Sometimes this modern world definitely begins to feels like a clown world when I’m reading about the past
Can you imagine what people from the 19th century and before would think about all the shit we do to encourage and protect the lifestyle of “sodomites” or “cross-dressers” (as people in the past would see them)?
I mean would they even be able to comprehend the purpose of “anal marriage?” I mean this shit would all seem so unbelievable and even hilarious to them.
It's all over for Christians. Biden signed it this week.
I don’t think about gay people at all unless they’re talking to me or Christians/conservatives complain about them on LULZ.
I mean the obsession and focus you have on them certainly points to something about your psychology. They occupy a suspicious portion of your mind and emotions
>I don't think about something therefore you are obsessed if you do
>Implying that fag marriage has zero consequences
>Implying social nihilism
I have never once in my entire being combined the words "anal" and "marriage" into a unifying concept. Why are you this way?
> I have never once in my entire being combined the words "anal" and "marriage" into a unifying concept. Why are you this way?
But that’s basically what gay marriage is in essence and that’s how people in the past would have seen it.
If you have autism and define marriage as a contract between a breeding pair.
>everyone in the past had autism
>it's happening and it's a good thing
>having standards is bigotry
You really need to go back
Just shill bots being retarded
>I have never once in my entire being combined the words "anal" and "marriage" into a unifying concept.
I told my therapist, my wife is a real pain in the ass. He told me that if the sex is a pain in the ass, then I'm doing it wrong!
>I mean the obsession and focus you have on them
Do you really think pic related is normal?
Imagine going back in time even just 20 years and trying to explain to them why the US government is so utterly obsessed with worshipping homosexuals.
>Do you really think pic related is normal?
Yeah. It's been an issue on the ballot for 40 years.
Retard
Why are fags the Alpha and Omega of Christian mortality? You literally do do not scorn any other sin.
It seems Christianity is shrinking down to guys who are closeted and engaging in reaction formation, using Christianity as a justification. I heard guys hear listen to Christian podcasts and don’t even go to church
>guys who are closeted and engaging in reaction formation, using Christianity as a justification
That's pretty much me, yeah.
>You literally do do not scorn any other sin.
LGBT is the only sin for which there is a massive industry of "pride" and promotion of that sin as if it is something to be praised.
You don't see, for instance, people marching down the street in their thousands for "Alcoholics Pride", screaming about how everybody that tells them they should stop drinking beer is a disgusting bigot and must be banished from public society. You don't see binge drinkers turning up to churches demanding that Christianity MUST accept them for "their true self" and allow them to booze as much as they want without condemnation.
No, there's no alcoholic pride but it is a massive culture in society just like a million other ills from the debt system to destruction of the environment but you're particularly outraged by trannies.
>No, there's no alcoholic pride but it is a massive culture in society just like a million other ills from the debt system to destruction of the environment but you're particularly outraged by trannies.
If a Christian goes to an alcoholic and tells him "you are welcome in the church, and Jesus loves you, but we can't endorse your usage of alcohol and we want to help you to stop doing that", most people would think that's a reasonable thing to say.
If a Christian goes to a gay man or a trans person and says "you are welcome in the church, and Jesus loves you, but we can't endorse your sexuality and want to help you to stop doing that", suddenly this is viewed as something hateful and unacceptable thing to say.
That explains the difference. Only LGBT sin is exalted to such a high degree in secular society that it is seen as completely beyond the pale to criticise it in any way.
I think the only comparable thing is abortion maybe. I guess many people would have a similar reaction and accuse Christians of being "hateful" if they say people should not get abortions.
It’s even nearly getting to the point where it would be considered hateful for Christians to go up to prostitutes or only fan content creators (aka “sex workers” as they are know called) to tell them "you are welcome in the church, and Jesus loves you, but we can't endorse your whoredom and we want to help you to stop doing that.”
>LGBT is the only sin for which there is a massive industry of "pride" and promotion of that sin as if it is something to be praised.
?t=571
>Why are fags the Alpha and Omega of Christian mortality? You literally do do not scorn any other sin.
The bible literally begins with Adam and Eve as the ideal human coupling, now it’s Adam or Steve or Adam trying to be Eve and calling himself a woman.
For Christians it’s probably a constant reminder how far humanity has fallen and much further it can fall.
Sounds like they need to stop being such bitches and let people live their lives without imposing themselves on people.
Or maybe they can but they need to shut the fuck up when modernity imposes upon them. It's a two way street and you can't have it both ways.
Have Christians throughout history ever been the “live and let live” kind of people?
Well, I sometimes think that the past was a true clown world, or rather a means to an end, a sort of a play, not so different from what it is now, but much more severe than right now.
Have you seen these "slices of life" pictures of the people of the past? Wtf are they doing there? It's almost like they lived there so you could live now. And living there was absolutely no fun. You could do so much more right now for your pleasure and entertainment, however sick and twisted this world itself made it to be, but it is a choice non a less, a possibility.
Compared to the older days, we're living itself another day was an achievement, yet alone getting a decent meal and shelter, and even then, what else can you do there?, Just sit in your, as modern lingo describes it, cage, and wait until this day passes so you can start you little routine of living through the next day again. There is nothing but emptiness in the eyes of a lucky few who've been able to be recorded from the ancient times. Yes, the situation is probably much worse now, but it is so because there are more ways to escape this dread of living, which homosexualry is one of the most twisted ones.
They'd think we've become a new Rome. We are definitely going to greater and greater lengths to get dopamine which would just confuse people in the past.
That’s an upper class ball from the what, 1800’s and early 1900’s when alcohol and drug use became a national emergency? GTFO
God have had to make me a woman soo i could be with a man not up to me really blame your god
Puritans went wild and mad merely because of men cross-dressing in the theatre. Imagine if they had met modern trannies lol. Would they self-destruct at the first sight of them?
> By the time of Charles I the transvestite controversy appears to have died down-at least the pamphlet polemic was muted-but it was revived in 1633 by a new spate of puritan attacks on the theatre. William Prynne poured scorn on men who would "adulterate, emasculate, metamorphose, and debase their noble sex" by acting womanish parts or putting on female costume. Like Gosson and Stubbes before him, Prynne cited Deut. 22:5 to prove that "God himself doth expressly inhibit men to put on woman's apparel, because it is an abomination to him." Even someone "who puts on a woman's raiment but to act a part, though it be but once, is doubtless a putter on of woman's apparel . . . and so a grand delinquent against God." The effect of such abominable behavior-inevitably in Prynne's view-was to shame nature by making men monstrous and effeminate and to unleash the sins of lustfulness, sodomy and self-pollution.