Tell me about the Indo-Europeans.
Tell me about the Indo-Europeans.
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Tell me about the Indo-Europeans.
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
R1a are the only true Indo-Europeans and Aryans, R1b are Caucasus and African rapebabies. Cope.
British-made conspiracy theory to justify British imperialism and colonialism. Other European powers jumped on it to justify their own imperialism and colonialism as well.
The conspiracy was invented by a British colonial judge in India who noticed a handful of words in Sanskrit were similar to Latin. He concluded that it was because both languages came from one language that was spoken by ancient Europeans. He didn't have a name for the language or them. The conspiracy wasn't taken seriously for decades.
There's no evidence for the conspiracy but it's still treated as a verifiable fact by paranoid retards who are always we wuzzing like .
The conspiracy is so bizarre that the years, locations and everything else changes every time someone talks about it. Zero substance.
> cope by pajeet
We, R1a-Aryans, should unite against R1b-mongrels, what do you do, stupid monkey?
Shoot yourself in the head, we wuzzer
You were enslaved by us. Seethe, monkey.
oh hey it's the mongol rapebaby in russia that is a white supremacist, "we wuzzes" as an iranian and samefags in every theead on LULZ whenever someone mentions the conspiracy theory
Cope, monkey. Aryan BVLLS came from Russia and enslaved you, you are just the retarded shitskin Slavs, lol.
You can't enslave a bug, virgin.
cope
we came from rassenia and took your elamite shithole and force you to speak our protoslav r1a language (you mutilated it btw)
Everything good that Persians have is taken over from civilized Elamites and Mesopotamians.
Cope brown cuck
>The conspiracy was invented by a British colonial judge in India who noticed a handful of words in Sanskrit were similar to Latin. He concluded that it was because both languages came from one language that was spoken by ancient Europeans. He didn't have a name for the language or them. The conspiracy wasn't taken seriously for decades.
Some more interesting facts about the conspiracy's creator. He claimed that Chinese and Japanese were descended from the same language as Sanskrit and Latin and claimed that Hindustani wasn't. He believed priests in Ancient Egypt had a teleporting mechanism to take them to different parts of the world.
Bro our even-further-back ancestor literally lived in India, went Northwest, founded our ancestors' bloodline, and they reconquered India.
Why do you deny a fact? Were you hurt? Can't you live with the fact and grow stronger than before?
>Aryans
They are indians now?
Genocide untold amounts of natives in europe and India, some that fag nezmets will not mention of course. https://indo-european.eu/2019/09/yamnaya-replaced-europeans-but-admixed-heavily-as-they-spread-to-asia/
>Afro-Saxon
HAHAHAHA LARPING N
Cope, Black Americans are the peak Blacks literally every Black person in Africa follows or imitates our culture as every race on earth does, literally on par with Brit/American culture.
Ancient white BVLLS
This image is outdated. PIE formed in Iran among Pajeet-looking people.
There are many things wrong with this, but not that.
What is the proof?
The Genetic History of the Southern Arc: A Bridge between West Asia & Europe
I doubt they will have a strong proof for this. The R1b Hasanlu samples are apparently from the Iron Age (around 800 BC).
Earlier we have the main theory suggest R1a came from Iran. Does anybody know why this was rejected? How I understood, the new study proof this again?
Meme based on modern subclades. It was the same with R1b. Both R1 are from the North.
I haven't heard anything about it and I don't think the southern arc paper is arguing for a southern origin of r1a or r-m269.
The Iron age Iran z2103 would be consistent with the abstract arguing a Yamnaya intrusion into Iran prior to PII.
supposedly it's a neolithic z2103 sample
The site ranges from the Neolithic to the iron age so I guess that's possible but apparently they've been leaked to others already.
It also sounds like they have trace Steppe ancestry too.
Also the chronology is very narrow because z2103 should precede Sredni Stog and CHG on the Steppe by a fair bit. If it were Neolithic it would be further upstream on the r1b tree.
Sorry I meant Sredni should precede z2103 (est 3400bc).
Also apparently Usatovo has been re-radiocarboned and it is closer to 4500bc which again pushes the Steppe profile far back.
It sounds like whatever mixture events happened on the Volga were very early.
I don't think Usatovo should be that old. They are buried with late Trypillian pottery. Such pottery is dated to some 1000 years later.
Sorry I misremembered the exact timeframe but it has indeed been pushed back.
>Re; EAA abstracts Aug 2022
>"New radiocarbon dates from the Usatovo culture suggest a re-evaluation of the culture’s chronology"
>Usatovo is one of the kurgan cultures of Eneolithic southeast Europe, occupying a strategic crossroads between the eastern Balkans and the Ponto-Caspian steppe. Usatovo is considered to be related to the farming cultures of southeastern Europe as well as to the pastoralist groups of the North Pontic.Usatovo currently dates to the second half of the 4th millennium BCE, based on C14 measurements obtained on pottery and charcoal using the scintillation method, as well as through ceramic typologies. Recent AMS radiocarbon dates obtained on human remains from the Usatovo site of Mayaki fall within the second half of the 5th millennium BCE.
Okay, it could be interesting. Usatovo is considered a mix of farmers and steppe.
Paper is not even out yet so don't jump to conclusiones.
>There is a an even bigger surprise coming from ancient Sumer in Mesopotamia which should be included in the Southern Arc papers. That is all I can say for now on this though. The papers should be out soon.
What did he mean by this?
Most likely a massive amount of E1b. Sumerians looked indentical to Berbers. Natufians may have spoken Proto-Sumerian rather than Proto-Semitic.
>THIS report on the human remains, found at Kish by the Field Museum and Oxford Expedition, is based on the material excavated in the old Sumerian palace at Ingharra (Eastern Kish) and at mound W, also in Eastern Kish, during the three seasons, 1923-24, 1924-25, 1925-26. All remains from the palace, or in our terminology, mound A, belong to the period immediately preceding the age of Sargon of Agade, and are contemporary with the last (fourth) dynasty of Kish, circa 2900-2800 B.c. The names of the eight rulers of this period indicate clearly a Semitic dynasty.
>The population at Kish in the period to which the human remains of the palace belong should be, therefore, very mixed; the investigations of Sir Arthur Keith on the skulls from 'Ubaid, near Ur, definitely prove the Sumerians to belong to the long-headed races, and Dr. Buxton finds two long-headed races in the palace skulls at Kish, which he designates as Eurafrican and Mediterranean.
>Sumerians looked identical to Berbers
Eh, I doubt it. This ancestry doesn't show up in the region, doesn't expand anywhere and isn't present in any Bronze Age samples.
E1b maybe, but I think at best they could resemble Natufians.
I disagree. Natufians were proto-Afroasiatics. Sumerians were originally to the northeast of Mesopotamia.
Proto-Sumerians likely had massive amounts of J, L, and R2a while Ubaid was distinct with massive amounts of E1b1b, G2a, and H2. Autosomally I'm assuming partial continuation of Sumerian ancestry in modern Iraq between 10-40%. Semitic and Ubaid populations likely contributed the majority of ancestry to Mesopotamia and modern Iraq. Early Semitic, Sumerian, and Ubaid populations were all Natufian-rich.
Northern Caucasus was their likely origin.
Sumerians were most likely predominantly Iran_N+ANF
Haplogroups J, G, maybe R
>Sumerians were most likely predominantly Iran_N+ANF
They would've had plenty of Natufian, probably more Natufian than ANF.
>Haplogroups J, G
I think they had E1b1b, H2, and R2a too.
>They would've had plenty of Natufian, probably more Natufian than ANF.
I doubt it. Iraqis have low natufian even after Semitic invasions.
What is your criteria for "low natufian"? 2%? 5%? 10%? 20%?
I was wrong, I thought they have less it. Anyway they definitely had less natufian in presemitic times than today.
That's why they weren't ANF rich in the past either.
Why? MENAs were more ANF before arabs
Older samples don't have much ANF either. Moderns have new steppe admixture and slightly more Natufian.
test
I doubt Anatolian languages came from the Balkans. I hope the papers that are going to be released later this month shine some light into it.
Yeah. It is clear as night and day now that PIE had an origin south of the Caucasus.
people have been seething at them for 4+ years now
the Afghans are the descendants of the Scythians
This hypothesis is true in my opinion, as I could digest milk without farting and vomiting like chinks and naggers
Early Indo-Europeans couldn't.