Which was objectively the most advanced?
Which was objectively the most kino?
Which was objectively the most stable?
Which was objectively the most influential?
Finally, if you were to live in one, which would it be?
Which was objectively the most advanced?
Which was objectively the most kino?
Which was objectively the most stable?
Which was objectively the most influential?
Finally, if you were to live in one, which would it be?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
i don't know, which one is still around as a superpower?
thats right india #1
Modern India is not the Indus valley civilization. And China still exists and is arguably a superpower, unlike India.
>Modern India isn’t even in the Indus Valley
SIR DO NOT REDEEM THE CIVILIZATION
SAAR ARE YOU MAD
Pakistan*
>China older than Mesopotamia
Tiannaman square happened. Just admit it. Everybody already knows.
>Which was objectively the most advanced?
Egypt
>Which was objectively the most kino?
Egypt
>Which was objectively the most stable?
We don't know much about the Indus Valley Civ but there doesn't seem to be any evidence of warfare or destructive periods before its collapse
>Which was objectively the most influential?
Mesopotomia
>Finally, if you were to live in one, which would it be?
None, civilization is the Anti-Christ
Indus Valley most kino. They were peaceful and meditated.. probably vegetarians too. Then the steppenigs ruined it
>They were peaceful and meditated.. probably vegetarians too.
It’s true. The based parts of Hinduism come from them
>the stuff that came thousands of years after the Vedas comes from them
What happened to them? Did they get fucked by northwestern nomads?
Nobody really knows , i think the common consensus is climate change caused their agriculture to collapse and then they migrated east with the aryans.
They collapsed because the climate in their region became drier and the retards didn't use irrigation IIRC
Aryans came later and mixed with the Indus people as they moved eastward
They did use irrigation
Noe one really knows why they collapsed, one theory is that their main river (not the Indus) dried up
>one theory is that their main river (not the Indus) dried up
that's a meme theory peddled by pajeets
When Lord Indra arrived in his chariot on the banks of the Ganges to slaughter 6 million dasyu varna the first and only word he spoke was "Namaste".
Nazi quads holy fuck
pretending to be the oldest
lol
Just look at GDP per capita...China is not on the same level as others.
>Which was objectively the most advanced?
Roughly the same I think, with maybe Egypt as the close number 1
>Which was objectively the most kino?
Mesopotamia, though I always have a soft spot for Yellow River
>Which was objectively the most stable?
Egypt. Mesopotamia was a collection of city states, Yellow might've ended up as the Xia which would make them the 2nd most stable and we know jack about Indus river
>Which was objectively the most influential?
Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, and Indus. In that order
>Finally, if you were to live in one, which would it be?
China, mostly because their climate is objectively the best. I hate heat
China is humid and hot as shit
Depends where.
Yellow river is in temperate region comparable to Anatolia and Greece though. An improvement compared to Meso or Egypt
Yellow River is Humid Continental, with Hot Summers and Dry Winters, with some Semi Arid Steppe. There's some Semi Arid Steppe in central Anatolia, but it's mostly Mediterranean Climate which is characterized by having it's Hot season by Dry and it's Winter season being Wet. Quite different from the North China Plain.
>three became great superpowers of the ancient world with civilizations coming and going some even lasting for thousands of years
>indus valley completely forgotten until recent years and isn't even the birthplace of modern india. Such literal WHOs that we don't even know the actual names of their towns
what's the reason for this? Where they really just the worlds first great jobbers?
I like how the creator of the map made sure to depict Taiwan as part of China even five thousand years ago.
Also it says on the timetable that China is older than Mesopotamia lmfao
>China
>3950-1000
>Taiwan colonized
Fucking kek, even the Xia is mostly mythological and that only goes back to 2000s.
Nile on all counts due to its connection to the Mediterranean. Han, Tang and Song China might be brief exceptions, but this is debatable.
>Which was objectively the most advanced?
Prolly China, able to sustain the highest population and produces lots of extremely essential technologies.
>Which was objectively the most kino?
Egypt no question. Pyramids, mummies, bird gods, frogs, the list goes on...
>Which was objectively the most stable?
Probably Egypt again, since the Nile was so stable. Floods in China have killed like a gorillion people.
>Which was objectively the most influential?
China, because it still exists.
>Which was objectively the most advanced?
China. Chinese civilization existed until the Communist Revolution so it had to far more advanced techs than the others.
>Which was objectively the most kino?
Too subjective.
>Which was objectively the most stable?
Either Early Tang China or Old Kingdom Egypt. Mesopotamia and the IVC were just a bunch of (warring) city-states.
>Which was objectively the most influential?
Egypt. Writing, farming, architecture, medecine, astronomy, mathematics, kingship were all invented there.
>Finally, if you were to live in one, which would it be?
Egypt.
You missed one.
OP also missed Peru
>Which was objectively the most advanced?
Egypt
>Which was objectively the most kino?
Egypt
>Which was objectively the most stable?
Egypt
>Which was objectively the most influential?
Egypt
>Finally, if you were to live in one, which would it be?
Egypt
Depends on era. Esrly on is obviously Mesopotamia.
China.
India is still a superpower
True enough
Egypt
Egypt
Egypt or Mesopotamia, if you include Medieval then maybe India
Egypt
This one, fuck your semitecentric take on history.