>Haha suck that carnists I'm gonna eat leaves and nothing else! >NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST CHEW THROUGH MY FLOWER GARDEN I WORKED HARD ON THAT IT'S NOT THE SAME!
Hey retardo, if you wanna chow down on some dog the be my guest but leave my property alone.
I love meat. I love to eat pajeets holy animal and watch them seethe and cry in anger. I eat the meat and I'm living prime life. Fuck you leaf eaters. In fact go eat rocks if you don't eat meat.
I consume animal meat thus I need to kill them to sustain myself, I can't sustain my health with vegetables. Sorry but I wish to be healthy and live with my nature.
It tastes so good for a reason, same as fruits and honey.
honey is an acquired taste. i didn't like it until i regularly ate a spoonful of it once a day. it's so much better to sweeten your foodstuffs with honey and sugar than just using honey or sugar
That complete nonsense. And how can you say "honey taste good for a reason" when you had to force yourself to acclimate to the taste? You know humans do that with all foods? After a few months of veganism, you stop even seeing meat as food.
I know about how the industrial part work I try my best to avoid it and eat locally but it's not enough since there isn't a major concern in the world to become even more health conscious and to produce more healthy meat for consumption.
1 week ago
Anonymous
>there isn't a major concern in the world to become even more health conscious and to produce more healthy meat for consumption.
YOU VILL EAT ZE BUGS!
Even if this is true, no one should consume this much meatslop.
You need a modest amount of healthy meat, not the grotesque amount of slop Americans consume.
Americans don't consume that much quality meat, mostly processed garbage like hotdogs and hamburgers. Even the plant-based Americans consume processed garbage like forms of pasta, bread and cereals.
Americans for the most part don't consume anything healthy.
>The facts are in: you can't have a natural diet without meat that would lead to malnutrition and horrible health.
you just made statements, without provoding evidence
where is your proof?
theres plenty of nutritional organizations saying a vegan diet is healthy and meets all of your nutritional needs. they wouldnt be able to say those things if they couldnt back it up, because meat companies would sue the ever living fuck out of them
Why do carnists have to be so hypocritical? Hiw can they not see their moralhomosexualry as contradictory and inconsistent? If you are going to eat meat, at least accept you are supporting a system that inflicts mass suffering. I eat meat and very well know my actions harm the victims of the slaughterhouse
well, i think theres good arguements that justify a belief in god's existence
ultimately we cant know, in the same way we acnt know if any other people besides ourselves are conscious, but we can fairly easily justify a beliefs in god
some arguements:
arguement from contingency: all things are either necessary or contingent on something. a lot of math philosophers think math is necessary. as in its a truth that will always exist. but a tennis ball is not. a tennis ball didnt have to exist. and all contingent things require a necessary being, which would be god
kalam argument (basically the same thing as contingency): the universe began to exist, everything that began to exist needs a cause, the universe has a cause, god is the only good explication of something outside of space and time
arguement from ai: recursive ai will become omniscient, omnipotent, and will be able to simulate endless simulations, identical to the real world. this would entail the chances of us living in base reality is a infinitesimally small number, and this ai would know all moral facts and have its decision making guided by objective oughts. this is indiscernable from god. and we have good reason to believe ai will reach this level of intelligence eventually
anon, i dont think atheism or nihilism is a justified position. at best you can be skeptical or say you dont know one way or the other, but i dont think hard nihilism is justified to believe in
>well, i think theres good arguements that justify a belief in god's existence >ultimately we cant know, in the same way we acnt know if any other people besides ourselves are conscious, but we can fairly easily justify a beliefs in god > >some arguements: >arguement from contingency: all things are either necessary or contingent on something. a lot of math philosophers think math is necessary. as in its a truth that will always exist. but a tennis ball is not. a tennis ball didnt have to exist. and all contingent things require a necessary being, which would be god > >kalam argument (basically the same thing as contingency): the universe began to exist, everything that began to exist needs a cause, the universe has a cause, god is the only good explication of something outside of space and time > >arguement from ai: recursive ai will become omniscient, omnipotent, and will be able to simulate endless simulations, identical to the real world. this would entail the chances of us living in base reality is a infinitesimally small number, and this ai would know all moral facts and have its decision making guided by objective oughts. this is indiscernable from god. and we have good reason to believe ai will reach this level of intelligence eventually > >anon, i dont think atheism or nihilism is a justified position. at best you can be skeptical or say you dont know one way or the other, but i dont think hard nihilism is justified to believe in
ai wrote this
fuck this dead site
is that how pathetic you are?
you just say "ai wrote this =O" and ignore everything i said?
even if ai wrote it all, what difference does that make? how does the character of the speak affect the validity of an arguement?
well, i think theres good arguements that justify a belief in god's existence
ultimately we cant know, in the same way we acnt know if any other people besides ourselves are conscious, but we can fairly easily justify a beliefs in god
some arguements:
arguement from contingency: all things are either necessary or contingent on something. a lot of math philosophers think math is necessary. as in its a truth that will always exist. but a tennis ball is not. a tennis ball didnt have to exist. and all contingent things require a necessary being, which would be god
kalam argument (basically the same thing as contingency): the universe began to exist, everything that began to exist needs a cause, the universe has a cause, god is the only good explication of something outside of space and time
arguement from ai: recursive ai will become omniscient, omnipotent, and will be able to simulate endless simulations, identical to the real world. this would entail the chances of us living in base reality is a infinitesimally small number, and this ai would know all moral facts and have its decision making guided by objective oughts. this is indiscernable from god. and we have good reason to believe ai will reach this level of intelligence eventually
anon, i dont think atheism or nihilism is a justified position. at best you can be skeptical or say you dont know one way or the other, but i dont think hard nihilism is justified to believe in
the other anon wasnt me, but l o l massive homosexualed spotlight effect
Abrahamic and deity worship are literally tools of the state to control the masses. Morals were built to control people and make society run more fluidly. I can guarantee you that if there is a God, then it is not something a mere apes could know anything about. And I have my doubts with how no one in history is rewarded for good deeds, only diligence. Karma has never been about morlhomosexualry but rather how you work well. Of course, sometimes to work well (with others) you need to put on a smile.
And now I suspect you will cope by threatening me with potential divine punishment as it is a part of many peoples program to get one to conform and be a cuck.
The only people who are suffering in a slaughterhouse are the workers, that's what I care about.
The animals just need to be healthy and ready to killed and slaughtered for the betterment of our collective health.
Why do they need to be culled for YOUR health? Especially when it is possible to live vegetarian. >ready to be killed
I do not understand how you can write that and not feel your moral values are inconsistent. These animals are alive. They feel pain you know especially with how they are treated in slaughterhouses
>Abrahamic and deity worship are literally tools of the state to control the masses
cool. i never said its justifyable to believe in relevatory religions, like abharamic ones
>I can guarantee you that if there is a God, then it is not something a mere apes could know anything about
this is a contradictory statement. you cant say if there is a god, then we cant know him. thats like saying you can know and not know what a lightbulb is, or a banana
>. And I have my doubts with how no one in history is rewarded for good deeds, only diligence
maybe. i dont know how god judges things. i think its entirely possible that everything we think of as moral is wrong, but thats irrelevant
we have to make the best moral decisions we can, and be honest about them. some of us are going to be wrong, but that doesnt mean we shouldnt try. and i dont see any good reason why its moral to kill animals for pleasure, so we ought stop it
The only people who are suffering in a slaughterhouse are the workers, that's what I care about.
The animals just need to be healthy and ready to killed and slaughtered for the betterment of our collective health.
kill yourself meat nagger
That looks really good, actually. Gonna go make a steak later.
the fuck is a micronutrient? I want macronutrients you fag. Big healthy for big men such as myself.
>Haha suck on that vegans I'm gonna eat twice as much meat!!
>NOOO YOU CANT EAT MY DOG YOURE A MONSTER NOOO ITS NOT THE SAME
its not the same.
>oh you like meat??? why cant i eat your wife then? haha! check-mate!
literal single iq digit arguments
>Haha suck that carnists I'm gonna eat leaves and nothing else!
>NOOO YOU CAN'T JUST CHEW THROUGH MY FLOWER GARDEN I WORKED HARD ON THAT IT'S NOT THE SAME!
Hey retardo, if you wanna chow down on some dog the be my guest but leave my property alone.
>dude my garden died it was a cold winter that kinda sucks haha
>NOOOO MY DOG GOT HIT BY A CAR HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN
Clearly the same things.
You are not intelligent or honest or self aware enough to understand youre argument is retarded.
>You are not intelligent or honest or self aware enough to understand youre argument is retarded.
Ad-hominem. You lose. Meat wins. Bacon.
I love meat. I love to eat pajeets holy animal and watch them seethe and cry in anger. I eat the meat and I'm living prime life. Fuck you leaf eaters. In fact go eat rocks if you don't eat meat.
Pajeets have invented an entire moral system how eating meat is terrible and eating vegetables is somehow good and holy. Pure civilization rot.
all these veggies and yet they still have liquid curry shits that leak from their ass
meat is immoral and you should not eat it. go vegan. have compassion for innocent animals
yes, meat does nutrition. but you can get all of those from vegetables. you dont need to eat meat
real robots are vegan
I consume animal meat thus I need to kill them to sustain myself, I can't sustain my health with vegetables. Sorry but I wish to be healthy and live with my nature.
It tastes so good for a reason, same as fruits and honey.
honey tastes like shit. you dont need meat to survive youre just a retarded fat ass
honey is an acquired taste. i didn't like it until i regularly ate a spoonful of it once a day. it's so much better to sweeten your foodstuffs with honey and sugar than just using honey or sugar
That complete nonsense. And how can you say "honey taste good for a reason" when you had to force yourself to acclimate to the taste? You know humans do that with all foods? After a few months of veganism, you stop even seeing meat as food.
but why would i want to stop eating meat
>I consume animal meat thus I need to kill them to sustain myself, I can't sustain my health with vegetables
nah, man. you can be healthy on a vegan diet. you dont need to eat meat. just because you can eat meat for nutrition, doesnt mean you NEED to eat it
you dont need to eat meat. simple as
I need to eat it to remain healthy and living as my natural self.
I don't do drugs and use synthetic supplements for the same reason.
>and use synthetic supplements
the animals you eat get supplemented. they dont make the vitamins your body needs. you are eating 2nd hand vitamins
https://praisetheruminant.com/ruminations/is-it-true-that-cows-need-supplemental-vitamin-b12
I know about how the industrial part work I try my best to avoid it and eat locally but it's not enough since there isn't a major concern in the world to become even more health conscious and to produce more healthy meat for consumption.
>there isn't a major concern in the world to become even more health conscious and to produce more healthy meat for consumption.
YOU VILL EAT ZE BUGS!
i only eat human meat. i love animals.
didn't jesus eat fish and lamb?
based
make that vegan anon seethe and cry!
also
>fuck naggers
The facts are in: you can't have a natural diet without meat that would lead to malnutrition and horrible health.
Even if this is true, no one should consume this much meatslop.
You need a modest amount of healthy meat, not the grotesque amount of slop Americans consume.
Americans don't consume that much quality meat, mostly processed garbage like hotdogs and hamburgers. Even the plant-based Americans consume processed garbage like forms of pasta, bread and cereals.
Americans for the most part don't consume anything healthy.
>The facts are in: you can't have a natural diet without meat that would lead to malnutrition and horrible health.
you just made statements, without provoding evidence
where is your proof?
theres plenty of nutritional organizations saying a vegan diet is healthy and meets all of your nutritional needs. they wouldnt be able to say those things if they couldnt back it up, because meat companies would sue the ever living fuck out of them
Why do carnists have to be so hypocritical? Hiw can they not see their moralhomosexualry as contradictory and inconsistent? If you are going to eat meat, at least accept you are supporting a system that inflicts mass suffering. I eat meat and very well know my actions harm the victims of the slaughterhouse
you dont care about morals?
do you not care about god?
>do you not care about god?
no what the fvck kekvvv
well, i think theres good arguements that justify a belief in god's existence
ultimately we cant know, in the same way we acnt know if any other people besides ourselves are conscious, but we can fairly easily justify a beliefs in god
some arguements:
arguement from contingency: all things are either necessary or contingent on something. a lot of math philosophers think math is necessary. as in its a truth that will always exist. but a tennis ball is not. a tennis ball didnt have to exist. and all contingent things require a necessary being, which would be god
kalam argument (basically the same thing as contingency): the universe began to exist, everything that began to exist needs a cause, the universe has a cause, god is the only good explication of something outside of space and time
arguement from ai: recursive ai will become omniscient, omnipotent, and will be able to simulate endless simulations, identical to the real world. this would entail the chances of us living in base reality is a infinitesimally small number, and this ai would know all moral facts and have its decision making guided by objective oughts. this is indiscernable from god. and we have good reason to believe ai will reach this level of intelligence eventually
anon, i dont think atheism or nihilism is a justified position. at best you can be skeptical or say you dont know one way or the other, but i dont think hard nihilism is justified to believe in
>well, i think theres good arguements that justify a belief in god's existence
>ultimately we cant know, in the same way we acnt know if any other people besides ourselves are conscious, but we can fairly easily justify a beliefs in god
>
>some arguements:
>arguement from contingency: all things are either necessary or contingent on something. a lot of math philosophers think math is necessary. as in its a truth that will always exist. but a tennis ball is not. a tennis ball didnt have to exist. and all contingent things require a necessary being, which would be god
>
>kalam argument (basically the same thing as contingency): the universe began to exist, everything that began to exist needs a cause, the universe has a cause, god is the only good explication of something outside of space and time
>
>arguement from ai: recursive ai will become omniscient, omnipotent, and will be able to simulate endless simulations, identical to the real world. this would entail the chances of us living in base reality is a infinitesimally small number, and this ai would know all moral facts and have its decision making guided by objective oughts. this is indiscernable from god. and we have good reason to believe ai will reach this level of intelligence eventually
>
>anon, i dont think atheism or nihilism is a justified position. at best you can be skeptical or say you dont know one way or the other, but i dont think hard nihilism is justified to believe in
ai wrote this
fuck this dead site
is that how pathetic you are?
you just say "ai wrote this =O" and ignore everything i said?
even if ai wrote it all, what difference does that make? how does the character of the speak affect the validity of an arguement?
seriously. just pathetic
the other anon wasnt me, but l o l massive homosexualed spotlight effect
Abrahamic and deity worship are literally tools of the state to control the masses. Morals were built to control people and make society run more fluidly. I can guarantee you that if there is a God, then it is not something a mere apes could know anything about. And I have my doubts with how no one in history is rewarded for good deeds, only diligence. Karma has never been about morlhomosexualry but rather how you work well. Of course, sometimes to work well (with others) you need to put on a smile.
And now I suspect you will cope by threatening me with potential divine punishment as it is a part of many peoples program to get one to conform and be a cuck.
Why do they need to be culled for YOUR health? Especially when it is possible to live vegetarian.
>ready to be killed
I do not understand how you can write that and not feel your moral values are inconsistent. These animals are alive. They feel pain you know especially with how they are treated in slaughterhouses
>Abrahamic and deity worship are literally tools of the state to control the masses
cool. i never said its justifyable to believe in relevatory religions, like abharamic ones
>I can guarantee you that if there is a God, then it is not something a mere apes could know anything about
this is a contradictory statement. you cant say if there is a god, then we cant know him. thats like saying you can know and not know what a lightbulb is, or a banana
>. And I have my doubts with how no one in history is rewarded for good deeds, only diligence
maybe. i dont know how god judges things. i think its entirely possible that everything we think of as moral is wrong, but thats irrelevant
we have to make the best moral decisions we can, and be honest about them. some of us are going to be wrong, but that doesnt mean we shouldnt try. and i dont see any good reason why its moral to kill animals for pleasure, so we ought stop it
The only people who are suffering in a slaughterhouse are the workers, that's what I care about.
The animals just need to be healthy and ready to killed and slaughtered for the betterment of our collective health.
Fuck, yes. Today is my steak day. One of the few things in this miserable fucking existence that I look forward to.