I was jerking off with a bungee cord tied around my junk and when I was done I didn’t want to put it on the ground so I tied it around my hand. I figured it was a good time to crack open some Lawrence. Anyway, this thread took a weird turn with anons bringing up scientific journals and all that
please stop reading fantasy opinion novels to get your takes on real world issues, this is where we get such braindead takes as "grand theft auto is destroying our youth and turning them into shooters!"
refer to actual real research instead, it's what we call a "scientific journal"
That's the sort of shit "flat earth" plants say to slide actual threads.
Scientific papers have to list their methods, they have to be reproducable, they have to be objective. I've read many papers on this sort of subject and no censorship can get someone to publish something that's false and have nobody contest it.
It's true that censorship exists so that China may silence people who disagree with the government narrative and that researchers are often scared to investigate topics that may be controversial but that doesn't stop the existing papers from being valid sources.
Certainly more valid than someone's essay formed from absolutely nothing other than their own opinion they've been stewing in their head without any objective basis.
i once read a paper where they compared breastfeeding babies to formula consumption babies and the only guys defending the formula were employed by a babyfood company
That's why scientific papers have to be reproducable.
If you think a paper is biased or wrong you can follow the steps they made to see if you get the same results. If you don't get the same results you can publish your results that show the contrary.
If you think the method itself is flawed you can point out to anyone citing the paper that the paper holds no water.
It is true, however, that people prefer to publish interesting experiments and new discoveries over papers like "we reviewed an old experiment to prove it" and I can understand there would be a lack of funding to support breastmilk feeding since there isn't any company selling breastmilk. It's certainly not a flawless system but it's nowhere near as flawed as opinion pieces.
You sound like an absolute moron coping with poor career decisions.
Almost none of this shit is repeatable since the 1950s.
They don't even post the methodology until the very bottom these days for a reason. Half the time the methodology is paywalled and the only parts you can get are the abstract, summary, and results.
>If you think a paper is biased or wrong you can follow the steps they made to see if you get the same results.
How am I going to do that? I'm not a scientist.
You sound like an absolute moron coping with poor career decisions.
Almost none of this shit is repeatable since the 1950s.
They don't even post the methodology until the very bottom these days for a reason. Half the time the methodology is paywalled and the only parts you can get are the abstract, summary, and results.
Sorry.
My wife is a neurologist and I spent years doing research and no one knows the methodology of any study.
I've questioned chairs, lead physicians, tech lab workers, etc.
NONE OF THEM know them methodology used to get any of the ideas they have in their head.
The several times I've done work on studies with these people the methodology was done about ten different ways and the people doing the study just say it was done in a certain manner for official purposes.
This is why they aren't repeatable except in rare cases.
I’m more interested in Lawrence than scientific journals. Your type of mentality would never understand why Gibbon, Thucydides, or Plutarch are read when we have modern scholarship
Vidya had considerable influence over mass shooters. Despite the pacifying properties of vidya for the majority, the wretched minority are thrown down the depths by it. Your banal statistic can’t remove the testimonies in their journals and “first person” recordings of their evils.
Mentally ill people will be mentally ill no matter what. Trying to censor reality from them will only lead them down a different path of destruction if they don't choose the same path of destruction out of a lack of understanding.
Anyone who cannot differentiate fantasy from reality is a threat to society and themselves.
Even if a videogame has caused someone to commit crimes they otherwise would not have, people would commit more crimes if you banned them and drove those criminals out from behind a screen and onto the streets, as you said about the "pacifying properties".
That's mostly conjecture, though. Since I'm talking about scientific papers I have to be honest and say we don't really know, all we know is that crime rates have gone down since video games have been introduced and no study has ever really proven it to be a bad thing. I certainly would not trust an insane man's journal.
I’m more interested in Lawrence than scientific journals. Your type of mentality would never understand why Gibbon, Thucydides, or Plutarch are read when we have modern scholarship
That's a difficult subject since yes, it's incredibly hard to reproduce history and prove events written about in history. One man's writing in history is nothing more than a peephole into the events that really happened. Unless they write down facts that can be reproduced and proven in the modern era there can be a lot of subjective bias.
>That's a difficult subject since yes, it's incredibly hard to reproduce history and prove events written about in history. One man's writing in history is nothing more than a peephole into the events that really happened. Unless they write down facts that can be reproduced and proven in the modern era there can be a lot of subjective bias.
That probably wasn’t the best example I gave. What I mean is that I’m more interested in Lawrence’s literature, opinions, ideas and thoughts than the scientific studies of masturbation
People should think for themselves. Which one is the cleanest sexual activity - lowest chance of any kind of disease or cancer down the road..or you know causing your partner to wear diapers.
Purple fingies :3
Kek. It must be the lighting and applying pressure to keep the book open. I’m white
No need to defend your honor buddy
Post your purple hands you fucking shapeshifter
Damn. Something might be wrong. I just looked at them and they are pretty fucked up. Should I go to the hospital?
You probably have cardiovascular problem .
Nah, you're probably fine.
I was jerking off with a bungee cord tied around my junk and when I was done I didn’t want to put it on the ground so I tied it around my hand. I figured it was a good time to crack open some Lawrence. Anyway, this thread took a weird turn with anons bringing up scientific journals and all that
Nigga you ashy
Great book title
why do your hands look frostbitten
>Homosex is… LE GOOD!
nigg A WHATS Rthe book called?
The Bad Side of Books: Selected Essays by David Herbert Lawrence
please stop reading fantasy opinion novels to get your takes on real world issues, this is where we get such braindead takes as "grand theft auto is destroying our youth and turning them into shooters!"
refer to actual real research instead, it's what we call a "scientific journal"
the people who write for science journals are paid off by fat cat big pig capitalist corporations only looking out for self interest
That's the sort of shit "flat earth" plants say to slide actual threads.
Scientific papers have to list their methods, they have to be reproducable, they have to be objective. I've read many papers on this sort of subject and no censorship can get someone to publish something that's false and have nobody contest it.
It's true that censorship exists so that China may silence people who disagree with the government narrative and that researchers are often scared to investigate topics that may be controversial but that doesn't stop the existing papers from being valid sources.
Certainly more valid than someone's essay formed from absolutely nothing other than their own opinion they've been stewing in their head without any objective basis.
i once read a paper where they compared breastfeeding babies to formula consumption babies and the only guys defending the formula were employed by a babyfood company
That's why scientific papers have to be reproducable.
If you think a paper is biased or wrong you can follow the steps they made to see if you get the same results. If you don't get the same results you can publish your results that show the contrary.
If you think the method itself is flawed you can point out to anyone citing the paper that the paper holds no water.
It is true, however, that people prefer to publish interesting experiments and new discoveries over papers like "we reviewed an old experiment to prove it" and I can understand there would be a lack of funding to support breastmilk feeding since there isn't any company selling breastmilk. It's certainly not a flawless system but it's nowhere near as flawed as opinion pieces.
You sound like an absolute moron coping with poor career decisions.
Almost none of this shit is repeatable since the 1950s.
They don't even post the methodology until the very bottom these days for a reason. Half the time the methodology is paywalled and the only parts you can get are the abstract, summary, and results.
>If you think a paper is biased or wrong you can follow the steps they made to see if you get the same results.
How am I going to do that? I'm not a scientist.
This is a joke.
seethe
Sorry.
My wife is a neurologist and I spent years doing research and no one knows the methodology of any study.
I've questioned chairs, lead physicians, tech lab workers, etc.
NONE OF THEM know them methodology used to get any of the ideas they have in their head.
The several times I've done work on studies with these people the methodology was done about ten different ways and the people doing the study just say it was done in a certain manner for official purposes.
This is why they aren't repeatable except in rare cases.
I’m more interested in Lawrence than scientific journals. Your type of mentality would never understand why Gibbon, Thucydides, or Plutarch are read when we have modern scholarship
Vidya had considerable influence over mass shooters. Despite the pacifying properties of vidya for the majority, the wretched minority are thrown down the depths by it. Your banal statistic can’t remove the testimonies in their journals and “first person” recordings of their evils.
Mentally ill people will be mentally ill no matter what. Trying to censor reality from them will only lead them down a different path of destruction if they don't choose the same path of destruction out of a lack of understanding.
Anyone who cannot differentiate fantasy from reality is a threat to society and themselves.
Even if a videogame has caused someone to commit crimes they otherwise would not have, people would commit more crimes if you banned them and drove those criminals out from behind a screen and onto the streets, as you said about the "pacifying properties".
That's mostly conjecture, though. Since I'm talking about scientific papers I have to be honest and say we don't really know, all we know is that crime rates have gone down since video games have been introduced and no study has ever really proven it to be a bad thing. I certainly would not trust an insane man's journal.
That's a difficult subject since yes, it's incredibly hard to reproduce history and prove events written about in history. One man's writing in history is nothing more than a peephole into the events that really happened. Unless they write down facts that can be reproduced and proven in the modern era there can be a lot of subjective bias.
>That's a difficult subject since yes, it's incredibly hard to reproduce history and prove events written about in history. One man's writing in history is nothing more than a peephole into the events that really happened. Unless they write down facts that can be reproduced and proven in the modern era there can be a lot of subjective bias.
That probably wasn’t the best example I gave. What I mean is that I’m more interested in Lawrence’s literature, opinions, ideas and thoughts than the scientific studies of masturbation
This is like an extrovert extolling the virtues of joining a social society.
People should think for themselves. Which one is the cleanest sexual activity - lowest chance of any kind of disease or cancer down the road..or you know causing your partner to wear diapers.
A. Handjob
B. Oral
C. Vaginal
D. Anal
sauce?
>he doesn't use books as onaholes
ngmi
>he doesn't use books as onaholes
>onaholes?
>search it on google
>holyFuckingShit.jpg
>get a massive boner cuz of no fap
thanks you moron