Left is Amoled Galaxy A52s (Amoled)
Right is Oppo A52 (LCD)
Look how oversaturated the pic on the AMOLED screen is
Fucking disgusting
LULZ / Science & Tech
>tfw you fell for the OLED meme
Left is Amoled Galaxy A52s (Amoled)
Right is Oppo A52 (LCD)
Look how oversaturated the pic on the AMOLED screen is
Fucking disgusting
[log in to view media]
here
dumbass.
put natural You don't want blueish white (looks like shit)
[log in to view media]
Still looks like shit
protip: those settings do not affect screenshots
/thread
shit bait thread, all consumer shit is oversaturated for market appeal for average customers, but at least you have the option to fix it
even my cheap Xiaomi has a color accurate mode for its OLED panel
[log in to view media]
Mine is already set to natural, homosexual
But then everything looks washed.
[log in to view media]
Uhm, no, it doesn't. You pea-sized brin had only been trained to garden gnometuber "crispy" "punchy" colours. Natural looks as intended by actual artists.
[log in to view media]
>Natural looks as intended by actual artists.
Nobody ever gave a shit to how things are "intended"
haha eq sliders go burr
If you were using good hardware and uncompressed media, you wouldn't need to mess with the equaliser.
An EQ is to color the music the way I see fit, it's not to make up for bad hardware or media. I mostly have lossless anymore and my components tend to have good measurements.
The whole gaslighting of there should be no subjectivity on how you consume media or that people's subjectivity melts away when introduced to a system this is objectively correct is bollocks.
>It compensates for the flawed frequency response of your speakers
My headphones are actually too flat for my tastes, actually bought them for how much SPL they can put out which allows you to crank out alot of bass if you EQ all the other frequencies down.
>The whole gaslighting of there should be no subjectivity on how you consume media or that people's subjectivity melts away when introduced to a system this is objectively correct is bollocks.
It's not bullshit at all, and I wish it was a more common belief so that we got good CD and web releases instead of wasting time making good masters for hilariously antiquated vinyl records used by idiot boomers.
they need to maintain the now-artificial divide between low-end and high-end, so they can overcharge for the high-end
perfect lossless master streaming can be done right now at the flip of a switch, they need only a fraction of the bandwidth low resolution youtube videos use
but they don't do that, because then who will buy the "premium" CD's or what-have-you?
It is available from services like Tidal, but many of Tidal's offerings are tainted by MQA's retarded encoding and that's a scam all its own.
The continued production of vinyl records certainly benefits somebody economically and it isn't any consumer. Good old CDs offer all the same benefits with perfect audio quality.
the problem those people have is that there isn't anywhere else for audio to go, everything up to the speakers is for all consumer intents and purposes, solved (and you can't really solve speakers and beyond since that depends on the room/space you're in as well, which is not controllable)
they have to make their own new limitations, like splitting streams into multiple bitrates, or providing cheap compressed-to-fuck CD's vs. expensive vinyl records that have been mastered well (real cool choice there, both are shit options, but i think even for them making a bad cd and a good cd would just be too obvious)
>everything up to the speakers is for all consumer intents and purposes, solved
You still need to ensure your amp has enough watts output, -100dB snr and <0.005% distortion, otherwise pretty much yes. A perfect DAC is $10 and FLAC files are the best source you can get.
I would say a system for less than $1000 can offer 99.9% perfect quality today.
The only blessing that's come from streaming is it does seem to be ending the loudness war. Good mastering is finally coming to high-quality digital audio like we always should've had.
Lossless is also good for the "mix" culture of the internet
>You still need to ensure your amp has enough watts output, -100dB snr and <0.005% distortion, otherwise pretty much yes. A perfect DAC is $10 and FLAC files are the best source you can get.
of course there's still bad equipment being sold
my point is that practically-perfect equipment is cheap and plentiful at this point, anybody can afford the best they will ever need, provided they know what they're looking for (can't really help that unless they stop making shit, which they won't)
>my point is that practically-perfect equipment is cheap and plentiful at this point, anybody can afford the best they will ever need, provided they know what they're looking for
Oh certainly. It's really impressive how far audio has come. We basically had the 8K UHD of audio quality back in the 1970s thanks to CDs, and now that level of quality is extremely accessible.
>Most audiophiles are the ones chasing objective perfection.
That's not my experience with audiofools. Almost all of them are scam enthusiasts.
>That's not my experience with audiofools. Almost all of them are scam enthusiasts.
Guess it depends on your definition.
The ones I'm talking about are the ones that think MDR 7506s are "good budget headphones" because they are accurate for not much money.
The ones you're thinking of are the delusionals.
Yeah that was probably the wrong term I haven't thought about this stuff in awhile. When I was saying transparent I was thinking of things that doesn't color the sound like a tube or a really colored opamp.
>Yeah that was probably the wrong term I haven't thought about this stuff in awhile. When I was saying transparent I was thinking of things that doesn't color the sound like a tube or a really colored opamp.
i'm not familiar with all the terms either
like idk if there's one for "uncoloured" sound
[log in to view media]
>The ones I'm talking about are the ones that think MDR 7506s are "good budget headphones" because they are accurate for not much money.
Holy fucking shit, and these are $100!?
I don't think they're wrong anon. I have so much egg on my face for buying Senns now.
>I don't think they're wrong anon
They are not wrong, just wasn't for me.
It's funny how anons here want to try to school me when I've already been down the objectivity rabbit hole and found I really didn't care for what I've heard/saw.
not him but at the end of the day, listening to music and watching videos for entertainment is objectively a subjective experience
people have different tastes in what music of videos they watch, just as they have different tastes in what equipment or configuration they use to consume it
audio quality is not subjective
no, but peoples' preferences when it comes to audio is
some people like bass boosting, some people like added reverb, some people filter out frequencies they don't like, some people like the sound of overdriven tubes, vinyl records, or tape, etc
there are objectively more and less accurate methods of recording/sampling/reproducing/etc audio, but it is possible to prefer something which is technically less accurate
>some people like bass boosting, some people like added reverb, some people filter out frequencies they don't like, some people like the sound of overdriven tubes, vinyl records, or tape, etc
yes, and those people aren't audiophiles
most people aren't concerned with studio accuracy, because they aren't mastering, they're just enjoying the music
they're enjoying their equipment, not the music
>I've already been down the objectivity rabbit hole and found I really didn't care for what I've heard/saw.
Your ears are lying to you as they always do. Just condition yourself to like better audio quality.
Not anon, but $20 apple earbuds are good too, it even has a microphone if you don't already have one (but to use it, you need a 3.5mm TRRS AKA most desktops have 2 ports for headphones and mics, but phone jacks combine them, they still work on TRS ports but only headphone sound is received and buttons don't work). At the worse case you might need a 3.5 TRRS extender since apple's earbuds are like 1.5 meters (but if you have a phone with a audio jack, the short length is really nice).
The best part is that your ears don't get sweaty while doing exercise, you can listen to an audio book or something, and on your deskop you can use your speakers (which sound amazing), and switch to your earbuds when you talk on discord or zoom.
[log in to view media]
you can get adapters for those 4-conductor 3.5mm headset jacks into separate 3-conductor headphone/mic jacks
I think using a 3.5 to usb-c adapter is better (if you have a usbc port on the front of your case), because you can put the connector closer to you if you need to plug it into the back of the PC and you can repurpose the adapter if you have a phone that doesn't have a 3.5 jack, but does have a usbc port, but I would suggest your Y splitter for a laptop since there is usually only 2 usb slots.
just keep in mind usb adapters have a dac and amp built into them, so you should not cheap out on them (unlike the adapter i posted, which doesn't matter how cheap it is)
DACs only matters if you are using a headset that is like $500 (they NEVER use TRRS), and using a $500 headset on your on board computer can have similar "quality" problems as using a usb-c dac, since their ohm's range might not be good enough (and "quality" is subjective since not everyone has sonar hearing to notice, since the audio will work fine even if the ohm's aren't matching).
AMPs only matters if you have low impedance microphone, and those don't exist with on board audio AMP's (they all use the same amperage).
And I forgot to mention that your wire doesn't support the buttons on the cable to change volume or cancel the call (but support does depend on platform, but it's likely to work on your phone).
And yes I know that the apple usb-c connector does have volume problems with android, but that's not a problem on a PC, and other adapters can solve this problem.
I've actually had a few pairs of earpods from boomers who don't use them when they buy an iphone
They sound alright but damn they hurt my ears and with one of my ears being a slightly different shape where they rest, I also got channel imbalance.
I actually really really did want to like them since I had 3 pairs which meant I didn't have to baby them.
>The continued production of vinyl records certainly benefits somebody economically and it isn't any consumer. Good old CDs offer all the same benefits with perfect audio quality.
there's also certainly an element of artificial difficulty here as well
they could make bad records and good cd's, but then who will buy the records? cd's are easier
since a vinyl setup is more expensive and involved than a cd setup, this gives the process a more premium feel, and they know this
>It's not bullshit at all
My feels say different
My headphones (HA-SZ2000) literally have a dedicated woofer, which also means they have a dedicated tweeter.
You actually have to turn down the treble if you actually want to get the low frequencies you bought them for or else you blow your ears out.
The picture wasn't mine
>TV enthusiasts for example would laugh at you for saying the equivalent of shit like this
I legit don't care what those people think
>This whole subjectivity thing is a cope invented by audiofools to justify the money they waste on being scammed.
>You either like listening to music or you like listening to your equipment.
You got it backwards bro
Most audiophiles are the ones chasing objective perfection. You have some chasing vinyl and tube shit but that's not the majority. EQing is actually shunned in most audiophool communities as everything should be perfect and transparent from the get-go.
>transparent
transparent generally means no audible compression artifacts
you're probably thinking of "flat", as in flat frequency response (not requiring EQ to flatten it)
>My headphones are actually too flat for my tastes,
TV enthusiasts for example would laugh at you for saying the equivalent of shit like this. Blown-out, inaccurate colors are considered to be preferred only by retards. This whole subjectivity thing is a cope invented by audiofools to justify the money they waste on being scammed.
You either like listening to music or you like listening to your equipment.
The equalizer is for just that: equalization. It compensates for the flawed frequency response of your speakers. Other uses for it are degenerate.
Cope. As overall quality of the speakers and room treatment go up research shows that people turn up the bass or treble very little if at all. What you basically eq is a shitty loudness curve that indicates either a too low of a listening level for high fidelity or a shitty setup with little low end and awful treble response. My guess is that you are are using shit speakers and no subs because even on low quality setups most people will only turn the bass up and not treble which mean your setup is abysmal.
name? i wanna cum inside her
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/5424512
>hair behind her eyebrows
wtf
that's standard practice with anime styles
The idea is that bangs are see through, since ther're not supposed to be thick
pic source
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=makima_%28chainsaw_man%29+zaphn
[log in to view media]
Kek I love how this bait backfired, bumass OP
All fields
OLED looks a lot better, colours are popping and it's must more vibrant, you need glasses op
This is purely because Samsung is terrible not because OLED is terrible
Thought this was going to be some tentacle kino from the thumbnail
same
touch grass
Your fault for not calibrating dumbass
Skill issue
What is the "perfect" display tech? Good accuracy, energy efficient, good viewing angles and highly durable?
Wait 15 years for microLED
In a shorter timeframe, QNED is very promising, and should deliver similar performance sooner for cheaper with only a mild reduction in energy efficiency.
There are also many improvements yet to be made to good old OLEDs, including phosphorescence and top emission among others.
you have to spend at least $5000 to get half way decent colors because all consumer panels are tuned to "make the colors pop"
Not true at all. All you need to do is get something with at least 100% sRGB (available on $300 panels) and a $200 colorimeter and accurate colors are yours. Delta E less than 2 is not visible to the human eye and essentially all monitors are capable of this. In fact, if a monitor isn't capable of it, it's probably garbage anyway.
This is considered a good thread on LULZ
brighter = better
when phones compare camera photo's, reviewers will prefer the pictures that are brighter.
same with the display.
OLED sucks at dark gradients, but it's really good at direct sunlight, and sometimes the blacks are deeper (there is haloing in some situations though).
Also the galaxy phone is 80hz and the LCD is 60hz (but the galaxy phone is approx $100 more expensive).
I like it saturated
I have this phone. Seems like you have the "eye comfort shield" turned on in the left phone.
Turn it off for more blue-light and color accuracy.
You can be a happier person by not comparing everything. I bought my phone, didn't change any settings, works like a charm, am super happy with it. It's that simple.
You think companies would check before giving a product a name that already exists.
like oppo would give a shit, they do it on purpose, they're a chink company
i've been to china, and the oppo stores are straight apple store clones
Chainsaw Man is probably the most overhyped manga in history.
Display does not matter on a cell phone. A cell phone should only send and receive calls and texts. Email is debatable. The resolution should allow for accurate reading of text at multiple sizes to accommodate varying vision levels.