Shekelman announced RDNA3 in 3rd of November.

Shekelman announced RDNA3 in 3rd of November.

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SAVE ME KIKELMAN

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >7900 XT, same performance as 4090, no CUDA, no RT features
    >$1549
    Screencap this

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'll still buy it if it used 150W less.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I'll still buy it if it used 150W less.
        3rd worlder detected

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          not him and I don't want a heater or tubine near me. also I don't play that much

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it's not like the idle power use would be massive on the 4090. right, guys..?

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              probably is going to waste like 70w on idle

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Actual third worlder here, we have 99 things wrong here, but power bills ain't one.
          That's more of a german thing.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >That's more of a german thing.
            :'(

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          usa is 3rd world country with 1st world gdp

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >3rd worlder detected
          - White man "I want to use the most power efficient machine I can get that satisfies my thirst for performance for years to come, if competitor makes a card that is just as performant and consumes less power, that's a win for me."
          Either runs vsync or a frame limiter set to double framerate+freesync/gsync.
          - nagger cattle "Power draw for consumer devices doesn't matter, 500W power usage and 1000W transient spikes on a GPU should be the mainstream. Vsync? What's that, why did my RTX 4090 died while in a main menu of the game."

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Poor people are often poor because they spend more money than they should. They conflate personal belongings with wealth.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >They conflate personal belongings with wealth.
              I don't think I yet understand the full scope of what you meant there.
              ---------------
              There is wealth of resources, which can include things like:
              Knowledge, connections, power, businesses, patents, people who work for you, having some form of savings etc.
              Your first sentence really brings the light onto resourcefulness and virtue of living below your means.
              You could consider that knowing how to cook well is a skill of nourishing yourself(and nourishing yourself well is important) above your means by spending below your means.
              ---------------
              But with this latter sentence you want to bring attention to something closer to:
              Bill Gates owning a lot of farmland, Black-rock owning a lot of houses in US.
              Which brings it to the core the concept of trying to "flex on the poor".
              And you see this in plenty of rap videos, it's this fake projection of wealth while the rapper is actually deep in-debt to the recording studio.
              Just like some artists aren't rich, because they own/rent a lambo(especially with money that they got lent to by a recording studio).
              People aren't wealthy because they bought a 1600$ gpu, while struggling to make ends meet.
              (And a gpu is basically extremely negligible value compared to something like a farm with equipment and a plot of land to cultivate)
              (Or even value of owning a house and paying property taxes instead of rent)
              ---------------
              Having in mind resourcefulness(how much money could you spend on this, what you need, and ideally you spend none), inherently low deprecating value.
              I guess you really summed it up well in just 2 sentences.
              It really just goes down to living below your means, and gradually building up resources which you can use to build up actual wealth, rather than spend on mere consumables.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      no need, I know you're right

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >7900XT
      >slightly less performance at raster than 4090, >about 3090Ti or 4080 12GiB at RT
      >$999

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You’d be able to get a 7900X and a 7900XT for less than a single 4090 if the price for the 7900XT is in that range lol

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not with the memory prices and capacity. They are matching the 4090 on that.
        Expect $1200 minimum. If not more.
        The big loss will be the 7800XT being $650. There's no fucking way the new AMD will be based and release their 4080 competitor for more than 10% less than the 4080 12GB, even if it performs less. They'll gouge for a $850 price point for sure, even if the specs are correct and it's a 12GB model this gen.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Underestimates Nvidia RTX and other gimmicks that use to justify their premium over AMD SKUs.
          If RDNA3 isn't able to on par with 4080 12GIB at RTX in RT. It will not persuade anybody who is set on RT being next big thing.
          Rasterization performance is kinda important but it will end-up being just like 16-bit color mode was for 3Dfx in its heyday.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >anybody who is set on RT being next big thing.
            all 5 of them?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >anybody who is set on RT being next big thing
            The games already run like shit without RT. You need to be a masochist to enable it, tank the framerate and then "fix it" by adding even more smear than TAA already does with DLSS 3.0 Nugamers were a mistake, they'll jerk off that their $1500 GPU does 4K 60 FPS on ultra while ignoring the fact that the game has vaseline smeared all over it because of TAA or other bullshit that completely destroys image clarity. Go disable TAA in a game that allows it and look at how dogshit the hair looks, literally a shimmering mess. Then compare it to the hair in pic rel. Looks amazing and no TAA needed. Devs are just lazy and publishers retarded with unrealistic expectations.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Devs are just lazy and publishers retarded with unrealistic expectations.
              That about sums up the entire industry. People don't even bother with performance optimization anymore.
              >You mean that would take 2 more months of work? Nah, ship it next week instead.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah.
                >Hire an experienced software engineer and pay and treat them well so that our game doesn't shit the bed and requires top hardware to brute force performance? Nah, let me pay a fuckton of money to some eceleb to shill my crappy game instead. KEANU CHUNGUS WAOW

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              wow games look like this nowadays? That looks great honestly.
              I have been playing only minecraft for the past years

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Assassin's Creed Unity came out almost 8 years ago. Not a lot has improved since then. Games that have barely better graphics run like trash now because optimization is pretty much ignored outside of a few examples.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This. I was thinking of upgrading but there's no reason to.

                These two. I should be happy for my wallet, but the disappointment is immeasurable.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nah it's going to be 1099

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bad take.
      7900XT will be faster if you ignore frame interpolation gimmicks full of artifacts and power viruses.
      AMD was guessing the 4090 would be 2x the performance of the 3090. Instead it's about 1.6x. And they aimed to beat that 2x, not just match it.

      With rumors of RDNA3 boosting near 4ghz, and how high the core counts were leaked to be, there's no way it doesn't completely demolish the 4090 in rasterization. There's a reason why Nvidia spent 10 seconds displaying rasterization performance, and spent hours on meme buzzwords and snakeoil.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You don't know what the word Rasterization mean. You're thinking of shader.
        And that's a lot of preemptive hype for a rumor at best.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Rasterization has become a generic term for OpenGL/DirectX rendering that is done in a "hacky" way rather than ray traced.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Please be true

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      delete all the screencaps

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Already had RT features last gen
      >No RT features

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's amazing how many people don't know this.

        AMD should have sued Nvidia to begin with because RTX is too close to RX but sounds like it does ray tracing when RX doesn't.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Don't forget worse drivers and lower value when you resell it a few years down the road when you decide to replace it.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Don't forget worse drivers
        Not from my experience.
        AMD drivers on my Radeon 6800 are better than on my GeForce 2060.
        Furthermore, Nvidia's Linux drivers are a joke while AMD works out of the box.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what do you need cuda for, anyways?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He doesn't, but Nvidiot gaymers like to LARP about all the features they don't use before settling in to play CS:GO on their RTX 4090 Super Ti OC Edition.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Stable Diffusion.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >no RT features
      lolwut

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        AMD don't have RT dedicated silicon

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It does.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      u mum a rasta

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At this point, the best we can hope for is AMD not raising prices or only raising prices by like $50. Reminder that all GPU MSRPs have been very overpriced for at least 3 generations now. We're in a really bad spot.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they have the opportunity do to better this time.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they wont

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How to boost AMD Radeon to 99% marketshare: Release a successor to the RX 480.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And don't screw with the current pricing. They'd still make bank, capture market share, and make consumers relatively happy. Do something like what Sony did with PlayStation 4 game sharing.

      Kick the competition (Nvidia) straight in the balls.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yeah, if the market truly has calmed down with the downfall of crypto they would win big by doing this. we've had years of "just make any card and price it however and it'll sell out immediately" and NV seems to be betting on this being the case again (or then it's going to be a paper launch to get the old cards out first)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i fucking wish

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      old card.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i'm still running an rx580 and I don't feel the need to upgrade.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Finewine™ chad stay winning.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Vega 56 for me

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This. I was thinking of upgrading but there's no reason to.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      RX 6600 was between 1080 and 1080ti performance but price was too high.

      If they would simply refresh the 6600xt slightly on the new 6nm, and make it $219 MSRP, 130W TDP, I think that'd do well. That's what an RX580 successor would look like imo.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      RX 6600M is the RX 580 succesor

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >M
        no

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005004101641050.html

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >not cheap enough
            >8x

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              16x vs 8x makes no difference on low end cards.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                put it in a pcie2.0 board and it does.
                I don't care if only 1% of people does that.
                Is a limitation the rx580 doesn't have.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The PCIe 4.0 x8 is literally meaningless.
              It's 15% performance loss in Doom if your board is 3.0, but still >144fps.
              Every other game it's a 0.1-5% fps loss if you're on PCIe 3.0

              put it in a pcie2.0 board and it does.
              I don't care if only 1% of people does that.
              Is a limitation the rx580 doesn't have.

              A CPU from a PCIe 2.0 board is not powerful enough to drive the RX 6600. It's between gtx 1080 and 1080ti performance. Just get a 1050ti, maybe RX570 at most, or upgrade your CPU.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it all depends on what you play or do. not all is tied to games the bigger bus is always a plus.

                and I know any cpu that era enough for it. but is not a reason to israelite in that regard.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The desktop version is 8x too

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Is this the mobile chip of the 6600? Not that much price difference

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Same specs, but cheaper.

              https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-6600.c3696

              https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/radeon-rx-6600m.c3776

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I only trust sapphire tho.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why cant chinks reverse engineer nvidia chips and make their own knockoff NVODIA or whatever.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    bros I dont wanna wait 2 more months. I had enough. I waited for so long.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >wait for our broken trash for $150 less on the high end and $50 on the lower end with less features and broken drivers
    It's alwasy the same shit.
    I have more hope in intel to deliver with battlemage than ayyyymd.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    nvidia is trying to not destroy their partners that have mountains of 3000s in stock. It is a paper launch.

    AMD is in a more comfortable position to either maintain the prices or decrease it a little bit.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >nvidia is trying to not destroy their partners that have mountains of 3000s in stock.
      Nah, they are totally weaning off their AIB partners.
      Nvidia wants full control whatever the next mining craze happens and rake in all of the profit.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the next mining craze

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          PoW isn't going away. There's too much to make in the grift.
          PoW mining will come again once the next crypto boomtown comes around.
          Retards said that crypto mining would have died once BTC tapped out. What happen is that movement simply moved into ETH and now ETH has been tapped out. It will not be long until next PoW crypto boomtown comes again.
          The only way PoW will die is you completely destroy the economic incentive to do it. PoS doesn't do shit and will only only become a geekier form of trading paintings, collectibles to avoid taxes.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          litecoin is still worth $50 somehow, could be profitable to mine again with new cards having 2x compute per watt

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            all coins are going down soon.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              remember, buy high sell low

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          there's another bitcion halving right around the corner, you know? eth doesn't do mining anymore, but so what? bitcoin and all its derivatives and copycat coins still do.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    announcing the announcement

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nvidia set Radeon up for success this time
    if they can't do it now then it's never gonna happen

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hope supply isn't an issue this gen. I would love to see these things on some kind of a discount by early next year.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can't wait for another rebrand of old cards that deliver half the features of nvidia ones at 95% their price.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ah fuck why nov 3rd?

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >never heard of DLSS or RDNA before september
    >now it's the only thing i hear about
    am i retarded or is this just snakeoil shit

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you are retarded.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you're underage or retarded

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so many seething NEETs
    you'll never have CUDA
    You'll never be needed for Art 2.0

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who the fuck cares? They are just going to price the cards $50 cheaper. It's a duopoly now

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just make the raster performance better and price lower and it will be great deal. No need for gimmick RTX thing so you have to use upscaling if you don't like 15 fps.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AMD is for gamers, Nvidia is for Nvidiots.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Modern GPUs are worthless since they don't have good drivers.

Your email address will not be published.