>On December 1, 1955 Rosa Parks made history by sitting in on the segregated bus in Montgomery, Alabama.

>On December 1, 1955 Rosa Parks made history by sitting in on the segregated bus in Montgomery, Alabama.

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most of black history is fake, Rosa Parks was a paid employee of the NAACP and had planned to make a scene so that the NAACP could sue the bus company. Doesn't sound very legal to me

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's totally legal. It's also legal for the Westboro Baptist psychos to provoke people into suing them then winning the lawsuit because of the 1st amendment.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        "provoking people to sue you" isn't the same thing as "sending agent provocateurs to your business to get kicked out so they can sue you"

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Whatever, it's still legal.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Is it? sounds like fraud

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              No. It doesn't violate any laws, and is protected by the 1st amendment in the US. The only obstacles might be qualified immunity and the high cost of filing lawsuits.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                staging events to sue companies is literally fraud

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Deception is a component of civil (not criminal) fraud, but she wasn't lying about anything. She deliberately violated a law and allowed herself to be arrested so she could challenge the law in court. That last bit isn't illegal.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                okay but fraud IS illegal

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This wasn't fraud, civil or criminal. Civil disobedience in and of itself isn't illegal.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                pretty sure if you jump in front of a car to get insurance money that's fraud

                so in the same way getting paid to be "harassed" to sue a company is also fraud

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Jumping in front of a car to claim insurance money from an accident or setting fire to your building to claim insurance money is illegal because it's deliberate misrepresentation of what happened. Civil disobedience doesn't involve that. It's not like the litigant fights his or her culpability in the act that got them arrested. They challenge the legality of their treatment under the relevant statutes while accepting the fact they broke the law.

                protest is one thing, being a paid agent to provoke "threatening behavior" against oneself to use as grounds to sue a company is fraud

                It doesn't matter if you're paid.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm pretty sure it's a big deal if you're a paid agent provocateur

                that's like claiming paid FBI informants making up shit and then the FBI using that as evidence is okay

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                People like Rosa Parks didn't practice purity politics. They were hardass realists who saw themselves in a political struggle and they wanted to win.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >hardass realists who saw themselves in a political struggle

                the projection is almost palpable, it's like I can taste it

                There's nothing about payment that makes what she did any more illegal.

                not what she did

                but certainly the company who paid her to do the job was in violation, if indeed there were such explicit terms.

                it begs the question, how many others were simply on a payroll?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the projection is almost palpable, it's like I can taste it
                It's just that the LIBERAL narrative is that Rosa Parks "was just tired and didn't want to give up," and the backwards loser segregationists try to screw with that narrative by claiming that she was actually part of an organized force with a strategy and a plan to carry it out. The thing is, those segregationists are also correct, SHE WAS, and that plan succeeded, but that has always been the case for movements of people struggling against injustice who want to win, because politics is ultimately about strategy, not clout. The liberal narrative exists to recuperate / defang such movements, that is the purpose of liberalism.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >that has always been the case for movements of people struggling against injustice who want to win

                uh huh
                yes, always

                >liberal narrative

                damage control
                learn

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What were they in violation of?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's fraud to scam companies and private individuals. Black history is fraud

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What was fraudulent about it?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Paid agent staging a publicity stunt to be used as propaganda to try and sue a private company and win based on public perception

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That isn't fraud, and it's not deceptive. She didn't act like she was just tired and didn't want to stand up. That misconception was spread by folklore and misinformed teachers.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There's nothing about payment that makes what she did any more illegal.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      she was an activist protesting the segregation on the buses. that's not illegal.
      why am I surprised that the crypto-fascists who want a return of segregation want to make organizing protests illegal?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        protest is one thing, being a paid agent to provoke "threatening behavior" against oneself to use as grounds to sue a company is fraud

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        She wasn’t doing anything other than enforcing the NAACP line that was funded by israeli businessmen.

        Individual actors are irrelevant, that line of thinking just demonstrates that liberalism is completely incoherent spontaneous order nonsense.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The """NAACP line""" that buses shouldn't be segregated?
          Great! wtf I love Rosa Parks now!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That’s irrelevant. Specific causes were funded by israelites because ethnic heterogeneity lowers the risk of retaliation against their financial/legal crimes.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >whether buses are segregated is irrelevant he says in a thread about Rosa Parks
              >proceeds with schizo babble about israelites
              It's very telling that you can't actually defend the bus company's actions, you have to make up fake crimes the NAACP committed by getting someone to protest it and proceed to go on and on about a israeli conspiracy theory.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It’s very telling that your model of politics is based on spontaneous order, which is nonsense. There’s far more nuance which you obviously can’t grasp.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >spontaneous order is an equilibrium behavior between self-interested individuals, which is most likely to evolve and survive, obeying the natural selection process "survival of the likeliest".
                What on earth does this have to do with me saying there's nothing wrong with protesting segregation?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because freedom of association isn’t a crime, baiting into moral hazard is.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Uh, no. breaking the law so that you get mistreated and then suing for mistreatment isn't "protesting"

                Damn, if only the government of Alabama could have afforded a lawyer.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Well if you remember correctly Parks' court case crash and burned and went nowhere

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Parks had been charged with a violation of city law. But when Blake had ordered Parks to move, there were no other open seats on the bus. From protests in the early 20th century, Montgomery city law forbid asking someone to move if there wasn’t an open seat. So under city code Parks should not have been asked to give up her seat. That day in court, the prosecutor requested the charges be changed from a violation of city code to state law.

                lmao. absolute state of cleetus.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >random quote
                okay?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >nooooooooooooooooooooo you can't just bring up historical events on the history board

                what a big fat fucking cope.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                and yet here you are today, seething because you had to sit on the bus next to a black person

                you know even her wikipedia says her court case failed right?

                she's celebrated for being a failure

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >she's celebrated for being a failure
                Who would have thought Rosa Parks and Donald Trump had so much in common?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wakanda will never exist.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >only black people despise white trash
                you give the rest of us a bad name. always have. perfidious cleetus.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                pathetic

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wow you sure owned that chud with a comment like this. Really put him in his place right? Showed him whats what

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You seem upset.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not even remotely as upset as you clearly are.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The main thing she is credited with is helping spark the Montgomery bus boycott. But
                >The case became bogged down in the state courts, but the federal Montgomery bus lawsuit Browder v. Gayle resulted in a November 1956 decision that bus segregation is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[3][4]

                Although she was not the person in the case that finally went to the Supreme Court, she became the public face of the bus boycott and bus sit-ins. That's just how history works. Some people get remembered while other people who were just as courageous get forgotten.
                I'm glad that you want to spread awareness of other civil rights leaders and activists rather than the few that do get remembered. We should honor them all!

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Rather her organization and the NAACP planned her arrest in order to use it as propaganda to start a boycott

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                thanks anon. the NAACP deserves a lot of credit too for organizing protests, and we can't forget the good they did entirely for just a few individuals!

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                again, planning an arrest of a paid provocateur to use as propaganda to stage a boycott isn't protesting

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Again, if only the government of Alabama could have afforded a legal mind like yours.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                again rosa park's court case was a failure

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                damn I guess she'll never be remembered.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                apparently not

                >decades later
                >RP is elderly and living in poverty in a Detroit apartment with nothing but Social Security for an income
                >gets robbed at gunpoint by a brudda
                >all the millionaire black celebrities and athletes out there did exactly fuck-all to help her
                >guess who does bail her out and get her an apartment in a lower crime neighborhood? Red Wings owner Mike Illich.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Damn I never realized Rosa Parks and Ayn Rand had so much in common.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                to be fair ayn rand was far more intelligent and had a few successful books, parks was a scapegoat and quickly kicked to the curb after her ten minutes of fame was over

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >ayn rand was far more intelligent
                So intelligent she required welfare.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A lot of women advocated for welfare. one of the largest wings of the civil rights movement was black women on welfare since they didn't have to work and could protest all day

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                well maybe Emitt Till should have been smarter and not acted fresh in 1950s Mississippi. that's like going to Iran and public defectating on a Koran.

                Two solid arguments from anons who clearly attended an institution of higher learning. Whatever shall I do?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >rosa parks was objectively perfect because uh, at least she wasn't on welfare
                >one of the main political points of the civil rights movement was the avocation of collecting welfare so that they could protest all day
                kek

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In the 1950s? Most black people were poor, even with the welfare state that existed.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Most black people were poor
                still are

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Not as much as in the past. More are at least lower middle class today.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah, if you believe government statistics that they make up on the spot

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What's wrong with them? Where are the alternatives?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they are no alternatives, the government makes up and sets the statistics for poverty

                go to china if you want to see how it works on a larger scale, the government lying about statistics that is

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The difference is you can see how the government of the US collects statistics, and you don't "disappear" or get a surprise visit from the police if you ask too many questions about it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >you can see how the government of the US collects statistics
                no you can't, otherwise you wouldn't be claiming that there's less blacks in poverty

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And why would that be? Are there more accurate statistics you've collected? Or do you have specific criticisms of the statistics available?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah it's called the government doesn't consider naggers on welfare people so they don't count them in the poverty statistics

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                do you have a sauce for that?
                because you have to be considered in poverty to receive welfare.

                also, you do realize the #1 recipients of government welfare are white southerners, right?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                does it really fry your brain to such a degree that the official government definition of poverty does not include those on welfare while claiming you need to be in poverty to receive welfare?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm still waiting for that source.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                when the welfare system was created, called "great society" they needed a way to spin it as a socialist societal welfare policy that reduced poverty, so in order to do that they considered people on welfare "out of poverty". Meaning once you receive government benefits you're no longer considered "poor" in the national registry of poverty levels.

                Similarly if you're retired or a dependent/child even if you're not consuming the "non-poor" level of calories it doesn't matter as it's based off your parents. Also the line gets blurry when you throw school breakfasts and lunches into the mix which are also federally funded as "access to meals" is a poverty measure. So basically if the federal government is paying for your food you're not poor anymore and won't show up in the poverty rate.

                Which means realistically the only people they're looking at for poverty are working age adults not on welfare, so of course the poverty rate is going to be low with them.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                your say-so is not a source. I trust you even less on historical policy programs from the 1960's than I do on modern day statistics.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't care if you trust me because I'm right

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >so in order to do that they considered people on welfare "out of poverty"
                Source?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                look it up, also do you have any reason not to believe me?
                or are you a shill for welfare for some reason, are you on welfare?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So you don't have a source?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I do it's called the US government

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Can you link to where they say it?

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yeah
                https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=The+History+of+the+Official+Poverty+Measure

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Haha epikly meme'd dood xdddd over 9000 upboats for you

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Source?

                do you have a sauce for that?
                because you have to be considered in poverty to receive welfare.

                also, you do realize the #1 recipients of government welfare are white southerners, right?

                >also, you do realize the #1 recipients of government welfare are white southerners, right?
                You forgot businesses. Some industries like agriculture get generous subsidies.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                when the wealthy get handouts it isn't called welfare, it's called supporting the job creators.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so you're just going to ignore that the Supreme Court ruled in an identical case that bus segregation was illegal? k

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's a fancy word for a protester. and if she was paid, she still did nothing wrong and the law was still unjust.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm curious how it's "propaganda" when she was arrested for not getting up for a white passenger, and both the boycott and the lawsuits tried to end bus segregation.
                Are you claiming the buses weren't actually segregated and you couldn't actually get arrested for not getting up for white passengers if you were black?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I'm curious
                He's a retard.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                This ruling was also rubbish because the 14th Amendment is designed to protect you from racial discrimination by the state not private parties. Thus a privately owned bus company is not obligated to serve black customers.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's why the target was state and local law.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Didn't Plessy vs Ferguson establish that segregated buses did not violate the separate but equal doctrine?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                and yet here you are today, seething because you had to sit on the bus next to a black person

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Segregation is the opposite of freedom of association

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This is different than the story they tell though as if the instant someone stepped out of line even without trying to do it deliberately that the laws got enforced.

        How many times did people "protest" against the laws and then nothing happened to them? The organizations were explicitl trying to break the laws enough times that some body might actually enforce them such that they could take the case they already wanted to take rather than trying to protect the civil rights of people only trying to live life normally.

        There are plenty of laws which you can deliberately challenge right now by breaking them and nothing would happen, either because nobody would ever enforce them, or because there isn't a pre-planned method of doing something if it ends up getting enforced. The idea that "Rosa Parks could have been anyone" is false.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >This is different than the story they tell though as if the instant someone stepped out of line even without trying to do it deliberately that the laws got enforced.
          Who? I definitely think this a common misconception, but it's in no way a cover up. There's nothing to cover up. You just outright lied about Parks and the NAACP committing fraud and now you're backpedaling to "this is the story ~~*they*~~ don't want you to know"?

          >There are plenty of laws which you can deliberately challenge right now by breaking them and nothing would happen, either because nobody would ever enforce them, or because there isn't a pre-planned method of doing something if it ends up getting enforced. The idea that "Rosa Parks could have been anyone" is false.
          I don't see how any of this is relevant, and Rosa Parks didn't do anything special to get arrested. Yes, most black people day-to-day were not arrested for getting on a segregated bus... because they followed the rules, sat at the back of the bus, and got up for white passengers.

          Now let's say that the law Parks was arrested for was barely ever enforced. Why does that make it wrong to break that law to get arrested in protest of the law?
          You're grasping at straws so much I can barely follow your train of thought.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I had a book about Martin Luther King JR as a child and it definitely said she was just "tired and didn't want to get up". That is probably the fault of the author for not fact checking but the point remains.

            >Now let's say that the law Parks was arrested for was barely ever enforced. Why does that make it wrong to break that law to get arrested in protest of the law?

            Because there are currently laws set up to discriminate against whites and Asians), not on an individual level but on a collective level through affirmative action. If can violate these laws if you want but most people don't for the same reasons you are listing. The reason the NAACP violated the laws is because they knew they would win the case. You cannot refuse to violate affirmative action on principle and get away with it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You'd be a lot cooler if you had a source.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >corporations and foundations met for a fundraising breakfast at the Carlyle Hotel in Manhattan.[4] $800,000 was raised. Donations came from the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation, and 93 other businesses and foundations in addition to the Taconic Foundation.[1] Few or none of these were Black-owned.[1]

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_for_United_Civil_Rights_Leadership

        It was above the NAACP really, they were just the footsoldiers. The whole civil rights operation was funded into existence by various NGOs/foundations, mostly by israeli donors.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        he's telling a half-truth to discredit the real story:
        >Parks was not the first person to resist bus segregation, but the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) believed that she was the best candidate for seeing through a court challenge after her arrest for civil disobedience in violating Alabama segregation laws, and she helped inspire the Black community to boycott the Montgomery buses for over a year. The case became bogged down in the state courts, but the federal Montgomery bus lawsuit Browder v. Gayle resulted in a November 1956 decision that bus segregation is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.[3][4]
        She was acting on behalf of the NAACP in order to make a case against the discriminatory policy. The other anon is trying to make it sound like she did something similar to faking breaking her leg on a bus for monetary damages, which the court case was not about. It was about the constitutionality of segregated buses.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >after her arrest

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If she was working for the NAACP before her arrest it still wouldn't matter. It's not illegal to organize protests.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Pretty sure it's not a protest if your goal is to sue a business

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Prove it in court, homosexual. Your opinion is irrelevant.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                yes, if you break an unjust policy or law on purpose in order to create a court case to attempt to have that policy or law ruled unconstitutional, that is a protest. By arguing this in court, you are admitting you broke said law.

                For this to be illegal fraud would have to be committed, like suing the bus for segregating the bus when the bus wasn't actually segregated. It was segregated.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Uh, no. breaking the law so that you get mistreated and then suing for mistreatment isn't "protesting"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                She was arrested for violating segregation laws, not private business policies.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >crackers still seething
    lmao

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      blacks will always seethe more when they're told truthfully all their "heroes" were frauds. Tell the average black rosa parks was a paid provocateur and they'll probably rob the nearest gas station

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        sweet headcanon. there's not a black person alive who seethes over rosa parks.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I know you people typically aren't very literate but read his post again.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Read it again. White trash seethe.

            You're right, most blacks have no idea who or what the civil rights movement was because they're retards

            kek stay mad cleetus.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              mad at what? black people's ignorance? or your own? I don't think ignorance is something you're supposed to be proud of

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Why would I need to read it again? You're the one that can't even correctly comprehend a 2 sentence post, no one said blacks seethe over rosa parks, but obviously they do when people correctly point out how much of a fraud she was, hence the embarassing chimpout sperg meltdown you are having

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >can't differentiate past and present tense from context
                lmao. keep working on that GED cleetus.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >that GED projection
                I guess I have to spell it out for the third time in a row now. I'll say it slowly. You're the one that comprehend a 2 sentence LULZ post, bright boy. And now you're trying some kind of nonsense cope lol, read the post again

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You're right, most blacks have no idea who or what the civil rights movement was because they're retards

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I never seethed over it, but it was such a huge redpill for me. That and the fact that blacks were more prosperous and civilized before the civil rights movement. Now I believe forced integration was wrong, and was just a ploy to further government overreach. Any integration should happen organically in communities that want it, but I think neither segregation nor integration should be enforced by law, but rather by community norms (although local law is a reflection of community desires and I believe that would be acceptable). Some will disagree, but I see that as the best solution.
        >t. mutt

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          as soon as divorce became legal and welfare was created blacks were doomed

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Unfortunately. Now the situation seems irreparable. Most blacks see all the objectively negative things they do and perpetuate as a part of their culture, and won't even listen to well-to-do blacks that tell them the hard truths about why they're a failed micro-culture. How do we fix them? Abolish welfare and no fault divorce? That doesn't seem like it will fix the crime problem because I doubt most of them will even start getting married or move to honest work in the first place. I believe they can be civilized, but only if a majority of them want it and start self policing their communities.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              No? It was observed as early as the Civil War. Among the slave population were found some intelligent, ambitious individuals eager for freedom and citizenship and many who had the mental capacity of a 7 year old and barely even knew what day of the week it was.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Eugenics, then?

                if you're white, and riding the bus, then you're a failure.

                Why shouldn't whites take advantage of the infrastructure they created?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >they created

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Blacks invented buses now according to you lmfao? This is a level of WE WUZZING I have never seen before

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I took a "how to protest" class put on by activist types about to how to plan such things and do them safely and Rosa Parks was the first example given on how to do it. The idea of actually having a plan, strategy, follow-through or being part of some... god forbid... organization at all is like heresy to Americans who are used to thinking of themselves as atomized individuals.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        whats the source for her being a paid provocateur? I cant find anything on this

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if you're white, and riding the bus, then you're a failure.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      1955 =/= 2022. In that time buses were entirely respectable and widely used by women to do their errands and shopping. What ruined it was, ironically, desegregation.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        can you give me artilces on this plox
        also, can you prove that lynchings were justified vigilante actions to actual rapists?

        if not then, MEDS!!!!!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No it was car culture

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Car culture was a product of that. In the 50s a lot of women didn't even drive; they didn't need to.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    https://i.imgur.com/nCWZJaP.jpg

    >On December 1, 1955 Rosa Parks made history by sitting in on the segregated bus in Montgomery, Alabama.

    Mark Ingraham, the mentally ill NEET spammer otherwise known as the gdpschizo

    Proof of him spamming LULZ for years:
    https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/gdp%20tourism/
    https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/peak%20oil/
    https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/coal%20resources/
    https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/crime%20density/
    https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/stalingrad%20physical%20evidence/
    https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/capitalism%20profitable/
    https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/asians%20white%20/
    https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/private%20property%201950/
    https://desuarchive.org/his/search/text/smallpox%20crap%20fake/

    He also believes he has a 3 g/cm3 thick skull:
    https://desuarchive.org/k/thread/51949490/#51949490

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    black men were already marginal and once welfare happened there was no reason at all for them to support their women and children so they became completely useless

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this was a planned NAACP stunt; they tried a few other times to do this, including with a pregnant teenager but that was bad optics so they decided a respectable middle aged officer worker like RP would work.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was above the NAACP really, they were just the footsoldiers. The whole civil rights operation was funded into existence by various NGOs/foundations, mostly by israeli donors.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >corporations and foundations met for a fundraising breakfast at the Carlyle Hotel in Manhattan.[4] $800,000 was raised. Donations came from the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation, and 93 other businesses and foundations in addition to the Taconic Foundation.[1] Few or none of these were Black-owned.[1]

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_for_United_Civil_Rights_Leadership

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Civil rights had nothing to do with blacks, it was israelites, it just helped blacks accidentally.
        The religious part of civil rights was entirely israelites as no other religious minorities cared.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was above the NAACP really, they were just the footsoldiers. The whole civil rights operation was funded into existence by various NGOs/foundations, mostly by israeli donors.

      Civil rights had nothing to do with blacks, it was israelites, it just helped blacks accidentally.
      The religious part of civil rights was entirely israelites as no other religious minorities cared.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >literally can’t even read evidence when it’s put in front of him
        Leftism is literally just mental illness.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Preplanned stunt that she had tried before, without success.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What if I told you that the man who asked Rosa Parks for her seat was physically disabled?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lmao that would be peak nagger behavior
      >p-please, may I have that seat?? I have a physical disability which would make it difficult for me to navigate further into the bus...
      >DAMN SHUT UP YOU BITCH ASS CRACKA! I BE TIRED N SHIET! DON'T YOU KNOW DA BLACK KWAAANS STRUGGLE?!?!
      >Mmph damn pasty ass mayo monkey, mmmhmm my feets be hurtan an shiet, this is reparashuns

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.revolver.news/2022/08/the-fake-history-of-the-20th-century/
    >It’s one of the most famous moments in sports history, or 20th Century American history, period. Jackie Robinson, the first player to break the pro baseball color barrier, took the field for the Brooklyn Dodgers on the road against the Cincinnati Reds. A hostile racist crowd poured abuse down onto him. But then, Robinson’s teammate Harold “Pee Wee” Reese shamed and quieted the crowd by walking over to Robinson and putting his arm around him in a gesture of support. It’s a moment immortalized in film, in children’s books, and even in bronze.

    >But as the Wall Street Journal revealed in a recent article, the whole episode never happened:

    >No newspapers reported the event at the time. In fact, the New York Post said Robinson had been “the toast of the town” in Cincinnati. The Cincinnati Post reported the day after the game: “If anyone had any objection to Jackie’s presence on the field, he failed to make himself heard.” Writing in his weekly newspaper column, Robinson called his visit to Crosley Field “a nice experience.”

    >The story of the Cincinnati embrace surfaced decades later in an interview with one of Robinson’s teammates, pitcher Rex Barney. But Barney got one of the key details wrong. He said he was warming up to pitch in the first inning of the game when Reese shut down the hecklers. The fact is, Barney didn’t pitch that day until the seventh inning.

    >In interviews I conducted with Robinson’s wife, Rachel, for my book on his breakthrough season, she insisted that no such hug occurred in 1947.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The story sounds too gay to be true anyway.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    /pol/tranny thread

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ITT: hopeless white trash

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      /pol/tranny thread

      Seething bootlickers. You’re literally controlled by israeli NGOs.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        /pol/tranny cope

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >You’re literally controlled by israeli NGOs.
        But I'm not a Christian.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Seething bootlickers
    he said in a rosa parks thread.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why did she need to sit up front? Looking at OP's pic the back seats look the exact same as the front seats.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >decades later
    >RP is elderly and living in poverty in a Detroit apartment with nothing but Social Security for an income
    >gets robbed at gunpoint by a brudda
    >all the millionaire black celebrities and athletes out there did exactly fuck-all to help her
    >guess who does bail her out and get her an apartment in a lower crime neighborhood? Red Wings owner Mike Illich.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >gets robbed at gunpoint by a brudda
      The guy who robbed her got his ass kicked in prison and had to be put in protective custody. Attacking old ladies isn't something that's going to win you a lot of friends behind bars.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it's okay the guy got beat up in prison
        black logic is an enigma

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          that's a lot coming from a guy who will defend a 14 year old black kid being brutally murdered because he allegedly whistled at a white lady.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            well maybe Emitt Till should have been smarter and not acted fresh in 1950s Mississippi. that's like going to Iran and public defectating on a Koran.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine being such a hopeless waste of existence that Rosa Parks rustles your jimmies.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Not an argument, Tulsatranny.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >implying i'm trying to argue with you
      just collecting (You)s and making ya seethe

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There was also a black man with her, Robert Freeman, but he is always left out of this story for some reason

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You will never have an ethnostate

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ISRAEL

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You know I'm getting mighty real sick of these naggers and their demands. At first we were guillabe to buy into their demands in the 1950s for their civil rights and da demand dat weza gets our righterinos.

    Well now it's over. When we finally take back this country we're gonna repeal civil rights for their kind and make it hell for them. Unlike most people here I ain't afraid of having white privilege. I'm proud of it and we're gonna show these baboons more white privilege. Africa had plenty of space for another 50 million niggles so start packing Rosa Parks, Tyrone, Lashawn, Isaiah, and Bartholomew because the airports are going to be expecting you soon. Maybe when we get the next president in he can nationalize an airline for the niggies. Sorry lolberts.

    We'll call it nagger Airways and it'll be for all the blackies that we are going to be sending to Africa and if they don't leave well perhaps a little destination to a place somewhere in the middle of nowhere might be more affordable for them.

    Because I am done I have snapped I have officially snapped. Civil rights is over. We tried it for 70 years and is failed. We're going to repeal the Supreme Court I know was going to repeal it because deep down they know that they fucked up.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Everything the Stone through Berger Courts did was a massive fuck-up.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    American history be like: A woman sat on a chair.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ITT: People whose ancestors came to America less than a century ago tell blacks who have been here since the 1500's to "go back".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this lmao. I'm a 4th generation immigrant but no one would think it because I'm white. There's people who's family's were chinese and japanese who've been here longer than my family.

Your email address will not be published.