Vista was peak comfy objectively (I got nostaliga for 2000 tho), I wish that they could just make an option to reverse the UI (I think win 7 or vista had that)
They aren't even part of Mozilla anymore, they're their own thing and Mozilla disavowed and defunded Thunderbird development
Following enrich-the-ceo tannyzilla after that is fucking retarded, they might be the same kind of people but there's barely anything tying them nowadays
>https://thunderbird.topicbox.com/groups/planning/T78a50846b554d0b4/new-thunderbird-new-logo
https://twitter.com/ryanleesipes
https://github.com/ryanleesipes
so this guy ruined the logo?
this one would have been better
https://twitter.com/ryanleesipes/status/1550553875823730689/photo/1
Why do you give a shit? Modern, minimalist design is what's trendy. At least for large companies who are always 5 years behind - nvm that many people are already sick of it, even in the mainstream. But a logo is just a fucking logo. It can be a cock and balls for all I care as long as it doesn't get pozzed with bloated features like most software. Thunderbird is fine. Also, most of LULZ, being contrarian as they are, will tell you they use some other garbage.
>Ohh, I have a job/grow up -> outlook >The only concern I have in my mom's basement is privacy for some reason -> proton >I'm so unique -> squirrel mail
>it's only at 102 version right now.
yep >wtf why do they skip a bunch of numbers?
they use and follow firefox esr versioning and codebase
afterall thunderbird is just a extrememly slimmed down version of firefox esr
No, they're just standard rapid monthly releases.
Also, that trend is cancer. Software should be released with truly new features, and developed for as long as it takes until it's ready, like old macos.
In browsers' case, like Netscape and old mozilla, which went 1-3 in like 5 years as opposed to today where we are up to 120.
No, they're proper beta/nightly releases both in name and in practice. Try using Thunderbird 107 right now and you'll notice that a lot of shit's just straight up broken.
And there's nothing wrong with this scheme. It's literally just a number going up.
I bet whoever made this thought they were smart
but they forgot the part where no one uses their mail client for "chatting" (especially with how long it takes just to launch)
Why? Just why? Why do tech companies or their "share holders" feel the need to force change no matter what?
What's wrong with the old logo? It's got a bird and it's got an envelope its pretty distinct. Now it looks like two colors of playdough smashed together. Why change it were people complaining about the logo, did it look like another program?
Wow they got around to trannifying it. Not updating.
>Dicks are on my mind all day every day
Only true homosexuals are like this
Shut up troon
soul
soulless
they sucked all the soul out of it leaving an hollow vessel
trannies will be the death of tech
why do software logos get worse as time goes on? this one was perfectly fine, it's just change for the sake of change.
The ~~*investors*~~ want something heckin modern.
Ironically, the 1.0 windows image would be peak minimalistic logo right now. If they went back to that, designers would cream their pants.
95 was so good
It's ironic cause it depicts a tiling window manager
NO you fucking linux troon
no
forgive him anon, he hasnt seen one in a long time
Wasn't it originally a tiling window manager?
I never understood any of windows logos. At least the latest one looks like a window
For me it's Vista
Vista was peak comfy objectively (I got nostaliga for 2000 tho), I wish that they could just make an option to reverse the UI (I think win 7 or vista had that)
>logo for Windows
>it's clearly a door
logo changes as design paradigms change. its not hard to understand anon. try to keep up and stop making these inane posts.
heh
Looks like a goatse to me
t. 2007 newfag
Some of those versions need to be shifted up. XP was when the ditched the large black borders for the more 3d-looking one
>bird trying to suck its own dick
Thematically appropriate for Pozilla
They aren't even part of Mozilla anymore, they're their own thing and Mozilla disavowed and defunded Thunderbird development
Following enrich-the-ceo tannyzilla after that is fucking retarded, they might be the same kind of people but there's barely anything tying them nowadays
It looks like it's holding an weird egg.
looks like a text bubble, i assume that's what they were going for
I like the new logo, but the actual interface still looks like shit
Now it is very similar to the Firecuck logo.
>abandons thunderbird
>makes community fix it
>takes it back and changes logo
wew
it's basically the ff logo flipped
not even flipped
anon that logo is flipped
how is it flipped?
in the firefox logo, the tail on the left is more pronounced, in the thunderbird logo the head on the right is more pronounced
bro...
bro..
That's some mandela effect shit anon.
what the absolute fuck, I swear it was the other way
GET OUT OF MY HEAD
more CERN fake news
stop gaslighting the thread
WHAT THE FUCK
your firefox logo is backwards lmmao
gigatroll
i sent an email to these naggers using a cockmail account and they permanently ip banned me from their website.
are you retarded? The image you replied to is flipped from the original
Maybe they want to make it more clear that thunderbird is the part of mozilla
original Mozilla needed more than ever and is fumbling ball so badly
On purpose too, the google contract makes them do this. The bitch CEO that rewards herself with millions of dollars is bad too.
all their logos are now homosexual animals sucking their own dicks
the west has fallen
Looks retarded
>https://thunderbird.topicbox.com/groups/planning/T78a50846b554d0b4/new-thunderbird-new-logo
https://twitter.com/ryanleesipes
https://github.com/ryanleesipes
so this guy ruined the logo?
this one would have been better
https://twitter.com/ryanleesipes/status/1550553875823730689/photo/1
make it look like the pre 2019 firefox logo instead of the current one
i like it
I like it slightly better than the old one
Where did the soul go?
FUCK
Why do you give a shit? Modern, minimalist design is what's trendy. At least for large companies who are always 5 years behind - nvm that many people are already sick of it, even in the mainstream. But a logo is just a fucking logo. It can be a cock and balls for all I care as long as it doesn't get pozzed with bloated features like most software. Thunderbird is fine. Also, most of LULZ, being contrarian as they are, will tell you they use some other garbage.
>Ohh, I have a job/grow up -> outlook
>The only concern I have in my mom's basement is privacy for some reason -> proton
>I'm so unique -> squirrel mail
Personally, I prefer Claws Mail.
But it lacks calendar and doesn't sync with my Baikal, so I use Thunderbird for Exchange at work.
>Claws
How does it handle HTML in email? I get a lot of that from my clients.
not my problem
the interface is also changing in july update(115 version)
it's only at 102 version right now.
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/releases/
wtf why do they skip a bunch of numbers?
>it's only at 102 version right now.
yep
>wtf why do they skip a bunch of numbers?
they use and follow firefox esr versioning and codebase
afterall thunderbird is just a extrememly slimmed down version of firefox esr
The missing numbers are beta/nightly releases
No, they're just standard rapid monthly releases.
Also, that trend is cancer. Software should be released with truly new features, and developed for as long as it takes until it's ready, like old macos.
In browsers' case, like Netscape and old mozilla, which went 1-3 in like 5 years as opposed to today where we are up to 120.
No, they're proper beta/nightly releases both in name and in practice. Try using Thunderbird 107 right now and you'll notice that a lot of shit's just straight up broken.
And there's nothing wrong with this scheme. It's literally just a number going up.
Did they finally fix the UI locking up when downloading e-mails? It would be a decent Outlook clone if not for annoying bugs like those.
what about this one
SEXO
SOVL VS SOULLESS
Don't care much for TB
But Firefox logo should be reverted back to 2005-2009
my bad, had the thumbnail
any of them are better than 2017+
firefox aurora was my favorite icon
2004-2005>>2013-2017>else
>starts off as a bad ass bird full of fire
>becomes furry masturbation material with downs syndrome
Where did it all go wrong?
You masturbate to minimalist drawings of foxes?
Nothing else gets me off anymore.
2017-2019 is perfect. Logo is clean and the fox is still recognizable. Also the only one with a big tail
Icon get worse everytime
Wrong
Right
>monitor resolution increases
>icons get simpler
when we get computers hooked up to the optical nerves, the logo wil be a blue circle with an orange outline on the bottom half.
This is the best Firefox logo and you can't prove otherwise.
what about this?
Tumblr-tier
10x better
perfect to confuse you even more with Firefox
designers are absolutely USELESS
looks sinister as fuck
left looks like a friendly bird bringing you a letter
right looks like a demon bird guarding a message
>a demon bird guarding a message
which is funny because it stores mails unencrypted in its profile folder
so do email servers
why is it angry, what did I do
You have 2000 unread emails that's what you did
trannys only know anger since they're mentally ill.
I don't get thunderbird, what do people use it for, any other email application does the job as well
Thunderbird is just another mail program.
>Thunderbird
that's not even fucking birb it's fucking ugly
I never liked original logo, the bird looks like just died. New one looks fine.
I just noticed the speech bubble around the message
the design is clever but retards immediately go for "SOUL vs SOULESS"
clever is no substitute for good design, retard
I bet whoever made this thought they were smart
but they forgot the part where no one uses their mail client for "chatting" (especially with how long it takes just to launch)
not a huge fan but I like that it's similar to firefox and also this
based
thunderbird has built in https://matrix.org support too
yeah that's cool
And they COULDN'T keep the little paw in Firefox's logo? Give it baaack you fucking troooons!
>Thunderbird
>Mozilla changes logo
>Doesn't change color from blue to yellow
Should call it "Waterbird"
Storm clouds are loaded with blue rain.
In fact, they should be combined.
WHY?????
WHY DOES IT HAVE TAIL LIKE FIREFOX?!
This has to be a parody.
Birds have tails.
Whoops, rain is transparent. Regardless, in fantasy there's a depiction of it being blue.
who the fuck looks at logos for software? don't tell me you guys have to click on those desktop shortcuts. take the WM pill
>Take the CringeManager pill
No.
I appreciate the "kinship" the new logo shares with the current Firefox logo.
I like it.
is thunderbird good
>THUNDERbird
>it's blue
Make it yellow or green you fucking homosexuals.
I like the old more but the new one is fine. Not that the logo matters all that much
Thunderbird for Android fucking when?
Is it actually smart to use an E-Mail client like Thunderbird?
I only ever used webmail. Not even a zoomer.
yes, especially if you have multiple accounts to check.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-9_Mail
it is on f droid etc for years
just noticed google authenticator changed its icon drastically
From a vault handle to a multicolored asterisk?
I assume I'm missing something with the new one.
i think its supposed to be the pinwheel handle that vaults have, but now in google rainbow color. still retarded though
Password:******
Who the fuck cares
Another oversimplified shit, much minimalism my ass
k
I don't care about the logo I can change it at will
Not bad, honestly. It look a little bit cartoon-ish, but all in all, I enjoyed.
What was wrong with the old logo? The newer one looks like a downgrade.
>What was wrong with the old logo?
its good and established/recognizable
give me back perfection, you mozilla fucks
Looks like I'm not updating this shit even moreso. Poor birbie...
Instead of delivering the message now the bird in consuming it.
Reminds me of the mask gate from mario 2.
Why? Just why? Why do tech companies or their "share holders" feel the need to force change no matter what?
What's wrong with the old logo? It's got a bird and it's got an envelope its pretty distinct. Now it looks like two colors of playdough smashed together. Why change it were people complaining about the logo, did it look like another program?
>New Thunderbird logo
It is all about the wrapping; never about the contents.
That is why we have BetterBird.
bruh, globohomo got it.
Anything to keep the "I'll make the logo" guys employed.
fuck mazilla.
It’s bad, but it’s just a logo. Not a big deal
>using email in 2013+10
It's terrible
AI could've done better. Designers are scammers.