>Oh no you can't/won't.
Stop being a retarded fanboy
The original repo is at >https://github.com/plummerssoftwarellc/Primes/tree/original
It's full of inconsistent implementations with some langs getting favourable attentions and others abandonded. It went to the extent of having console I/O in some benchmarked code.
It's even pozzed at the timing part where it uses the popular API of the lang (which obviously has differences from lang to lang) for measuring time instead of using /bin/time to remove timing code that might ruin caching and favourable code alignment.
>It's even pozzed at the timing part where it uses the popular API of the lang (which obviously has differences from lang to lang)
Almost as if he's testing for performance differences between languages.
By writing optimized code for some and retarded code with I/O for others. Even using vector<bool> lol.
Why is it that most benchmark tards can't into benchmarks? Stay brainlet, fanboy.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Why is it that most benchmark tards can't into benchmarks? Stay brainlet, fanboy.
I legitimately don't understand the process here, dude.
>testing for performance differences between languages.
if your timing function is part of the language then you don't have a consistent basis to compare. those functions are for testing multiple implementations within the same language, not for comparing to other languages.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Okay so the testing was done "accurately" but wasn't framed properly.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>the testing was done "accurately"
not really. he should've used an external timer like
said, because otherwise the benchmark of the language includes the loss involved with the timing library. two languages which would be extremely close could be shown with a larger disparity simply because of the way timing was implemented for the language.
this also doesn't touch on the fact that his implementations weren't really equally well-designed and so aren't truly comparable in the first place. essentially the entire benchmark is unreliable because there are too many confounding variables impacting the performance.
>It's even pozzed at the timing part where it uses the popular API of the lang (which obviously has differences from lang to lang) for measuring time instead of using /bin/time to remove timing code that might ruin caching and favourable code alignment
do you genuinely have autism? It's a benchmark for a 10 minute youtube video, not the IEEE.
>make shitload of claims and promise dozens of impls >write shit code >share thoughts build on invalid results >get popular because of codelets >hundreds of people so pissed off that they rewrote his garbage code hundreds of times and all were faster >lots of pajeets praising the jvm sir in comments >i-it's not supposed to be a proper benchrmark
too much backpeddling chud.
The one that's been meme'd on since before LULZ existed? The one that alternates between "Done in 30 seconds...7 weeks...5 hours....1 minute... ERROR: File Transfer Halted"
>He said Linux is insecure while Windows is secure.
For desktop distros OOTB, this is very true. It's easy enough to fix though.
Windows is more secure by default because it's a more valuable target and riddled with pajeetery.
He's not a MS shill as much as he is a corporate bootlicker. He uses a mac mini now and has 4 other macs for his family.
His video about "how to fix a slow PC shows this very well". >remove unused software
Literally does nothing, software that is not running does not matter. >Update OS & applications
Literally the opposite of what you should do. If you computer is slow now, but wasn't before, update bloat is a very likely cause. >Disable startup apps and services
Yeah that's what you should have done instead of #1, but even so it doesnt do much. >Defrag
irrelevant >Cleaning with windirstat
Certainly a good idea, but doesn't help speed anything up unless disk is full.
The actual answer is: >Reinstall windows (of the old version you used before), it gets slow and buggy after a couple years. There is no way around this when it happens. >Downgrade software versions to the old versions that ran well
This fixes it 100% of the time.
If it's slow when watching youtube, install an extension so it uses h264 again and not AV1 which is CPU-decoded. But in the case that the software you use cannot be downgraded, because it's javascript on a webpage, you have been hit by planned obsolescence and there's nothing you can do, the garden gnomes got your money now unless you step away from the botnet.
>Literally does nothing, software that is not running does not matter.
unused != not running homosexual >If you computer is slow now, but wasn't before, update bloat is a very likely cause.
kys if you think this thanks >disable apps but even so it doesn't do much.
nothing does much. What are you complaining about? It works. >defrag irrelevant
only if you have an SSD chud
>Reinstall windows (of the old version you used before), it gets slow and buggy after a couple years. There is no way around this when it happens. >Downgrade software versions to the old versions that ran well
No shit. Not a practical option for everyone. Eat shit.
Dave Plummer did nothing wrong
What's with all the LULZ hit pieces on Dave since he announced he voting republican?
I've seen his prime number benchmarks and they are all hilariously trash.
His work on the file transfer dialogue box is fuckin legendary. Troonix has nothing on it.
Care to go into detail anon? Oh no you can't/won't.
His Python implementation was laughable but only because he didn't know the syntax.
>Oh no you can't/won't.
Stop being a retarded fanboy
The original repo is at
>https://github.com/plummerssoftwarellc/Primes/tree/original
It's full of inconsistent implementations with some langs getting favourable attentions and others abandonded. It went to the extent of having console I/O in some benchmarked code.
It's even pozzed at the timing part where it uses the popular API of the lang (which obviously has differences from lang to lang) for measuring time instead of using /bin/time to remove timing code that might ruin caching and favourable code alignment.
>It's even pozzed at the timing part where it uses the popular API of the lang (which obviously has differences from lang to lang)
Almost as if he's testing for performance differences between languages.
By writing optimized code for some and retarded code with I/O for others. Even using vector<bool> lol.
Why is it that most benchmark tards can't into benchmarks? Stay brainlet, fanboy.
>Why is it that most benchmark tards can't into benchmarks? Stay brainlet, fanboy.
I legitimately don't understand the process here, dude.
>testing for performance differences between languages.
if your timing function is part of the language then you don't have a consistent basis to compare. those functions are for testing multiple implementations within the same language, not for comparing to other languages.
Okay so the testing was done "accurately" but wasn't framed properly.
>the testing was done "accurately"
not really. he should've used an external timer like
said, because otherwise the benchmark of the language includes the loss involved with the timing library. two languages which would be extremely close could be shown with a larger disparity simply because of the way timing was implemented for the language.
this also doesn't touch on the fact that his implementations weren't really equally well-designed and so aren't truly comparable in the first place. essentially the entire benchmark is unreliable because there are too many confounding variables impacting the performance.
>It's even pozzed at the timing part where it uses the popular API of the lang (which obviously has differences from lang to lang) for measuring time instead of using /bin/time to remove timing code that might ruin caching and favourable code alignment
do you genuinely have autism? It's a benchmark for a 10 minute youtube video, not the IEEE.
>make shitload of claims and promise dozens of impls
>write shit code
>share thoughts build on invalid results
>get popular because of codelets
>hundreds of people so pissed off that they rewrote his garbage code hundreds of times and all were faster
>lots of pajeets praising the jvm sir in comments
>i-it's not supposed to be a proper benchrmark
too much backpeddling chud.
>he voting republican
Based, buying my windows 11 pro license at full msrp right now
>since he announced he voting republican
only an amerimutt would even think anyone cares
He said Linux is insecure while Windows is secure.
The one that's been meme'd on since before LULZ existed? The one that alternates between "Done in 30 seconds...7 weeks...5 hours....1 minute... ERROR: File Transfer Halted"
>He said Linux is insecure while Windows is secure.
Funny I feel that way too
Funny you're both retarded
>Funny your both retarded
You’re* lmao
i'm stealing that one
> He said Linux is insecure while Windows is secure.
He didn’t that. It’s true though.
Works on my machine. Try a modern Aarch64 system instead of your 8008 derived boatcores
>He said Linux is insecure while Windows is secure.
For desktop distros OOTB, this is very true. It's easy enough to fix though.
Windows is more secure by default because it's a more valuable target and riddled with pajeetery.
He's right windows secured him a job.
All the Plummer hate makes me want to be a Microsoft fanboy.
Leave him alone, he's on the spectrum!
I liked this video
I'm autistic and I'm a millionaire. Now look at me shill for Windows spyware. Microsoft is very based and friendly. Send us your data.
Didn't this retard claim Microsoft doesn't have backdoors?
we don't
they don't*
The design of the OS itself breeds backdoors. Everything potentially talks to each other.
Of course we have backdoors. That’s how I get in if I cycle to work.
Omega kek
[log in to view media]
You look like this and you say this
The day freetards got told
The fact this retard even has an audience shows how most people are just a waste of oxygen.
He's not a MS shill as much as he is a corporate bootlicker. He uses a mac mini now and has 4 other macs for his family.
His video about "how to fix a slow PC shows this very well".
>remove unused software
Literally does nothing, software that is not running does not matter.
>Update OS & applications
Literally the opposite of what you should do. If you computer is slow now, but wasn't before, update bloat is a very likely cause.
>Disable startup apps and services
Yeah that's what you should have done instead of #1, but even so it doesnt do much.
>Defrag
irrelevant
>Cleaning with windirstat
Certainly a good idea, but doesn't help speed anything up unless disk is full.
The actual answer is:
>Reinstall windows (of the old version you used before), it gets slow and buggy after a couple years. There is no way around this when it happens.
>Downgrade software versions to the old versions that ran well
This fixes it 100% of the time.
If it's slow when watching youtube, install an extension so it uses h264 again and not AV1 which is CPU-decoded. But in the case that the software you use cannot be downgraded, because it's javascript on a webpage, you have been hit by planned obsolescence and there's nothing you can do, the garden gnomes got your money now unless you step away from the botnet.
>Literally does nothing, software that is not running does not matter.
unused != not running homosexual
>If you computer is slow now, but wasn't before, update bloat is a very likely cause.
kys if you think this thanks
>disable apps but even so it doesn't do much.
nothing does much. What are you complaining about? It works.
>defrag irrelevant
only if you have an SSD chud
>Reinstall windows (of the old version you used before), it gets slow and buggy after a couple years. There is no way around this when it happens.
>Downgrade software versions to the old versions that ran well
No shit. Not a practical option for everyone. Eat shit.
- Dave