Realistically if carthage supported Hannibal’s campaign in italy would they have won ?
Realistically if carthage supported Hannibals campaign in italy would they have won ?
Realistically if carthage supported Hannibal’s campaign in italy would they have won ?
no, carthage didn't support hannibal's campaign in italy because they couldn't
What if the Carthaginians hadn't chased Xanthippus out? What if they'd sent Hamilcar the reinforcements he'd asked for?
>DAS RIGHT
Real answer is no, it was a miracle he got as far as he did
Hannibal was black and wuz a kang
Cope chud
Fo4/starfield dialogue option I presume
Nah Hannibal was black n shiet
sure
maybe
i don't know
could you repeat the question?
YOU'RE NOT THE BARCA ME NOW
Hannibal was s*mitic, not sub-saharan. Also whites (Romans) were undisputed kangs, they only got defeated by stronger whites (Goths).
Goths used to be vassals of Rome. You pigskins think rome fell to riding pagan norsemen bringing death and destruction when in reality they all were posh christian nobility that schemed their way in the military and turned the emperor and senate into powerless puppets
The fact they were christian is only incidental. By that point, the vast majority of people in Italy were christians. The Italinate aristocracy scheming and refusing to let competent outsiders like Aetius in is an entirely separate issue.
It's just semi-humorus bait man. Chill.
Aetius was a big shot, the reason why he ultimately failed was because valentinian was pants on head mad and paranoid to the extreme. No that he could've changed much, when he died aetius was an old man and rome basically still existing only in name. If he wanted to save it he should've been born three centuries earlier
>Aetius was a big shot
Who had to force his way in and fight against the imperial aristocracy at every step. The court at Ravenna was intensely closed off to outsiders like him. The fact that he managed to achieve high office is as impressive as his feats holding the West together.
No he was black Phoenicians and Canaanites were black
This is the thing though all black people are not related all black people are not African.
For example most of the blacks in America came to America from Europe not Africa. That's why they have European names.
Europe was ruled by black people for over 1300 years. Even Benjamin Franklin admits this in his writings that Europe was mostly black and brown during his time.
>Hannibal
>Black
r u just pretending to be retarded cuz u better not be.
And how would they supply hannibal as he trapped himself in the middle of southern italy?
Hannibal Barca wuz a nagger.
The funny thing about afrocentrism is that it shows how little American naggers know about Africa. They think Africa simply means sub-Saharan black, or more specifically the kind of Congo/Gold Coast black that most black Americans are descended from.
They don't know anything about the different ethnicities, cultures, tribes and people who lived in Africa, nor the separation between North African and sub-Saharan Africa, or the difference between black western Africans, eastern Africans, southern Africans, and so on and so forth.
I mean, I'm no expert myself, but at least I have a general understanding of it.
All Americans are men of no tribe, black or white. Nigerians don't recognise Jamarcus as one of theirs in the same way Scottish people don't care if an American's surname is Campbell etc.
simply not coming from north america unironically makes you an expert on ethnicity in comparison to 90% of the loudest people on the internet, when the topic of race comes up
WE
Kangz
If Hannibal and his warriors had been given proper support the entirety of Western history would have been altered, we would likely have been looking at a situation where no collapse or dark age happened, and the African slave trade would not have been tolerated, the world would be centered on an Afrocentric technocracy and we would be literally light years ahead of where we are now.
Nah we would have adopted semetic customs and would be sacrificing infants and speaking Hebrew
>sacrificing infants
European lies formulated in the 19th century to justify the enslavement and rape of Africans peoples.
VILE
NILOTIC
RITES
Is this a larp ? No the Roman’s even said they did child sacrifices also Africans were raping and enslaving their own well before the first European colony in Africa nagger
>If Hannibal and his warriors had been given proper support
Fucking how? By this point the Roman fleet was far superior to Carthage and there was no avenue to get more men to him oversea from Africa or overland from Spain. Saying "if he was supported" is as vapid as saying "if the Nazi Germany wasn't an economic basket case, they could have won." There's not instance where Carthage could have sent more support, it's not like they just wrote him off.
That's not what Hannibal looked like, Netflix.
CARTHAGO DELENDA EST
Why is there a black on my computer screen?
>support
With fucking what? They couldn't hold Hispania with the troops they had. Had they sent them to bolsters Hannibal's harassment campaign in Italy, the rest of their provinces and economy would have died even faster.
Carthage's chance of victory died with Hasdrubal's defeat. Even then, Hannibal could not have taken Rome under the best of circumstances.
If they have provided with him siege engines and supply, he would've taken Rome yeah.
no the roman national socialists would never stop until all BLACK carthagians were exterminated
>if carthage supported Hannibal’s campaign in italy
They did. Hannibal was sent a shitload of reinforcements, it's just that the romans never let them join up and defeated thm all piecemeal.
The only way Hannibal could have won was if the italics as a whole rose up against Rome, which was exactly what he was aiming for.
Of course, it was an extremely dumb idea. Pyrrhus already tried and failed, Hannibal had no reason to believe he'd succeed.