>singlehandedly deletes millions of jobs at age 37


Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

>singlehandedly deletes millions of jobs at age 37
how did he do it ai bros?

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a parlor trick for 85 IQ types.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >parlor trick
      doesn't take away the fact that companies can start laying off their jeets. why should I hire a jeet that most likely will do jackshit when im not looking while I can ask a bot to do it for free and within 2 mins?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      It can still replace millions of jobs.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Who is that supposed to be?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      openai's boss

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    early life

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      ffs

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The AI can't even do math retard. Why is everyone all over this as if it's anything more than the amalgamation of internet opinions.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      low IQ bugs always fly to the hottest shit, can't wait until everybody realizes it's all just a glorified automated querying tool that uses the internet as its db

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        that's why microsoft throws billions at it huh

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >muh microshit

          kys

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      If it can create unique fluff content that still is very useful for low output work positions. I can see a lot of jobs in creative/marketing/journalism being affected by this. It's the best content generator tool I have ever seen. Along with the ai art tools openai has.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >he thinks ChatGPT is the most advanced model

      ChatGPT isn't intended to be productive, it's intended to help OpenAI better understand alignment. You get a vastly dumbed down version of the best models in exchange for your data.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Solved an already solved problem. Where do you think it got those solutions anon. Theorem solving is one of those NP vs p computer science problems. AI can't do it as well as humans can.

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The AI shit they have that they don't let the public play with must be fucking insane.

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    israeli nepotism and general anti-human kikery, as per usual

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You're fucking retarded. AI is going to push your shit in and shock the world over and over again while 10 IQ boomers and shartists point out minute flaws.... such as misdrawing hands, or having poor english. Regardless it doesnt fucking matter because AI generated all that shit in 1/100 of the time it takes for a human to do. What the fuck are you retards gonna do when it pumps out PhD tier theses with invented diagrams, perfectly engineered and simulated every possible scenario, full scale 3d rendering and 3d printing control. Oh, and by the way, it's going to be able to mimic people's voices over the phone, mass automate email, and trade stocks/gamble better than everyone else who has ever existed.
    But go ahead and worry about an outdated artist ai fucking up hands when 6 months from now it could draw your tiny mangled penis gnashed into a thick den of grime and crusty jizz'm plus cheeto dust. Fuck you.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >he thinks ChatGPT is the most advanced model

      ChatGPT isn't intended to be productive, it's intended to help OpenAI better understand alignment. You get a vastly dumbed down version of the best models in exchange for your data.

      These are the 85 IQ guys being talked about in earlier posts, they can't understand that these AI are essentially glorified pattern-matching programs that only seem impressive because they use the whole of archives human knowledge as a data set and trained by warehouses of processors
      We're not going to get to AGI within our lifetime, maybe even this century

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >We're not going to get to AGI within our lifetime, maybe even this century
        true...but they're going to do everything possible to convince us that they've achieved AGI in the near future.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >We're not going to get to AGI within our lifetime, maybe even this century
        true...but they're going to do everything possible to convince us that they've achieved AGI in the near future.

        >AGI
        Whats that?

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The question is why optimizing one factor of a system leads to it becoming worse. Presumably, you'd call a return to the Egyptian system of digging holes, pushing stone blocks, fetching water, tilling fields, etc. by hand "inefficient". Yet today, we clamor for a maintenance of a certain level of inefficiency, and that should tell us that we don't have the correct picture.

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    is that the tech bro from she hulk?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *