Making premarital and extramarital sex illegal would solve sex relations overnight by reintroducing a cost to premarital and extramarital sex that has...


Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Making premarital and extramarital sex illegal would solve sex relations overnight by reintroducing a cost to premarital and extramarital sex that has been lost with the pill, abortions, easy divorces, etc. Opponents would call this a restriction of freedom but it is more like a return to the baseline.

  1. 3 days ago
    Stormy, Grey Knight

    Yeah, go for it, make sure to identify yourself when you propose the bill.

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      Ok.

      >spending tax money to control something uncontrollable
      nice solution

      This is such a bullshit argument. People avoid doing illegal things and if something is illegal they are unlikely to talk about it and promote it like they do now.

      • 3 days ago
        Stormy, Grey Knight

        >Ok
        You won't do shit.

        • 3 days ago
          Anonymous

          Are you offended?

          • 3 days ago
            Stormy, Grey Knight

            Go ahead, make good on your proposal. Make sure to put your name on the bill so everybody knows what a dummy you are.

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              Its not dumb

              • 3 days ago
                Stormy, Grey Knight

                Yeah you are, and I can feel my patience running low, this happens when I interact with dummies. But that's on me because I chose to.

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                Stop interacting then.

                saudi arabia and other arab upload a shitload of porn.
                things wouldn't get better

                No they don't?

              • 3 days ago
                Stormy, Grey Knight

                Or how about I just call you an idiot because I don't tolerate it either.

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                Continue to say what you want. Maybe eventually you'll want to make a point.

              • 3 days ago
                Stormy, Grey Knight

                Why bother, it's not like you would even consider it, this isn't one of those threads.

                So yeah, about that propsal, remember to type your name and address on the bill and click "post" so we can review the terms.

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                Why do you continue to post useless comments in this thread if you have nothing new to say? Dance for me.

              • 3 days ago
                Stormy, Grey Knight

                Looks like this is a "who can post more useless posts" type of thread. You can't handle these dance moves.

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                I admit defeat.

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        >This is such a bullshit argument
        nah, you're just retarded

  2. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    >spending tax money to control something uncontrollable
    nice solution

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      God made marriage when He separated Women from Men, this is common sense, not to mention fair.

      why not? we do it for weed and parking and all sorts of strange stuff, it would also make society more interesting

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        >we do it for weed
        And that worked wonderfully! There are more deaths to overdoses every year, more revenue for drug cartels, more people losing their fathers! Genius solution! Make society worse because it will be "more interesting"!

        • 3 days ago
          Anonymous

          yes, ordinary people except for degenerates largely abstained from weed until it was culturally acceptable again. The purpose of a law is to punish lawbreakers and through this method civilize the populace. It is already a disgusting habit (adultery/ "cheating") that everyone looks down upon, if we declare a start date of criminalization i'm sure we could get the death penalty instituted without much pushback. As for fornication (premarital), we will make it a law for them to marry. This in itself is enough punishment to give kids sense and wait. People naturally flow to the line, this has resulted in a corrupt society. Raising the bar is historically and practically achievable. Also i'm not sure if you can overdose from weed, but that sounds really funny. I've been told to avoid it for the sake of avoiding schizophrenia.

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            Do you think all the people who watched porn before age 18 should be retroactively captured and thrown in prison?

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              >if we declare a start date of criminalization
              lol
              >go after porn addicts
              We should at the very least ban the websites and if possible persecute the distributors

              It's just too hard to not be retarded isn't it. I really pity you morons. Even though reality contradicts you you'll still go against it.

              Yes, but what if it were illegal? How might society improve?

              By all accounts cheating should be a crime since
              >It causes terrible psychological damage, in some cases even suicide
              >Relationships are expensive and being cheated means you wasted money on a false pretense
              No reason this should not be a crime if you can get sued for verbally abusing or scamming someone

              It has historically been and it biblically warrants the death penalty (Leviticus 20:10)

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                >go after porn addicts
                We should at least punish anyone who has watched porn before age 18.

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                I'd unironically undergo a porn reeducation camp if it existed
                I am so tired of this shit

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                What about gender transitioning therapy?

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                this is even more pointless than going after drug addicts

                I'd unironically undergo a porn reeducation camp if it existed
                I am so tired of this shit

                something like this could be beneficial if the state wanted to do something ig

                >It has historically been and it biblically warrants the death penalty (Leviticus 20:10)
                Some even say the New Testament passage of Jesus revoking it is apocryphal
                Either way even if you can't stone them, it says nothing about jail time or a huge fine to compensate the victim

                >some say
                ? the Gospel is clear as day, the ceremonial laws which were a metaphor for the gospel were done away with (sacrifice of lambs with the coming of the Lamb, Christ who is our Sabbath, circumcision = metaphor for spiritual circumcision), the moral law all stayed ("For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.")

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                There is a passage where he tells people not to stone a woman but it's authenticity has been debated
                >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_and_the_woman_taken_in_adultery
                I think most English versions leave it out and the Catholic version has an asterisk about it being possibly a later invention
                Even if true he is still tells her to stop sinning so clearly it's still wrong

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                again the gospels are crystal clear, the men wanted Jesus to say something before them so that they could accuse Him, (similar to when He is asked if they should pay taxes). If he says "yes" they would kill the woman and He would be arrested by the romans for going against the law, if He said "no" He would be going against the Word of God. So by saying "Let he without sin cast the first stone" He is telling them to follow the law and not being accused to the romans (similar to His answer with the tax question) effectively beathing their catch-22. That woman should have been stoned under the law, Christ ignores the scene largely and after the men fail to kill her
                >8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

                >9 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

                >10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
                The Lord has mercy upon her, but this is largely a side effect of Him beating their challenge. Her accusers leaving (no one would be put to death without at least 2 witnesses) means she is spared.
                >11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.

                >12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.
                It might be easy for a false prophet to reinterpret "Neither will I condemn thee" as "Adultery is okay" but that was not the point of the earthly ministry of Jesus Christ
                John 3:17
                >For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
                The Word of God hasn't changed since it was written, catholics like to take credit for this one way or another, they're fools. This is God keeping His promise.

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                >It has historically been and it biblically warrants the death penalty (Leviticus 20:10)
                Some even say the New Testament passage of Jesus revoking it is apocryphal
                Either way even if you can't stone them, it says nothing about jail time or a huge fine to compensate the victim

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            It's just too hard to not be retarded isn't it. I really pity you morons. Even though reality contradicts you you'll still go against it.

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            By all accounts cheating should be a crime since
            >It causes terrible psychological damage, in some cases even suicide
            >Relationships are expensive and being cheated means you wasted money on a false pretense
            No reason this should not be a crime if you can get sued for verbally abusing or scamming someone

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              It would probably be a good thing but men would never allow it. Pretty much every guy cheats especially at the level of lawmakers.

  3. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    We should make speeding illegal so that everyone drives the speed limit.

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      If there were no speed limits everyone would just be going as fast as they could. Speed limits clearly effect behavior. Most people probably break the speed limit, but the amount is restricted by knowledge of more stringent punishments and the lack of ambiguity and expectation of leeway when going 40 over as compared to 2 over.

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        >If there were no speed limits everyone would just be going as fast as they could.
        No, they'd teach in driver's ed that you should go about 70 or 80 on a superhighway, 55 on an empty but paved country street, 35 unpaved and city, 25 residential. Wackos would go faster but die.

        • 3 days ago
          Anonymous

          Uber drivers would be doing 50+ down residential areas

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            nagger Uber drivers are doing 50+ down residential areas

  4. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    saudi arabia and other arab upload a shitload of porn.
    things wouldn't get better

  5. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    If I could change anything about society it would be banning pre/extramarital sex. I mean marriage in the literal sense too so obviously that also bans trans and gay relationships. Society would be greatly improved in only ten years following this simple change. There's nothing good about pre and extra marital sex. Only bad people like it. Don't even bother wasting a prison cell on them. Hang them from the nearest sturdy object once discovered.

  6. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Making premarital consumption of sweets illegal would solve obesity by reintroducing a cost to sugary foods that has been lost with the industrial revolution, increased standards of living, etc. Opponents would call this a restriction of freedom but it is more like a return to the baseline.

  7. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    >higher cost of sex
    >incel thinks this will help him
    LOL

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *