https://twitter.com/Grimezsz
This bitch is the mother of Tau Techno Mechanicus, X Æ A-Xii, and Exa Dark Sideræl Musk, and she's made that tweet about having read Bronze Age Mindset.
>This bitch is the mother of Tau Techno Mechanicus, X Æ A-Xii, and Exa Dark Sideræl Musk
I don't know what those companies are but she sounds industrious I hope they are successful
It is a chart with someone's opinion on works of fiction, there is nothing to refute. My opinion is that whoever made the list is probably a petersonian midwit.
>my comment is still a valid statement
It's not though. Call of the crocodile doesn't have as much literary value as the bible. You're a redditor who think everything is just >muh opinion can't be wrong
You really are a midwit if that was your takeaway. You are also trying to praise the Bible and threw in reddit, you must have been triggered by the petersonian joke. Don't mistake a statement saying opinions with no factual basis offer no means of refutation for moral relativism. It's just agreement or disagreement and taking the position you have is the morally relativistic one. I do believe call of the crocodile has more literary value than the bible since the Bible only produces cucks who spout about it endlessly, refute that bitch. Literally go fuck off back to following whatever eceleb is flavor of the month on twitter.
>You are also trying to praise the Bible
If that's your takeaway you actually are retarded.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
I'm not reading a refutation. Go back to christcucking homosexual.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
>christcucking
I'm an atheist so that shows how perceptive you are low IQ anon
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Still no refutation. Or was that supposed to be the refutation? I don't give a shit what you are, is this now a contest of who can regurgitate more opinions?
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Kill yourself homosexual.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
Sounds like you need some grade A copium there sport. Keep on seething.
I started early down the path of cultural osmosis over direct consumption. Every time I read a classic I tend to know basically exactly what's going to happen and what themes will be explored. I used to be really proud of my book reports at school because I wrote them without touching the book but still got the highest marks in class.
It's some form of knowledge but as I get older I notice the advantages of more formal and strict thinking with clear references, the problem is it's boring to me. I think this represents a huge trend that's undermining things like academia, the creatives don't contribute so it completely stagnates.
Solve this problem for me and the kids please ok.
A real, worthwhile "creative" cannot be purely an "ideas man", he has to be able to settle in and appreciate detail. I am bad at this too btw, I tend to take an overly big-picture, meta-analysis view of literature, missing the trees for the forest basically. Someone here was recently complaining about this in Bloom's criticism, that he never gets into specifics. It's great that you're good at grasping the essence of the discursive "point" of a work but any actually great work will have its essence not in discourse but in the *experience* of the work.
Where's Evola?
Where’s BAP?
Being read by Elon Musk's wife.
Who?
https://twitter.com/Grimezsz
This bitch is the mother of Tau Techno Mechanicus, X Æ A-Xii, and Exa Dark Sideræl Musk, and she's made that tweet about having read Bronze Age Mindset.
You homosexuals stay talking about blue check mark twitters and social media than my girlfriend. Shame on you. LULZ of 10 years ago would be disgusted
>This bitch is the mother of Tau Techno Mechanicus, X Æ A-Xii, and Exa Dark Sideræl Musk
I don't know what those companies are but she sounds industrious I hope they are successful
I don't even know what those words mean
They will be the god-kings of Mars.
>futurism
visibly cringed
what the fuck
She's a Nietzschean gf
Dunno about the rest but Sculpting in Time is indeed a middling book
everything but atlas shrugged should be removed from god tier.
That would make the bait much more obvious
Add Moby Dick and it would be good again
Wtf. Where is Stephen King?
It is a chart with someone's opinion on works of fiction, there is nothing to refute. My opinion is that whoever made the list is probably a petersonian midwit.
>opinion
no it's literary value
If you substitute literary value for opinion my comment is still a valid statement. Was this your attempt at refuting something?
>my comment is still a valid statement
It's not though. Call of the crocodile doesn't have as much literary value as the bible. You're a redditor who think everything is just
>muh opinion can't be wrong
You really are a midwit if that was your takeaway. You are also trying to praise the Bible and threw in reddit, you must have been triggered by the petersonian joke. Don't mistake a statement saying opinions with no factual basis offer no means of refutation for moral relativism. It's just agreement or disagreement and taking the position you have is the morally relativistic one. I do believe call of the crocodile has more literary value than the bible since the Bible only produces cucks who spout about it endlessly, refute that bitch. Literally go fuck off back to following whatever eceleb is flavor of the month on twitter.
>You are also trying to praise the Bible
If that's your takeaway you actually are retarded.
I'm not reading a refutation. Go back to christcucking homosexual.
>christcucking
I'm an atheist so that shows how perceptive you are low IQ anon
Still no refutation. Or was that supposed to be the refutation? I don't give a shit what you are, is this now a contest of who can regurgitate more opinions?
Kill yourself homosexual.
Sounds like you need some grade A copium there sport. Keep on seething.
dorian gray is better than atlas shrugged tho
>dorian gray is better than atlas shrugged
bait
most things are
b8 chart
stop feeding the troll
maybe make it less obvious next time
Where's Call of the Crocodile?
>1984 High-tier
>Brave New World Low-tier
Whoever made this either hasn't read both or is an r/books user
(OP) #
>Atlas Shrugged God tier
>LotR shit tier
Jesus Christ, this list refutes itself
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas > All them books
I started early down the path of cultural osmosis over direct consumption. Every time I read a classic I tend to know basically exactly what's going to happen and what themes will be explored. I used to be really proud of my book reports at school because I wrote them without touching the book but still got the highest marks in class.
It's some form of knowledge but as I get older I notice the advantages of more formal and strict thinking with clear references, the problem is it's boring to me. I think this represents a huge trend that's undermining things like academia, the creatives don't contribute so it completely stagnates.
Solve this problem for me and the kids please ok.
A real, worthwhile "creative" cannot be purely an "ideas man", he has to be able to settle in and appreciate detail. I am bad at this too btw, I tend to take an overly big-picture, meta-analysis view of literature, missing the trees for the forest basically. Someone here was recently complaining about this in Bloom's criticism, that he never gets into specifics. It's great that you're good at grasping the essence of the discursive "point" of a work but any actually great work will have its essence not in discourse but in the *experience* of the work.
test
Thinking about the person who made this chart is pretty funny to me. Unless they were older than ~17-18, then it's quite sad.