What kind of a person believes that knowledge comes only from perception? We have innate knowledge, we have genetic knowledge. The Tabula rasa theory effectively argues that people are born bots.
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
haha no we don't
We are bots and you will cope and seethe about it
>it's the idealist chud with the strawmen again
Not an argument.
I am a new tourist to LULZ recently but I have taken interest the phenomenon of the idealist-op. I think this is something bigger and I am going to call it anon-x for a place holder. I think op idealist is completely related to other boards shit posting. Like bump-fag and the "local lord" threads of /tg/ or the bay leaf does nothing on LULZ.
They're literally a bunch of homosexuals from leftypol and discord that are probably paid by your government nowadays to shill here.
He's really not that interesting. Just a boring autist who has been shitting up this board for at least a year now with his repetitive 24/7 spam. He's unable to argue and only floods the thread with always the same insults when you prove him wrong.
There is no innate knowledge. The so-called a priori knowledge is not "knowledge" but rather a given restriction for thinking.
genes are real anon
Genes aren't knowledge.
NEVER CHANGE LULZ...
>my eye color is knowledge
>my body hair is knowledge
No. Although in your case this is probably the only thing you have coming close to "knowledge".
>genetics is when eye colour
Genes still have nothing to do with knowledge. Any attempt of yours to forcefully redefine knowledge this way is nothing but immature cope.
Genes still have everything to do with knowledge. Any attempt of yours to forcefully redefine knowledge this way is nothing but immature cope.
>forcefully redefine knowledge
Dont talk to me about linguistic, this thread and its confusion about words (materialism/idealism thread is a primo example) is exactly I say this.
Ive literally read the Thesaurus for fun, and still sometimes do...because I AM LITERALLY THAT AUTISTIC.
>Ive literally read the Thesaurus for fun
Its a game. Pick a word at random, read its synonyms and antonyms for a word you do not recognize, look it up, and then turn to that word and do it again.
Each word "mostly means the same" but over time the defnition of the word you go to will change until youre searching up aomething completely different.
Aspergers, its not a game but can be.
So this is how people with low verbal IQ are coping because they can't naturally infer the meaning of words based on etymology ...
Thats what the books on Latin and Greek are for...I now quasi translate Heirglyphs and various symbols.
>yea but i have an inate
stfu youre retarded
I travel the world for research...what do you do for work? Forklift?
>people pay dumb retards to travel
This is just proving how dumb and fucking retarded this world is.
>look I'm a retard and this world pays me to be a dumb retard
How is this a positive badge?
Youre not even competent enough to watch the video, shits cutting edge. Levin needs nore recognition for his breakthrough research.
(Which mirros much of mine which was written YEARS before his and is all my own. NO ONE will ever pay you for research of anything, EVER.)
...but you wouldnt know either way, just a troll....NOT A GENETICIST OR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGIST.
....I read this at age 12, in the year 1996.
You read an unintellectual trash book at age 12? Great thing to brag about on LULZ.
Correct, you listen to ~~*intellectuals*~~, Im an esoteric barbarian scientist alien god-king.
What are you?
>What are you?
Better than you.
lol....alright, you've admitted defeat while saving face. I'm going to bed.
Why would I read or watch garbage?
>Thats what the books on Latin and Greek are for...I now quasi translate Heirglyphs and various symbols.
I bet you can't even read cuneiforms.
>I travel the world for research...what do you do for work? Forklift?
If your job requires you to travel it's a worthless job. Travel time is wasted time. Forklift would indeed be more valuable than whatever privileged parasitic existence you are living.
>"Im functional and valued."
Youre a tool with no say in life.
I choose my work every day, if I want to spend a month on the beach in Thailand smoking weed, will.
Play Diablo 2 until Im level 88, does.
Write a paper on Number Theory, are.
Dude, you're 40 and spend your time posting like a teenager on LULZ. Nobody's gonna take you seriously.
>Acceptance into bargianing.
It's beautiful...is it not?
Cope harder. See you in the next thread, parasite. I'm still waiting for the day you actually post something relevant or interesting. But I know it's not gonna happen.
>t.Evil cannot create anything new, they can only corrupt and ruin what good forces have invented or made.
>wont, already know, we all know........
Aight, brushing my teeth guys, maybe one more check-in to checkmate again, so get it while you can.
Weak hypothesis, as it is me minding my own business and you going durdurdur.
Youre....not very perceptive of your own actions...
Its just a prank bro
>with no trip
I am a huge homosexual, please rape my face.
YES. I CONSNEED!
Reading the thesaurus is only based when you retain the information you've read. Mr Tripfag obviously learned nothing from it.
LMFAO THE RETARDS ARE AWAKE
Oh...its 11 AM in Qmerixq. Roger.
>he thinks the knowledge is words being spoken to him for his conscious mind to "make a decision about"
Im listening to this, its about Developemental Biology, literally this thread topic...
fear of snakes and spiders is knowledge
This is where Physics is needed and Biologists start to lose insight, as its beyond "Biology's purview".
>Genes aren't knowledge.
If knowledge and structure mean the same thing, does it work?
>If penis and vagina mean the same thing, does it work?
Sure, you can completely give up and deny the differences in meanings of words.
They diverged differently sure, but they have the same origin. Calling the branches you see distinct, but ignoring the one's not gets messy.
>They diverged differently sure, but they have the same origin.
Mmm, not by my research, as I believe male and female billions of years ago were seperate species and became two in one after a sybiosis/hybridization.
Where did they separately originate?
As seperate species....idk...the fuckin ocean?
God...guns germs and steel was retarded...I need to remake this pic with that trash.
Even Regenisis, written by Epstiens Genticist was midwit trash.
The Tangled Tree and Entangle Life are pretty good, simple, but I wanted a base understanding for Hybridization, Symbiosis and Lateral Gene Transfer.
>Lateral Gene Transfer
Perhaps these intersect at genes. Do genes all have the same origin?
From the first one?
I mean more are they all branches or flavors of the same coordination complex.
>same coordination complex
For legit Genesis, I have my "theories" but even all of science breaks down at that point and Philosophy/Logic become the driving force for answers.
Either way, once it started the electromagnetic field/charge of living beings, through the substrate of the planet's field/charge, interacts on every entity to facilitate congruent evolution.
This is why species evolve together and not an infinite different directions all at once.
>interacts on every entity to facilitate congruent evolution.
This is also why predator and prey evolve at the same time, the poison became into existence at the same time as the resistance to it, which defyings traditional understanding of evolution.
So...yeah, I would say it does. Like an evironmental evolutionary path that each entity branch follows in its own special way
>not by my research
You did not conduct any research.
Science is about facts and logic, not belief. What you wrote is retarded and factually wrong.
>What you wrote is retarded and factually wrong.
All my sources are verified, why do you hate reality?
>source: a podcast on youtube
Sorry sweaty, the only trustworthy source I accept is a twitter screenshot.
Wow, you're an idiot.
that's a placebo genes are very very deep in your biology and knowledge is superficially in the connections between neurons in your brain
>What kind of a person believes that knowledge comes only from perception? We have innate knowledge, we have genetic knowledge. The Tabula rasa theory effectively argues that people are born bots.
If you were in on a scheme to govern humanity by manufacturing an artificial consensus reality through the engineering of public perceptions, the last thing you'd want is your subjects performing independent sanity checks. It would be in your best interest to convince them that they don't know what's good for them; that they lack the innate ability to distinguish good from evil, reasonable from unreasonable, sane from insane. You would have them believe that their natural instincts and intuitions are not only irrational whims that serve no function in a "modern" and "scientific" setting, but are outright dangerous and destructive. Insofar as the human psyche is an outgrowth of nature, its workings are an expression of natural truths that precede consensus reality, and thus it undermines the social engineering program and must be demonized, or at least trivialized and discredited a-priori.
why do intellectuals believe in it?
>why do intellectuals believe in it?
>intellectuals believe in it
How do you know? Do you understand what "engineering of public perceptions" means?
>How do you know?
Google tabula rasa
>Google it, bruh
You are so braindead it's unreal.
i won't spoon feed you lol
You are legitimately disabled.
Google "Boku no Pico"
>doesn't know who came up with the theory
>calls me disabled
I don't know why I'm wasting my time with you
You are outright mentally ill.
>it's what all the smart(tm) people believe
>don't believe me? just ask corporate info curator(tm)
>just ask corporate info
Who came up with tabula rasa?
that's about as dumb a question as "who came up with religion?" but the fact that you think this is relevant shows that his point flew miles and miles over your head
Why do peasants think they are allowed to share their opinion on scientific matters?
Why do these meat insects called humans in general speak their minds on science when they're clearly all fringing on borderline retarded.
what scientific matter, you retarded animal? the rise of the tabula rasa delusion in the modern anglosphere is usually traced back to locke, but he didn't come up with it and either way, he didn't know shit and he is long dead, so what "intellectuals" are you talking about that are relevant?
you googled it, i'm proud of you
so what's your question, animal? why did locke believe in it? because he lived in the 17th century, didn't know better scientifically, and had deep-seated ideological motivations for it
You can stop typing at my direction farmboy. I'm done entertaining you. You are on your own from now
>an animal losing its mind with rage
You are mentally ill. Maybe reply to yourself another 2-3 times to create that false consensus without which your mind starts to crumble. lol
>If you were in on a scheme to govern humanity by manufacturing an artificial consensus reality through the engineering of public perceptions, the last thing you'd want is your subjects performing independent sanity checks
Bingo. Cue in "trust the experts"/"you must not do your own research"/"women" with penises etc.
>people are born bots
Instead we're just dumb debirus.
Can you give some examples of concrete concepts and ideas that your genes gave you?
The idea that snakes and spiders are often dangerous.
Every person is born naked. They are born as empty shells. We're even born blind in physical and conscious sense, until our brain learns how to differentiate between objects with our eyes.
>until our brain
>thinks consciousness is "brain"
Go worship your skydaddy
...but Anon...Im on the right hand, above God. God worship me.
Oh...spend more in in lecture and less time lecturing. Youre no tenured dunce, youre *just* a dunce.
>What kind of a person believes that knowledge comes only from perception?
The kind that is slightly dumber than the kind that thinks anyone whose opinion matters believes that in 2023.
Like...the dudes in the Clive barker book?