Synthetics – why theyre not necessary

Long ass post but there’s a clothing-related point.
For the winter I bought a merino wool thermal layer for my legs. I found a pair that were 100% merino for a good price. When I unwrapped them, they were literally SO stretchy that I had to re-check the label to make sure they had 0% synthetics. And theyre not itchy at all. After a couple months of wearing the same pair every work day, there’s no sign of wear. This is proof that the idea that clothing like socks and underwear absolutely NEED synthetics for durability and stretch is complete BULLSHIT. You don’t need to put plastic on your body.

Also, when I was looking for merino socks, I read info on a manufacturer’s website that was very enlightening. Their socks were ~40% wool and then 10-20% each of various synthetics. They claimed that this was because the different synthetics all had different qualities that made the perfect sock. Yet It also said that, by US law, wool MUST be the largest single material to market it as wool clothing. So they basically admitted that they use a melange of 4 synthetics just to ensure that wool is still technically the plurality, so they can be legally labeled as merino socks. Another reason not to trust the narrative that synthetics are for performance and not cost-cutting.

36 thoughts on “Synthetics – why theyre not necessary

  1. Anonymous says:

    Yeah it’s amazing the lies fed. How did people before the invention of plastics wear socks then? Oh if you’d need a garter then you get some, one also without plastic shit like how they used to make em

  2. Anonymous says:

    The only advantages of polyester base layers are price, durability and drying times. I like hiking and I have a 100% merino shirt from odlo which is indeed better than all my other polyester shirts.

    • Anonymous says:

      Also breathability. Whenever i wear polyester i end up sweaty as hell.
      I imagine the materials/knits for stuff like pro cyclist gear must be engineered for good breathability. But for regular clothes, synthetics are not comfortable.

  3. Anonymous says:

    You are close to realizing the scale of the operation of shifting accountability for petroleum waste and byproducts from corporations to consumers. Even smaller local companies are just unwitting dupes to facilitate the exchange. Plastic spits in the face of the biological/preternatural creature. "plastic is cheap" is STILL a marketing gimmick. Plastic is quite literally worthless, and, considering it’s uniquity, you are being conned paying even a cent for anything made of it. Moreoever, the culture of plastic enabling cheap manufacture has even mutated classically designed garments such that, even when made of 100% natural local materials, they are shaped like something out of a chinese factory, designed by a brain fried homosexual or some borderline lardass woman.

    Plastic is cheap enough to be tempting to consumers, and priced at all, to legally justify it’s path down the hierarchy quickly, considering that it is already waste this process is outrageous. Soon enough, the end user has a whole house full of literal garbage refashioned into otherwise useless items. Eventually they have to throw their crap away or dispose of it by burning. So they pay twice, once for the inherently defective product, which is an explicitly fiscal exchange, and twice – this time, the cost isn’t necessarily monetary – for the inevitable disposal of it. If they pay in money, they pay the municipal council or a contracted private company who have their money circulate back up to where the chain began via the same unwitting dupe nepotism.

    You can look at it from so many angles. My favorite is the schizo interpretation, that ‘they’ who profit off of such an exchange are trying to destroy the world and the quality of the souls thereof. Even in that interpretation you can go for the bataillean view, that such waste is part of the vigor and violence of reality, or the mystical view, that it’s a kind of tikkun olam/tempting hand of God.

  4. Anonymous says:

    I have one synthetic fleece vest, the rest of my clothes are wool, cotton or leather, besides my barbour jacket which has a poly liner bit that runs along the bottom of the jacket, unfortunately.

    • Anonymous says:

      Did you know that in Saudi Arabia, one of the hottest countries in the world, most people wear 100% polyester clothing?

      I checked the material of these cloths the other day and was shocked to know there weren’t any without a large percentage of synthetics. I thought synthetics had low breathability, why are most people in my country wearing it?

  5. Anonymous says:

    Our relation to animals is more interesting-I mean to the animals we eat. We adore eating veal, lamb, beef, antelope, pheasant, or grouse, but we don’t throw away their "leftovers."
    We dress in leather and adorn ourselves with feathers. Like the Chinese, we devour duck without wasting a bit; we eat the whole pig, from head to tail; but we get under these animals’ skins as well, in their plumage or in their hide.

    Men in clothing live within the animals they devoured. And the same thing for plants. We eat rice, wheat, apples, the divine eggplant, the tender dandelion; but we also weave silk, linen, cotton; we live within the flora as much as we live within the fauna.
    We are parasites; thus we clothe ourselves. Thus we live within tents of skins like the gods within their tabernacles. Look at him well-dressed and adorned, magnificent; he shows-he showed-the clean carcass of his host.

    Of the soft parasite you can see only the clean-shaven face and the hands, sometimes with out their kid gloves. We parasite each other and live amidst parasites. Which is more or less a way of saying that they constitute our environment.
    We live in that black box called the collective; we live by it, on it, and in it. It so happens that this collective was given the form of an animal: Leviathan. We are certainly within something bestial; in more distinguished terms, we are speaking of an organic model for the members of a society.
    Our host? I don’t know. But I do know that we are within. And that it is dark in there.

    M. Serres – The Parasite

    • Anonymous says:

      Not sure about their base layers but I got a 3 pack of their socks for work last year and they were very comfortable while they lasted, but all 3 started rapidly developing holes after about 9 months of wear. If they had a lifetime warranty, i didnt realize or forgot because I replaced them with Darn Tough socks. Which arent as soft but hopefully last longer.

      • Anonymous says:

        What? 30 day return policy is standard.

        https://i.imgur.com/QBHUG9J.png

        anybody familiar with merino.tech? they claim life time warranty, is it legit?

        >lifetime warranty
        This is misleading. Lifetime warranty = lifetime of the product, not the lifetime of (you).

  6. Anonymous says:

    We also inhale micro plastics from these garments which lead to cancers and other health problems.

    The synthetic materials are also likely sourced from asia and involved slave labour in their manufacturing.

    Synthetics are a failed human experiment

  7. Anonymous says:

    I’m surprised more people are disgusted by the idea that most sports clothes are either plastic or recycled plastic

  8. Anonymous says:

    top athletes compete in 100% synthetic jerseys and shorts

    military including special forces wear uniforms with at least 50% synthetics

    /thread

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *