, I will gladly retract and admit I was wrong. Even the famed Anglo-Saxon Chrinicle, written during Alfred's reign, was not contemporaneously dubbed so. That came later, during Anglo-Norman times. No contemporary person called himself an Anglo-Saxon. They were Englisc during their time, as you note.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                "He hafað geweorðad mid cynedome Angulseaxna Eadred cyning & casere."

                King Eadred to Ælfsige Hunlafing: Sawyer, 1968 566; Sawyer, P.H.Anglo-Saxon Charters, An Annotated List and Bibliography (London) : Robertson, 1956 no. 30; Robertson, A.J.Anglo-Saxon Charters , 2nd ed. (Cambridge).

                Do you want more?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nope. I retract, and also thank you.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Gracious.
                Ah, this was meant in reply to you:

                >No contemporary person called himself an Anglo-Saxon.

                Not true, but it wasn't normal. It was a learned locution (monkish). The sense of English identity long predates the unification of England. Normal people would have called themselves by tribal / local kingdom titles, and more broadly "englisc" (and variants). Even the Saxon tribes called themselves and the language "englisc", even though originally it belonged only to the Anglish tribes.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A man should admit when he's wrong. A man looking to learn should appreciate new knowledge.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A man should admit when he's wrong.
                True, but it's easier said than done.
                By the way, if you're interested, the entire corpus of Old English literature is kept on a database at the University of Toronto. You can sign up free and have unlimited access (despite what it says!). Add details and an email, and sign up!

                https://doe.artsci.utoronto.ca/pages/about.html/

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Would I need to know Old English to read any of this?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, but learn! It may seem daunting at first (especially the verbs), but plug away at it steadily, and bear in mind you don't have to learn to speak it! (Unless you wish.) The database is really for text-searches rather than for reading long-form. You have to get the editions for that.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Any recommendations for way to learn or a good place to start?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The textbook A Guide to Old English by Mitchell and Robinson is good and widely used. (Bear in mind it is an introduction; it does not go into great depth on morphology, syntax, etc, but a very good place to start. There is another one by Baker (can't remember his first name or the name of the book.) There is also this one that is free online. I've only glanced at it, but the author, Fulk, is one of the world's leading experts.
                https://scholarworks.iu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2022/25547/Fulk_Print4.pdf?sequence=3

                But otherwise, just search online. Archive.org has a few Old English texts with translations, e.g., Bede. That would a good book to have to get a feel for how the language looks and feels.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I am, in fact, interested. Thank you again.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                My pleasure. Free access to the corpus and dictionary (A-I so far) is supposedly for 20 sessions only per subscribed email, but I'm sure you can get round that ... unless you're rich, in which case, pay!

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >No contemporary person called himself an Anglo-Saxon.

                Not true, but it wasn't normal. It was a learned locution (monkish). The sense of English identity long predates the unification of England. Normal people would have called themselves by tribal / local kingdom titles, and more broadly "englisc" (and variants). Even the Saxon tribes called themselves and the language "englisc", even though originally it belonged only to the Anglish tribes.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          so the bongs are a nation of cucks who worship foreign kings?

          Can someone explain to a retarded burger like me how this German house came to be he royal family of the United Kingdom and all bong subjects? Why do the bongs willingly bow down to jerryies?

          It's much the same in every European country. The royals in Europe aren't English, German, French, Dutch, Russian, etc, but euromutts. The Tudors weren't Welsh, the Stuarts weren't Scots, and so on. And no, Kaiser Wilhelm II wasn't an Englishman. Euromutts: I thought you euromutts would be able to grasp this.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Additionally, one of England's most famous, beloved Kings, Richard I, Coeur de Lion, spike no English, absolutely hated England, and spent less than 2 years in the country between his coronation and his death 10 years later. He viewed England as a piggy bank to fund his French wars, and pay his ransoms and nothing else.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          lol. I watched the Showtime Tudors show too. In that show, Henry VIII speaks french and calls the French king Francis I his brother and cousin. Why can't England have an actually English royal family? Is that so much to ask?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I've never seen a single episode of that show. I study English history because it is the history of my culture.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Why can't England have an actually English royal family? Is that so much to ask?
            I'd love it to. But more pressingly, why do Yanks assume this is a uniquely British thing, when it has been normal in Europe for centuries to have euromutt kings? Why do the Swedes have a "French" monarchy (not actually French of course).

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I'd love it to. But more pressingly, why do Yanks assume this is a uniquely British thing, when it has been normal in Europe for centuries to have euromutt kings? Why do the Swedes have a "French" monarchy (not actually French of course).
              So you Europeans are all cucks who bow your neck to foreign leaders? You are more pathetic than I previously thought you were. .

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                All your presidents have been Anglo-Saxons? No, most were euromutts like our monarchs. One of them wasn't even that.

                By the way, no king has led this country in three hundred years and more. Keep up!

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Keep up!
                you aren't Dr Who you bong homosexual
                >By the way, no king has led this country in three hundred years and more
                Do you actually believe the UK royal family has no power? The queen and House of Lords still have the legal power to veto laws and pass whatever bullshit they want, no matter what Parliament says.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The queen and House of Lords still have the legal power
                Ever heard the terms de jure and de facto?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Prince George, if he should reign, is 3/4 English with a pinch of Scottish. That's pretty close.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Prince George, if he should reign, is 3/4 English with a pinch of Scottish. That's pretty close.
        He seems like the only hope to restore the crown back to a fully English Englishman. It would be based if he changes his house name to something more traditionally English too.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          House of Noncery

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i see what you did there

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Protestant king of England dies. Catholic king of Scotland next in line for throne. "ate catlicks. simple as." Invite protestant ruler of Netherlands to become king of england instead. "Yea man sure". Dies without an heir. Find his closest living relative. It's literally who from the house of literally who in literally where Germany. Invite him to become king of England. "Yea man sure" house rules England until the present day. Changes name to Windsor during ww1 because "ate the bally krauts. simple as."

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >this German house
    It's Danish, you mutt burger twit. Out late King was called the grandfather of Europe for a reason.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Hanoverians are German you stupid bastard. The Danish last had a hold of the English thrown under Harthacnut in 1040. Jesus fuck, you Yurofagonians are so desperate for fame and clout you'll lie about anything and everything. Now stfu and go make me some abelskaver you fucking peasant.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Throne*

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Aurelian isn't danish you homosexual

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Seems like the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha originated in Bavaria, you fucking retarded europoor.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Saxe-Coburg_and_Gotha

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There's a meme about bongs hiding in swamps and be stupid I think it was some Muslims or Arabs maybe Romans? Idk something about being stupid, illiterate swamp homosexuals.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Julius Caesar said that, I believe, unless it was Hadrian.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    seriously, what's wrong with their kid?

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    382643325
    (You) are

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The German line really is the House Of Wettin, the same family that funded Martin Luther and who were behind the reformation. So they certainly have the credentials to be monarchs, there is no doubting that.

    The Scottish Lyon side also has a long history of royalty (on the Queen mothers side)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Queen Elizabeth is also a descendent of the Scottish King James. So you have two seperate lineages that separately published the most famous Bibles in history in their respective languages (The Luther Bible in German and the KJV)

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They also are responsible for the East India trading company and opium wars and Hong Kong, which lead to China retaliating in revenge 100 years later with the fentanyl epidemic and covid 19 scam.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The German line really is the House Of Wettin, the same family that funded Martin Luther and who were behind the reformation. So they certainly have the credentials to be monarchs, there is no doubting that.
      So why are they called Sax-Coburg and Gotha? Is that a lesser branch family and house Wettin are the main house?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It was to do with the land they ruled over at the time. House of Wettin is the main house as they originally ruled over Wittenberg.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Only the British and Belgian lines retain their thrones today.
          Intradesting. The home of Mark Dutroux and Jimmy Savile and the Rotherdam rape gangs and the Hampstead Heath ritual child abuse victims... House of Wettin what have you been up to?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            To be fair, if the House of Wettin really wanted to acquire children to abuse, they wouldn't do it in such public way via a creepy children's show entertainer. They wanted to bring attention to Savile for some reason.

            They have A LOT of money and wouldn't need to resort to low rent entertainers such as Jimmy Savile, if they actually desired to abuse children.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >To be fair, if the House of Wettin really wanted to acquire children to abuse, they wouldn't do it in such public way via a creepy children's show entertainer. They wanted to bring attention to Savile for some reason.
              Savile only went down after he was a corpse, and that was in order to traumatize the bong subjects. I believe that Jimmy Saville was the John Dee court magician of his time.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >John Dee
                Jimmy Savile wasn't writing books about their finer points of arithmetic, believe me

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They knighted Jimmy and thought he was hilarious.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Jimmy Savile was knighted (x2)

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This 2008 article has dated poorly
                https://www.express.co.uk/expressyourself/43798/How-Jim-really-did-fix-it

                >He claims that he spent 11 consecutive Christmases with the Thatchers at Chequers. He says of the former premier: “I knew the real woman and the real woman was something else. The times I spent up there – Denis, me and her, shoes off in front of the fire. There was no conversation really.” He says he is no longer in touch because Lady Thatcher is now too infirm but that he still sees her daughter Carol “off and on”.

                >But his strangest stroke of apparent influence was when he met the Israeli president on his first visit to Jerusalem in 1975.

                >“I’m very disappointed be-cause you’ve all forgotten how to be gnomish and that’s why everyone is taking you to the cleaners,” Sir Jimmy told him.

                >“You won the Six Day War, you took all that land, you gave it all back, including the only oil well in the area, and now you’re paying the Egyptiansfortheoil you already had.”

                >He says the president asked him to come and say the same thing to the cabinet, which he duly did. “They asked my opinion about a couple of things, to which I said, ‘Nothing’s impossible’. They did exactly what I suggested and it worked out 100 per cent successful.”

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Jimmy Savile was knighted (x2)

                >He was first introduced to the Royal Family, he reveals, by Lord Mountbatten. In 1966, Jimmy became the first civilian to be awarded a Royal Marines’ green beret. Mountbatten was commandant general at the time and realised that Savile could be a useful contact.

                >“Coming from Lord Louis, who was the favourite uncle of Prince Philip, that was quite something,” he says. “So obviously I hooked up with the Prince – what was good enough for Lord Louis was good enough for him.”

                Lord Mountbatten is the one who introduced Jimmy to the royal family in the first place.
                >pic related PM Edward Heath, another friend of Jim, another high ranking pedophile working for the British royal family.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >He donated proceeds from signed photos of himself with Elvis Presley to the Duke of Edinburgh’s National Playing Fields Association and Philip returned the compliment in the Eighties to raise money for the National Spinal Injuries Centre at Stoke Mandeville, Sir Jimmy’s pet project.

                >In 1991 writer Andrew Morton identified him as “an unlikely royal peacemaker”betweenCharles and Diana, adding: “As unofficial court jester, he articulates opinions courtiers can only think.”

                The "unofficial court Jester" they called him openly in the mainstream press.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Fuck 30 posts, does Jim fix it for you? You know the cunts dead and you can't get a medal.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You got a loicense for that joke m8?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Now then now then, go smoke a cigar and listen to Showaddywaddy

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >They have A LOT of money and wouldn't need to resort to low rent entertainers such as Jimmy Savile, if they actually desired to abuse children.
              The royals hanged out with Saville in their free time and thought he was jokes. He was their child procurer and jester.
              Johnny Rotten called out Saville in the 1970s and the BBC banned him off the air for it.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You don't realise how much money the English royals have.
                If they really wanted children, they would have much better channels than a greasy BBC kids show entertainer.

                No chance in hell that they would go through someone like Jimmy Savile.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >If they really wanted children, they would have much better channels than a greasy BBC kids show entertainer.
                Jimmy Saville was a Knight of the Realm, an Officer of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, a Papal Knight, and hanged out with the royal family even during Christmas. They kept him around as much as possible.Lord Mountbatten, the homosexual WWII military leader the IRA assassinated, was also a pedo that the royals kept very close to them.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The royal connection brought a lot of attention to Savile. The royal connection also brought a lot of attention to Epstein.

                To reiterate, the old money of the British royalty would not need to go through low level people such as Epstein and Savile if they really wanted to acquire children to abuse.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its more like we are all cucks to the small group of elites

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ethnic nationalism is a new thing and aristocracy was the original globohomo. Sweden hasn't had a Swedish ruling dynasty since 1600s and imperial Russia was ruled by Germans too.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This post is at least partially True. George V of England and Nick II of Russia wete first cousins, and looked like vrothers.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nick was a German? I thought that was just his wife. Germany also funded Lenin. It seems like Germany are the European heart of globohomo all over the world.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >German
          America has ton's of German Heritage; it's just it took them forever to convince us to join in WW2. We've always been against brother wars.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Prescott Bush JP Morgan and Henry funded the Nazis and provided them with tech and infrastructure. The Bush's are descended from some kind of old world german illuminati bloodline themselves.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Bushes and the Nazis were Rome/Catholic Church.
              Nazis were a Vatican funded psyop to overtake the protestant Germany. The entire 20th century shitshow was the Catholic Church assassinating monarchs in order to gain power.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Next are you going to tell us that the garden gnomes are innocent?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Got it, your brain is just rot on the prot. Carry on.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This is why the Nazis were so successful, because they based their party policies on Lutheran hatred of garden gnomes which the majority of Germany believed.
                Just because some political party says 'trust us! we hate the garden gnomes too!' doesn't mean that they are telling the truth.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Jesuit related perchance?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Jesuits are more the education, scientific and entertainer/public outreach arm of the Catholic Church. Bushes would have been higher up the totem pole than jesuits. Same as the Nazis upper hierarchy

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Not German in the sense he was born in one of the German states, no. However, Nick was from the same German bloodline as the English monarchs. Can there be any doubt, looking at that image? Nick was Victoria - George V's mother's - nephew. Hence the 1st cousinhood of George and Nick. Which is why they look so much alike.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >A small handful of highborn families intermix on one patch of land for centuries.
      >globohomo
      mongbrained

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    House of Saxe Coburg Gotha comes from Prince Albert, who married Queen Victoria
    The 3 George's and a William were the House of Hanover
    Don't you euroweenies even know your own history?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Prince Albert also started the great exhibition movement

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They all are

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think the global peasantry is at a level of manageable complacency where the minute Elizabeth dies, they can just say there was a "gas leak" in Buckingham Palace that took out Elizabeth, Charles, Camilla, Harry, and Meghan... And pretty much everybody will just casually accept William as king with no further questions.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the same way a Bourbon rules Spain: family marriages

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    khazarians

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    House of Hanover was offered the crown by the parliament after the Glorious Revolution. Queen Victoria's husband, Prince Albert belonged to the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. The name was changed to Windsor during WW1 to accommodate the plebs and was kept when HM the Queen married HRH the late Duke of Edinburgh.
    Vivat Regina Elizabetha!

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being a bong. Jimmy Saville was their Mister Rogers combined with their Ryan Seacrest. Entire generations were raised watching this pedo on their TV.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The British Royals are gnomish. gnomish as in...garden gnomeS. Princess Camilla is the White Trash German Garbage that the garden gnome is hosting through.

Your email address will not be published.