Pirating software is theft, and thus it is immoral. If you acknowledge and accept this, you will find peace.
Pirating software is theft, and thus it is immoral. If you acknowledge and accept this, you will find peace.
Pirating software is theft, and thus it is immoral. If you acknowledge and accept this, you will find peace.
i'm not looking for peace
Venerable Ching Chong, I acknowledged it.
Now do I have permission to pirate software in peace?
Now that you have acknowledged that it is immoral, you can be honest with yourself. Go with the wind and may fortune bless you, wise pirate.
Money is an illusion, so any points for or against it are not addressing the root.
There is no such thing as theft, because you don't own anything. You don't even own your body.
If this is your belief, then would you permit me to steal your knife, wife, and life?
HAHAHAHA, I'm "stealing" something that is infinity copiable. Go to the circus clown
A customer is not infinitely copiable. Time and labor spent in development is irreplaceable. Ponder these things and you will find that there are more things at play, my child.
Cope harder shill troll, HAHAHAHA. Now you change the goalpost: "Pirating Software" does not exist, for "software" is infinity copiable (its not "property"). Now what? you are gonna defend Disney with their trademark of 100 years of Mickey Mouse, clown. You would also trademark cooking recipes because... you are a clown? HAHAHAHA. Putting and limiting ideas is the must immoral thing in this planet
My son, in our world there exists a concept of intellectual property. Ponder this and reflect.
"Intellectual Property" it's infinitely copiable, real property is not. If I steal from you, you lose your real property; if I steal your "Intellectual Property" you don't, because it's fake. It's just an artificial construct pushed by the American Anti-Christ. Now what? are you against your own? ching chong? HAHAHAHA, you claim that you are moral, yet you are the most immoral one: prohibiting and limiting people to ideas because of your greed
The protection of intellectual property is what allows and incentivizes the creation of new ideas. What incentive is there for the writer to write, the composer to compose, and the developer to develop if they are not compensated for their labors?
they will do it for free like they always have. creative types are cucks by nature, they can't help themselves.
I eagerly await the noble conglomerate of thousands of creatives to devote their lives to creating the next hit video entertainment game for no monetary compensation.
Artistic expression?
Opportunity to exchange and spread ideas?
Enrichment of society?
The act of creation in itself can be worth it, too.
Do we expect this of the cobbler? The tailor? The butcher? The farmer?
Now you pivoting again. Repeat with me "Intellectual Property" is not property, 10 times. And now... what "innovation"? the one you just made up? like Discord and all of this proprietary immoral garbage that are reiterations of the same thing over and over and over again, for the sheep to suffer; and that are inferior to their moral counterparts (e.g. emacs > ms-word), your utilitarian argument is the must immoral one yet
My son, intellectual property is property just as property is property. To be one's property is a state given by our society. We are thusly able to give this state to both physical objects and ideas. Ponder this and may you find peace.
full stop lies
If you never open your eyes, you will forever be blind.
Sure troll, sure
>what innovation
The semiconductor.
Intellectual Property Laws exist as a means of exerting force upon others.
This is not a ‘bad’ thing - it’s how all laws work.
One wishes to produce something, but wants to be compensated for it. Therefore, they will exert legal pressure on others to compensate them for their work.
It is all violence and power plays. It is not a transcendent value (think Occams Razor). Your perceived guilt at theft etc arises from your internal risk analysis: what if I get caught, what if others do this and collapse the production system, and so on.
The concept itself is meaningless without credible threat of violence to back it up. This is all that matters, really.
Since software and media can be attained by a consumer with minimal risk, they will get it through those means.
this applies to all property. Private property isn't an intrinsic thing either.
moral goods serve all peoples
software existing serves all peoples
so paying for software (creating incentive) is morally good
cope
To be proud of one's immortality is to claim a corrupt soul. One day I hope you are able to cleanse yourself of these sins and find peace.
It's ok on my death bed I will totally feel remorseful of my action and repent.
>zoom zoom learns how to torrent for the first time
lol
Ok old man
>One day I hope you are able to cleanse yourself of these sins and find peace.
ok schizo
>I worked hard, you owe me
Labor Theory of Value has no meaning in what is materially real.
I want a product. I can get it the product with minimal hassle (less money spent, extremely low risk). Therefore I will.
I can't even stream shit legally because I use Linux and I have to use chrome and Windows, until they respect my choices then I am not going to be a paypig. There is no excuse for a central platform to not exist where I can find all my TV shows and movies I watch, since essentially they are all connected to each other. Until Netflix returns to what it was in 2016, I will still pirate.
who cares about morality? and whose morality?
Your soul cares.
I will own nothing and I will be happy
No body cares about your pseudo wisdom you stupid chink.
Your soul will be forever tormented until you accept the world as it is. I hope you find peace.
I wouldn't buy software even if I had money
I'm glad you put the "it's morally justified or even GOOD" retard on the left at least
>and thus it is immoral
deontologists are cucks
I had this stupid discussion with some Mozilla shill who uses Ublock anyway
It's not theft if it's free.
I have no regrets
Copyright is the work of demonic forces, and everything that counters evil is good and just.
Christ is king.
Why is it okay to steal software but not to steal a car? Software still takes effort to create. Cars take effort to create.
>pirate video game
>delete it
>redownload and delete it again nine more times
>company loses $600