Its the simplest language ever. Simple syintax,easy to figure out, works well with emacs. I cant use anything else. I want to solve problem's not learn syintax. And code written in 1985 still works .
I recommend Emacs Lisp, why? Because it's quite a small language and won't take you long to learn, you can then keep going and learn common lisp 🙂
You don't learn Lisp to get a job, you learn it so you can perfect your Emacs setup
No one actually uses emacs. It's just something LULZtards LARP about. Much like lisp. Just use VS Code or Visual Studio, learn a real language, and ignore this LARP.
>5s startup time you fucking midwit
First of all it's more like 100ms and if you really need low startup time you can compile your application to native with Graal.
>if you really need low startup time you can compile your application to native with Graal.
that doesn't help when you want a fast startup time when writing programs
JVM languages usually have a compiler itself executing on the JVM so it adds up when you are doing both compilation + execution
1 week ago
Anonymous
>that doesn't help when you want a fast startup time when writing programs
What? nagger Clojure has a repl, you don't need fast startup times when writing programs.
1 week ago
Anonymous
>repl
fuck no >you don't need fast startup times when writing programs.
why should I wait 1 or 2 seconds each time I modify something and want to see if it work?
1 week ago
Anonymous
>fuck no
? It's literally one of the main reasons to use Clojure also you're proving you have never actually used clojure you fucking naggerhomosexual. You can literally work on backend code without having to recompile shit, it does everything for you. Jesus fucking Christ, do the world a favor and kill yourself.
1 week ago
Anonymous
you might as well say that I should kill myself because I don't use YOUR meme editor which is fucking retarded
you kill yourself for caring about something as trivial as this, fucking homosexual stop projecting
1 week ago
Anonymous
>>repl >fuck no
are you retarded? with the repl you don't need to wait because you're not recompiling anything
>Should I learn LISP?
Sure, if you want to. It's a very unique set of languages that are fun to write in, imo.
>If so, which dialect?
Depends. If you want something smaller and more beginner-friendly, Racket or any Scheme should work fine. Otherwise, use Common Lisp.
>Should I learn LISP?
yes >If so, which dialect?
common lisp >Is it useful for getting a job?
no, which is why it's good
people who like lisp are people who like programming and appreciate good design
Yes you should learn Lisp, it is the most powerful programming language.
Clojure will let you actually get a job, build practical programs, and teach you about immutable data structures.
Scheme is the most elegant and will give you the deepest insights into the nature of programming and computation (and imo is the most fun). Guile Scheme will let you hack on Guix and perhaps Guile Emacs in the future.
Elisp will let you hack on Emacs, the most powerful text processing environment which will never die.
Common Lisp, though truest to the original idea of "Lisp," has fallen into an uncanny value of being both uglier than Scheme, less practical than Clojure, and with no relevant pieces of software like Emacs. Waste of time ecxept for historical curiosity.
>Is it useful for getting a job?
probably not
ask in the tech worker general, this didn't
Yes. Racket or Common Lisp. There's not much market for it, but it's not impossible.
it's good for becoming better at recursion
Its the simplest language ever. Simple syintax,easy to figure out, works well with emacs. I cant use anything else. I want to solve problem's not learn syintax. And code written in 1985 still works .
No one actually uses emacs. It's just something LULZtards LARP about. Much like lisp. Just use VS Code or Visual Studio, learn a real language, and ignore this LARP.
Thanks, but I'm sticking with Emacs anon.
>No one actually uses emacs
I use emacs to fuck your mom.
M-x order-gpl-hooker
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/lisp-is-not-acceptable-lisp.html
clojure
>JVM
No
What's wrong with the JVM homosexual?
It's dogshit, Pajeet.
Elaborate.
5s startup time you fucking midwit
stop larping
>5s startup time you fucking midwit
First of all it's more like 100ms and if you really need low startup time you can compile your application to native with Graal.
>if you really need low startup time you can compile your application to native with Graal.
that doesn't help when you want a fast startup time when writing programs
JVM languages usually have a compiler itself executing on the JVM so it adds up when you are doing both compilation + execution
>that doesn't help when you want a fast startup time when writing programs
What? nagger Clojure has a repl, you don't need fast startup times when writing programs.
>repl
fuck no
>you don't need fast startup times when writing programs.
why should I wait 1 or 2 seconds each time I modify something and want to see if it work?
>fuck no
? It's literally one of the main reasons to use Clojure also you're proving you have never actually used clojure you fucking naggerhomosexual. You can literally work on backend code without having to recompile shit, it does everything for you. Jesus fucking Christ, do the world a favor and kill yourself.
you might as well say that I should kill myself because I don't use YOUR meme editor which is fucking retarded
you kill yourself for caring about something as trivial as this, fucking homosexual stop projecting
>>repl
>fuck no
are you retarded? with the repl you don't need to wait because you're not recompiling anything
babashka, graalvm
I recommend Emacs Lisp, why? Because it's quite a small language and won't take you long to learn, you can then keep going and learn common lisp 🙂
>Should I learn LISP?
Sure, if you want to. It's a very unique set of languages that are fun to write in, imo.
>If so, which dialect?
Depends. If you want something smaller and more beginner-friendly, Racket or any Scheme should work fine. Otherwise, use Common Lisp.
>Is it useful for getting a job?
Absolutely not.
> Should I learn LISP?
Yes.
> If so, which dialect?
Common Lisp.
> Is it useful for getting a job?
No.
You don't learn Lisp to get a job, you learn it so you can perfect your Emacs setup
Ah you reminds me about the Greek Emacs dude
>Should I learn LISP?
yes
>If so, which dialect?
common lisp
>Is it useful for getting a job?
no, which is why it's good
people who like lisp are people who like programming and appreciate good design
>people who like lisp are people who like programming and appreciate good design
Don't jerk yourself off too hard
Yes you should learn Lisp, it is the most powerful programming language.
Clojure will let you actually get a job, build practical programs, and teach you about immutable data structures.
Scheme is the most elegant and will give you the deepest insights into the nature of programming and computation (and imo is the most fun). Guile Scheme will let you hack on Guix and perhaps Guile Emacs in the future.
Elisp will let you hack on Emacs, the most powerful text processing environment which will never die.
Common Lisp, though truest to the original idea of "Lisp," has fallen into an uncanny value of being both uglier than Scheme, less practical than Clojure, and with no relevant pieces of software like Emacs. Waste of time ecxept for historical curiosity.
>Should I learn LISP?
If you want to, it's fun if you enjoy studying languages.
>If so, which dialect?
I found Scheme to be the one I liked the most.
>Is it useful for getting a job?
Fuck no.