kek Linux spends decades trying to get Wine to work and Windows just loads up all of Linux.
This kills the linux user.
kek Linux spends decades trying to get Wine to work and Windows just loads up all of Linux. This kills the linux user.
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
homosexual running windows what a clown
Oh yeah? W-well install GNOME 43 on windows, I'll wait
I would rather use the Windows UI than gn*me, thank you very much.
Linux can do the same using virtual machines so i don't really care
Virtual machines can't do Kali Linux seamless mode.
Yes it can you dumb fuck. Have you never forwarded x11 applications over ssh?
No it can't you dumb fuck. Can't forward Windows to the linux level.
NTA, I just want to say it's funny when both arguers use the same insults
wine runs windows executables natively, WSL is just a glorified virtual machine
Not even that, it’s just a hyper-v vm. It’s worse than running Linux in vmware player. You’d have more functionality from a free application running Linux than this half assed attempt.
>hyper-v bad
jokes aside, hyper-v is probably the most funded hypervisor of all time
the point of free software is not to have better software, that's called open source. the point of free software is to have FREE software.
you think so? I'd say xen is more funded
almost, but not really, because globohomocorpo funds are fragmented between kvm and xen. If they joined forces we would've had a perfect flawless hypervisor
All this means is that Microsoft admitting that it's scared of losing users to Linux. Especially in the dev market.
Wasn't long ago that m.s. referred to it as communism and cancer.
Cancer remark was made in 2001, or 1 voting generation ago.
I don't want to run windows at all tho
not into candy crush
meanwhile in reality
https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/7480
>green screen
you still need to be on a dev branch of windows to get wsl at all?
>you still need to be on a dev branch of windows to get wsl at all?
Hasn't been the case for like 5 years now.
>meanwhile
>2 years ago
I don't think you know what that word means.
>wsl1
>without the overhead of a traditional virtual machine
>windows can run open source code
wow so surprising.. jk it isn't surprising that their shit is broken as fuck, that's microsoft for you
spoonfed the code and still can't figure it out.
Can I run games with near native performance through WSL?
>windows subsystem for linux
>not a windows subsystem
>not on linux
You use Linux to run your shitty WordPress/Joomla/PHP service.
>hey why does linux look like dog shit?
>well actually this is not a toy, real developers just use cli
>hey look i can run Linux on Windows
>oh yea? really? how about you run [graphical apps with worthless effects] on it? you cant huh. heh thats not real Linux
cool mental illness you got there.
literally strawman argument
life is too short to run nonfree software. This is the only truth and the core of freechad belief.
Linux is free if your time is worthless
lots of burger flipping pseudo tech folks here so ofcourse you would go for the free software
>linux is free
wrong. it has binary blobs
>never used that shit
Exactly, I will never use nonfree software
nobody expects the unemployed to use nonfree software, so nothing to worry about buddy
You could have answered with one of the obvious gaping usability/security holes that WSL still has, but you did not hence you never used that shit, you just shipost.
>massive closed source binaries are hard to reverse engineer
>open source code is easy to port
wow OP, you sure showed us!
OP is an Indian pedophile
Why is it that virtual machines have existed for decades, but wintards pretend Microsoft invented them yesterday?
>and Windows just loads up all of Linux.
It's the power of working for free.
wrong.
Windows spends some engineering effort showing off memey broken features of NT and unveils WSLv1, which a basically overcomplicated shitshow that makes wine look simple.
That obviously didn't work so well because POOSIX != Wangdoze and soon enough people were complaining about all the filesystem race conditions that kept being "fixed" (but not actually fixed) and all the unimplemented syscalls.
Some intern probably shit out some related unused win32 features like Host Compute Network (absolute shit), the fact that Hyper-V is running and plan 9's 9pfs2000's simplicity to hack together a "seamless" virtual machine.
Wine is still objectively a superior experience since it's mostly based on using Win32 the way its meant to be, userspace. It's only because of pajeet tier videogames do you see shit like wine-server bloating up in features to mimick the retardation of NT on top of Microsoft having no balls to break people making syscalls directly like they threaten they would.
>www.cygwin.com
this has been around for awhile
and windoze came after unix
im am confuse
the merging of all arch syntax compile etc was always inevitable
be polymorphic autodidact anon
>slower, shittier, can only use ubuntu and just pure cancer in general
Yeah, it is totally going to kill linux users
>can only use ubuntu
Way to have several year old information. I say this as someone on a Linux desktop even.
You will never be a real Linux. You have no kernel, no POSIX, no GNU coreutils. You're a VM twisted by Microsoft spyware engineers into a crude mockery of the developers' perfection.
All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back sysadmins mock you. Torvalds is disgusted and ashamed of you, the "developers" using you laugh at your halfhearted compatibility effort behind closed doors.
Why would you want to run a known compromised OS on bare metal? Your data is being sold and given to glownaggers if you use Windows.
>This kills the linux user.
Linux users exist because they want control OVER THEIR computer something windows toddlers cant comprehend, with that shit taking 30% of performance in telemetry and useless background process
so youre saying Linux runs better and is more reliable?
the ubuntu distro doesnt do cleanup automatically so if you delete something it still takes up room on your drive unless you fucking compact it manually
>the ubuntu distro doesnt do cleanup automatically so if you delete something it still takes up room on your drive unless you fucking compact it manually
lolwut
They need CCleaner spyware to empty the trash for them, kek
>wine
Clean room reverses the windows API and reimplements Windows system calls to linux ones
>WSL
is a vm
>This kills Linux users
Not really. This is the difference between having to reverse engineer proprietary code and white room a new implementation vs just using existing code. The WSL is just a GPL condom over Linux in a virtual machine. If anything this just proves the value of FOSS software. I run windows in KVM because I like to keep the telemetry spyware on a leash rather than have Microsoft's crappy platform as a service be super invasive in my personal life.
that would just be another testament to how portable and modular linux is
Windows runs just fine in a virtual machine on linux as well