Nice revisionism, homiepologist
Slaves in Africa were literal property
That's the reason they were traded to Europeans in exchange for guns and booze
It's also the reason why they sometimes were used as fodder for human sacrifices
2 years ago
Anonymous
Cope.
“Upon slavery Mr Robins remarked that it was not what people in England thought it to be. It means, as continually found in this part of Africa, belonging to a family group-there is no compulsory labour, the owner and the slave work together, eat like food, wear like clothing and sleep in the same huts. Some slaves have more wives than their masters. It gives protection to the slaves and everything necessary for their subsistence - food and clothing. A free man is worse off than a slave; he cannot claim his food from anyone.”
2 years ago
Anonymous
No one cares about "Mr Robins"'s anecdotal view on a culture he doesnt even understand
Fact: Slaves in Africa were raped, killed on a whim, sacrificed to local deities and sold to European merchants for cheap goods
Us as in FBA/ADOS and diaspora Blacks. Like read the room bruh who else do think?
Nice revisionism, homiepologist
Slaves in Africa were literal property
That's the reason they were traded to Europeans in exchange for guns and booze
It's also the reason why they sometimes were used as fodder for human sacrifices
No one cares about "Mr Robins"'s anecdotal view on a culture he doesnt even understand
Fact: Slaves in Africa were raped, killed on a whim, sacrificed to local deities and sold to European merchants for cheap goods
Cope not all Slavery in Africa is the same some bush monkies treated themselves and others badly other greater Empires and small kingdoms/chieftians didn't same like how Arab slavery in other places were on par of American slavery and other places better.
There's no general sameness just cause you brush off Africa with one stroke.
And love how you disregard one white person or other white people and Arabs anecdotal view of Black slavery or African empires when it doesn't fit your world/racial view yet you'll accept the usual fake anecdotal views and works from whites like "Blacks in Blackland" or the copy spam Arab quotes of Blacks(who didn't even visited said lands) as gospel.
Are you gonna disregard earlier white views on Irish people during the 17th century earlier by White slavers themselves cause it goes counter to your white narrative?
>blacks
>Not moronic hypocrites
Remind me again who sold blacks into slavery for beads again
seems like blacks were perfectly assimilated into the southern culture
Yeah, because the culture they original came from totally didn't have slavery, right?
African “slavery” was serfdom
Not being literal property
Nice revisionism, homiepologist
Slaves in Africa were literal property
That's the reason they were traded to Europeans in exchange for guns and booze
It's also the reason why they sometimes were used as fodder for human sacrifices
Cope.
“Upon slavery Mr Robins remarked that it was not what people in England thought it to be. It means, as continually found in this part of Africa, belonging to a family group-there is no compulsory labour, the owner and the slave work together, eat like food, wear like clothing and sleep in the same huts. Some slaves have more wives than their masters. It gives protection to the slaves and everything necessary for their subsistence - food and clothing. A free man is worse off than a slave; he cannot claim his food from anyone.”
No one cares about "Mr Robins"'s anecdotal view on a culture he doesnt even understand
Fact: Slaves in Africa were raped, killed on a whim, sacrificed to local deities and sold to European merchants for cheap goods
>African “slavery” was serfdom
ahahahahaha
What's next, you posting a thread in surprise when you realize blacks don't want equality at all, but to be in a dominant position?
shut your white ass up
>ayo hol up bix nood
speak american Black person
Telling white people to shut up is peak American culture. Now shut up and check your privilege.
Dispute OP with facts, homosexual. Americo-Liberians were elitist racists.
/thread
He unironically did.
Cope those natives deserve it and was better off, they were gonna do it to us anyway.
What do you mean by "us?"
Us as in FBA/ADOS and diaspora Blacks. Like read the room bruh who else do think?
Cope not all Slavery in Africa is the same some bush monkies treated themselves and others badly other greater Empires and small kingdoms/chieftians didn't same like how Arab slavery in other places were on par of American slavery and other places better.
There's no general sameness just cause you brush off Africa with one stroke.
And love how you disregard one white person or other white people and Arabs anecdotal view of Black slavery or African empires when it doesn't fit your world/racial view yet you'll accept the usual fake anecdotal views and works from whites like "Blacks in Blackland" or the copy spam Arab quotes of Blacks(who didn't even visited said lands) as gospel.
Are you gonna disregard earlier white views on Irish people during the 17th century earlier by White slavers themselves cause it goes counter to your white narrative?