Objective morality is better than man-made human rights

Otherwise it would be too confusing as everyone would give their own interpretation rather than obeying one divine set of laws.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    non-objective morality = your morality is no better or more correct than a person who thinks it is good to be a serial killer child rapist = no morality at all

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Non objective morality is LITERALLY just people disagreeing. According to you, people disagreeing means no morality at all.
      Which if it isn't clear enough by now, it's moronic.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If you disagree over what is moral then who decides what is moral?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Nonsensical question

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Explain why it is nonsensical.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >If you disagree over what people agree on what's good and bad, then who decides the agreement of people on what's good and bad?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The answer is of course the dubiously existent magic man in the sky that endorses moahmmed having more wives than anyone else, of course.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Why is there disagreement? Over what?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Typical atheist homosexual who squeels like a pig when faced with the consequences of what he asserts as his world view.

        is there a fact of the matter about whether you , who says that it is wrong to rape and murder children , are morally correct or whether a child rapist who says that is good to rape and murder children is morally correct?

        If you do not believe in objective morality then either you believe that there is no fact of the matter in which case moral truth does not exist according to you and so you basically do not believe in morality , or the fact of the matter is that two directly contradicting statements are both true and correct simultaneously, which by the principle of explosion means every statement and every contradictory statement are all true.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          mind = broken replies do not apply

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            the atheist AIDS-victim israelily squirms and tries to use sacarsm to mask the fact that he has no argument or rational grounds to disagree with

            Typical atheist homosexual who squeels like a pig when faced with the consequences of what he asserts as his world view.

            is there a fact of the matter about whether you , who says that it is wrong to rape and murder children , are morally correct or whether a child rapist who says that is good to rape and murder children is morally correct?

            If you do not believe in objective morality then either you believe that there is no fact of the matter in which case moral truth does not exist according to you and so you basically do not believe in morality , or the fact of the matter is that two directly contradicting statements are both true and correct simultaneously, which by the principle of explosion means every statement and every contradictory statement are all true.

            non-objective morality = your morality is no better or more correct than a person who thinks it is good to be a serial killer child rapist = no morality at all

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yes it would be better if only people could agree on what it was, which they have never done

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Islam

      non-objective morality = your morality is no better or more correct than a person who thinks it is good to be a serial killer child rapist = no morality at all

      Elaborate please because this is an interesting discussion

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        https://islamqa.info/amp/en/answers/143146
        >The websites that speak ill of the religion of Allah and of His Messenger (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) are no different from the gatherings where people say similar things that constitute kufr. In both cases it is haraam to stay in such gatherings and it is haraam to visit such websites, except for one who will object to what they do and is able to put a stop to these offences. If he is not able to do that, and those people carry on with what they are doing, then it is not permissible to remain in that gathering and it is not permissible to visit those websites.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Too bad there is no such thing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Islam

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That is Subjective. Go away adults are talking.....

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Sunni, Shiite or Sufi? Is it moral to have slaves, have sex with underage children or murder someone because he made a joke? Because the hadiths and the quran support such actions.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Religion is immoral.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    All ethic is man-made. Morality itself is intersubjektive and social-dependent.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Objective morality could be a great thing if it existed.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ok great. Now prove Islam isn't man made.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Morality doesnt exist. It is just a useful tool to facilitate social order. What we call morality are just intuitions we intrinsically posses and there is nothing objective about that. You dont consult the bible or your prefered system of philosophy in order to figure out if diddling kids is bad. You feel intuitively diddling kids is bad and try to use the bible to justify your intuition in a post hoc way.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    what makes an act intrinsically moral or immoral? do tell

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *