>lies about harry potter
>lies about harry potter
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
>lies about harry potter
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
whad he say
that harry dies of ligma at the end of the series
ok whats this ligma thing that you're talking about? and don't even think about pranking me because i will get very mad
LIGMA BALLS LMAO
Lmao goteem
He says a blatantly untrue factoid about Rowing misusing the phrase “stretched his legs” repeatedly when it shows up twice in the book.
>in the book
Was actually the entire series of books.
The stretched his legs was used often. The issue with the books for me though is that Harry is a little boy who loves going shopping, knows how sherry smells like and somehow cooks with it, and spends way too long describing the physical attributes of antagonistic characters like Cedric Diggory, Tom Riddle and Draco Malfoy as opposed to looking at potential love interests
It's like she forgets she is writing a boy
Could it be Eve was an early self-insert protagonist then? She's the one that is the center of that narrative more than Adam
Boys don’t care about love interests at that age.
Then it should have gone away as he grew but at age seventeen the little poof is still ignoring both Chinese chick and Ginny to think about handsome Voldie and Draco's "glimmering eyes". Take a drop of sherry every time Harry thinks his enemy's handsome or glittering and you will be dead drunk by the end of the Harry Potter books, which is coincedentally the easiest way to enjoy YA as a grown-up
There is nothing wrong with acknowledging the positive attributes of adversaries. Get your mind out of the gutter, sodomite.
>positive attributes of adversaries
Non-physical attributes like strength or cleverness; neither of which Rowling's baddies possess because she needs to give them ass-kickings at the end of each book
Male authors write women who don’t spend all day looking in a mirror and wondering what Becky thinks about Stacy’s latest outrageous outfit after the rumour that Anna and Bill are dating just two weeks after Bill had a kiss with Bella who had a relationship with Bill’s brother which HAS to be super awkward and uncool because this was like after the big class trip where everyone was hooking up and Bella was like super uncomfortable and on her period so even though she WANTED to fuck Bill’s friend she couldn’t and he kinda knew that so it was super uncool of Bill to just ASSUME that it would be okay for him to do that?
Thank for the smile. But male authors get attacked all the time for writing bad female characters and I actually think they do well compared to ladies writing boys, especially young boys since they don't understand them
For example, Robert Jordan may not be some kind of genius, but he has girls admire boys instead of looking at other girls when he writes their PoV; and he usually gives them goals independent of being the dedicated love slave of a man
But more than he admires the looks of women throwing themselves at him? At sixteen years old? Come on.
Scared, Pottah?
Who?
The boy who lived
Why?
Was he a tranny?
Not canonically. He just had a scar on his forehead.
I like Bloom and what he stood for but he was a snob, straight up.
I don’t think you know what snob means.
same
reminder that he believed Genesis was written by a woman
Women can have that book because it is not even well written.
>He did this AND IT WAS GOOD
>then he did this AND IT WAS GOOD
Actually come to think of it since Genesis promotes wife swapping and spousal infidelity (Genesis 38:8) it is easy to see that as written by a woman.
anon that's not what genesis 38:8 is about at all
No but it is explicitly a man being forced to sleep with his (dead) brothers woman. Were the Bible written by a woman you could actually read a bunch of sexual domination stuff into traditionally assumed masculine lines like that one where it was assumed it was men taking power over woman. That’s actually a sort of interesting idea.
I believe the Bible was multiple writer but it actually sounds like a possibility that a woman wrote in the part about sleeping with a dead brother's wife
Think about the history of it. A widow was quite helpless in ancient times because she had no husband to take care of her and not few would want to marry a non-virgin with small children. The lady would want to make sure that she's taken care of, and by who other than the family of her dead husband
It's also true that israeli women have historically been better educated than White or Black women. Some of the first memoirs are by israeli ladies
Maybe, but that specific verse isn’t in the Biblical section Bloom said was written by a woman
Couldn’t it be written by a man who married his dead brother widow trying to justify it?
No, only women are mean and evil. Men are good and dindunuffin (even if they marry their brother’s widow).
My point was more on the polygamous nature of women. Women are known for wanting to sleep around and it is entirely within reason that woamn would write in "if her husband goes then YOU have to do her to keep her satisfied."
Yeah like the Bible isn’t some patriarchy power thing but it’s a woman’s masochistic writings.
“He said ‘Let there be light and there was light’” is a kino line. Thanks, women.
Women subtly want their husbands relatives and friends to go to town on them (Genesis 38:8). That holds straight up. ALL women fantasize about men not their husband.
Technically speaking, he believes J was written by a woman. J being a proposed text that contained elements of Genesis, Exodus, and the ending of Deuteronomy, which was later (per the documentary hypothesis) redacted with further sources called E, P, and D. He claims J was a woman due to the prevalence of women taking action throughout the work. He also claimed that this specific woman lived during the reign of King David, and later regretted not being bolder with his theories about the author of J
Reminder the only fiction he ever wrote received lukewarm reviews and is considered to be a carbon copy of, of all things, Voyage to Arcturus. Truly the Ebert of literature.
I thought it was kino.
Sorry, anon. He cannot think, and he cannot write.
Are you a Wallace fanboy?
Inconceivable!
>Truly the Ebert of literature.
But Beyond the Valley of the Dolls is kino.
Where do I start with Harry Bloom, fellas?
The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages (1994)
Sorcerers Stone
Harold Bloom would have loved biggro0ve
Imagine actually naming your book “Abberations in the Heartland of the Real.” How far your head has to be up your own ass