Literally the entire cosmos is connected by chains of causality that are an infinite number of order of magnitude more vast in scope and minute intricacy than you will ever be remotely capable of comprehending, and you don't believe in, what, exactly? Profundity? You don't think there is a realm of consciousness that is "intelligible" but nevertheless so remote and beyond the scope of man that we will never understand it? How is a cosmos that is (10 x 90019001) more intelligent and complex than the upper limit of human reasoning any discernibly different from a universe under control of a god or gods?
>Literally the entire cosmos is connected by chains of causality that are an infinite number of order of magnitude more vast in scope and minute intricacy than you will ever be remotely capable of comprehending, and you don't believe in, what, exactly? Profundity? You don't think there is a realm of consciousness that is "intelligible" but nevertheless so remote and beyond the scope of man that we will never understand it? How is a cosmos that is (10 x 90019001) more intelligent and complex than the upper limit of human reasoning any discernibly different from a universe under control of a god or gods?
Δ: Solid Snake Beater / Delta Green / Cobra Unit: The Satisfaction
if you don't think there is spirit, soul, magic or a higher power, that's fine. Maybe you're perceptive and intelligent but get off on an unwillingness to properly understand what people are referring to when they speak of those things. I've known a lot of people like that. I don't really care what you or anyone believes, I'm more concerned with concrete knowledge.
exactly because of what you're writing there I refuse to reduce such a massive mystery to some fucking dumb system of magical thinking
>I admit that the truth is stranger than fiction >refer to /x/ as fiction
you're blind. Some people get off on being reductively atheistic. If you're constantly posed against retardedly theistic or superstitious people, more often than you have to deal with dead-eyed, empty-souled materialist rationalists who are blind and congenitally or culturally numbed to the subjects of the mysteries. then maybe it's the right orientation for you. I wasn't raised in a theistic environment and I more frequently have to content with the latter category so I tend to lean toward a mysterian/mystical rhetorical stance
Make her read the scholarly literature on NDEs. As one NDE researcher said that he does not know anyone who has read the literature on NDEs who has not been convinced by it. Indeed, NDEs are irrefutable proof of life after death, because anyone can have them if they come close to and survive death. And they are so undeniably real to those who have them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U00ibBGZp7o
As this NDEr described their NDE:
>"I saw how life never ends. I remembered the process of reincarnation is endless, wonderful and truly eternal. I witnessed my own spiritual evolution and saw that I had existed long before this present incarnation (where I am now a male human). For me, watching the process of living life, after life, after life unfold, was mind-blowing! I undeniably observed that I had lived an innumerable amount of lives. My NDE clearly showed me that these bodies (we now inhabit) are not the first and only time we have existed! I saw that our soul and spirit is ancient! I also observed that there is no such thing as death."
And importantly, even dogmatic skeptics have this reaction, because the NDE convinces everyone:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mysteries-consciousness/202204/does-afterlife-obviously-exist
So anyone would be convinced if they had an NDE, we already know this, no one's skepticism is unique. And the book in pic related is known to convince even hardened skeptics that there is an afterlife.
>muh brain chemistry
Neuroscientists are convinced by NDEs too. What do skeptics think they understand that neuroscientists do not?
>muh DMT causes it
Scientifically refuted already, and NDErs who have done DMT too say that the DMT experience, while alien and really cool and fun, was still underwhelming to the point of being a joke when compared to the NDE.
Δ: Solid Snake Beater / Delta Green / Cobra Unit: The Satisfaction
I'm not an atheist but I genuinely do not understand how a uniform NDE-style experience across different individuals and cultures does anything to demonstrate that the NDE is an experience of life after death. The way I see it, it is perfectly plausible that an illusion of afterlife, experienced during NDE's, would be evolutionarily adapted for our group-selected, cooperative species, when people who come back from a near-death physiological episode verbalize their pleasant experiences it boosts the wellbeing of the people around them insomuch as they believe the anecdotes of the NDE experiencer. I've done acid, shrooms, and other more harmful kinds of psychedelic drugs and the experiences I had on those drugs at age 14 and onward, generally during the prime of my health. we almost indistinguishable from the details reported by NDE testimonies
If u force ur beliefs on her and especially in a condescending way she will break up with you. If you need your girlfriend to believe then find a different one. Alternative to this is just telling her little tidbits like tiny lil sentences with info every once in a while. It’s helpful if you make it sound cool or make jokes about it to pique her interest. If she doesn’t ask by the 2 month mark about it, she’s not interested and probably never will be.
Curse her with all you can, Sorath, Zazel, Belial, Bartzabel.
Also kill yourself after normalfag
Lsd
dunno, I don't believe either, you can practice on me
Literally the entire cosmos is connected by chains of causality that are an infinite number of order of magnitude more vast in scope and minute intricacy than you will ever be remotely capable of comprehending, and you don't believe in, what, exactly? Profundity? You don't think there is a realm of consciousness that is "intelligible" but nevertheless so remote and beyond the scope of man that we will never understand it? How is a cosmos that is (10 x 90019001) more intelligent and complex than the upper limit of human reasoning any discernibly different from a universe under control of a god or gods?
>(10 x 90019001)
superscript don't work here, read that s (10x9001^9001)
>Literally the entire cosmos is connected by chains of causality that are an infinite number of order of magnitude more vast in scope and minute intricacy than you will ever be remotely capable of comprehending, and you don't believe in, what, exactly? Profundity? You don't think there is a realm of consciousness that is "intelligible" but nevertheless so remote and beyond the scope of man that we will never understand it? How is a cosmos that is (10 x 90019001) more intelligent and complex than the upper limit of human reasoning any discernibly different from a universe under control of a god or gods?
>t. pseud
if you don't think there is spirit, soul, magic or a higher power, that's fine. Maybe you're perceptive and intelligent but get off on an unwillingness to properly understand what people are referring to when they speak of those things. I've known a lot of people like that. I don't really care what you or anyone believes, I'm more concerned with concrete knowledge.
>I admit that the truth is stranger than fiction
>refer to /x/ as fiction
you're blind. Some people get off on being reductively atheistic. If you're constantly posed against retardedly theistic or superstitious people, more often than you have to deal with dead-eyed, empty-souled materialist rationalists who are blind and congenitally or culturally numbed to the subjects of the mysteries. then maybe it's the right orientation for you. I wasn't raised in a theistic environment and I more frequently have to content with the latter category so I tend to lean toward a mysterian/mystical rhetorical stance
fine
exactly because of what you're writing there I refuse to reduce such a massive mystery to some fucking dumb system of magical thinking
Kill yourself and come back as a ghost, I guess.
But don't be surprised if you see me with her working some pottery.
Make her read the scholarly literature on NDEs. As one NDE researcher said that he does not know anyone who has read the literature on NDEs who has not been convinced by it. Indeed, NDEs are irrefutable proof of life after death, because anyone can have them if they come close to and survive death. And they are so undeniably real to those who have them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U00ibBGZp7o
As this NDEr described their NDE:
>"I saw how life never ends. I remembered the process of reincarnation is endless, wonderful and truly eternal. I witnessed my own spiritual evolution and saw that I had existed long before this present incarnation (where I am now a male human). For me, watching the process of living life, after life, after life unfold, was mind-blowing! I undeniably observed that I had lived an innumerable amount of lives. My NDE clearly showed me that these bodies (we now inhabit) are not the first and only time we have existed! I saw that our soul and spirit is ancient! I also observed that there is no such thing as death."
And importantly, even dogmatic skeptics have this reaction, because the NDE convinces everyone:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mysteries-consciousness/202204/does-afterlife-obviously-exist
So anyone would be convinced if they had an NDE, we already know this, no one's skepticism is unique. And the book in pic related is known to convince even hardened skeptics that there is an afterlife.
>muh brain chemistry
Neuroscientists are convinced by NDEs too. What do skeptics think they understand that neuroscientists do not?
>muh DMT causes it
Scientifically refuted already, and NDErs who have done DMT too say that the DMT experience, while alien and really cool and fun, was still underwhelming to the point of being a joke when compared to the NDE.
Genuinely wish for someone to murder this homosexual.
>Neuroscientists are convinced by NDEs too.
No they arent.
I'm not an atheist but I genuinely do not understand how a uniform NDE-style experience across different individuals and cultures does anything to demonstrate that the NDE is an experience of life after death. The way I see it, it is perfectly plausible that an illusion of afterlife, experienced during NDE's, would be evolutionarily adapted for our group-selected, cooperative species, when people who come back from a near-death physiological episode verbalize their pleasant experiences it boosts the wellbeing of the people around them insomuch as they believe the anecdotes of the NDE experiencer. I've done acid, shrooms, and other more harmful kinds of psychedelic drugs and the experiences I had on those drugs at age 14 and onward, generally during the prime of my health. we almost indistinguishable from the details reported by NDE testimonies
Does your gf believe in the spiritual extraordinary?
Some us experience it often so it becomes plain. Others experience it rarely.
If u force ur beliefs on her and especially in a condescending way she will break up with you. If you need your girlfriend to believe then find a different one. Alternative to this is just telling her little tidbits like tiny lil sentences with info every once in a while. It’s helpful if you make it sound cool or make jokes about it to pique her interest. If she doesn’t ask by the 2 month mark about it, she’s not interested and probably never will be.
I like your tree OP.
I don't think you should force it, she'll likely find it herself someway or another.
Bring her to me and let her spend one night here.
Be spiritual cool instead of spiritual plain.
bump
You hypnotize her into believing it.
beat her ass