So the Fact of Evolution, proving there was no Adam and Eve, completely destroyed this thing?
So the Fact of Evolution, proving there was no Adam and Eve, completely destroyed this thing?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
The Bible completely owns itself lol. It's loaded with ridiculous nonsense, contradictions, and total barbarity. Evolution is one of the many, many things that point to Biblical claims about the world being overwhelmingly unlikely to be true.
No. There have been many skeptics and critics long before Darwin was even born.
You don't even need to develop any observation based theory about the origin of life to know that Genesis is out of reason. I bet if the West never secularized and atheism was rare there would still be plenty of people nitpicking contradictions.
Some American protties already omit the parts that involve the Pharisees calling for the execution of Jesus. On behalf of their kike overlords in Israel of course. It won't be long before the crucifixion is denied as well.
>literalist boggles his own mind
Why does this always happen?
>religtard has no argument
Why does this always happen?
It must hurt to not have inductive reasoning
I'll induct my foot into your ass.
No way I just got btfo like that
Captcha: GAWDJ
That's strike two. If the next post isn't an argument then it's a concession.
>4 days pass
>he makes the Sun
Say the line, crossbrain.
Charles Darwin was a freemason
Yes
>start reading the Bible
>two pages in and these niggas already talking about how Heaven is literally just some land God separated from the Earthly land and put up in the sky and then hung the sun on the bottom of Heaven to light the lower firmament
Yeah I'm thinkin' we need a new life manual, fellas.
Most Christians cope by saying that it was an allegory and it's stupid to take it seriously.
I am patiently waiting for a moment when most Christians are going to claim that God was and ressurection of Christ were metaphors.
Adam and Eve eating the apple was a real event!!! But everything else is Le allegory (an allegory for what? We won’t say but trusterino me bro!)
It was more natural selection and continuous change over time explaining the diversity of life. Before that idea really hit home, it was easier to believe something created the tiger, and the evergreen, and humans. Darwin showing common descent was the real game-changer.
Kinda. Normies were still overwhelmingly Christians, but after Darwin and the geological discoveries of the 19th century (that showed how old the Earth really is) Christianity would never again hold sway over people's minds as much as it used to. Even in the 18th century educated people still believed that Earth was like 5000 years old, that all humankind used to worship Yahweh at some point etc. That was all ogre.
>Even in the 18th century educated people still believed that Earth was like 5000 years old, that all humankind used to worship Yahweh at some point etc.
No cap?
No cap. I was reading a book about Stonehenge, and it turns out even in the 18th century there were serious debates about stuff like whether the name of the Welsh people in Welsh language (Cymru) comes from Gomer (the grandson of Noah). There was also a very popular idea that druids had kept the uncorrupted monotheistic faith of the Biblical patriarchs (until idolatry was introduced to Celts by Phoenician merchants). Or that all mother-goddesses in all pagan religions are a corrupted memory of Noah's Ark.
>comparative religion/mythology stumps the atheist (he thought he could pigeonhole Christianity)
Not an atheist, and there's nothing wrong with comparative mythology. The point is that as late the 18th century even the educated elite believed in Adam and Eve, Noah's Ark, 5000-ears-old Earth etc, but in the 19th century things shifted pretty radically.