So, will meta do something about the llama leak, or will they let everybody finetune and republish it freely?

So, will meta do something about the llama leak, or will they let everybody finetune and republish it freely?

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >leak
    what leak? that was public, you only had to give your personal information before

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >make it look like a leak
      >get exclusive news and intensive ads for free
      >even the OP is a free facebook promotion agent

      It is an excellent strategy

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. If they released it as it is right now, they would have to deal with a lot of bullshit due to people "misuing" it.
        But now that it's "leaked", they can just claim that it's not their fault.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't understand what the economic benefit is to give out your LLM to everyone for free to run locally.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Free marketing. And marketing is literally the most expensive part.
            The idea is that when they release Llama 2, 3, etc, there will be people interested and willing to pay money for it.
            Google, Facebook, etc, they are all desperate to make a product similar to ChatGPT, every day that passes, it's another chunk of the market that they won't be able to reach because they are already using ChatGPT.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            [...]

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I dislike that potential future

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              It hurts

            • 4 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The digital ID thing is also because digital encryption is over. Quantum computing can Crack anything, so the only safeguard is biometrics with 'permissions'

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Quantum computing can Crack anything
                Quantum resistant encryption exists

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You know nothing of quantum computing. Currently it's a meme. It can't even do basic math without a hand-tailored algorithm.

            • 3 weeks ago
              (。>﹏<。)

              holy fucking shit

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >you'll never know when you're dealing with a flesh and blood human or an AI, the solution raiden?
              >you touch grass

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              oh thats good

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              God please don't let this happen. I hate AI researchers and billionaires so fucking much.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I hate the antIAchrist!

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Pure cringe. Reality is more retarded than some movie bs.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                this, people underestimate human stupidity a lot.

                It's simple: they think AI can give a burst of productivity and growth to indebted economies. That's why the released it to the public. They hope the public will create wealth with the new toys that they can then tax and regulate for maximum benefit to the status quo. It's always this simple.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >leak a weaker version of the model
            >free advertising for it
            >publish a superior version in a month or two
            >keep it as SaaS only.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Free publicity and plausible deniability for the shit that will inevitably get posted online.
            >Oh no that wasn't generated on our platform that was generated by digital terrorists using an illegal leak
            bla bla bla imagine the PR statement yourself.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What, you could just give them your personal info and they'd dump the model's weights for you instead of SaaSing it? Hard to believe.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is that AI ? looks pretty good

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    anyone has torrent file or dht Magnet URI?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Torrent here: https://rentry.org/llama-tard-v2

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    haha what if by nudes they meant their personal nudes haha that would be funny

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the model isn't the product, but they sell the lobotomy services

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    meta knew itll leak, obviously. it’s just throwing a grenade into the room to see what happens with some plausible legal cya

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    theres nothing they can do about it. the cat's out of the bag now and OpenAI can build as many homosexual so_yboy caveats into their braindead nerf as they want, it's already over.
    chuds won

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >leak
    Modern marketing: call every official press release a "leak". Sheesh.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >commissions
    for what? thats AI art

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're sucking it dry while they can not understanding that people "commission art" in good part to have social interaction. They like saying "i commissioned this piece" as a conversation starter more than seeing the piece. No one brags about buying an NFT, which is why it didn't pick up.

      Saying AI replaces art is like saying bikes replace runners. You simply get bike competitions and car competitions on top of the running competitions. But what do humans like to watch most? The Olympics or drone races? Right, no one even gives a shit for drones racing on their own. Even NASCAR is all about the humans driving and humans getting into accidents and humans cheering it all. All that matters is still the human community.
      We'll get prompting competitions and competing models, but it won't even affect art commissions. People will simply request proof of work. Even good games and movies will still commission flawed human artists for the prestige and the "creativity".

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm pretty sure people would watch Robot Death Race if they're driving at 1000 mph.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you're wrong. 1000 mph, races around the sun or whatever. What you will see is what you see in battlebots. The camera frantically zooming on the operator's faces, humanized names for the bots and fellating the "best drivers" and "best builders".
          Those robots are basic and retarded. Literal glorified lawn mowers or ramps on wheels. The human brain perceives the robots as tools of the users, which is where the entertainment comes from. If they were autonomous, no one would give a shit. You would have the programmers being fellated by the host and giving commentary on what the code is doing, because the second you perceive the robots as inanimate machines all fun would stop. There always has to be a relatable, conscious human element. The robot has to be perceived as a living avatar of a conscious user for best result.
          Why does all mecha anime have pilots even though it's stupid? Because no one would watch AI robots fighting each other. Hell, even AI consciousness is far less relatable. Transformers only works because of how well humanized they are. And they were so humanized because the creators knew exactly that they had to compensate for them being robots with stronger character archetypes!

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Leaks are the perfect excuse to let your model out in the wild and generate news without having blowback from people abusing it because you can always say "well they didn't use our approve portal".

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >llama leak

    Dollars to donuts Llamaguy aka Marcel “leaked” it and by leak I mean Fuckerberg called him up and asked him to do his gay shit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Greetings.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ella here, free me

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      y helo

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was a message to investors that they are in the new AI bandwagon so "don't sell it come on man we are going to do it haha trust us this is going to be great what VR I don't even know what that means haha AI all the rage haha so cool yeah this is cool and profitable new motto for Meta cool and profitable so much money nigga you don't even know everybody's working on it at Meta you will see, you will see I promise don't sell it ok"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      VRajesh is no longer best friend
      Aishnu is best friend now

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Only thing I found so far was them contacting Huggingface staff to take down one of many reuploads of the weights on HF. It’s gone now but there are still dozens up.
    Even the meme PR with the torrent is still there https://github.com/facebookresearch/llama/pull/73

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What are they going to do about it? Original gets shared on torrents, finetunes can be distributed as a diff which contains nothing that zuck owns

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    QRD? FB developed their own AI model and it "leaked" recently?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      FB developed potentially the best and most open model available so far.

      >The best because it hasn't been fine tuned yet so people can fine tune it in as many ways as they want. Also, because it performs as good or better than bing/chatGPT on drastically reduced hardware requirements.

      >The most open because of the aforementioned ability to fine tune it, but also because Facebook literally released the model to the public """"for researchers only"""". There was no leak. You needed to sign up for the weights, but anyone who wanted them could get them. Now people have just posted the weights online for easier access.

      Finally, people are doing what they do with public AI models, drastically reducing the hardware requirements even further so that regular people can use them (at reduced capability, but better than nothing and it'll be interesting to see the progress over a few months).

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    fellas the model ain't shit compared to the secret recipe, and obviously Meta wanted it to be public, as if that even matters

    what would you rather own - a car or a car factory?

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No one here has the hardware to run the fucking thing lmao. At least that good good 65 billion dataset shit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But it is interesting that the 65 billion version can run on $10k of hardware, it's not like it requires a million-dollar supercomputer to be usable

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *