>tfw you fell for the OLED meme

Left is Amoled Galaxy A52s (Amoled)
Right is Oppo A52 (LCD)

Look how oversaturated the pic on the AMOLED screen is

Fucking disgusting

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    here
    dumbass.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      put natural You don't want blueish white (looks like shit)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [log in to view media]

        Still looks like shit

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          protip: those settings do not affect screenshots

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      /thread

      shit bait thread, all consumer shit is oversaturated for market appeal for average customers, but at least you have the option to fix it
      even my cheap Xiaomi has a color accurate mode for its OLED panel

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [log in to view media]

      Mine is already set to natural, homosexual

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But then everything looks washed.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [log in to view media]

        Uhm, no, it doesn't. You pea-sized brin had only been trained to garden gnometuber "crispy" "punchy" colours. Natural looks as intended by actual artists.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [log in to view media]

          >Natural looks as intended by actual artists.
          Nobody ever gave a shit to how things are "intended"
          haha eq sliders go burr

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If you were using good hardware and uncompressed media, you wouldn't need to mess with the equaliser.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              An EQ is to color the music the way I see fit, it's not to make up for bad hardware or media. I mostly have lossless anymore and my components tend to have good measurements.
              The whole gaslighting of there should be no subjectivity on how you consume media or that people's subjectivity melts away when introduced to a system this is objectively correct is bollocks.

              The equalizer is for just that: equalization. It compensates for the flawed frequency response of your speakers. Other uses for it are degenerate.

              >It compensates for the flawed frequency response of your speakers
              My headphones are actually too flat for my tastes, actually bought them for how much SPL they can put out which allows you to crank out alot of bass if you EQ all the other frequencies down.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The whole gaslighting of there should be no subjectivity on how you consume media or that people's subjectivity melts away when introduced to a system this is objectively correct is bollocks.
                It's not bullshit at all, and I wish it was a more common belief so that we got good CD and web releases instead of wasting time making good masters for hilariously antiquated vinyl records used by idiot boomers.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they need to maintain the now-artificial divide between low-end and high-end, so they can overcharge for the high-end
                perfect lossless master streaming can be done right now at the flip of a switch, they need only a fraction of the bandwidth low resolution youtube videos use
                but they don't do that, because then who will buy the "premium" CD's or what-have-you?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is available from services like Tidal, but many of Tidal's offerings are tainted by MQA's retarded encoding and that's a scam all its own.
                The continued production of vinyl records certainly benefits somebody economically and it isn't any consumer. Good old CDs offer all the same benefits with perfect audio quality.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the problem those people have is that there isn't anywhere else for audio to go, everything up to the speakers is for all consumer intents and purposes, solved (and you can't really solve speakers and beyond since that depends on the room/space you're in as well, which is not controllable)
                they have to make their own new limitations, like splitting streams into multiple bitrates, or providing cheap compressed-to-fuck CD's vs. expensive vinyl records that have been mastered well (real cool choice there, both are shit options, but i think even for them making a bad cd and a good cd would just be too obvious)

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >everything up to the speakers is for all consumer intents and purposes, solved
                You still need to ensure your amp has enough watts output, -100dB snr and <0.005% distortion, otherwise pretty much yes. A perfect DAC is $10 and FLAC files are the best source you can get.
                I would say a system for less than $1000 can offer 99.9% perfect quality today.
                The only blessing that's come from streaming is it does seem to be ending the loudness war. Good mastering is finally coming to high-quality digital audio like we always should've had.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Lossless is also good for the "mix" culture of the internet

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >You still need to ensure your amp has enough watts output, -100dB snr and <0.005% distortion, otherwise pretty much yes. A perfect DAC is $10 and FLAC files are the best source you can get.
                of course there's still bad equipment being sold
                my point is that practically-perfect equipment is cheap and plentiful at this point, anybody can afford the best they will ever need, provided they know what they're looking for (can't really help that unless they stop making shit, which they won't)

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >my point is that practically-perfect equipment is cheap and plentiful at this point, anybody can afford the best they will ever need, provided they know what they're looking for
                Oh certainly. It's really impressive how far audio has come. We basically had the 8K UHD of audio quality back in the 1970s thanks to CDs, and now that level of quality is extremely accessible.
                >Most audiophiles are the ones chasing objective perfection.
                That's not my experience with audiofools. Almost all of them are scam enthusiasts.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It's not bullshit at all
                My feels say different

                [...]
                My headphones (HA-SZ2000) literally have a dedicated woofer, which also means they have a dedicated tweeter.
                You actually have to turn down the treble if you actually want to get the low frequencies you bought them for or else you blow your ears out.
                The picture wasn't mine

                [...]
                >TV enthusiasts for example would laugh at you for saying the equivalent of shit like this
                I legit don't care what those people think
                >This whole subjectivity thing is a cope invented by audiofools to justify the money they waste on being scammed.
                >You either like listening to music or you like listening to your equipment.
                You got it backwards bro
                Most audiophiles are the ones chasing objective perfection. You have some chasing vinyl and tube shit but that's not the majority. EQing is actually shunned in most audiophool communities as everything should be perfect and transparent from the get-go.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >That's not my experience with audiofools. Almost all of them are scam enthusiasts.
                Guess it depends on your definition.
                The ones I'm talking about are the ones that think MDR 7506s are "good budget headphones" because they are accurate for not much money.
                The ones you're thinking of are the delusionals.

                >transparent
                transparent generally means no audible compression artifacts
                you're probably thinking of "flat", as in flat frequency response (not requiring EQ to flatten it)

                Yeah that was probably the wrong term I haven't thought about this stuff in awhile. When I was saying transparent I was thinking of things that doesn't color the sound like a tube or a really colored opamp.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Yeah that was probably the wrong term I haven't thought about this stuff in awhile. When I was saying transparent I was thinking of things that doesn't color the sound like a tube or a really colored opamp.
                i'm not familiar with all the terms either
                like idk if there's one for "uncoloured" sound

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                >The ones I'm talking about are the ones that think MDR 7506s are "good budget headphones" because they are accurate for not much money.
                Holy fucking shit, and these are $100!?
                I don't think they're wrong anon. I have so much egg on my face for buying Senns now.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't think they're wrong anon
                They are not wrong, just wasn't for me.
                It's funny how anons here want to try to school me when I've already been down the objectivity rabbit hole and found I really didn't care for what I've heard/saw.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                not him but at the end of the day, listening to music and watching videos for entertainment is objectively a subjective experience
                people have different tastes in what music of videos they watch, just as they have different tastes in what equipment or configuration they use to consume it

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                audio quality is not subjective

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no, but peoples' preferences when it comes to audio is
                some people like bass boosting, some people like added reverb, some people filter out frequencies they don't like, some people like the sound of overdriven tubes, vinyl records, or tape, etc
                there are objectively more and less accurate methods of recording/sampling/reproducing/etc audio, but it is possible to prefer something which is technically less accurate

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >some people like bass boosting, some people like added reverb, some people filter out frequencies they don't like, some people like the sound of overdriven tubes, vinyl records, or tape, etc
                yes, and those people aren't audiophiles

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                most people aren't concerned with studio accuracy, because they aren't mastering, they're just enjoying the music

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they're enjoying their equipment, not the music

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I've already been down the objectivity rabbit hole and found I really didn't care for what I've heard/saw.
                Your ears are lying to you as they always do. Just condition yourself to like better audio quality.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not anon, but $20 apple earbuds are good too, it even has a microphone if you don't already have one (but to use it, you need a 3.5mm TRRS AKA most desktops have 2 ports for headphones and mics, but phone jacks combine them, they still work on TRS ports but only headphone sound is received and buttons don't work). At the worse case you might need a 3.5 TRRS extender since apple's earbuds are like 1.5 meters (but if you have a phone with a audio jack, the short length is really nice).
                The best part is that your ears don't get sweaty while doing exercise, you can listen to an audio book or something, and on your deskop you can use your speakers (which sound amazing), and switch to your earbuds when you talk on discord or zoom.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                you can get adapters for those 4-conductor 3.5mm headset jacks into separate 3-conductor headphone/mic jacks

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I think using a 3.5 to usb-c adapter is better (if you have a usbc port on the front of your case), because you can put the connector closer to you if you need to plug it into the back of the PC and you can repurpose the adapter if you have a phone that doesn't have a 3.5 jack, but does have a usbc port, but I would suggest your Y splitter for a laptop since there is usually only 2 usb slots.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                just keep in mind usb adapters have a dac and amp built into them, so you should not cheap out on them (unlike the adapter i posted, which doesn't matter how cheap it is)

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                DACs only matters if you are using a headset that is like $500 (they NEVER use TRRS), and using a $500 headset on your on board computer can have similar "quality" problems as using a usb-c dac, since their ohm's range might not be good enough (and "quality" is subjective since not everyone has sonar hearing to notice, since the audio will work fine even if the ohm's aren't matching).
                AMPs only matters if you have low impedance microphone, and those don't exist with on board audio AMP's (they all use the same amperage).
                And I forgot to mention that your wire doesn't support the buttons on the cable to change volume or cancel the call (but support does depend on platform, but it's likely to work on your phone).
                And yes I know that the apple usb-c connector does have volume problems with android, but that's not a problem on a PC, and other adapters can solve this problem.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I've actually had a few pairs of earpods from boomers who don't use them when they buy an iphone
                They sound alright but damn they hurt my ears and with one of my ears being a slightly different shape where they rest, I also got channel imbalance.
                I actually really really did want to like them since I had 3 pairs which meant I didn't have to baby them.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The continued production of vinyl records certainly benefits somebody economically and it isn't any consumer. Good old CDs offer all the same benefits with perfect audio quality.
                there's also certainly an element of artificial difficulty here as well
                they could make bad records and good cd's, but then who will buy the records? cd's are easier
                since a vinyl setup is more expensive and involved than a cd setup, this gives the process a more premium feel, and they know this

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >It's not bullshit at all
                My feels say different

                Cope. As overall quality of the speakers and room treatment go up research shows that people turn up the bass or treble very little if at all. What you basically eq is a shitty loudness curve that indicates either a too low of a listening level for high fidelity or a shitty setup with little low end and awful treble response. My guess is that you are are using shit speakers and no subs because even on low quality setups most people will only turn the bass up and not treble which mean your setup is abysmal.

                My headphones (HA-SZ2000) literally have a dedicated woofer, which also means they have a dedicated tweeter.
                You actually have to turn down the treble if you actually want to get the low frequencies you bought them for or else you blow your ears out.
                The picture wasn't mine

                >My headphones are actually too flat for my tastes,
                TV enthusiasts for example would laugh at you for saying the equivalent of shit like this. Blown-out, inaccurate colors are considered to be preferred only by retards. This whole subjectivity thing is a cope invented by audiofools to justify the money they waste on being scammed.
                You either like listening to music or you like listening to your equipment.

                >TV enthusiasts for example would laugh at you for saying the equivalent of shit like this
                I legit don't care what those people think
                >This whole subjectivity thing is a cope invented by audiofools to justify the money they waste on being scammed.
                >You either like listening to music or you like listening to your equipment.
                You got it backwards bro
                Most audiophiles are the ones chasing objective perfection. You have some chasing vinyl and tube shit but that's not the majority. EQing is actually shunned in most audiophool communities as everything should be perfect and transparent from the get-go.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >transparent
                transparent generally means no audible compression artifacts
                you're probably thinking of "flat", as in flat frequency response (not requiring EQ to flatten it)

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >My headphones are actually too flat for my tastes,
                TV enthusiasts for example would laugh at you for saying the equivalent of shit like this. Blown-out, inaccurate colors are considered to be preferred only by retards. This whole subjectivity thing is a cope invented by audiofools to justify the money they waste on being scammed.
                You either like listening to music or you like listening to your equipment.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The equalizer is for just that: equalization. It compensates for the flawed frequency response of your speakers. Other uses for it are degenerate.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Cope. As overall quality of the speakers and room treatment go up research shows that people turn up the bass or treble very little if at all. What you basically eq is a shitty loudness curve that indicates either a too low of a listening level for high fidelity or a shitty setup with little low end and awful treble response. My guess is that you are are using shit speakers and no subs because even on low quality setups most people will only turn the bass up and not treble which mean your setup is abysmal.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          name? i wanna cum inside her

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5424512

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >hair behind her eyebrows
          wtf

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            that's standard practice with anime styles

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The idea is that bangs are see through, since ther're not supposed to be thick

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          pic source

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=makima_%28chainsaw_man%29+zaphn

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    Kek I love how this bait backfired, bumass OP
    All fields

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OLED looks a lot better, colours are popping and it's must more vibrant, you need glasses op

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is purely because Samsung is terrible not because OLED is terrible

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thought this was going to be some tentacle kino from the thumbnail

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      same

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      same

      touch grass

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Your fault for not calibrating dumbass
    Skill issue

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What is the "perfect" display tech? Good accuracy, energy efficient, good viewing angles and highly durable?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wait 15 years for microLED
      In a shorter timeframe, QNED is very promising, and should deliver similar performance sooner for cheaper with only a mild reduction in energy efficiency.
      There are also many improvements yet to be made to good old OLEDs, including phosphorescence and top emission among others.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you have to spend at least $5000 to get half way decent colors because all consumer panels are tuned to "make the colors pop"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not true at all. All you need to do is get something with at least 100% sRGB (available on $300 panels) and a $200 colorimeter and accurate colors are yours. Delta E less than 2 is not visible to the human eye and essentially all monitors are capable of this. In fact, if a monitor isn't capable of it, it's probably garbage anyway.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is considered a good thread on LULZ

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    brighter = better
    when phones compare camera photo's, reviewers will prefer the pictures that are brighter.
    same with the display.
    OLED sucks at dark gradients, but it's really good at direct sunlight, and sometimes the blacks are deeper (there is haloing in some situations though).
    Also the galaxy phone is 80hz and the LCD is 60hz (but the galaxy phone is approx $100 more expensive).

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like it saturated

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have this phone. Seems like you have the "eye comfort shield" turned on in the left phone.

    Turn it off for more blue-light and color accuracy.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can be a happier person by not comparing everything. I bought my phone, didn't change any settings, works like a charm, am super happy with it. It's that simple.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You think companies would check before giving a product a name that already exists.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      like oppo would give a shit, they do it on purpose, they're a chink company
      i've been to china, and the oppo stores are straight apple store clones

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Chainsaw Man is probably the most overhyped manga in history.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Display does not matter on a cell phone. A cell phone should only send and receive calls and texts. Email is debatable. The resolution should allow for accurate reading of text at multiple sizes to accommodate varying vision levels.

Your email address will not be published.