The English monarchy hasnt been legitimate since 1066.

The English monarchy hasn’t been legitimate since 1066.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves.

    Romans 13:1-2

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      israeli hands typed this gospel

    • 2 years ago
      Dirk

      The christian can be called not to resist authority despite the illegitimacy of a ruler, in fact this was obviously the case when the gospels and acts occurred and when Romans was written

      And if you're a moral universalist, which biblical christians must be, and if you take the teachings of Jesus seriously including the sermon on the mount, you realize that every state in history wields illegitimate authority since the initiation of force is unacceptable.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >every state in history wields illegitimate authority
        >literally contradicts what his bible plainly says
        Christian doublethink.

        • 2 years ago
          Dirk

          Where?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >bible: all governments are legitimate
            >dirk: no governments are legitimate

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            : all governments are legitimate
            Ahab and Jezebel would have wished that was so (it's not)

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You've discovered the Bible shamelessly contradicts itself all the time.

          • 2 years ago
            Dirk

            Whence are you quoting?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The English monarchy hasn’t been legitimate since 1066.
      Or at least since 1487, when rightful mnarch Richard III was overthrown and killed by Henry Tudor.

      >Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.
      That only applies to LEGITIMATELY installed rulers. Heads of state/government installed by coup, rebellion, invasion or trickery may be opposed without fear of sin or offense in God's eyes.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >The English monarchy hasn’t been legitimate since 1066.
      Or at least since 1487, when rightful mnarch Richard III was overthrown and killed by Henry Tudor.

      >Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.
      That only applies to LEGITIMATELY installed rulers. Heads of state/government installed by coup, rebellion, invasion or trickery may be opposed without fear of sin or offense in God's eyes.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        monarch

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Harold was illegitimate though. He was quite literally the biggest enemy of Edward and his house. Edgar Ætheling was supposed to be King.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If he lived long enough he probably could’ve gotten Edgar’s sisters to marry some of his sons.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It hasn't been legitimate since the roman invasion.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    > English monarchy
    >Posts French King who ruled England

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >harold
      >french
      at least click at the thumbnail before spouting bullshit, you absolute moron

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw William of Normandy introduced the israelites to England

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >>tfw William of Normandy introduced the israelites to England
      it's cromwell which stars the downfall

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    nah
    the blood of Alfred the great rejoined to the Royal family twice
    first by Empress Matilda
    second by his direct descendant James
    but glorious revolution ruined it

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Parliament says who's legitimate. And Charlie Tigerblood 3 is legitimate.

      *1688

      based and truthpilled

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Also Edward III through his mother was a descendant of Harold Godwinson

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Parliament says who's legitimate. And Charlie Tigerblood 3 is legitimate.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    *1688

  9. 2 years ago
    Chud Anon

    Are Saxons still seething that Norman chads civilized them from their existence of being mud shoveling peasants?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Ngl its hypocrisy. The Saxons conquered the Angles 100 years before so they can't really complain

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Anglo-Saxons were already civilised.

      • 2 years ago
        Chud Anon

        Anglo-Saxons couldn't even keep the vikings off their turf, the Normans elevated them culturally, socially, and militarily

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Anglo-Saxons couldn't even keep the vikings off their turf,
          That has nothing to do with whether the Anglo-Saxons were civilised or not.

          >the Normans elevated them culturally, socially, and militarily
          I can agree with the cultural and military part, but how were they 'elevated' socially?

          • 2 years ago
            Chud Anon

            >but how were they 'elevated' socially

            Normans brought over refined court culture

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The irony being that France was notoriously savage with its court proceedings for the medieval period around then.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    no such thing as a legitimate monarchy.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Might makes right

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *