So what are people without internal dialogue? Are they even human? Golems? What exactly? Of all the things I've seen on /x/ this is actually what scares me the most, sharing the planet with these "people".
How do they even think critically? Do they just constantly react to stimuli and mimic/ape things? Is this just all a big misunderstanding because low IQ retards can't understand the question and give shitty answers that baffle the people researching this?
What gives /x/?
I think the question is flawed for the purpose of clickbait.
The kind of person that's not well educated that would likely answer "no" on that, probably doesn't know what you mean in the first place.
it's not really clickbait, i wanted to see what /x/ thinks because its related to the soul possibly etc. and the threads on /misc/ about the subject are just trash and completely played out at this point.
...
You do understand that it's not you personally that I'm accusing of clickbaiting, right?
he's trying to think of how he'd felt if you had called him a clickbaiter.
I just realized what you said now, but it does kinda read like you were accusing me of making a bait thread rather than the whole phenomenon being clickbait for shitty websites.
a quiet mind is something achieved through much work and observation.
Okay, but what in the seven hells does that have to do with the subject at hand?
How would you do something like play scrabble without thinking out letters and words to yourself inside your head though?
That's kind of what I'm thinking. Some people don't understand or misinterpret the question, or they're just lying or larping. You need an internal monologue to be able to analyse or plan anything
Or you can imagine a list with checkmarks that have the goals/objectives written on them. You could have an imaginary journal and then analyze things through that. Internal monologue is not needed to do those things.
Say you were learning a language. How would you practice if you had no internal monologue and for some reason had to be quiet and couldn't speak out loud. Just imagining pictures of words isn't going to help you speak the language
I have the ability to both, so I wouldn't be able to say how someone would do that. When it comes to planning/analyzing things though, visualizing helps me more because I have massive attention deficit problems and I tend to be better focussing on visuals rather than auditory things.
>so I wouldn't be able to say how someone would do that
Exactly. If people without an internal monologue were common then it would be obvious because as children learning a 2nd language at school as most children do there would be a large number of children that would be a long way behind their peers, because sounding out the words in your head is a large part of learning a language. Maybe they could learn their first language from years of just hearing their parents speak but I reckon they'd be impaired at doing that too. But there's many small tasks where talking in your head is important, like learning a script or leaning lyrics to a song or singing a song in your head or spell checking something or doing a crossword or like a million other things where thinking about words phonetically is needed. Just looking at our picturing a sentence alone loses all that phonetic context that people need to fully understand something
That's a fair enough point to raise, I was just merely referring to planning and analyzing. I do think a lot of people genuinely don't have a grasp on their mother tongue though, because they lack an internal monologue. Just look at how the average social media dweller spells and talks and how they don't seem to understand the most basic language concepts in terms of debating their points, for example.
>like play scrabble without thinking
You look at the words and suggestions of words pops up. Kind of like listening to music and it triggers visual thoughts.
You just do it, the word just comes to you, dont need to be talking to yourself if you already know the answer
>How would you do something like play scrabble without thinking out letters and words to yourself inside your head though?
Why are your thoughts verbal? My thoughts are structures, paths, ideas that web ad nauseum.
Are you insisting that you stammering A-P-P-L-E internally over a scrabble board is highest wisdom or something?
Why do you think you actually process information in terms of language?
You think, then create your internal dialogue after the process of thinking.
Some simply skip that extra step, or process information purely visually, or some other odd thing. Thoughts are voiceless and wordless.
I think you need to have the ability to process SOME things with language. It’s not the only mode of internal reflection - you can think visually, geometrically etc . I read in my native language by kind of photographing a third or so of a page and it slides into my head. I only ‘read it to myself’ if it’s technical and I’m going slow or it’s in another language.
Reading out loud in your head is slow - it’s why audiobooks are so annoying, takes hours to get through when if you just read it it’s half an hour or so.
But anyway, what I want to know is whether these people have no internal reflection. No way of reflecting on issues, whether that’s verbally, visually or whatever.
How do they think?
people dont think in words, even the ones that think they do, its all memory recall, word recall combines the memory of sound or the shape of words with acquired totemic meaning of the term
>How do they think?
with the recall of anything encountered
what do you think thinking is? when you typed annoying here for example, did you stop to think about where the o key was, the pressure needed to activate it, the concise pattern of muscle activation needed to move between n o and y? or were you aware of these things with no need to think at all?
this. if you pay attention you can actually get a feeling for the lag between the concepts your brain presents and the language translation you then make when converting it to monologue.
No, my thought voice sounds just like that olden day actor, jimmy stewart.
If you boost your abilities beyond a certain point, normies won't be a problem anymore.
The real problem is the other people orchestrating this shitshow
There are more eggs being fertilized than there are consciousnesses and the simulation fills it in with NPCs. They follow Current Thing because that's the direction the sim wants us to go.
Iv read this before. Something along the lines of souls being finite and the soul-pool being depleted due to overpopulation.
The racial soul is also a thing. The African soul would differ to a European or Asian one. That's my understanding anyway
hail Odin sire
This is somber
This is baggage
This is the cosmic secret
In a more practical sense, I don't actually care if a being is sentient in some Platonic ideal, abstract philosophical way.
What I care about is intelligence, and the ability to communicate that intelligence.
Compared to zoomers, at least Markov chains don't freeze up, for example.
cringe, I bet you enjoy talking to AI (demons).
Beats talking to you.
rude
t. narcissism
even the dumbest person on this can teach you profound wisdom if you had the capabalities to observe it. Also, if you think people are dumb, you have the power to change that to some degree.
IQ is real and the "NPCs" are just a step above animals. They live only to eat, reproduce and be enamored by shiny things. No one wants to admit this because it makes everyone feel bad and may contradict religious beliefs; like the beliefs that we were created in the image of a god, or that everyone evolved the same from the neck up.
So is EQ and you seem to not have a lot of that in particular 😉
>muh emotionz
Found another one.
>does not know what emotional INTELLIGENCE is
You cant make this shit up
>emotional INTELLIGENCE
You aren't smarter because you're crying. I do not subscribe to whatever new age cult you're in.
I am laughing anon. EQ is the ability to emphathize with others and avoid conflict/resolve problems based on the way you deal with other peoples and to some extent, your own emotions.
IQ/EQ was invented by the same people, so you can't really say one is a new age cult and then believe that IQ is "real"
TLDR; you're the npc and midwit kek
>ability to emphathize with others and avoid conflict/resolve problems based on the way you deal with other peoples
I can do all of this and more through raw cognitive abilities. Can you even rotate an apple?
>TLDR; you're the npc and midwit kek
Your inferiority complex is showing.
>through raw cognitive abilities
yeah that's what psychologists would call your emotional intelligence, lol.
Emotional intelligence is not real because it's not separate from general intelligence.
Actually, yes it is. There have been studies on this and they have shown that there is no correlation between the two and it can have massive deviations but I have the feeling that I'm not going to sway you into checking them out. IQ is more of a measure of academic success. I don't think you really know what you're talking about at this point, to be totally honest with you, and that's okay, but I'd prefer it if you stopped acting like you did lmao
>There have been studies on this
There has been an ongoing replication crisis. In before you've never heard of replication.
>I don't think you really know what you're talking about at this point, to be totally honest with you, and that's okay, but I'd prefer it if you stopped acting like you did lmao
You write like you smell bad.
>replication crisis
Yeah that is not really the case with these studies since they seem to all come to the same conclusion, separate from eachother though... You can throw these things around but these studies are verifiable if you did them yourself lol
You found some headlines and you think you know it all? That's real nice, I've never seen that before.
>copium
>ongoing replication crisis
Is that from that BBC news article where they checked only like five studies and two of them couldn't be reproduced exactly so they called it a crisis in the article headline?
Funny how you would type that right as this midwit projects the whole
>You found some headlines and you think you know it all?
on to me
Results speak for themselves. I'll see you on the moon with your 82 EQ points!
You're so emotionally intelligent that you can't stop being assmad at online strangers. Powerful.
If you were emotionally intelligent enough you would know that I'm literally not mad, and that you think that says way more about you than it does about me. But hey man, keep huffing your copium. I have a verbal IQ of 140 and I speak 4 different languages lol
>I'm literally not mad
You are. You initially got buttmad when I compared low IQs to animals, which you felt personally attacked by. You chose to respond and take offense immediately
You were too transparent. Better luck on the next one.
LOL okay buddy, whatever you need to think to feel better about yourself, don't quit your dayjob for the psychological analyses though
despite having quotient in the name iq testing really isnt comprehensive because it focuses on anaclitic intelligence. all standardized testing dose. if the same picture is broken down to the highest fidelity its analyzers should come up with the same components, if a catalogue of components is given to synthesizers to make a similar fidelity of picture, all the pictures will be different. its much more difficult for one proctor to test many for synthetic intelligence because there will be no standardization of outputs.
not thinking in words dose not mean your a souless goyem it means you were probably functionally illiterate before puberty. the entire npc talking point is just another piece of dehumanization propaganda thats serves a divide and conquer agenda.
Everyone look out we've got a real badass up in here, fighting internet battles like it's 1995
'EQ' exists because women and black people consistently score lower in IQ most of the time. So they have invented a new category where they gain points by answering 'emotionally sound' answers. I.e, "crying because someone looked at you wrong" is seen as "emotionally intelligent" because... You are apparently 'in-tune' with your personality or some shit I don't know, I don't subscribe to that bullshit.
Guess i'm a black woman then cause my EQ is through the roof and yes, i'll admit, my IQ is low as fuck.
I guess those strengths are complementary and should cooperate instead of competing for who's best at shitting straight.
It's ironic that you are apparently "emotionally intelligent" and yet almost all of your posts reek of a weird inferiority complex / coping mechanism. You know IQ is mostly israeli bullshit anyway, right?
So why act like a butthurt homosexual about it?
Meanwhile anyone who isn't "emotionally intelligent" would just not give a fuck. Like you know, a normal man.
OK anger god, i assure you i never gave a fuck in my life.That's why i'm so chill also a bit confused and curious about why all this anger, ignorance? or past events in your life?
>i assure you i never gave a fuck in my life.
Then why are you arguing here? And don´t try to frame this as a discussion.
Curiosity, simple as.
That's not even the same guy you're replying to lol, why are you so fucking triggered my dude?
>crying because someone looked at you wrong" is seen as "emotionally intelligent"
That's not what it means. Compare a normal person who can tell they're upsetting someone vs an autist who will say heinous things over and over and not even know it. Iq and eq are not directly comparable but both are important.
Holy fuck bro, embarrassing, i'm embarrassed for you.
Animals cant be convinced to kill themselves and hate those trying to rescue them. Goyimnaggercattle are lower than bacteria.
this sounds directly relevant to that whistleblower/experiencer/abductee. they said the issue was going to be primarily about how not everyone is capable of changing their situation, future, etc.
Can you comment, do you think it is related to the npc phenom?
would visualizations and imagery be considered dialogue?
I have an internal monologue but also… do people usually not have music playing in their head like all the time throughout the day?
I only have an internal monologue when it comes to me things: thinking about what I need, etc.
Or I guess when I’m thinking critically or problem solving
do some people have a CONSTANT internal monologue? I feel like that would drive me insane.
Is thinking in pictures the next step above internal monologue? I was talking to someone and was kind of surprised when she said she doesn’t?
Like if I try to think of a place to go eat I picture the types of food and the outdoor/front entrance of the restaurants
Or if I am trying to explain something I picture or imagine the relationship between the things I’m describing and then choose the best word(s)
It weirds me out that people don’t think in pictures because is it just blankness and words just pop in your head? What the fuck?
I was reading a history of philisophy, and I got to a part where they mention that Anaximander had written about how peculiar it was that of all the creatures on earth humans babies are virtually helpless for years and that man could not possibly have lived as they are today as animals since they would simply not make it in the wild.
When I read this I instantly thought of how amazing it was that someone over 2,000 years ago is musing about something that hits home hard today battling evolutionists and trying to beat back contemporary consensus on human history as a whole.
How would making connections like this even be fucking possible without an inner dialogue?
NPCs have always existed. Even when humans were monkeys. There were alpha monkeys, and npc monkeys. The alpha monkeys had all the food, meat, and tools. The npc monkeys were scared of the alphas so they became their slaves
Even in the animal kingdom it exists. Some dogs are well trained, can follower orders, and interact with their owner without any problem. Other dogs are lazy, stupid, and most of them cannot even see humans that are right in front of them. Most pets cannot see us,
People with internal dialogue are schizos
people with internal dialogue they don't control*
FTFY golem
would be interesting in reading something about emotional intelligence... finding a distinction between that and emotional awareness. curious.
those that never learned to read, hmmm tribal individuals, interesting.
go be a schizo in succgen, big boys are talking.
>NPCs
My low-tier, low IQ response.
Personally, I think people with very low IQs have internal thoughts and monologues. It takes skill through intense mental and spiritual training to obtain an empty mind. It’s actually a desirable thing since it’s only a temporary state of being. You can achieve it through most religious paths if you are curious.
succgen said that they miss their big boy and something about emotional intelligence. told em i would relay their message. lol
I refuse to believe there are people who do not have an internal dialogue. I think that people who say they do not have it are just dumb and think that the dialogue is an actual schizo voice telling you what to do like a shoulder angel instead of your own thoughts.
>what's up with people who are different than me? are they even people???
OP is the real NPC here
congenitally deaf people obviously wouldn't. And since there are plenty of "real" people born deaf it's obviously not necessary for human cognition.
deaf people are golems
Rude
They are Homunculi. Artificial humans made from roses (girls) and cabbage (boys). Look up YT for Mind Unveiled, Conspiracy-R-US these guys know something. They might have found some answers for ya! 😉
Schizoitypal vs monotypal
Monotypals are dense mofos and easy to manipulate while schizotypals are prone to delusions.
I don't have a comprehensive answer to you question, but consider that for many people, the point of meditation is to quiet the voice in their heads so they can experience peace. This implies that the voice can actually be stressful, and even detrimental to your being. It could be that some people never learned to speak to themselves internally and are actually better off for it in many ways. Language can be useful for sorting out complex problems, but it can also restrict you and lead you down the path to incorrect, and even dangerous, conclusions. This is essentially what ideology is: what happens when a person is consumed by an idea and all its corollaries, even though the idea - linguistically speaking - may be poorly formulated or just outright wrong.
>no internal thought
Lowest human
>internal thought only
Mid
>ability to manually have internal thought but rarely uses it because that slows down thought, instead thinks in instant and abstract ideas and can speed read and speed write because no time is wasted "speaking the words out in his head", instead the exact meaning of each word is instantly transcribed so that rather than word > sound (internal speech) > meaning, it goes directly from word > meaning skipping that internal speech step
Any other speed reading Chads who can use internal speech if they want (usually for daydreaming, entertainment purposes) but usually keep it off since it slows them down?
>internal thought anons be like "t-the cat s-s-sat on the c-c-c....couch"
>me: INSTANT UNDERSTANDING OF THE PURE CONCEPT OF A CAT SITTING ON A COUCH WHICH RADIATES IN MY MIND IN A SINGLE INSTANT
What's the point of speed reading
There's like a years worth of useful info out there anyway
Lol
Thats three letters, you should be able to speadread that
What does it mean?
Hilarious but imperfect gem (How can there be a "now" for the godform to be mad in?)
the power of autism bends causality to the necessity of righteous momentum of the moment.
What does mean what ? The picture or the text ?
Yes
I used to be able to do what you're describing, but somewhere along the way I lost that ability. It's a gift to not be a slave to linguistic thinking.
I mostly use my nonverbal thoughts to envision mechanical structures. If I'm reading a story, I enjoy the verbal thought sounds, because it sounds like someone is reading to me. I like that. If I'm reading something for information only I'll just get the concepts from it without the extra step of verbalizing it internally. Unless it's something I need to memorize. Having multiple ingress methods for language-conveyed concepts reinforces memorization. Oftentimes when studying I'll stand up and read text out loud, tracing a finger under the line of text. Try it sometime when you're studying for a test. It boosts recall by (my estimate) at least 50%. But yeah I never thought about switching it off and on since it's so natural based on the kind of reading I'm doing.
Bare with me on this point anon, I was reading a LoA post where an anon said they used a manifestation technique where they imagined in a space behind their eyeball.
Do you feel like you use a different part of your brain when you want the reading voice and a different part of your brain when your reading just to absorb/acknowledge information? If so, can you describe the different areas you feel are being used.
When I think I feel it in my frontal lobe, my inner ear and if it's more emotional I feel it in my heart, the very front of my frontal lobe and the back of my throat.
I am a very slow reader and I feel like I can only read with an inner voice. I wonder If there's a technique to not doing that, maybe its faster?
i thought i was among the very few.. Hello, fellow intelligent chad! I found i developed this skill over the years by reading a ton of books. Been finishing at least one a week, every week, for the past 25 or so years. I don’t even need to read entire paragraphs of exposition as I’m able to deduce which words will follow without any effort on my part, and i can essentially fill the gaps in with my head. Entirely dependent upon what i’m reading, however. When I was going through my greek classics phase i had to slow it down a bit because both the books and the concepts they presented were so dense. My wife can’t believe how quickly i can read something and can consume the information, she thinks it’s a superpower despite me telling her i’m a mortal man with a lifetime of experience with ADHD and forced mindfulness.
I genuinely feel bad for people who don’t read books. Anything and everything worth knowing has been written down, but then again reading also requires discipline, and the dopamine release is extremely delayed. That said, coupled with all the talk & research that’s been done on “neuroplasticity”, I’m of the belief that modern humans are simply being conditioned to be dumber, and it’s entirely of their choice; i can understand relieving oneself of the stress of having to think, but not at the cost of one’s free will.
You get what you deserve in this world.
When you are confindent in who you are, internal thoughts gets redundant. It´s neither good nor bad as it keeps you anchored and puts an halt to the personal growths but makes life comfy since you arent distracted by thoughts you which leads to stuff you have no intrest in.
the npc is a tool to be utilized by humans; they cannot be trusted to do as they will, because they have no personal will.
I have two types of internal dialog, one is when I'm reflecting on something and the other one is when I'm deep focused on something, some voices start to apear and say random things, this also happen when I'm falling asleep, I can hear them but for some reason I don't pay them much attention otherwise I'd be unable to sleep
am I becoming a schizo?
if i lost the ability to think without talking to myself like some sort of slow person i think id kill myself. the fact that you all think you're superior because of it is deeply amusing if unsurprising
thinking is the confusion between consciousness and awareness. be not confused
Bro needs words to express ideas in his head. What a fucking loser.
They're hylics/"NPCs". What you need to understand, though, is that they aren't lesser than us. They have their own role to play in the grand tapestry, and are equally deserving of all the courtesies we'd want for ourselves.
>Pneumatic
>Psychic <this
>Hylic <----and this
It's just as curable as Aphantasia. Take shrooms and your brain will be louder.
You know how once you can do something in a video game you no longer have to think “ok now I do xyz” and you can just think of the pure idea and remind yourself to do that? It’s probably like that. They’re just skipping the verbal stage
That's called muscle memory, but I get what you're saying.
Yeah I meant more like you can just skip the thinking of the action or the mental image of it without having to monologue to yourself about it
language may have interrupted a natural psychic condition among humans
With only so many to round
Here you shall snivel
We dilute each remaining soul
Twenty bodiesasoul
Scold mourner
Make meltnostalgia wax
Flinch when the meter digitturns
Flinch when the iron brand burns
Flinch when the meter digit turns
Flinch when the iron brand burns
Scold mourner
The bad forlorner
Embracing this bad carrot
Hold it with your heart
Cast off your Soul
Flinch when the meter digit turns
Flinch when the iron brand burns
Flinch when the meter digit turns
Flinch when the iron brand burn
Soul coroner
The vapid clad adorn her
Water down all those souls
Spread thin so all can taste
Look into bicameral mentality theory
What happened to the succgen schizo where did he go?
>So what are people who don't think like me?
>Are they even human?
Do you listen to yourself at all?
People who post this question are literal retards. The funny part is they think they are special for having an internal monologue when that is literally evidence of being a retard enslaved to logic. Internal monologue is known as "subvocalization" and it is the most slow, surface-level type of thinking possible. Not subvocalizing thoughts makes you a lateral thinker capable of making more connections than others, and gives you access to deeper layers of thought which are more abstract and non-linear, stuff like intuition, clairvoyance etc. You should be able to switch between modes of thinking on command though. If I want to subvocalize for more logical linear thinking then I just turn on my internal voice. Once I no longer need it I turn it off. If you can't do this you have no control over your mind and YOU are the NPC.
it's almost impossible.
people think that they don't have thoughts because they're too stupid to notice them.
Actually, most people have a multitude of ways of thinking.
An internal monologue is just one of them, it's vocalization of whatever your subconscious is spouting at you. It's comfy, helps you remember stuff, but also inefficient and slow.
There's also visual thinking. Most people who literally cannot have an internal monologue think using visual thinking - there is nothing inherently wrong with this.
The third method is basically impulse/instinct. Kind of like using your subconscious as muscle memory, like seeing four cats and instinctively thinking "there are four cats" instead of counting the cats individually.
There is nothing smart about having an internal monologue, and there is nothing bad about having one. The game is effortlessly switching between the thinking methods to tackle your daily life.
Im a chad cerebrate
They probably just misunderstood the concept of an inner voice. Thinking it's a literal audible voice you hear.
easy test that checks whether you’re dealing with an NPC or not.
Do they ever say “y’all”?
If they do they’re an NPC And you need to cut contact IMMEDIATELY.
Or don’t and brace yourself for the biggest pile of shit you’ve ever heard/read
the same way people with aphantasia are able to be visual artists (indeed a lot of them seem to gravitate toward visual art forms). their brains manage a workaround for it, though one that is hard to describe to those of us who can visualize things. the best way i’ve heard an artist describe how they draw without picturing something is that they use muscle memory to map a concept out. perhaps something similar goes on with those who don’t have an inner monologue. maybe we don’t have to dehumanize everyone into PC and NPC categories like fucking psychotic shower avoiders.
wait until you guys get an inkling of how differently your fellow humans experience time from you.
you would be surprised by how many people do not have a soul. you can call them npcs its kind of the same thing. a lot of people are born with souls but usually lose them as kids and thus create people who dont have internal dialogues for example
My theory is that NPCs are just people who are both heavily brainwashed by the TV and also have a calcified pineal gland from fluoride. I think they have souls but their spiritual part of their mind has been dampened, and their critical thinking neutered.
how dose fluoride calcify?
I think the Fluoride ends up in the Pineal gland and lots of Calcium bonds to it. Fluoride is very reactive. I don’t really know though, also not that anon.
the pineal crystal contains calcium phosphate, when your body is acidic calcium phosphate is removed from crystal structures to neutralize the acid (your bones and lenses are less important then not being acidic) when you introduce fluoride to the acidic biota where calcium phosphate transfer is occurring the fluoride can bond in place of the recently removed calcium phosphate, this in creases density, brittleness and changes the resonant song of the crystal matrix. however its fluoride that gets added to water, hexafluoride decasulfide, an acidic fluoride molecule, you don't even need an extra. pineal lens good, its made of calcium, as nature intended.
You think that’s funny shit until you realize that your internal monologue isn’t private and other people can literally hear it (all the while you thought you were alone)
I’ve noticed several Asian people could hear my internal monologue. How do they do it? I heard about that on /x/ like a decade ago and thought it was bullshit but it’s true.
You said chink out loud, that's why they're looking at you.
aaarfgh
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Origin_of_Consciousness_in_the_Breakdown_of_the_Bicameral_Mind
This book was mentioned in pr*j*ct m*narc*
Any thoughts on the connection?
I believe that being able to install a voice inside a person, which orders him to do certain things, as in schizophrenics, is the link.
I am not sure i have internal monologue, like i am typing it rn so guess it's my internal monologue? But also when i think i usually imagine it as a conversation with somebody so that's weird but it doesn't bother me much
You have an internal dialogue, Kek. That’s called schizophrenia these days.
Identifying with the monologue is just as crazy. There is actually nobody there doing the thinking. Thoughts arise automatically in the chest region as a reflex to input. A blob of mental potentiality but not yet fully being identified. Near the Frontal lobe is where it becomes clear what the thought was about. You can even block thinking if you focus on the field in front of your head.
I'm this
anon
Tell me more about these techniques if you please
Did you learn them from another source?
I started working out and I now I'm beginning to have more control over my individual muscles when I do sets and it really impacts results.
I believe that thinking techniques could be similar.
This is from Meditation and Self-Observation. I had a very negative mind and at some point the mind attacks became unbearable. So what usually happens is a breakdown and disidentification with mental processes or the ego mind. It's still ongoing.
The entire root of this discussion is Caucasian people having the gift of the logos and posing the question, “why doesn’t everyone think like me” when it is discovered that not everyone thinks in the same way. This is a vast world with a vast multitude of minds. An inner dialogue is advantageous for critical thinking but it doesn’t cap any individuals ability to self actualise. I think this is the main thing to remember.
People without inner chat are either unaware of it or jivanmukta.
No ego, no chatter. Just bliss.
It's a myth. The people who say they don't have an internal dialogue take it too literally and think you mean something like talking to your brain in a back and forth. Internal dialog means thought process. Everyone has a thought process.
I do talk to it back and forth though. I try to compromise with my subconscious all the time.
You mean internal monologue, internal dialogue would be schizo. I imagine they fall into 2 categories, they could either be non-thinkers or efficient thinkers. I only have think in words part of the time, if I'm really trying to pick something apart or if it is a complicated idea I need to communicate to someone else, I think it out in words to prepare communicating the idea. Thinking in dialogue is slow, it's more efficient to visualize and conceptualize in other ways. You do it too. If you are trying to imagine an apple, but the only thing that comes to mind is literally the word "apple" and no sensory imagination of the apple, then you have a serious deficiency. Also an example of thought too dependent on dialogue are those apparently unable to imagine a shape and then rotate it in their mind's eye. If you are so heavily restricted to words, your thought is not only slower at putting together abstract ideas which could otherwise be done almost instantaneously, but you are also limited by speech in what you are able to conceptualize. Like how in 1984 speech was intentionally diminshed to limit thought and communication. If you are totally reliant on language for thought, if you dont have a word for it, you can't even think it in the first place. Most people are not like that, and thankfully, but the point is that lack of internal monologue does not equate to lack of thought or hindered thought, there are different modes of thinking, and in a more efficient way at that. The exception, ofcourse, would be the NPCs and mentally deficient with barely any thought at all that just process and react to stimuli in real time.
what you do unconsciously is you. are you saying BREATH IN BREATH OUT BREATH BREATH OUT in your "inner" voice? you dont have an inner voice, that's the electro magnetic dupe. You move your hands without asking them to move, you can just do it. YOUR thoughts are like that too. Anything vocal like music like speech anything thats not as quiet as your mind when you move your hands is not your mind