next time there is a blood moon, try to look at it through binoculars or a telescope when it is just above the horizon, the way the earth's shadow sits on it will show you.
>next time there is a blood moon, try to look at it through binoculars or a telescope when it is just above the horizon,
Not sure what you are talking about here. Blood Moon has a couple of meanings, I assume you are talking about a total lunar eclipse, is that correct? If so, not sure what you think you are seeing when the moon at a lunar eclipse happens to be close to the horizon. Can you show a picture? Even a shitty drawing -- I promise not to critique your art skill, I'm not interested in that, only in what evidence you have for a nearby moon.
I meant a lunar eclipse yeah, if you can catch it when the top is barely illuminated, like in the photo on the right, and look at it through magnified lenses, it looks different and closer than I've ever seen it. I know it's 3d but it looked more 3d and I can't explain how really
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/December_2010_lunar_eclipse
Thanks for a reply. It looks like I don't get a total lunar eclipse here until 2025 -- so it'll be awhile before I can look. FWIW, I have seen the moon through a telescope pretty often (not during an eclipse) and disagree with your conclusion, but I'll certainly give it a look when I get a chance and see if I can see what you are talking about.
2 weeks ago
Anonymous
When I saw it, the moon was only 3 or 4 fingers over the horizon, it did not look the same when it was overhead.
The most insightful scene in Sailor Moon is from the 1993 'R' movie when Usagi is sacrificing herself to divert the meteor away from Earth. Each inner Sailor Scout has a flashback of Sailor Moon's most important lesson she taught them, it's always negative and inverse and by technical definition satanic, but it's also exactly what each one needs to step outside of their ego. She tells the bookworm Mercury to stop studying all the time and interact with her friends. She tells Venus she's been dying to meet the real her, not her celebrity persona. She defies Mars' need to work all the time and suggests a little fun. She isn't afraid of Jupiter and decides the other is a gentle giant. That's the Moon, it's not native to our conscious world but its adverse nature can be used to an individual's benefit.
Reading about shadow bands. they are bands of shadow that move across the surface of the planet, on either side of the eclipse.
It would be interesting to note their size and frequency, as this may be an electromagnetic phenomena tied to frequency and resonance. that is probably the clearest explanation.
the popular explanation is one where they simply speak about it being atmospheric interference, but the real explanation would be that same thing... but tied to sequential resonance patterns. It is akin to a large sample value (statistical) two slit quantum resonance pattern residual.
We are seeing a statistical residual of a quantum phenomena.
Due to us having a record, on FILM (video tape) of the band patterns we can check for the given frequencies involved and their intensity, over time, in different eclipses. ~~*~~*O*~~*~~
We can actually do a scientific check on this ley line vortex phenomena. We do indeed have a residual record of something that appears to be tied to the phenomena.
We will probably find a pattern. We are seeing the fundamental resonance oscillatory aspect of the earth field/resonance in integration with the moon's resonance combined with the charge field and elasticity of the general overall solar system's characteristics.
All these charge fields, will indeed exhibit their natural elasticity and thus resonance. The pattern of it, the record of it, is right there.
This, does indeed tilt toward verifying my statement that quantum phenomena RULES the entire envelope of the known universe and that the mass aggregate, lattice structure of the universe, the solids, they are like aggregated lensing points, refraction and diffraction points.
That time is a differential phenomena, tied to quantum systems. Which is why the 'out of time' aspects of the massive sub-nanoparticle mass of the universe, in the aspect of them being charge sheets of plasma...in which quantum aspects are DOMINANT...those massive charge sheets dictate 'reality' to the smaller and extremely minor (in comparison) mass aggregate 'solids' or things like planets, suns, solar systems, etc.
Our linear time aspects of reality... are constantly in agitation by the much more massive quantum aspects of the universe. In this shadow banding, we see the record of this.
This is how the position of the planets, in those resonant quantum ruled fields, that their patterns can statistically dictate the condition of the given person, as they move through time, as tied to the record of their 'birth'. This is why astrology works, as the planets are pushed around and ruled by plasma sheets of quantum affected materials and quantum aspects, all in patterned resonance integration. (this statement is not more than a small bit of a opening statement in a given thesis or paper on how astrology works..so investigate along these lines, if you want the full explanation)
We will probably find a pattern. We are seeing the fundamental resonance oscillatory aspect of the earth field/resonance in integration with the moon's resonance combined with the charge field and elasticity of the general overall solar system's characteristics.
All these charge fields, will indeed exhibit their natural elasticity and thus resonance. The pattern of it, the record of it, is right there.
This, does indeed tilt toward verifying my statement that quantum phenomena RULES the entire envelope of the known universe and that the mass aggregate, lattice structure of the universe, the solids, they are like aggregated lensing points, refraction and diffraction points.
That time is a differential phenomena, tied to quantum systems. Which is why the 'out of time' aspects of the massive sub-nanoparticle mass of the universe, in the aspect of them being charge sheets of plasma...in which quantum aspects are DOMINANT...those massive charge sheets dictate 'reality' to the smaller and extremely minor (in comparison) mass aggregate 'solids' or things like planets, suns, solar systems, etc.
Our linear time aspects of reality... are constantly in agitation by the much more massive quantum aspects of the universe. In this shadow banding, we see the record of this.
This is how the position of the planets, in those resonant quantum ruled fields, that their patterns can statistically dictate the condition of the given person, as they move through time, as tied to the record of their 'birth'. This is why astrology works, as the planets are pushed around and ruled by plasma sheets of quantum affected materials and quantum aspects, all in patterned resonance integration. (this statement is not more than a small bit of a opening statement in a given thesis or paper on how astrology works..so investigate along these lines, if you want the full explanation)
Are you saying that you believe the positioning of the "solids" in the universe, is affecting the resonant frequencies of individuals (personal magnetic field, manifestation, Qi, aura) those types of things by bending the sheet of reality ( i envision an heavy ball on a bed, indenting and depressing the material) You are saying that these depressions in the sheet alter how energy states operate, (time feeling different, general aura and energy of an individual being higher or lower) And that measuring the frequencies from the shadow bands of the moon could then be scaled to account for the fluctuations of the other celestial objects? I imagine you would compare the resonant frequencies of the shadow band and right outside of the shadow band to see the effects of the moon and sun respectively. Is that right?
>Are you saying that you believe the positioning of the "solids" in the universe, is affecting the resonant frequencies of individuals
nta but menstruation cycles are tied to the moon phases
>nta but menstruation cycles are tied to the moon phases
No they aren't. They do not synch up with a particular lunar phase (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003924/) -- if they did women would all menstruate at the same time. The carnage would be horrific.
The menstrual period for mammals is all over the spectrum. Among animals with a regular cycle (not seasonal) the elephant has the longest, at 13-18 weeks, humans are in the middle at 21-35 days (mostly around 28 which happens to be the lunar cycle's length as well), rats have a cycle of 3-4 days.
Not a whamen, and very single so not sure exactly how to calculate it, but surely their birth nakshatra, lunar mansion, of the moon in their natal chart is going matter so it wouldn't be expected for them to menstruate at the same time. Seems like a really terrribly designed study. as usual, to just look at the phase of the moon without looking at the full natal chart of each person in the study.
There is no spooky woo-woo going on here, just pure simple science, stuff that we know, but things we may not be aware of and things that some might want to hold back from us.
Then we get to the scientific implausibility, the utter impossibility of the moon's position and distance being 'chance'. that the moon is exactly the correct distance to perfectly cover the sun's disc. the perfect lensing position, which by the norms we know of the solar system, simply CANNOT HAPPEN.
When one adds in all the other aspects of the moon, the plausibility of it happening naturally, we get into purely astronomical odds that defy any chance of explanation in the realm of chance and place it squarely, unequivocally in the realm of intelligent design and intelligent placement. The moon itself and it's placement is wholly, unequivocally, scientifically -----unnatural.
>Then we get to the scientific implausibility, the utter impossibility of the moon's position and distance being 'chance'. that the moon is exactly the correct distance to perfectly cover the sun's disc. the perfect lensing position, which by the norms we know of the solar system, simply CANNOT HAPPEN.
You are confusing "unlikely" with "impossible." You also are missing that the moon is not EXACTLY at the right size/distance combination to create solar eclipses, since the distance from Earth to moon (and Earth to Sun) varies over time (pic related for orbital variation, there is also the fact that since it is tidally locked the moon is slowly moving away from us and so over time will appear smaller in the sky.)
The question is always if the moon is spherical enough, enough of a perfected spheroid...or not.... that it should not be (or should be) suffering this near absolute tidal locking. that, as a scientific question alone, is a very interesting one.
How did the moon, if such a decent spheroid... become tidally locked... and at this absolute perfected distance from the sun, in order to provide perfected eclipses? These sort of questions are ones that science has no answer for, at this time. So the questions sit suspended as if they are answered, simply by the very physicality of the existence of the given two facts. The anomalous aspects are ignored, in the face of a lack of sensed dangers. It looks and feels safe, over time, so these anomalies are accepted as if they are non-important non-questions.
ie, if everyone walked around the planet, for a thousand years, with literally a dagger hanging over them, individually..and never suffering issue from it... it would eventually be considered non-important and a non-question, a fact of no importance whatsoever. And anyone who observes and notes and questions the anomaly, would be considered a, well...lunatic.
And this is how these sort of anomalies and imposed realities finally 'get to you' and everyone around you.
People foolishly accept the insanity as normal, over time. Ie, Those people in Israel simply have to hang on to the land long enough for the idea of Palestine and stolen land, to go away.
in the same way that 'America' now exists, as a normal world, when it is really stolen land taken from murdered natives. Just like the Palestinian situation. And half the planet is the in the same boat, for that matter. It does not make it right, or correct, but simply the new normal. Which needs to be questioned, as the animal in the human will normalize, acclimatize (be born into it, etc) and block and neutralize the idea of thought and inquiry..... like it always does.
Shadow bands are caused by atmospheric turbulence refracting light -- same thing that makes stars twinkle. Nothing to do with elctromagnetic resonances or whatever.
They are not bands that move scross the globe, they are local phenomena that show up where there is upper air turbulence, but not where there is none. So for a given location, there may or mat not be shadow bands during an eclipse. People a few miles apart may see shadow bands at one location but not at the other.
They do not seem to move particualarly fast, they cross a bedsheet in a half-second maybe, and on a larger surface you can track then by eye pretty easily. In other instances they don;t really move across the surface but fade in and out. Really, they look more like a reflection of sunlight off of water than anything.
?t=610
BTW, elcipse coming up in the US next year, if you have not done so get a place to stay in the band of totality asap, prices are already going up. Watch for shadow bands by spreading a bedsheet or similar on the ground, the bands appear just as the Sun is about to be totally blocked,and just after it first come back -- they only happen when the Sun is a very tiny sliver in the sky.
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6732/8/6/186
The discovery by Hanbury Brown and Twiss of non-trivial correlations in the intensity of spatially separated, fluctuating, classic light fields has led to a number of ground-breaking technologies, the most important of which are the stellar interferometry and ghost imaging. In the majority of scenarios, the measured light field is thermal, i.e., obeys the circular Gaussian statistics, and, hence, involves a very simple relation between the field correlations and the intensity correlations, as a consequence of the Gaussian moment theorem.
Oh you mean the lunar nodes, Rahu and Ketu, the head and tail of the dragon?
There is no spooky woo-woo going on here, just pure simple science, stuff that we know, but things we may not be aware of and things that some might want to hold back from us.
Then we get to the scientific implausibility, the utter impossibility of the moon's position and distance being 'chance'. that the moon is exactly the correct distance to perfectly cover the sun's disc. the perfect lensing position, which by the norms we know of the solar system, simply CANNOT HAPPEN.
When one adds in all the other aspects of the moon, the plausibility of it happening naturally, we get into purely astronomical odds that defy any chance of explanation in the realm of chance and place it squarely, unequivocally in the realm of intelligent design and intelligent placement. The moon itself and it's placement is wholly, unequivocally, scientifically -----unnatural.
Isn't it like 108 moonlengths between the earth and the sun too? All of that shows that synchronicity is everywhere and so nothing is truly random, but occurs according to fate, for coincidence contains within it the correspondence of disparate elements, is repeated at the lowest level, i.e applied to rhythm, and it's sheer number is only explainable as the result of Wyrd, which determines fate.
We will probably find a pattern. We are seeing the fundamental resonance oscillatory aspect of the earth field/resonance in integration with the moon's resonance combined with the charge field and elasticity of the general overall solar system's characteristics.
All these charge fields, will indeed exhibit their natural elasticity and thus resonance. The pattern of it, the record of it, is right there.
This, does indeed tilt toward verifying my statement that quantum phenomena RULES the entire envelope of the known universe and that the mass aggregate, lattice structure of the universe, the solids, they are like aggregated lensing points, refraction and diffraction points.
That time is a differential phenomena, tied to quantum systems. Which is why the 'out of time' aspects of the massive sub-nanoparticle mass of the universe, in the aspect of them being charge sheets of plasma...in which quantum aspects are DOMINANT...those massive charge sheets dictate 'reality' to the smaller and extremely minor (in comparison) mass aggregate 'solids' or things like planets, suns, solar systems, etc.
Our linear time aspects of reality... are constantly in agitation by the much more massive quantum aspects of the universe. In this shadow banding, we see the record of this.
This is how the position of the planets, in those resonant quantum ruled fields, that their patterns can statistically dictate the condition of the given person, as they move through time, as tied to the record of their 'birth'. This is why astrology works, as the planets are pushed around and ruled by plasma sheets of quantum affected materials and quantum aspects, all in patterned resonance integration. (this statement is not more than a small bit of a opening statement in a given thesis or paper on how astrology works..so investigate along these lines, if you want the full explanation)
[...]
Are you saying that you believe the positioning of the "solids" in the universe, is affecting the resonant frequencies of individuals (personal magnetic field, manifestation, Qi, aura) those types of things by bending the sheet of reality ( i envision an heavy ball on a bed, indenting and depressing the material) You are saying that these depressions in the sheet alter how energy states operate, (time feeling different, general aura and energy of an individual being higher or lower) And that measuring the frequencies from the shadow bands of the moon could then be scaled to account for the fluctuations of the other celestial objects? I imagine you would compare the resonant frequencies of the shadow band and right outside of the shadow band to see the effects of the moon and sun respectively. Is that right?
There is no need to translate everything into modern science jargon, but I think I get what you are saying more or less, even if i don't believe in particles, nano or otherwise. There is only Aether and vibration, energy.
>There is no need to translate everything into modern science jargon
it's not about you. people are engineering this. nhi are engineering this. it is knowable and engineerable.
Cope. Scientists are barley catching up, despite their insufferable arrogance. The fact you seem to think I arbitrarily made up or picked and chose terminology is amusing and ironic. They are wasting so much time with their stupid quantum and relativity games. They are just going in a long circle back to where they went wrong centuries ago.
it's totally dark
it's a lot smaller and closer than you think
>it's a lot smaller and closer than you think
Can you back this up, at all?
next time there is a blood moon, try to look at it through binoculars or a telescope when it is just above the horizon, the way the earth's shadow sits on it will show you.
Nice a treasure hunt
>next time there is a blood moon, try to look at it through binoculars or a telescope when it is just above the horizon,
Not sure what you are talking about here. Blood Moon has a couple of meanings, I assume you are talking about a total lunar eclipse, is that correct? If so, not sure what you think you are seeing when the moon at a lunar eclipse happens to be close to the horizon. Can you show a picture? Even a shitty drawing -- I promise not to critique your art skill, I'm not interested in that, only in what evidence you have for a nearby moon.
I meant a lunar eclipse yeah, if you can catch it when the top is barely illuminated, like in the photo on the right, and look at it through magnified lenses, it looks different and closer than I've ever seen it. I know it's 3d but it looked more 3d and I can't explain how really
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/December_2010_lunar_eclipse
Thanks for a reply. It looks like I don't get a total lunar eclipse here until 2025 -- so it'll be awhile before I can look. FWIW, I have seen the moon through a telescope pretty often (not during an eclipse) and disagree with your conclusion, but I'll certainly give it a look when I get a chance and see if I can see what you are talking about.
When I saw it, the moon was only 3 or 4 fingers over the horizon, it did not look the same when it was overhead.
You know the moon moves further and closer to earth with its orbit?
turn the telescope around and cross reference
Moon is cute.
The most insightful scene in Sailor Moon is from the 1993 'R' movie when Usagi is sacrificing herself to divert the meteor away from Earth. Each inner Sailor Scout has a flashback of Sailor Moon's most important lesson she taught them, it's always negative and inverse and by technical definition satanic, but it's also exactly what each one needs to step outside of their ego. She tells the bookworm Mercury to stop studying all the time and interact with her friends. She tells Venus she's been dying to meet the real her, not her celebrity persona. She defies Mars' need to work all the time and suggests a little fun. She isn't afraid of Jupiter and decides the other is a gentle giant. That's the Moon, it's not native to our conscious world but its adverse nature can be used to an individual's benefit.
So moon is my shadow ?
Reading about shadow bands. they are bands of shadow that move across the surface of the planet, on either side of the eclipse.
It would be interesting to note their size and frequency, as this may be an electromagnetic phenomena tied to frequency and resonance. that is probably the clearest explanation.
the popular explanation is one where they simply speak about it being atmospheric interference, but the real explanation would be that same thing... but tied to sequential resonance patterns. It is akin to a large sample value (statistical) two slit quantum resonance pattern residual.
We are seeing a statistical residual of a quantum phenomena.
Due to us having a record, on FILM (video tape) of the band patterns we can check for the given frequencies involved and their intensity, over time, in different eclipses. ~~*~~*O*~~*~~
We can actually do a scientific check on this ley line vortex phenomena. We do indeed have a residual record of something that appears to be tied to the phenomena.
you good bro?
We will probably find a pattern. We are seeing the fundamental resonance oscillatory aspect of the earth field/resonance in integration with the moon's resonance combined with the charge field and elasticity of the general overall solar system's characteristics.
All these charge fields, will indeed exhibit their natural elasticity and thus resonance. The pattern of it, the record of it, is right there.
This, does indeed tilt toward verifying my statement that quantum phenomena RULES the entire envelope of the known universe and that the mass aggregate, lattice structure of the universe, the solids, they are like aggregated lensing points, refraction and diffraction points.
That time is a differential phenomena, tied to quantum systems. Which is why the 'out of time' aspects of the massive sub-nanoparticle mass of the universe, in the aspect of them being charge sheets of plasma...in which quantum aspects are DOMINANT...those massive charge sheets dictate 'reality' to the smaller and extremely minor (in comparison) mass aggregate 'solids' or things like planets, suns, solar systems, etc.
Our linear time aspects of reality... are constantly in agitation by the much more massive quantum aspects of the universe. In this shadow banding, we see the record of this.
This is how the position of the planets, in those resonant quantum ruled fields, that their patterns can statistically dictate the condition of the given person, as they move through time, as tied to the record of their 'birth'. This is why astrology works, as the planets are pushed around and ruled by plasma sheets of quantum affected materials and quantum aspects, all in patterned resonance integration. (this statement is not more than a small bit of a opening statement in a given thesis or paper on how astrology works..so investigate along these lines, if you want the full explanation)
Are you saying that you believe the positioning of the "solids" in the universe, is affecting the resonant frequencies of individuals (personal magnetic field, manifestation, Qi, aura) those types of things by bending the sheet of reality ( i envision an heavy ball on a bed, indenting and depressing the material) You are saying that these depressions in the sheet alter how energy states operate, (time feeling different, general aura and energy of an individual being higher or lower) And that measuring the frequencies from the shadow bands of the moon could then be scaled to account for the fluctuations of the other celestial objects? I imagine you would compare the resonant frequencies of the shadow band and right outside of the shadow band to see the effects of the moon and sun respectively. Is that right?
>Are you saying that you believe the positioning of the "solids" in the universe, is affecting the resonant frequencies of individuals
nta but menstruation cycles are tied to the moon phases
>nta but menstruation cycles are tied to the moon phases
No they aren't. They do not synch up with a particular lunar phase (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003924/) -- if they did women would all menstruate at the same time. The carnage would be horrific.
The menstrual period for mammals is all over the spectrum. Among animals with a regular cycle (not seasonal) the elephant has the longest, at 13-18 weeks, humans are in the middle at 21-35 days (mostly around 28 which happens to be the lunar cycle's length as well), rats have a cycle of 3-4 days.
Not a whamen, and very single so not sure exactly how to calculate it, but surely their birth nakshatra, lunar mansion, of the moon in their natal chart is going matter so it wouldn't be expected for them to menstruate at the same time. Seems like a really terrribly designed study. as usual, to just look at the phase of the moon without looking at the full natal chart of each person in the study.
There is no spooky woo-woo going on here, just pure simple science, stuff that we know, but things we may not be aware of and things that some might want to hold back from us.
Then we get to the scientific implausibility, the utter impossibility of the moon's position and distance being 'chance'. that the moon is exactly the correct distance to perfectly cover the sun's disc. the perfect lensing position, which by the norms we know of the solar system, simply CANNOT HAPPEN.
When one adds in all the other aspects of the moon, the plausibility of it happening naturally, we get into purely astronomical odds that defy any chance of explanation in the realm of chance and place it squarely, unequivocally in the realm of intelligent design and intelligent placement. The moon itself and it's placement is wholly, unequivocally, scientifically -----unnatural.
>Then we get to the scientific implausibility, the utter impossibility of the moon's position and distance being 'chance'. that the moon is exactly the correct distance to perfectly cover the sun's disc. the perfect lensing position, which by the norms we know of the solar system, simply CANNOT HAPPEN.
You are confusing "unlikely" with "impossible." You also are missing that the moon is not EXACTLY at the right size/distance combination to create solar eclipses, since the distance from Earth to moon (and Earth to Sun) varies over time (pic related for orbital variation, there is also the fact that since it is tidally locked the moon is slowly moving away from us and so over time will appear smaller in the sky.)
The question is always if the moon is spherical enough, enough of a perfected spheroid...or not.... that it should not be (or should be) suffering this near absolute tidal locking. that, as a scientific question alone, is a very interesting one.
How did the moon, if such a decent spheroid... become tidally locked... and at this absolute perfected distance from the sun, in order to provide perfected eclipses? These sort of questions are ones that science has no answer for, at this time. So the questions sit suspended as if they are answered, simply by the very physicality of the existence of the given two facts. The anomalous aspects are ignored, in the face of a lack of sensed dangers. It looks and feels safe, over time, so these anomalies are accepted as if they are non-important non-questions.
ie, if everyone walked around the planet, for a thousand years, with literally a dagger hanging over them, individually..and never suffering issue from it... it would eventually be considered non-important and a non-question, a fact of no importance whatsoever. And anyone who observes and notes and questions the anomaly, would be considered a, well...lunatic.
And this is how these sort of anomalies and imposed realities finally 'get to you' and everyone around you.
People foolishly accept the insanity as normal, over time. Ie, Those people in Israel simply have to hang on to the land long enough for the idea of Palestine and stolen land, to go away.
in the same way that 'America' now exists, as a normal world, when it is really stolen land taken from murdered natives. Just like the Palestinian situation. And half the planet is the in the same boat, for that matter. It does not make it right, or correct, but simply the new normal. Which needs to be questioned, as the animal in the human will normalize, acclimatize (be born into it, etc) and block and neutralize the idea of thought and inquiry..... like it always does.
Shadow bands are caused by atmospheric turbulence refracting light -- same thing that makes stars twinkle. Nothing to do with elctromagnetic resonances or whatever.
They are not bands that move scross the globe, they are local phenomena that show up where there is upper air turbulence, but not where there is none. So for a given location, there may or mat not be shadow bands during an eclipse. People a few miles apart may see shadow bands at one location but not at the other.
They do not seem to move particualarly fast, they cross a bedsheet in a half-second maybe, and on a larger surface you can track then by eye pretty easily. In other instances they don;t really move across the surface but fade in and out. Really, they look more like a reflection of sunlight off of water than anything.
?t=610
BTW, elcipse coming up in the US next year, if you have not done so get a place to stay in the band of totality asap, prices are already going up. Watch for shadow bands by spreading a bedsheet or similar on the ground, the bands appear just as the Sun is about to be totally blocked,and just after it first come back -- they only happen when the Sun is a very tiny sliver in the sky.
>A WHOLE BUNCH OF TURBULENCE
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6732/8/6/186
The discovery by Hanbury Brown and Twiss of non-trivial correlations in the intensity of spatially separated, fluctuating, classic light fields has led to a number of ground-breaking technologies, the most important of which are the stellar interferometry and ghost imaging. In the majority of scenarios, the measured light field is thermal, i.e., obeys the circular Gaussian statistics, and, hence, involves a very simple relation between the field correlations and the intensity correlations, as a consequence of the Gaussian moment theorem.
Neat, can you explain what that means in terms of a discussion of shadow bands?
shadow bands imprint the information from solar interferometry.
Oh you mean the lunar nodes, Rahu and Ketu, the head and tail of the dragon?
Isn't it like 108 moonlengths between the earth and the sun too? All of that shows that synchronicity is everywhere and so nothing is truly random, but occurs according to fate, for coincidence contains within it the correspondence of disparate elements, is repeated at the lowest level, i.e applied to rhythm, and it's sheer number is only explainable as the result of Wyrd, which determines fate.
There is no need to translate everything into modern science jargon, but I think I get what you are saying more or less, even if i don't believe in particles, nano or otherwise. There is only Aether and vibration, energy.
>There is no need to translate everything into modern science jargon
it's not about you. people are engineering this. nhi are engineering this. it is knowable and engineerable.
Cope. Scientists are barley catching up, despite their insufferable arrogance. The fact you seem to think I arbitrarily made up or picked and chose terminology is amusing and ironic. They are wasting so much time with their stupid quantum and relativity games. They are just going in a long circle back to where they went wrong centuries ago.
i don't think you made shit up. i think you're stuck.
made of cheese innit
moon shadow is warmer than moonlit areas
But it isn't, if you are careful not to have your shade set up so as to reflect ground heat back at your shaded spot.
>moon shadow is warmer than moonlit surroundings
via flir sensor
it is my ass <3
and i started my period 🙂
It's hollow
why would I go to a moon with you to redpill you there?
roflmfaool
poo poop pee caca
moon matrix
This man is always pointing at the moon. Wonder why
He knows what it's up to
How can the moon be real if our eyes arnt real?