25 thoughts on “so this is?

      • Anonymous says:

        benzos don’t have any toxicity to the brain, and while withdrawal can be deadly it can be safely done in pretty much any hospital in the US. there’s no reason it’d cause the bizarre personality changes/evident brain damage. there’s something much deeper wrong with him

        • Anonymous says:

          >personality changes
          Like what? The crying he seems to do all the time now? Other than that it seems like he is reacting to what he sees as an increasingly radicalised and polarised world, and thus he has upped the intensity of his rhetoric to match. I don’t see how his personality has changed all that much, just that his changes circumstances seem to have brought more out of it

          • Anonymous says:

            he seems barely articulate a lot of the time lately. that and becoming ben shapiro’s hand-puppet and dressing like an effeminate clown

          • Anonymous says:

            Shapiro is merely cashing in on him. At least the funny shortie man with a big tiddy sister somewhat makes sense, this guy doesn’t and he targets a very vulnerable audience: losers and schizos. Shapiro is basically late nite TV for people who still think they’re trolling da libs.

        • Anonymous says:

          He very likely suffered seizures from withdrawal, and that’s why he was put into an induced coma. His daughter described him as nearly dying multiple times, which sounds like she’s describing bad seizures. Being in a coma for an extended period of time could’ve also caused damage but I suspect it was seizures from withdrawal that caused this. I think he said on some podcast, maybe rogan, that he had brain damage now. But any addiction can leave your brain hecked, that isn’t science, just basic knowledge.
          >t. former drug abuser

    • Anonymous says:

      >daughter "dates" an fsbshnik
      >daughter ran a raw meat eating psyop
      >peterson shills for ruski "orthodoxy" (basically fsb brainwash church that is an extension of their propaganda)
      >after the trip peterson "suddenly" gets stylists, gets in cahoots with celebs, all that shit.
      He is a puppet, plain simple. Most likely a "shared" puppet, most like between ruskis and Arabs.

    • Anonymous says:

      >camera points at JP
      >cries on command

      every time

      Shapiro is merely cashing in on him. At least the funny shortie man with a big tiddy sister somewhat makes sense, this guy doesn’t and he targets a very vulnerable audience: losers and schizos. Shapiro is basically late nite TV for people who still think they’re trolling da libs.

      mf isn’t going to fight the chaos dragon while looking like willy wonka.

      NPCs

  1. Anonymous says:

    Peterson used to be someone you could trust when he was first rising to popularity and publishing books, but has been turned him into controlled opposition and a clown as a requirement to extend his time in the spotlight.

  2. Anonymous says:

    He looks okay but sneakers will never work with a suit regardless of how casual it is. Imagine that fit with blue penny loafers instead.

  3. DougDevious says:

    I posted this before so i’ll post it again:
    I feel like Jordan Peterson doesn’t actually have any style of his own, he just lets his tailors play dress-up with him and thats how you get ridiculous shit like the twitter suit and elon musk tie.
    Even after years of wearing suits for nearly every public appearance, it’s like he hasn’t pursued any deeper knowledge on dressing well, stuff that you don’t hear on a trip to the tailor or menswear department. Some tell-tale signs are:
    >he NEVER pays attention to a balanced tie length
    >he sometimes wears jackets that are clearly too big
    >he ties his ties with large FIH knots almost always, and they often look too thick for the somewhat short collar
    >sometimes his collar is garbage-tier stub length
    >he almost never wears a shirt that isn’t white, which shows that he might not even ever try considering how to pair colors together
    >he wears corny, trendy shit like tweed ties with tweed suits
    >he once wore a brown suit with black lapels and lapel piping that look straight the heck out of a bad polyester tuxedo from the 70s or 90s
    >he NEVER dimples his hecking tie

    He wears suits because of this mentality he has that wearing suits are a symbol of purpose, occasion, and a return to conservatism and formality, which is absolutely not wrong, but he doesn’t actually take it further than the surface-level idea of wearing a suit. I highly doubt he’s ever read any literature on being well-dressed, or even watched the Gentleman’s Gazette, which is a great, easy-to-follow resource for any "well-dressed man" and at any rate a better use of his free time than exposing his brain to ionizing stupidation on twitter and debasing himself to the level of your average autistic rightoid reply-guy.

    TL:DR: He’s the kind of man that doesn’t quite "buy" nice clothes as much as he is SOLD nice clothes, and there’s an observable difference to anyone with that kind of eye for detail.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *