Lets say the Christians offered to accept LGBT people, including early transitioners, as long as they stay monogamous and marry each other
But in exchange orgies would be banned, grindr would be banned, pride would be banned (and all the equivalent things would be banned for straights)
Who would you side with?
not the christians for sure. i disapprove of orgies, but i will defend to the death your right to have them or something lol
I'm Christian. I accept everyone in the LGBT, except AGPs.
How do you define agp
Trans women attracted to women or the thought of being a woman.
“Im christian and I accept everyone except people who im attracted to and dont want to frick me”
Classic chaser
Implying I would ever be attracted to avile creature like you, keep stroking your ego
Im MTF And I agree AGPs are weird, I dont really think HSTS is the only other reason for transitioning I think gender dysphoria is a thing but no matter what AGPs are gross and abusive.
how am i gross or abusive
I think I'm gross but I don't think I'm abusive for being agp
>I dont really think HSTS is the only other reason for transitioning I think gender dysphoria is a thing
AGPs have gender dysphoria.
You're just a coping AGP who's too pathetic to even pretend to be HSTS.
There's nothing wrong with you anon.
I would not go so far as banning those things. And casual sex isn't inherently a bad thing. But I do think the gay community could benefit a lot from coming around to the idea of sexual morality and self-respect and connecting sex with love. A culture of out-and-out no-rules hedonism is not good for most people, very few can be genuinely happy living that way
the christians
bugchasers out
Considering that christians are 30% of the population (or less if you live in the first world) and shrinking, its objectively a bad move to cuck out when we're still making good progress and dont really need to compromise.
Ignoring that though, are all orgies and hookup apps banned? People can live without those. Banning pride is one im more hesitant to accept, given that its reactive to the same social pressures the christians are promising to stop projecting at us. If they uphold their end of the bargain they dont need to ban pride, it just becomes a meaningless corporate holiday like christmas. Why ban it if they actually intend to honor the deal? (Not that they've ever honored similar deals in the past)
If instead of just Christians being accepting it was just the proper protections for LGBT being completely, unambiguously, and irrevocably enshrined in the law, then all of those conditions are absolutely acceptable. Nowadays a lot of people are coming up with secular excuses for LGBT hatred so just having Christian support in exchange for some restrictions wouldn’t be that helpful.
i will never accept any normie religion
Ellaphae is my way )*
in christianity everything in the LGBT comunity is seen as "imorality" in other words as a behavior to be fixed. So monogamous heterosexual relation is the only thing accepted. If any "church" around claim ot accept anything else, trust me they are anything but christians.
I dont even understand people here to claim to be christians and defend LGBT stuff. You can be a christian, as long as you change your desires to be a cis hetero person because God told so.
My family is christian, so they dont impose I have to be a christian, "but if you want to claim to be one, then behave like one"
there are plenty of up and coming LGBTQ+ churches and Christian movements anon, the path of progress is a slow but steady one
>Pride will be banned
Pretty arbitrary. Aside from some folks and the distinct late night events, shit is tame and is mostly information on local groups.
Why would I accept such a puny offer? How about they completely bow down to the liberal world order and we promise will wont completely irradicate their religion down to a wikipedia entry?
FRICK YES
i want my nice christian husband and to not be on the verge of doing a mass shotting every june
There's no way that modern corporate cucked "christianity" would ever ban any of that diseased bullshit, it would be a super fricked-up "acceptance" that stuck with the corporate fake-christian mammon tradition of making both trannies AND straight people pay assloads of money to be nagged by some windbag about how much they should hate themselves even more for being a sinner.
Just like the modern suggestion that crackas and oreos alike should hate themselves for their non-existant "white privilege."
Tough question. The Christians offer almost everything I think is right, but they're apparently also pro medicalised child abuse in this scenario, which might be a bridge too far.