Men and women are equa

ACK!
What are the political implications of 40% of women failing a basic spatial awareness problem?
https://steemit.com/steemstem/@alexander.alexis/the-70-year-cognitive-puzzle-that-still-divides-the-sexes

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The problem at hand

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The answer

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Fricking moron

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        hollow earth wins again

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe neurogenesis.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Hollow earth
          there'd be more mass above you until you float into the center where you'd get stuck

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            die

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yes, this explains why I drop a iron weight on my lawn it sinks down 300 feet. thanks, homosexual.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            at least you can drill for honey.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The frick is this? The water isn’t even level for the flat earther

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          He's a 181 degree earther.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Water always finds its level. You can't bend water.

        The fricker talks about gravity like it's real? Its Not!

        And dont get me on the surfactant deal. I designed and helped build performance aluminum auto radiators. So I know about all the bullshit and additives etc...

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >gased for wasted get
        for flat'tards the water is all around outside

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, seems about right.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The water in that second bottle is not parallel to the first bottle, so that isn’t the answer. It is close to and estimated answer, but not there yet.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's no water if you freeze it, then it's ice.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Water is a liquid

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nope. Water can be vapor, liquid, or solid.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >steam
            >water
            >ice

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Water vapor, water, frozen water. Its still water despite a phase change.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            gas H2O is steam
            liquid H2O is water
            solid H2O is ice
            Its still H2O despite the phase change

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            H20 IS STILL H20 IN SOLID OR LIQUID FORM, moron.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Kek. Bless you stylus anon.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            she could be beautiful..

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I want her to step on me

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Its solid water b***h.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Then water is liquid steam, see the contextual madness you've unleashed?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't care about the semantics until you implied steam is a gas. Steam is water condensing on nuclei in the air until it evaporates again, it's actually a liquid. It's a gas before and after it's steam though, unless it runs into something cold.

            The cup is upside down. If you tilt it the water will spill out.

            I thought this was funny too, picrel

            Since we got a2 + b2 = c2 and we know a and b are the same we could maybe go a2 + b2 = 100. 50 + 50 = 100. So a = 7.07

            Lul pythagorean theorem only works with a right triangle.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah but isn't that what we got? 90 degrees at the center 45 at each line end

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            problems like this usually aren't drawn to scale, there's information from the question intentionally left out for luls. The information we have is that there's a 10m line inscribed inside the larger circle which is also tangent to the inner circle, and the inner circle is concentric to the larger one. 0<(radius of the inner circle)<infinity and 5<(radius of the outer circle)<infinity

            infinite solutions
            r_small^2 + 25 = r_big^2

            suppose the larger radius was arbitrarily large. You can always increase the smaller radius until the chord at the point of contact is 10m
            infinite solutions

            how do you find this?

            This assumes a right triangle and unmarked angles which is a lmao, those red 10m lines would also have to be tangent

            Steam is gaseous, it's the gaseous phase of H2O.
            It forming clouds in air due to condensation doesn't make a difference to this fact.

            Gotcha, I assumed what's visible was what steam was referring to

            Did you not see [...] ?
            Or are you going to be a homosexual and say the line is not quite exactly the diameter of the circle?

            again this is moronic because those 10m lines don't even touch the inner circle, should be a dead giveaway to a struggling 10th grader that the solution's wrong

            your assumption is incorrect,
            where the chord meets the larger circle, and u draw the perpenicular bisectors, you are not guaranteed that the resulating rectangle is a square

            it only apears that way on paper

            I hope for your sake this is bait

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >I hope for your sake this is bait
            read

            infinite solutions
            r_small^2 + 25 = r_big^2

            suppose the larger radius was arbitrarily large. You can always increase the smaller radius until the chord at the point of contact is 10m
            infinite solutions

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Steam is gaseous, it's the gaseous phase of H2O.
            It forming clouds in air due to condensation doesn't make a difference to this fact.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Horseshit, the only difference between water and ice is the temperature. The question does not specify the temperature, ice is perfeclty reasonable

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          H2O = H2O

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If you feeze the water then the volume expands, dipshit

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Unless it’s ice IX (ice 9)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >fails to illustrate expasion of ice

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Come on core.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This thread is so moronic that the dude who writes on his screenshots is the smartest guy in the thread

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          More interesting than the typical garbage here these days. I’m surprised the homosexual jannies haven’t trashed it yet. Quick, post some black wieners so we can keep the thread going.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I have sample of her handwriting now

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The problem is way more difficult than what they say. You would have to measure the dimensions of the container, and determine the volume available for the water to occupy in each configuration to determine the height of the line. They aren’t going to be at exactly the same height, because there is a different volume beneath the line at the tilt because the shape occupied by the water is different, there is more area for water to occupy say in the bottom 2 vertical inches of height in B than A, assuming the glass is cylindrical. Of course the line will be parallel with the surface of the table in any case, and anyone who doesn’t know that by the age of 5 should be culled, but that is another issue.

      Women is science is such a fricking farce it is beyond imagination.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The only accurate answer itt

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      What's the problem?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Globe Cope

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the only answer

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The water would be perfectly level, horizontal, straight, as always, to infinity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      am I moronic

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      t. law student

      Dumbasses

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    t. law student

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It shows.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >law student
      More like homosexual

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Oof

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      proof that female law students are almost male

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Water is not level
      Are you a flat earther?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Haha nice troll.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Are you an asian troony?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Brilliant. Did not see that coming.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Brilliant. Did not see that coming.
            Well of course, you're on the northern hemisphere, so it is below your horizon 🙂

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            touche fren.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          But thats exactly how it looks from space to an observer aligned with the poles.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          HAHAHAHA TOO TRUE.
          globeheads cant explain that one.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Anyone who thinks they know exactly how the Earth is setup is a disgrace to the Socratic method. Socrates was declared the wisest man in Greece by the Oracle of Delphi precisely because he knew that which he didn’t know.
        None of you clowns have any idea how the Earth is setup.
        While I don’t know what it means, it is amazing that the line on the shade line on the moon doesn’t move, not even a little bit. At least as we observe it.
        If the Money Power Empire financed model is correct, the Earth is spinning over 1k MPH, rotating around the sun, the moon is racing around the Earth (although its face never changes, the sun is moving rapidly through space, and despite all this rapid movement…. Not even a wiggle of that shadow line on the moon.
        You can’t hold a flashlight 3” from the wall without noticeable shake!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The real secret is that we live in a geocentric universe. Yes, it's a globe, but everything in the universe revolves around the Earth. Both the current academic model as well as flat earth are psyops to divert knowledge from this and it's implications.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If you are already willing to throw out everything they told you about the globe universe. Why still clinging to a ball? Why is it so abstract and difficult for people to let go of the ball? We can see the level nature of this earth realm, we can see dozens of miles disproving the official globe curve, and airplanes don't account for any curvature at all, they fly straight and level towards the horizon and they have to treat the earth as flat and non-rotating when operating their real world machinery. The horizon is always on your eye level, at all altitudes, 90° to the vertical, all around you 360°. The conclusion of these things is no mystery and nothing crazy at all. It's the geometric reality of an extended plane.
            https://ia802206.us.archive.org/28/items/16-emergency-landings-proving-flat-earth/16%20Emergency%20Landings%20Proving%20Flat%20Earth.pdf

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            behold, in the land of hegel, schoppenhauer, kant, nietzsche, heidegger, another genius flourishes

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >If you are already willing to throw out everything they told you about the globe universe. Why still clinging to a ball?
            Because I only care about the truth, not what's popular. The Earth is a globe, that's easy to prove. But it's also at the center of the universe, which is what the masonic gays in charge need to hide, so you think you're small and unimportant. The geocentric model is true, but the Earth is a globe.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            > airplanes don't account for any curvature at all
            They fly via air pressure. On a globe, they would automatically stay at a given height where air pressure is equal.
            The real airplane problem is north/south flying on a spinning globe.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Not a flat Earther, but IIRC they don't believe the Earth is spinning - it's the sun, moon, and stars that move.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The Earth is alleged to spin over 1000 MPH at the equator.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Eratosthenes estimated the earth's circumference within 16% of the correct figure
          flat earthers btfo by Pythagoreans over 2000 years ago

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable that people can be so stupid.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Idiot

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Really? Must be a low bar..

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Law schools are removing the LSAT as a requirement now because Black folk can’t complete the test

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      First off, "tilted" not "balanced on its edge." Second, the bottom of a glass is already heavier than the top because it's solid and the top is a literal fricking hole. Law students only good for sounding smart to 99 IQ morons?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Bruh

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Badge of honor for double moron answer.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If you were an engineer you would kill people.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just because you know law, doesn't meant you have a clue about maths. Unless you studied maths too...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus Christ, homie
      All your clients are going to go to the chair
      Even the ones who only stole a frozen chicken

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Males are superior in intelligence in every aspect compared to females

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >if men have more synapsis why do women have longer hair
      This is true. How is this possible

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The animals have no reason to make more connections and arent trimmed for a certain efficiancy.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They also lack the natural aggression.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      does that really work?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Post breasts

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          alright, just for you big boi

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nooooooooooo

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            What horror is this. Please tell me that is a filter.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Would. And so would (You).

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It do.
        T. M.A. in Mathematics

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          would be better to give an argument instead of appeal to authority, but basically it works if its a cylinder because each half is symmetrical right

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      get out, funwrecker

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Now do it for this one.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        My example only works in the first one because the volume under the red dot horizontal plane remains constant. It won't work for this one because the volume under the initial plane changes as you rotate - so it's not so simply demonstrable

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Some of the water spills over as you tilt it but not enough to equalize the levels

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          NO. JUST LIKE THE ORIGINAL EXAMPLE, THERE IS LESS VOLUME OF THE CONTAINER AVAILABLE FOR THE WATER, WHEN THE CONTAINER IS TILTER. THE WATER LEVEL WILL STILL RISE.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Unknowable without knowing if the visual representation is accurate or without being given specific dimensions and angles (i.e. have we passed the point of no return in where

            solution would no longer work)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Nice

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Not nice. Do it yourself with a bottle. The level will be lower in B.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is wrong you morons. I dont know why he thought water level would rise

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nvm I figured out why he thougt that. Cus the mesured the distance from the bottom of the glass instead of the bottom of the water kek

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      WRONG. THE WATER LEVEL GOES LOWER THE GREATER THE TILT.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong, it's a curve moron. The level initially goes higher then lower as the angle gets more extreme. You're still smarter than most of the morons in here though.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        only if the tilt is between 45 degrees and total spillage

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ACTUALLY YOU'RE RIGHT. I JUST TESTED IT WITH A BOTTLE OF WATER WITH A MEASURING DEVICE BEHIND IT.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Elegant solution. It works up to the bottom corner, then things get more complicated.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >posts a workable solution to demonstrate his proud midwittery
      Anon, I...

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I have a better one and 90% of /misc/ fails
    how long are the radiuses of circles

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You cropped out the question

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >A car drives the first mile fast enough to have driven 1 mile in 4 minutes. How fast must it go in the next mile to have traveled 2 miles in 4 minutes?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Cursed..

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Heya non, gonna need you to cool it with that image.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        45mph if one way, 35mph if round trip.

        >A car drives the first mile fast enough to have driven 1 mile in 4 minutes. How fast must it go in the next mile to have traveled 2 miles in 4 minutes?

        Infinite speed? It already traveled 4 minutes.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Are you moronic? You replied different answers for the same question

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I feel like this is a trick question.

        with 30 mph it will take 4 min to drive 2 mile

        with 15 mph it will take 4 min to drive 1 mile
        Already spent.

        Am I just too tired and I screwed up somewhere?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You got it correct. The 2nd mile has to be done instantly because you already used up all the time in the first mile

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nice.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yes it is a trick question, which is why it is famous. Back in Einstein’s day, people were almost as moronic as they are now. He probably asked this during presentations and at dinner parties to the plebs and they all thought it was super mind boggling and neato.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        45

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Wrong. See

          You got it correct. The 2nd mile has to be done instantly because you already used up all the time in the first mile

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            There is not timelimit moron.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        (15 + x ) ÷ 2 = 30
        X = 45

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The math is correct but this is a time problem, not a distance and rate problem.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Obviously Einstein and everybody here got this wrong.

        If the car has to do 30 miles an hour for the trip it will take 4 minutes for 2 miles.

        The first mile at 15mph takes 4 minutes, so that Einstein moron said it was not possible.

        Obviously after 4 minutes climbing up the hill at 15mph the car just needs to fall in a straight line for a mile down a cliff to average 30mph for 2 miles. I don't care if it takes 18 seconds for the car to hit bottom,

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        PARSE_ERROR

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The difference of their squares is 25m^2.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      R2 = SQRT(R1^2+25)
      R1 = SQRT(R2^2-25)

      That's as far as I got.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's a troll indeterminate question. Imagine shrinking the big circle and sliding the line down--still fits, with different circles.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Since we got a2 + b2 = c2 and we know a and b are the same we could maybe go a2 + b2 = 100. 50 + 50 = 100. So a = 7.07

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Only if it's a right triangle, and it's not.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I feel like some part of the question is missing.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            No, you just have to know the Pythagorean theorem.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            For Pythagoras to be applied here you have to know the length of at least two sides...you don't. You can't assume the middle radius is 5.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Did you not see

            ?
            Or are you going to be a homosexual and say the line is not quite exactly the diameter of the circle?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            It's not...that's what I'm saying, you can't give a definite solution unless you manually measure and even this you'd wanna do a better job than the shoddy fricking lines drawn. There's a mathematical proof I can link you on this question if you wish. You can't assume the inner circle has a radius of 5.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Damn. Intellectual degradation of Bongs are enormous.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Jesus christ you're a moron. I'm doing a masters in engineering at a top UK uni. I don't even know why I'm arguing with you fricking dopes about this.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You may be book smart, but you're an idiot. You just doxxed yourself to a Kremlin c**t.
            And despite what you think, they do still make attempts to frick up people internationally.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, Putin is personally paying me, so I can shitpost here and collect different information about some Bongs, to send them postcards with "From Russia with Love".

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Still good enough to whack your soviet era tanks into the fricking dirt LOL

            Guys, none of us have governments that give a shit about us or our families. We are cannon fodder and slave labor for them. No need to fight amongst ourselves. We are all serfs here.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Man will always have the reasons to conflict with each other.
            The true question is about some kind of a rules about the limitations of a such fights.
            And the true problem, I would say, that till the period of WW1 European countries had broke such limitations and different gentlemen agreements and start the uncontrollable brawl that's continuing upon this date.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Put Germans in every Monarchy
            >it goes to shit

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Future of the British infrastructure and machinery looks bright as hell.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Still good enough to whack your soviet era tanks into the fricking dirt LOL

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Unfortunately to you, British ATGMs are pieces of shit too. By common opinion of Russian and Ukrainian troops. Anyway, at least you still will have Rajesh to make basic calculations for you.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Built an empire on the Rajeshs

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >empire
            in which tense?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Technically, you had already built it.
            Cause British Empire was, partly, the Great Moghols Empire too.
            Still, I doubt that they will make it alone.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, well if they wanted to illustrate a more obscure mathematical concept, they would not have drawn the line so that it is exactly the diameter of the circle in the drawing to the tune of 99.9%. I understand that you probably have some legitimate math training and in testing they often use drawings that are not to scale in order to force you to use non-intuitive understanding and apply mathematical proofs, but I dont think that is the point here. I understand what you are saying though, and if you were building a bridge, you would probably need to measure to be sure that the line and the diameter of the circle are the same to an adequate margin of error.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah that's what I was originally saying, there's clearly something missing. The question might be asking you to literally measure the circles using the 10m measurement, and would tell you to assume everything is to scale. The people trying to apply trig here are simply not understanding that you don't have enough information to do that.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yes,

            Missing a value bro

            [...]
            This anon gets it

            [...]
            [...]
            [...]
            [...]
            Go back to gradeschool

            illustrates how the question should have been drawn though if you were trying to illustrate that the answer is unknowable while not being a purposefully tricky c**t.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >90°

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Correct.
          Anyway, answer is ~14.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is that line supposed to be the same length of the diameter of the inner circle cause it’s not obvious.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think so.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This anon got very close to it.

          Literally none of you don't get it. This homosexual used a vpn to be jap, this is a pun about the jap flag dot being off-centre before they changed it. Good one anon.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The smaller circle's radius is 5.
      The bigger circle's radius is 10/sqrt(2).

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not possible, require more info to find an exact solution to the question. The only certainty without manually measuring the circles is that the radius of the outer circle is > 5.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Look at this bongman too

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You can't apply Pythagoras to this. What I said is a literal mathematic proof on circles applied to this very question.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You CAN, because you can calculate the other sides of the triangle if you know at least one of it.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You need to know two sides of a triangle if you are using Pythagoras you fricking moron. That's the entire formula. You never did trig before???

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You have exact values of triangle base and angles. You don't need anything more.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            WHERE ARE THE FRICKING ANGLES??? TELL MEEE??? YOU CNA'T FIND LENGTH WITH JUST BASE AND 90 DEGREE YOU FRICKING SPECCCCCCC

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            no you dont. you have the length of one side and the angles arent given

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            not without an angle or a second length
            >SOH CAH TOA

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      infinite solutions
      r_small^2 + 25 = r_big^2

      suppose the larger radius was arbitrarily large. You can always increase the smaller radius until the chord at the point of contact is 10m
      infinite solutions

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Another solution.
        And pretty nice one.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        your assumption is incorrect,
        where the chord meets the larger circle, and u draw the perpenicular bisectors, you are not guaranteed that the resulating rectangle is a square

        it only apears that way on paper

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I meant this one

          You CAN, because you can calculate the other sides of the triangle if you know at least one of it.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          i thought that as well at first but then i realized it will always be a square as long as:
          1. they are perfect circles
          2. the inner circle is perfectly centered in the outside circle

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            its not a guarantee
            draw on a piece of paper two circles, one really small, and the other much larger.
            Repeat the logic and you get an obvious rectangle

            read this

            infinite solutions
            r_small^2 + 25 = r_big^2

            suppose the larger radius was arbitrarily large. You can always increase the smaller radius until the chord at the point of contact is 10m
            infinite solutions

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Pretty nice

        [...]
        No, you just have to know the Pythagorean theorem.

        I guess I just wanted some text ensuring me that the two circles shared the same center or something similar.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Pretty nice
          its wrong

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The logic is there. I think it is just the fat lines that end up making it look off.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            my dude
            read

            infinite solutions
            r_small^2 + 25 = r_big^2

            suppose the larger radius was arbitrarily large. You can always increase the smaller radius until the chord at the point of contact is 10m
            infinite solutions

            dont make me pull out a compass and ruler to show you

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I get what you are saying. The figure may not be representative for the actual dimensions and we can only rely on numbers. I'm just saying that in lack of any other options it looks like that was what was intended. Sort of a best guess.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >it looks like that was what was intended
            i disagree
            the only intent we can assume is the information givven
            and if enough information isnt given, we must give the generalised solution

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is not solvable without eye-balling assumptions on other measurements

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Easy, inner circle radius 4.615m, outer circle radius 6.846m.
      Suck my wiener.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      R1=5
      R2=10/(2^(1/2))

      You cropped out the question

      30=[(15*4)+(x*(x/60))]/2
      X=0
      It must travel instantly.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Missing a value bro

      R2 = SQRT(R1^2+25)
      R1 = SQRT(R2^2-25)

      That's as far as I got.

      This anon gets it

      The smaller circle's radius is 5.
      The bigger circle's radius is 10/sqrt(2).

      Since we got a2 + b2 = c2 and we know a and b are the same we could maybe go a2 + b2 = 100. 50 + 50 = 100. So a = 7.07

      Correct.
      Anyway, answer is ~14.

      Go back to gradeschool

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      There are infinite possible radii.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Big circle is 14 m and smaller circle is 8 m

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's unsolvable since you have no angles so you can't ultimately know what the size ratio is between the 2 circles and you can't apply any formulas and figures to find out.

      https://i.imgur.com/t3xKIyv.jpg

      ACK!
      What are the political implications of 40% of women failing a basic spatial awareness problem?
      https://steemit.com/steemstem/@alexander.alexis/the-70-year-cognitive-puzzle-that-still-divides-the-sexes

      The water level thing is a brutal blackpill on women honestly.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      7.07m

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > have a better one and 90% of /misc/ fails
      how long are the radiuses of circles
      Not enough information to solve.
      Increase the size of the outer circle and the inner circle, and you can get a 10m tangent to the inner circle.
      More info required to solve.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        There might be enough there to support this one

        This would have to assume that the circles are concentric, but there's likely a way to prove that at the point of tangent, a line from the center that intersects the chord at 90 degrees bisects it.

        You're still working in terms of r1 and r2, but you now have a right triangle with a one side a known length so you can establish the relationship between them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      record player

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Just phone gayging on the shitter, my guess is 5 and 5*sqrt(2)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      1st biggest circle = 7.021 m
      2nd smallest circle = 2.021 m

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I dont think it is solvable. You could draw that same picture witht the inner circle being any size, and keep that 10 m the same.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Outer circle is 5sqrt2 and inside circle is 5

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        That’s my answer but that requires the circles to share a center point (not stated)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Literally none of you don't get it. This homosexual used a vpn to be jap, this is a pun about the jap flag dot being off-centre before they changed it. Good one anon.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Depending upon the speed at which you tilted the glass and the moment wherein you've captured diagram b, there could either be more or less water on either side, until it settles.

    Additionally, the weight of the water would wither tip the cup over fully or settle it back down as in diagram A.

    Problem solved.

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly, this difference can to amount to which sex handles bottles more. It's not necessarily an intuitive question to ask, but absolutely one that can be answered with the experience of fricking around with a bottle, which I'm certain more men have done.

    I don't think the question is representative of intelligence

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I fell for the bait so
      >women don't drink from a bottle or a glass multiple times a day
      >people don't literally see the solution to this problem every time they have a drink of something

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah because women never drink or handle liquids in clear glasses or bottles. They all drink out of water fountains.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >It's not necessarily an intuitive question to ask

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't think the question is representative of intelligence

      Pic related is all women literally all the time

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > I don't think the question is representative of intelligence
      You are correct. It is about entitlement.
      Women are entitled to out the water wherever the hell they want to put it. BTFO, and kiss their *ss, you know you want to pretend they like you and want you.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My girlfriend failed this one.. it is embarrassing but I still love her very much. I think I saved the screenshot somewhere.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ah yes here it is

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      never delete that

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      She considered the momentum

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Read article wondering what the error margin is for the area. Find out women don't draw a horizontal line. WTF?

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The cup is upside down. If you tilt it the water will spill out.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Idiot

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Less space on the bottom of the glass when it is tilted, water level will be slightly raised

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Only to the 45 degree point. Then it lowers.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Cmon anon!!! Does do the respective areas below the line look to be the same size, my god

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    simple as.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Frick. I didn't know that NSFFW is that stupid.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I hate ~~*feminism*~~ with a burning passion.
    >WE HAVE DECLARED OUT OF OUR ASS THAT MEN AND WOMEN ARE THE EXACT SAME
    >OH SHIT SOMETHING CONTRADICTS OUR NOW KNOW FACT
    >TRY TO MAKE IT RIGHT BY ENY MEANS NECESSARY USUALLY WITH MUH ~~*SOCIOECONOMICS*~~

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >math teachers treat boys and girls differentially
      >differentially
      Heh

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Men: try to determine how high to draw the waterline to keep the same cross sectional area.
    >Women: omgz, does it stay square?? I can haz degree?

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If your answer is something other than this, congratulations you’re fricking moronic or a woman.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Oops forgot pic

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Again, this is wrong. Luckily this is something you can prove to yourself if you own a clear glass or bottle. At your level you should be reading, not posting.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Wrong. The area under the line is greater for the left jar than it is for the right. The water line needs to be higher for the right jar.

          You’re both fricking stupid. The water will be level as you tilt the glass.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            That would mean there's less water on the right. Where is the water magically vanishing to when you tilt it?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Glass gets wider at the top of the line.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            You're moronic

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            No my friend you are.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Here’s your (You).

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong. The area under the line is greater for the left jar than it is for the right. The water line needs to be higher for the right jar.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No the left is higher. Just take a glass or bottle and you will see.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The area under the water line needs to be the same for both jars. In order to accomplish that the picture I was responding to needed to raise the line on the right.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          No it isnt youu dumbass. The water line is also longer on the right bottle. It evens out.
          Cant belive there are so many women gere

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >line is longer
            You have to think of it in terms of area, not length. You're missing an entire dimension, no maths dimwit.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Yes idiot. The left space is equal on every side. While right one starts wider and goes thinner. But it evens out. Its the same space
            This is lioe that thin long tube and wide shorter tube experiment for kids. It contains the same amount of liquid and children dont understand it

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >It's the same space
            No, it's closer to half the space if you actually measure.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          This guy is correct autismos. I don't really think measuring the water volume is the intent of the question though

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The point of the picture is to determine whether it not someone has a high enough spatial IQ to draw the line sightly higher for the right jar. If you wanted to go turbo autism it wouldn't be too hard to measure and draw the exact height, but obviously that's not the point. It's just to see if you're smart enough to understand that the glass needs the same cross sectional area of water for both positions. It's so obvious to me that I can't believe people can struggle with this yet somehow manage to breathe.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Reading the article (didn't at first), it's even worse than you'd think. The purpose is to see whether you draw a horizontal or non-horizontal line. So women can't even draw the surface of the water level, let alone visualize what the volume of the water should be

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Women can't even think in one dimension
            Frickin kek

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yeah i was kinda blown away personally, at first i felt a bit embarassed because i was having problems determining just how high to put the line, it didn't even occur to me that someone could think to change the slope of the line, it's very bizarre

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        now imagine it is a closed glass box.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        you are moronic

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I dated a well accomplished female engineer and a female welder, it's weird how mechanically incompetent women are by nature.

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    There is no bottom to the beaker, so when tilted it all runs out onto the table.

    In science you are not allowed to assume and since the question does not give enough data to confirm there is a bottom to the beaker, means there isn't a bottom.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Water level stays the same, duh.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is objectively the only correct solution.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Literally have never seen the correct answer on this board.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      75/75

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Even

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Even, since the third box was never a part of the equation once the gold ball was selected.

      I don't know - it's either this puzzle or one like it where the obvious answer isn't the correct one I think having to do with the fact that if you chose a gold ball, you were likelier to have chosen it from the box with the two gold balls so your odds of picking up another gold ball are better than even.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >pick a randon box
      1 in 3 chance

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Even, since the third box was never a part of the equation once the gold ball was selected.

      I don't know - it's either this puzzle or one like it where the obvious answer isn't the correct one I think having to do with the fact that if you chose a gold ball, you were likelier to have chosen it from the box with the two gold balls so your odds of picking up another gold ball are better than even.

      >pick a randon box
      1 in 3 chance

      It's 2/3 you gorilla Black folk.

      pick a random gold ball
      2/3 chance it's in the box with the two balls

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    there are no correct answers to this problem. the truth is that were are all human beings and that Dennis had it right when he said that the best answer is always the answer that is the best.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    behold

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you at least get a (you) for being correct. nice illustration.

  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >implications
    The standards will be lowered Like usual.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Does anyone have a wife/gf can you show them this problem and see how they respond?

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      YOU WIN.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What I find interesting about this thread is that it started as a woman "hate" thread but evolved not into malevolent woman bashing but rather into a discussion regarding solutions to math problems, both satirical and actual, and it's been going on for three hours now. Since it started as a women thread, it kind of begs the question, are there any forums where an audience of almost exclusively women ever discuss this kind of stuff?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > The real secret is that we live in a geocentric universe.
      How do you know? I have no idea if you are right or not, but I am interested in gaining more data to logically assemble through my trivium algorithm.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Doubtful; unless you find a single gendered maths forum.
      The second gender's brain is wired for social interaction; whereas the first gender is geared toward logic and problem solving.
      Doesn't mean that both aren't capable of the other, its just part of the reason HR, nursing and teaching are dominated by the second gender, and engineering is dominated by the first.

  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    an old but very good vid

    "The Gender Equality Paradox"

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the political implications I don't see, the problems happen when they are behind the wheel maneuvering

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    que?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      b

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Picrel is the high IQ answer.

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >https://steemit.com/steemstem/@alexander.alexis/the-70-year-cognitive-puzzle-that-still-divides-the-sexes
    >Females disproportionately give the wrong answer to this puzzle. In their efforts to level the results, researchers tried using photos instead of schematics, using a container with rounded sides so there will be less interference with a horizontal water line, having the water lines pre-drawn and just asking the participants which line looked correct, and just generally making it easier and easier. It didn't matter: after decades of variations to the puzzle, a significantly higher proportion of female adults and adolescents still draw a slanting line.
    Holy fricking hell

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      wait they get it wrong because they draw a SLANTED line? wtf?

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >https://steemit.com/steemstem/@alexander.alexis/the-70-year-cognitive-puzzle-that-still-divides-the-sexes
    >If the line you drew is anything other than horizontal, you answered wrongly.

    WTF how stupid are people. I was looking at it trying to figure out at what level the water would be. OBVIOUSLY it is going to be horizontal, I wanted to know whether the line would be above or below A. I say it is below because if the glass had a lid and you turned it horizontal, the water level would be lower.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      volume bro

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The top part you'd need to calculate the area of the triangle and then how much it fills the parallelogram. Hope this test is open book.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          brother, parallelogram volume = base x height x depth

          exactly the same as a rectangular prism

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Oh well that's easy then I just can't remember that shit from 20 years ago.

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    because they're let into undergraduate and graduate degrees with lower standards, standards have lowered across the board. Moreover, the game that used to be played (the best wins) with men, is not how women play. Which is why men demure from education as they are surrounded by women and their rules of the game are the antithesis of male virtue

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *