So... why DO all the Greek statues have dicklets?

So... why DO all the Greek statues have dicklets?

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    They saw smaller penises as a sign of higher IQ.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    my dick is that size unerect

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    they didnt find bulbous flaccid penisses aesthetically pleasing, they did depict themelves with huge cocks when erect though

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      fucking five star goddamn post
      everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance thing but including the emphases on erect phalluses adds a new dimension.
      we should also emphasize the word "aesthetic" doesnt just refer to a superficial, visual effect or an arbitrary taste-preference. the aesthetic in this case is a rule based on an underlying hierarchy of concepts.

      if you went through life blind and never touching your own hands and lips you might interpret them as giant organs - some of us have might have seen that youtube video 😉
      similarly, with art being a reflection of a certain kind of consciousness - certain things tend to be emphasized.
      our culture is cock-obsessed - and for flatly erotic, sensual and egotistical reasons - so the expressions to be found in our generation's college kids' art is all some irrelevent and subjective view of their own stupid bodies.
      As an element in art, a big strong penis in roman times may well have had an erotic component - but it had little to do with the sculptor's "daring and important" statement about himself and more to do with granting physical incarnation to the greater concept of individuation. this was an unspoken truth, understood intuitively, immediately by the eyes. they didnt need some gay excerpt printed on a plaque beneath the art, or a tourguide's lecture to tell you this.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      fucking five star goddamn post
      everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance thing but including the emphases on erect phalluses adds a new dimension.
      we should also emphasize the word "aesthetic" doesnt just refer to a superficial, visual effect or an arbitrary taste-preference. the aesthetic in this case is a rule based on an underlying hierarchy of concepts.

      if you went through life blind and never touching your own hands and lips you might interpret them as giant organs - some of us have might have seen that youtube video 😉
      similarly, with art being a reflection of a certain kind of consciousness - certain things tend to be emphasized.
      our culture is cock-obsessed - and for flatly erotic, sensual and egotistical reasons - so the expressions to be found in our generation's college kids' art is all some irrelevent and subjective view of their own stupid bodies.
      As an element in art, a big strong penis in roman times may well have had an erotic component - but it had little to do with the sculptor's "daring and important" statement about himself and more to do with granting physical incarnation to the greater concept of individuation. this was an unspoken truth, understood intuitively, immediately by the eyes. they didnt need some gay excerpt printed on a plaque beneath the art, or a tourguide's lecture to tell you this.

      Worth noting that those greek and roman statues would invariably be displayed on at least a pedestal as tall as the statue, maybe even on top of a column. If they had big dicks it'd block the view of the rest of the statue and be pretty awkward to look at

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        nice, im learning.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    ?t=374

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      this, a big penor is basically the Big Mac of sexuality.
      >whoaaa I'm overwhelming my sensory organs through what amounts to brute force instead of cultivating taste and meaning
      no wonder why BBC spam is uniquely American

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I would hate for women to say my dick is overwhelming their sensory organs. Thank god I'm a dicklet

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          you ever felt uncomfortably overstimulated? yeah, it's not pleasurable.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Then how come I've had several GFs and a GF(male) who were very specifically in to me tying them up and overstimulating them

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              because they're sick. most people are nowadays.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >[blanket statement based on personal anecdote]
                >[refutation]
                >[whining about degeneracy and claiming everyone different from you is the crazy one]
                I don't do this often, usually I'm the one calling people naggers when they do this, but

                [...]

                wdym by that? that they wanted pain? idk, people are fucked up.

                No they wanted more stimulation than they'd be willing or able to provide themselves.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                there's a difference between wanting more and being overwhelmed. being tickled is an almost universal example of overstimulation. also, I think you neglected to tackle the Big Mac analogy when it comes to taste. you could either try to "game" your receptors by overloading them with fat, salt, and sugar, or you can try to refine your taste.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                I don't need to tackle that, it's a false analogy. The sensation of touch and the pleasure/pain spectrum is not at all like the sense of taste detecting combinations of chemicals. Not in nature, mechanism, or its effect on the brain. You might as well try to directly compare vision to smell

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                How is it any different? It all boils down to the perception of inputs delivered by switches and signals at the end of the day. I think you're just being intellectually lazy.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                They aren't processed by the brain in any comparable way. How can I compare touch, which only conveys a sense of pressure and temperature, to the near infinite combinations of flavors?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                There are all kinds of dimensions to touch. Pleasure, pain, roughness, smoothness, wetness (or lack thereof), dryness, heat, stickiness, friction, temperature, etc. That's a non-exhaustive list. And they can all be arranged in all kinds of intensities with nearly infinite combinations. There are more unique kinds of mechanoreceptors alone than there are taste receptors of all kinds. Taste receptors are even funnier too, since there's 3 for sweetness and 61 for everything else, so what you like in the "rawest" sense is actually quite simple. And it's all delivered to your brain through nervous signals.

                The analogy works, possibly far better than you've bothered to test it. You're just not thinking about this seriously enough.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              wdym by that? that they wanted pain? idk, people are fucked up.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Your personal anecdote means nothing.

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Because they saw erect penises as animalistic and something that relies on instinct alone instead of reason, wisdom, intelligence etc

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >the least intelligent people (subsaharan africans) are also the ones with the longest dicks
      it checks out

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Dicklet cope

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >dicklet cope
          mutt cope

          That's a meme though

          is it? The second most intelligent people (eastern Asians) have tiny dicks. Coincidence?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            It's definitely a meme that black guys are more well endowed.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            So whites clam mental superiority from hair/eye color and Asians claim mental superiority from dicklet?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            israelites are the first most intelligent people and they have big dicks like Ron Jeremy

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              lmfao! nobody tell him

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              We're average down there, just hairier

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Yet some also have micropeens like Harvey Weinstein.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          nagger cope

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        That's a meme though

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It was just the beauty ideal back then, no reason to depict what you think is ugly except as a joke (the graffiti of Priapus, satyrs etc)

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Based Greeks not giving a fuck what women care about anything as it should be

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Because Greek men are dicklets. Every other post to the contrary is pure cope.

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    ITT white boys claim their small penises make them more "cultured" and "refined"

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Greek boys

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    porn has fried your brain
    flaccid penises exist

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The actual reason (the origin of their aesthetic preference) is that greek sculpture evolved from making pederastic kouros twink statues

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      fake and roman

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      He was a god of fertility, so his penis is being emphasised to demonstrate that purpose, like what

      fucking five star goddamn post
      everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance thing but including the emphases on erect phalluses adds a new dimension.
      we should also emphasize the word "aesthetic" doesnt just refer to a superficial, visual effect or an arbitrary taste-preference. the aesthetic in this case is a rule based on an underlying hierarchy of concepts.

      if you went through life blind and never touching your own hands and lips you might interpret them as giant organs - some of us have might have seen that youtube video 😉
      similarly, with art being a reflection of a certain kind of consciousness - certain things tend to be emphasized.
      our culture is cock-obsessed - and for flatly erotic, sensual and egotistical reasons - so the expressions to be found in our generation's college kids' art is all some irrelevent and subjective view of their own stupid bodies.
      As an element in art, a big strong penis in roman times may well have had an erotic component - but it had little to do with the sculptor's "daring and important" statement about himself and more to do with granting physical incarnation to the greater concept of individuation. this was an unspoken truth, understood intuitively, immediately by the eyes. they didnt need some gay excerpt printed on a plaque beneath the art, or a tourguide's lecture to tell you this.

      says
      >everyone knows the shrunken size = shrunken importance

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    They were growers.

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Is this how amerimutt history lections are like?!

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It'd make you gay to make big ones so they tamed them down

Your email address will not be published.