I like how everything that is called gnome is, uglier, flatter, and with WAY LESS features/functionality
i only use gnome disks to power off drives tho, but gparted is just way superior, that and kparted or whatever is called
1) read what you typed before pressing enter
2) both fdisk and lvm do not go to purposefully overwrite actual data. Just remove the mess you made and put correct numbers into the table.
>dont need a DE
This, because SSH.
Also guarateed to have full feature set and to work in fucked-up cases of filesystem-in-lv-on-pv-on-dmcrypt-in-partition-in-mbr-in-lv-on-pv-on-dmcrypt-on-bare-partion (ddrescue'ing drive into dedicated PV to avoid extending XFS was not best idea)
this once again shows that LULZ ist a bunch of unemployed NEETS. if you learn how to do it the proper way at home, you can apply that skill to your fucking job. if you connect to your linux server using rdp and install gnome on it, your coworkers will rightfully laugh at you.
>dont need a DE
This, because SSH.
Also guarateed to have full feature set and to work in fucked-up cases of filesystem-in-lv-on-pv-on-dmcrypt-in-partition-in-mbr-in-lv-on-pv-on-dmcrypt-on-bare-partion (ddrescue'ing drive into dedicated PV to avoid extending XFS was not best idea)
Google works well enough for either of these situations. GUI is still better if you have a DE.
Linux users pretend that you can't script and automate a GUI, not understanding that Microsoft solved that problem 30 or 40 years ago.
Linux users pretend a GUI will eat all their resources, not understanding that Amigas had a GUI, Englebart and team had a GUI on a 1960s computer, and their terminal is drawing colors and Unicode glyphs on a GPU.
Linux users pretend GUIs are for n00bs, which is proof that they really only feel superior for learning some arcane bullshit. That you can replace CLI commands with a simple GUI that anyone can use should show everyone that what is being done is simple and easy and the CLI tools are what is shitty and complex, not the task. Instead Linux users put forth the cope that if the GUI makes it easy, the GUI must be at fault somehow.
ssh terminal is wonderful, it takes a bit of trial and error to learn a new system
I use a GUI on my linux system, but I prefer scripts and term to do some tasks.
How do i delete Windows Defender definitions woth a gui?
That shit breaks in Updates regularly ever since windows xp and the windows pajeet always tes you to paste stuff into cmd.
Funny posting, because the Windows partition manager GUI is utter dogshit, can't shrink partitions or move them if they arent in one specific state and gparted is lightyears ahead of it.
And this already for decades.
>> Everything is better with a GUI. >How do i delete Windows Defender definitions woth a gui?
Sounds like you agree it would be better with a GUI.
> Funny posting, because the Windows partition manager GUI is utter dogshit, can't shrink partitions or move them if they arent in one specific state and gparted is lightyears ahead of it.
This is nothing to do with the GUI, it connects to the Virtual Disk service which "Provides management services for disks, volumes, file systems, and storage arrays." - as does the command line diskpart. That Windows can't shrink NTFS is because Microsoft didn't code that, not because there is a GUI disk management interface.
>Windows can't shrink NTFS
Of course it can. On new PC's with preinstalled Windows I've used the Volume Management GUI to shrink the C: drive to make room for a linux install several times over the years.
You're right, but maybe he is talking about *that* issue where you can only give the value the disk manager decides, it's quite anoying, but yes i recommend to shrink/extend inside windows
why should i care i don't use crap like f2fs
sure, i knew that, there are lots of things you probably don't use, and that's fine, gnome only knows about removing functionalities and making huge buttons
>gnome only knows about removing functionalities and making huge buttons
fuck man its too true, but taking away extra things to tweak isn't entirely a bad thing in my case, i'll find myself getting too focused on screwing with my desktop setup in kde instead of getting stuff done
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
holy shit i just realized how high cope levels are here rereading this
I just use gnome disks.
I use 3.5" disks LOL
Not even in the same category, not even similar at all.
I like how everything that is called gnome is, uglier, flatter, and with WAY LESS features/functionality
i only use gnome disks to power off drives tho, but gparted is just way superior, that and kparted or whatever is called
what actually useful stuff can gparted do that gnomedisks can't?
a wider list of filesystems? doesn't gnome disk gives you the option to format to ext4, xfs, btrfs and fat/ntfs only?
why should i care i don't use crap like f2fs
the extremely niche ancient filesystems? what practical use do they actually serve though?
use case unclear wontfix
i know right? i only use zfs-git and bcachefs
true
Just use parted, nagger.
gimped pozzware
fdisk
Yes.
But partitioning is not one of them.
why would you want a cli for this?
>oops I accidentally missed typing a digit in my partition size now all my data is gone
1) read what you typed before pressing enter
2) both fdisk and lvm do not go to purposefully overwrite actual data. Just remove the mess you made and put correct numbers into the table.
but whats the advantage over gparted? Other than the fact that you dont need a DE
>dont need a DE
This, because SSH.
Also guarateed to have full feature set and to work in fucked-up cases of filesystem-in-lv-on-pv-on-dmcrypt-in-partition-in-mbr-in-lv-on-pv-on-dmcrypt-on-bare-partion (ddrescue'ing drive into dedicated PV to avoid extending XFS was not best idea)
this once again shows that LULZ ist a bunch of unemployed NEETS. if you learn how to do it the proper way at home, you can apply that skill to your fucking job. if you connect to your linux server using rdp and install gnome on it, your coworkers will rightfully laugh at you.
Google works well enough for either of these situations. GUI is still better if you have a DE.
not everyone employed is a linux sysadmin anon. The LARP is obvious. And assuming the machine has a DE, why not use gparted?
I prefer cfdisk
ffmpeg crop doesn't have a gui
It's honestly nice to not have to memorize or look up every fucking option or syntax outliers.
Everything is better with a GUI.
Linux users pretend that you can't script and automate a GUI, not understanding that Microsoft solved that problem 30 or 40 years ago.
Linux users pretend a GUI will eat all their resources, not understanding that Amigas had a GUI, Englebart and team had a GUI on a 1960s computer, and their terminal is drawing colors and Unicode glyphs on a GPU.
Linux users pretend GUIs are for n00bs, which is proof that they really only feel superior for learning some arcane bullshit. That you can replace CLI commands with a simple GUI that anyone can use should show everyone that what is being done is simple and easy and the CLI tools are what is shitty and complex, not the task. Instead Linux users put forth the cope that if the GUI makes it easy, the GUI must be at fault somehow.
ssh terminal is wonderful, it takes a bit of trial and error to learn a new system
I use a GUI on my linux system, but I prefer scripts and term to do some tasks.
How do i delete Windows Defender definitions woth a gui?
That shit breaks in Updates regularly ever since windows xp and the windows pajeet always tes you to paste stuff into cmd.
Funny posting, because the Windows partition manager GUI is utter dogshit, can't shrink partitions or move them if they arent in one specific state and gparted is lightyears ahead of it.
And this already for decades.
>> Everything is better with a GUI.
>How do i delete Windows Defender definitions woth a gui?
Sounds like you agree it would be better with a GUI.
> Funny posting, because the Windows partition manager GUI is utter dogshit, can't shrink partitions or move them if they arent in one specific state and gparted is lightyears ahead of it.
This is nothing to do with the GUI, it connects to the Virtual Disk service which "Provides management services for disks, volumes, file systems, and storage arrays." - as does the command line diskpart. That Windows can't shrink NTFS is because Microsoft didn't code that, not because there is a GUI disk management interface.
>Windows can't shrink NTFS
Of course it can. On new PC's with preinstalled Windows I've used the Volume Management GUI to shrink the C: drive to make room for a linux install several times over the years.
You're right, but maybe he is talking about *that* issue where you can only give the value the disk manager decides, it's quite anoying, but yes i recommend to shrink/extend inside windows
sure, i knew that, there are lots of things you probably don't use, and that's fine, gnome only knows about removing functionalities and making huge buttons
>gnome only knows about removing functionalities and making huge buttons
fuck man its too true, but taking away extra things to tweak isn't entirely a bad thing in my case, i'll find myself getting too focused on screwing with my desktop setup in kde instead of getting stuff done
holy shit i just realized how high cope levels are here rereading this