Well adjusted aka NPC fucking retards who can’t think for themselves and allow tech companies to invade their privacy and the government to fuck them over and their boss to under pay them etc
They say that but it's just the fantasy of it. They wouldn't like to live with someone who doesn't contribute finantially
What they mean is they want a woman who's okay with just being the woman without any feminist hints in her behavior
Seems like a bad deal for women. Still have to work but get the brunt of childcare and chores.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Childcare is on both parents, otherwise is negligence. The baby's only just "hers" for 9 months
The next 18 years aren't just on her, and it's not feminist to expact a father to be a dad
Most men on here are incels who don't know a stay at home wife is generally a lardass watching TV and eating snacks rather than an 8/10 woman from 1920 doing 10h of work a day and sucking dick on demand.
>does she work >does she have a house >does she have a car >does she have money/power >what has she achieved
https://i.imgur.com/uH8pn6H.jpg
Should a man care about a gf/wife's status?
They say that but it's just the fantasy of it. They wouldn't like to live with someone who doesn't contribute finantially
What they mean is they want a woman who's okay with just being the woman without any feminist hints in her behavior
Most men on here are incels who don't know a stay at home wife is generally a lardass watching TV and eating snacks rather than an 8/10 woman from 1920 doing 10h of work a day and sucking dick on demand.
an 18 year old without a career has more value than a career women. your gf/wife should spend her 9-to-5 working out, cleaning and cooking
Doesn’t really matter, as long as she is
1. Beautiful
2. Charming
3. Smart
In that order. A wife inherits the good status of his husband as long as she has these traits. Then she won’t be seen as a leech.
Yes, absolutely we should care.
When we marry, we agree to provide, under the trad plan at least. This is because this is the optimal path to success and happiness in life for both men and women. Women, especially, suffer greatly by not heeding the biological imperitive. Kids suffer when women give birth to them outside of a nuclear family with 2 parents under the same roof. The proof is in the statistics. Kids do better under even a dysfunctional nuclear family than they do under s single parent household, and kods born into a trad family are the happiest and most successful of all. Women without kids and without a dominant husband suffer emotionally and mentally, as evidenced by skyrocketing depression and record medication rates. Biology dictates instinct, including parental instincts through the Biological Imperitive. Ignoring instinct has brutal consequences.
A trad man wants to help his wife elevate her status while still dealing with the massive economic and opportunity cost of being a sole provider during peak childrearing years. As provider we are entrusted with our wives' lives in a way that leaves them vulnerable, and so we have to earn that trust every day as part of the marriage contract. We must be worthy of their trust, and they must be worthy of our great efforts to provide.
Yes. But women are already usually more well adjusted just because of the "agreeable" trait.
Well adjusted aka NPC fucking retards who can’t think for themselves and allow tech companies to invade their privacy and the government to fuck them over and their boss to under pay them etc
Status?
>does she work
>does she have a house
>does she have a car
>does she have money/power
>what has she achieved
Oh then yes. Don’t marry a loser.
Does it matter? Don't most men on here want a stay at home tradwife anyways?
They say that but it's just the fantasy of it. They wouldn't like to live with someone who doesn't contribute finantially
What they mean is they want a woman who's okay with just being the woman without any feminist hints in her behavior
Seems like a bad deal for women. Still have to work but get the brunt of childcare and chores.
Childcare is on both parents, otherwise is negligence. The baby's only just "hers" for 9 months
The next 18 years aren't just on her, and it's not feminist to expact a father to be a dad
Most men on here are incels who don't know a stay at home wife is generally a lardass watching TV and eating snacks rather than an 8/10 woman from 1920 doing 10h of work a day and sucking dick on demand.
I see a bunch of stay at home wives at the gym. They wear nice leggings and walk on the stairmaster.
NEET women aren't losers
an 18 year old without a career has more value than a career women. your gf/wife should spend her 9-to-5 working out, cleaning and cooking
sounds empty
Doesn’t really matter, as long as she is
1. Beautiful
2. Charming
3. Smart
In that order. A wife inherits the good status of his husband as long as she has these traits. Then she won’t be seen as a leech.
Yes, absolutely we should care.
When we marry, we agree to provide, under the trad plan at least. This is because this is the optimal path to success and happiness in life for both men and women. Women, especially, suffer greatly by not heeding the biological imperitive. Kids suffer when women give birth to them outside of a nuclear family with 2 parents under the same roof. The proof is in the statistics. Kids do better under even a dysfunctional nuclear family than they do under s single parent household, and kods born into a trad family are the happiest and most successful of all. Women without kids and without a dominant husband suffer emotionally and mentally, as evidenced by skyrocketing depression and record medication rates. Biology dictates instinct, including parental instincts through the Biological Imperitive. Ignoring instinct has brutal consequences.
A trad man wants to help his wife elevate her status while still dealing with the massive economic and opportunity cost of being a sole provider during peak childrearing years. As provider we are entrusted with our wives' lives in a way that leaves them vulnerable, and so we have to earn that trust every day as part of the marriage contract. We must be worthy of their trust, and they must be worthy of our great efforts to provide.
>they must be worthy of our great efforts to provide
Which they aren't. Oh well. That's that.
When they're not, that represents a failure on the husband's part just as much at the wife's.
You should be giving your wife status
Absolutely not. She should have held down some kind of job for a few years, just so you can be sure she is somewhat capable of handling daily life.